
Sally Rooney vows to use BBC royalties to fund Palestine Action
The novelist said the police should investigate the corporations and the high-street stores that stock and promote her work if they believe she is committing an act of terrorism.
Membership and support of Palestine Action, including funding, can carry sentences of up to 14 years in prison after the group was banned by the Government in July.
The Normal People author made the comments in the Irish Times, noting that it would be illegal for her to publish them in a British newspaper.
She said she felt compelled to publicly express her support after 'more than 500 peaceful protesters' were arrested for doing the same in a single day on Aug 9.
'If this makes me a 'supporter of terror' under UK law, so be it,' she wrote.
'My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets.
'In recent years the UK's state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees.
'I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can.
'If the British state considers this 'terrorism', then perhaps it should investigate the shady organisations that continue to promote my work and fund my activities, such as WH Smith and the BBC.'
The BBC and WH Smith have been contacted for comment.
Ms Rooney said that 'to ensure that the British public is made aware of my position, I would happily publish this statement in a UK newspaper – but that would now be illegal'.
She has previously expressed her support for the group in a witness statement handed to London's High Court, where the decision to proscribe the group is being challenged by one of its founders.
The Irish author has now accused Sir Keir Starmer's government of stripping its citizens of 'basic rights and freedoms' to protect its relationship with Israel.
The ramifications are 'profound' and 'an increasing number of artists and writers can no longer safely travel to Britain to speak in public', she said.
Palestine Action was proscribed by the Home Secretary after activists allegedly broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and vandalised two military aircraft, causing £7m of damage.
Ms Rooney, whose novels Normal People and Conversations with Friends have been adapted into BBC dramas, noted that the decision puts it on the same footing as al-Qaeda and Islamic State.
This means that 'even a simple placard or T-shirt' expressing support is now 'a serious terror offence under UK law', she wrote.
In the six weeks since the ban, the Metropolitan Police have arrested more than 700 people for supporting the group.
The force said a further 60 people will be prosecuted for support of Palestine Action, while Norfolk Police said on Saturday that 13 people were arrested at a protest in Norwich.
Ms Rooney pointed out that those arrested include an Irish citizen and a woman in Belfast.
She described the arrest by PSNI officers as 'political policing', noting that the force made no arrests after a mural for the proscribed Ulster Volunteer Force, 'responsible for the murders of hundreds of civilians', was repainted in north Belfast last year.
She said: 'Palestine Action, proscribed under the same law, is responsible for zero deaths and has never advocated the use of violence against any human being.
'Why then are its supporters arrested for wearing T-shirts, while murals celebrating loyalist death squads are left untouched?'
Ms Rooney also questioned why the Irish Government, which has stated that Israel is committing genocide in Palestine, has remained silent when its citizens have been arrested 'for protesting an acknowledged genocide'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
ckglxlx5vldo (GIF Image, 1 × 1 pixels)
Frank Gardner BBC Security Correspondent Getty Images It is quite possible that Monday's meeting in the White House could prove even more crucial to the future of Ukraine - and for all of Europe's security - than last Friday's US-Russia summit in Alaska. On the surface, that Putin-Trump reunion seemed to live down to every expectation. There was no ceasefire, no sanctions, no grand announcements. Were Ukraine and Europe about to get cut out of a deal cooked up behind closed doors by the world's two foremost nuclear powers? Not, apparently, if Ukraine and its partners can prevent it. The presence of Sir Keir Starmer, President Macron, Chancellor Merz and other leaders alongside President Zelensky in Washington is about more than making sure he does not get ambushed in the Oval Office again, in the way he did on 28 February. They are determined to impress upon Donald Trump two things: firstly, that there can be no peace deal for Ukraine without Ukraine's direct involvement and secondly, that it must be backed by 'cast-iron' security guarantees. Above all, Europe's leaders want the US President to see that Ukraine and Europe present a united front and they are eager to ensure he is not being swayed by his obvious personal rapport with Vladimir Putin into giving in to the Russian leaders' demands. Watch: How the Trump-Putin summit unfolded... in under 2 minutes This is where the Sir Keir Starmer's diplomatic skills will be sorely tested. Trump likes Starmer and listens to him, and in a month's time Trump will be coming to the UK on a state visit. He also likes Mark Rutte, the NATO Secretary-General who will be in attendance, a man who is sometimes called 'the Trump Whisperer'. The US President appears to be less fond of President Macron and the White House was sharply critical recently of his intention to unconditionally recognise a Palestinian state at the next UN General Assembly. For a peace deal in Ukraine to have any chance of working, something has to give. European leaders have said frequently that international borders cannot be changed by force and President Zelensky has said time and time again he will not give up land and besides, Ukraine's constitution forbids it. But Putin wants the Donbas, which his forces already control around 85 per cent of, and he has absolutely no intention of ever handing back Crimea. Yet as the former Estonian PM and now Europe's top diplomat Kaja Kallas once said to me: victory for Ukraine in this war does not have to be exclusively about reconquering occupied land. If Ukraine can obtain the sort of Article 5-type security guarantees now being