
Benefits bill passes – all the Universal Credit and PIP changes YOU need to know
They would have needed to score at least four points in one activity like washing, dressing, or preparing food.
2
2
Currently, people can qualify by scoring eight points across multiple tasks, making it easier to access the benefit.
Last week, ministers watered down the policy to apply only to new claimants after more than 120 Labour MPs threatened to revolt.
But after more fury from the backbenches, the changes were shelved altogether with no date for when - or if - they'll happen.
Disability benefits
Any proposed changes to Personal Independence Payments now won't kick in until after a review has taken place.
The PIP benefits - the main disability welfare payment for those with a disability - is subject to a review by Welfare Minister Sir Stephen Timms.
The benefit payments are in place to help those affected with daily tasks such as mobility.
Payments currently start at £1,500 but rise to £9,600 which are paid out even if someone is still working.
The daily living rate comes in at £73.90 for the lower rate and £110.40 for the higher rate.
Figures show that the mobility rate is worth £29.20 and rises to £77.05 for the higher rate.
Ministers have revealed that 1,000 people per day are claiming PIP - which is the equivalent of the size of Leicester every year.
Following a major rebellion, those who are now claiming PIP be able to claim the same amount of money.
But for new claimants from November 2026, there will be a set of stricter measures set out as the government aims to reduce spending on the benefits and get people back to work.
Review by Sir Stephen Timms to delay PIP changes
Welfare Minister Stephen Timms has told MPs that any changes to PIP eligibility will come in after his review has been published.
The major concession came just 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote. The Timms review is due to report in autumn 2026.
His four-point eligibility criteria has been dropped entirely from the legislation.
Now, disability groups will work with Timms on his review.
Universal Credit
More than three million recipients of Universal Credit don't have to find work due to their poor health.
A single person who is aged 25 or over can receive the basic level of UC which comes in at £400.14 every month.
But that can rise by a further £422.37 due to the incapacity top-up due to a disability or long-term condition - more than doubling the original payment.
The new plans mean that anyone up to the age of 22 will not be able to claim.
Existing claimants will get £97 per week until the end of the decade. But new claimants will only receive £50 a week in the next financial year.
Ministers had tried to freeze the payment for the next four years but a commitment has been made for it to go up with inflation.
Employment support package
Welfare Secretary Liz Kendall will spend an extra £300 million on employment support she insists is the biggest disability employment support package for a generation.
The cash will be spent on trying to get those claiming sickness benefits back into work. A total of £1 billion will be spent in 2028/29.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Tories and Reform decry two-tier justice as suspended Labour councillor cleared
Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court accused of the offence after he described demonstrators as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' at an anti-racism rally in the wake of the Southport murders. He was cleared on Friday. Nigel Farage and shadow home secretary Chris Philp both pointed to the idea of 'two-tier justice' in relation to the case. This is another outrageous example of two-tier justice. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) August 15, 2025 Mr Philp compared the case to that of Lucy Connolly, who was jailed after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' and 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks last year. In a post on X, Mr Philp said: 'The development of two tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming.' Ex-Reform chairman Zia Yusuf also referred to Connolly's case, and said that 'two tier justice in this country is out of control'. Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X, which meant she did not face a trial. In Jones' case, a jury deliberated for just over half an hour before they found him not guilty. A video showing Jones addressing crowds on Hoe Street in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year went viral on social media after the protest, which had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau. It is astonishing that Labour councillor Ricky Jones, who was caught on video calling for throats to be slit, is let off scot free – whereas Lucy Connolly got 31 months prison for posting something no worse. The development of two tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming.… — Chris Philp MP (@CPhilpOfficial) August 15, 2025 The suspended councillor said in the clip: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Jurors deliberated for just over 30 minutes before finding him not guilty. Jones, who wore a navy blue suit with a white shirt and pale pink tie in the dock, was seen mouthing 'thank-you' at the jurors. Family and supporters hugged each other before Jones, who declined to comment, was driven out of the court grounds in a car. The 58-year-old, who at the time was also employed as a full-time official for the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association union, was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton police station that night. Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by Labour the day after the incident. It is understood a party investigation continues and its outcome will decide what happens to his membership. A spokesperson for the party said at the time his behaviour 'was completely unacceptable and it will not be tolerated'. Giving evidence in his trial, Jones said his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them. Before he made the comment, jurors were shown video where he said to crowds: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays.' Lawyers said the case cannot be compared to that of Connolly, as they faced different charges and she pleaded guilty while Jones did not. Peter Stringfellow, a solicitor at Brett Wilson, said in Connolly's case, racially aggravated discourse on social media translated into real-life violence across the country, whereas Mr Jones' comments at a rally did not cause violent disorder. Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, said: 'We need to be honest about what is going on here. The verdict in the Ricky Jones case was not political, it was legal. 'A jury listened to the evidence, tested it and decided unanimously he was not guilty. That is not bias or 'two-tier justice', it is the justice system doing what it is supposed to do, separating facts from noise.' Laura Allen, head of the protest and public order team at Hodge, Jones and Allen lawyers, said it was 'frankly offensive' to the ordinary members of the public who sat on the jury to suggest they had not acted appropriately. She said: 'They are 12 members of the jury, picked at random, who have done their civic duty, have listened to the evidence in the case and concluded they could not be sure that Ricky Jones was guilty. 'Due to the way our jury system works they are not required, and certainly are not permitted, to explain the reasons for their decision.'