talked about, sufficient to deter any future Russian aggression and thereby safeguard its independence as a free and sovereign state, then that would be a form of victory. It does now appear that what the US and Russia have been discussing is a proposal that broadly trades some Ukrainian land for security guarantees that it won't have to give up any more to Russia. But the question marks are huge. Could Ukraine accept a deal that ends the war but costs it land, especially when so many thousands have died trying to save that land? If it is asked to give up the remaining 30 per cent of Donetsk Oblast that Russia has yet to occupy then does that leave the path westwards to Kyiv dangerously under-defended? And what of Starmer's much-vaunted Coalition of the Willing? Earlier talk of deploying tens of thousands of boots on the ground have since been scaled back. Now it's more about 'safeguarding skies and seas' while helping Ukraine to rebuild its army. But even if peace does break out on the battlefield we are still in dangerous territory. Every military expert I have spoken to believes that the moment the fighting stops Putin will reconstitute his army, build more weapons, until he is in a position, perhaps in as little as three to four years, to grab more land. If and when that happens it will be a brave Typhoon or F35 pilot who is prepared to fire that first missile on an advancing Russian column. Zelensky and allies head to White House for Ukraine talks


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Zelensky and allies head to White House for Ukraine talks with Trump
US President Donald Trump will host Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday for their first meeting since the pair's heated exchange in the White House - but this time the Ukrainian president is bringing European general of Nato Mark Rutte and UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer are among the leaders who will join Zelensky in Washington for efforts to end the war with follows Trump's summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska that ended with the US president dropping a demand for a ceasefire and calling instead for a permanent peace deal.A US envoy said on Sunday that Putin had agreed to security guarantees that could lead to a Nato-like security pact for Ukraine. "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED!" Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, without heading to Washington for Monday's meeting are French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. It is unclear how many of them will go to the White handing Donbas to Putin would mean for UkraineIn maps: War-ravaged Ukrainian territoriesFor so many heads of state to travel with such little notice across the Atlantic to what is essentially a wartime crisis meeting appears without precedent in the modern era, underscoring the sky-high sources say European officials are concerned that Trump may try to press Zelensky to agree to terms, after the Ukrainian leader was excluded from the Trump-Putin meeting on US soil last US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the BBC's US partner CBS that any suggestion Zelensky might be bullied by Trump into accepting a peace deal was a "stupid media narrative". Nato leaders also appear eager to avoid a repeat of Zelensky's February trip to the Oval Office that ended abruptly after an argument with Trump and US Vice-President JD altercation - which saw Trump accuse Zelensky of "gambling with World War Three" - left Washington-Kyiv ties in European leaders have been working diligently behind the scenes since then to mend the relationship. The Ukrainian leader has been coached to talk in terms of deal-making - language that resonates with April, Ukraine signed a minerals agreement that gave the US a financial stake in the country, and Trump and Zelensky spoke privately at the Vatican before Pope Francis's funeral. Ukraine made it clear it was willing to pay for US July, the two leaders had a phone call that the Ukrainian president described as "the best conversation we have had".Meanwhile, Trump had begun to express exasperation with Russia's unrelenting onslaught in Ukraine. He called Putin "absolutely crazy", drastically shortened his deadline for a peace deal, and threatened economic sanctions on these deliberations grind on, Russian forces continue to advance on the battlefield. They now occupy almost a fifth of Ukraine since Moscow launched its full scale invasion in February 2022. A virtual summit was held on Sunday between Zelensky and the so-called coalition of the willing - a group of nations including the UK, France and Germany that have pledged to protect peace in Ukraine once it is achieved. Afterwards, Emmanuel Macron told reporters their plan was to "present a united front" for Monday's talks with and the Nato leaders said they were keen to learn more after US envoy Steve Witkoff told US television that Putin had agreed on Friday to "robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing".Witkoff said such an agreement could see Europe and the US protect Ukraine from further aggression with a Nato-like defence agreement."We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato," Witkoff told CNN on has long opposed Ukraine joining Nato, and Witkoff said the arrangement could be an alternative if the Ukrainians "can live with it".Article 5 is a principle at the heart of the 32-member transatlantic military alliance that says its members will come to the defence of an ally that is under also told CNN that Russia made "some concessions" around five heavily contested regions of talks with European allies after the Alaska summit, Trump said Putin had reiterated that he wants the key Donetsk and Luhansk regions that make up Donbas, eastern Ukraine, according to European at Sunday's virtual summit with Nato leaders, Zelensky stressed that the Ukrainian constitution makes it impossible to give up territory - and that this should only be discussed by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia at a trilateral summit with the US secretary of state, meanwhile, sought to temper hopes that a deal to end Europe's deadliest conflict for 80 years could be imminent."We're still a long ways off," America's top diplomat said on Sunday.