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Five common myths about PIP that could be costing people up to £749 a month
Personal Independence Payments can be a much-needed lifeline for disabled people, but thousands may be unnecessarily turning down this help A number of misconceptions are wrongly preventing people from claiming their disability benefit entitlement, Personal Independence Payments (PIP). PIP provides support for disabled individuals to help cover the additional costs they face. It offers four different rates ranging from £29.20 per week to £749.80 per month, depending on the severity of a person's disability. Despite around 3.7 million currently receiving PIP, common myths and misunderstandings about the disability benefit could be stopping many more from claiming their entitlement. This is particularly relevant as proposed changes to PIP eligibility have been put on hold following controversy around Labour's welfare reform. 'I can't work and claim PIP' Many believe that all DWP benefits are only available to those who are unemployed. However, PIP is a non-means tested benefit so your income, National Insurance contributions or working hours won't affect your eligibility or entitlement. Claiming PIP does not prevent individuals from working, and claimants can alter their hours, earnings, or employment status without jeopardising this benefit. However, they may still need to report these changes to the DWP. 'I need a specific diagnosis' The disability benefit is determined by how your condition or disability impacts your ability to carry out everyday tasks and move around. Although the DWP does release figures on what conditions are being claimed for, there isn't a definitive list of diagnoses that ensure you will or won't be eligible for the benefit. According to Scope, you can even apply for PIP without having a diagnosis. The primary eligibility criteria is that your mental or physical condition has caused difficulty in everyday tasks or moving around for the past three months and you anticipate these difficulties to persist for at least another nine months. 'I can't have savings on PIP' PIP is not affected by the amount of savings you have. It's not means-tested like Universal Credit, so the amount of money or assets you have saved won't impact your eligibility or the amount you may be entitled to. However, if you successfully claim PIP, these earnings and any savings you accumulate from the benefit might affect your eligibility for means-tested benefits like Universal Credit. 'PIP is only for physical disabilities' PIP can be granted for mental or even 'invisible' conditions as well as physical disabilities. This includes conditions that may not be apparent to the naked eye, such as Crohn's disease, autism or learning disabilities. According to Benefits and Work, learning disabilities have one of the highest success rates for PIP claims at 90%, with 79% of claimants receiving the highest rates. 'I can manage without a support worker' PIP, much like Attendance Allowance, is often misunderstood, with many believing that recipients must spend their benefit money on specific support such as a carer. However, there are no rules stipulating how claimants should spend their money, as the right support varies from person to person. Some individuals may use their PIP funds to supplement their income if their disability has resulted in job loss. Others might utilise the money to make their homes or lifestyles more accessible, such as affording specialised food. The funds can even be used for hobbies, outings or savings.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
AntiSocial Asylum hotels
Anger has flared outside hotels used to house asylum seekers. Protestors say they are worried about illegal migration, cost to the taxpayer and a lack of consultation, but one issue seems to spark even more concern - the safety of women and children. Opponents have accused protestors of racism and whipping up hate. Is there any evidence that asylum seekers are more likely to commit sexual offences? We trace the clamour for more data to answer that question. Police have been given new guidance on disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects in criminal cases - especially high profile ones. What might be the effect? And why are so many asylum seekers currently housed in hotels anyway? We hear how the system is supposed to work and how it's evolved. Presenter: Adam Fleming Producers: Simon Tulett, Natasha Fernandes, Emma Close and Tom Gillett Editor: Penny Murphy Production coordinator: Janet Staples Studio engineer: Annie Gardiner