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Strictly contestant calls the police and almost turned down the show after being targeted by stalker who issued 'disgusting threats'
Strictly Come Dancing contestant Chris Robshaw was forced to call the police after being targeted by a female stalker who issued 'disgusting threats'. The former rugby legend, 39, was one of the 15 celebrities to be announced for the BBC show this week, however, it has emerged that Chris nearly turned down the gig due to his shocking situation. The Sun reports that the sports star, who is married to opera singer Camilla Kerslake, 37, was subjected to a campaign of harassment from the woman after briefly meeting her twice at work events last year. Six months after their meeting, Chris was then said to have been targeted by the woman who proceeded to threaten violence and spread false allegations about him and his colleagues - causing Chris to contact the cops. It is reported that the woman, who is now on the National Police Wanted List, has fled the country and is being pursued by the police. A source told The Sun: 'Chris almost turned down Strictly because of what this woman has been putting him and his family through. She's made some disgusting threats. It has been awful for them. 'Chris and Camilla have been told by the police they're not alone. This woman has form for what she's been doing to them and has done it to other people too.' They added that the couple, who tied the knot in 2018, are the 'latest victims' in a 'string of lives' the woman attempted to 'destroy. Strictly bosses are said to be aware of Chris' ordeal and are supporting him. The insider added that Chris 'bit the bullet' and only went ahead with his Strictly stint for the sake of his son Wilding, four, who told his dad that he wanted 'mummy to laugh at your dancing'. They told how he'd been 'honest' with the BBC from the get go, with the broadcaster having been 'amazing' in 'supporting' Chris and are aware of everything that's happened. Chris' ordeal reportedly began in July last year when he attended the same event as the woman, who proceeded to make damning allegations about him and wife Camilla, whom he shares two sons with. The woman, who was known to the police, even posted their address online and called up companies Chris and Camilla worked with to spread her 'farcical' lies in an attempt to ruin their lives. The insider noted that it has been an 'absolutely terrible' time for the couple, stating that Chris has 'no idea' why he was targeted seeing as he was 'never alone' with the woman and 'barely spoke' to her. The insider noted that it has been an 'absolutely terrible' time for the couple [pictured in 2024], stating that Chris has 'no idea' why he was targeted seeing as he was 'never alone' with the woman and 'barely spoke' to her Classical singer Camilla was also targeted as the woman recently contacted a company Camilla auditioned for, with her claims about the couple said to be 'stomach churning' and have pushed them to 'utter devastation'. The source to continued: 'It's deeply frightening that no one has been able to stop her, she's fled the country, and has been clever to avoid arrest. They've been advised by their case officer that the minute this woman steps back onto UK soil, she will be arrested.' It is said that the stalker was previously arrested in December and was released with a caution, but went on to continue with her campaign of harassment and has now left the UK. Chris is thought to just want to 'crack on' with the competition and make his children 'proud', with the BBC working alongside him to ensure his safety. Daily Mail have contacted Strictly and Chris' representatives for comment, with a spokesperson for Chris stating: 'This is an ongoing police investigation, and therefore we are unable to comment at this time.