Trump loved Epstein conspiracy theories - now he's at the heart of one
He questioned Barack Obama's birthplace and citizenship, claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him without a shred of evidence, and has endorsed and promoted far-right figures who gleefully stoked the lie that Hillary Clinton ran a child sex ring from the basement of a pizza restaurant.
These weren't fringe ideas muttered in back rooms or basements. They were central to Trump's political theatre – designed to paint his opponents not just as wrong, but satanically evil.
So when the President recently told reporters he didn't understand why his supporters are interested in late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, dismissing the entire saga as 'a very boring story', the response from the conspiratorial base was, predictably, swift and furious.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
From InfoWars and Telegram channels to MAGA influencers and mainstream news, the reaction boiled down to one thing: how dare he?
Today, Trump ramped up his criticism, saying that the discussions around the former banker were a 'scam', labelling it a 'bulls**t Jeffrey Epstein hoax' and urging his supporters not to be 'hoodwinked.'
Well, tough luck – conspiracies can't be controlled. Not even by Trump.
Let's remember, Epstein's story isn't boring – it's horrifying.
A convicted child sex trafficker with friends in high places. A mysterious prison death. A long list of alleged enablers and abusers still unnamed, still unaccountable. Rumours (encouraged by Trump and his allies) of a blackmail 'client list' held by Epstein.
People are obsessed because they should be. Because justice, clearly, hasn't been served.
The President has made a rod for his own back. He fuelled the fire for years, and not just on this.
He platformed figures who are prominent in the QAnon conspiracy movement (which believes, among other things, that President Trump is battling satanic elite paedophiles), posted cryptic messages about 'the storm' (a QAnon dog whistle), and appointed people like Mike Flynn who actively amplified such theories.
Trump's years of conspiracy indulgence were based on set rules: suspicion by association, trust no institution, and believe only him.
But now, scrutiny has edged closer to Trump himself – with people on the left and right revisiting his long-standing friendship with Epstein, sharing those awkward photos and the quote where he called Epstein a 'terrific guy' who liked women 'on the younger side'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Suddenly, the President is no longer interested.
You can't unleash a monster and then act surprised when it turns on you.
Trump made himself the hero of the anti-elite, anti-paedophile crusade.
But when people apply that same lens to his own past, he retreats. And not with his usual bluster, either.
Lately, Trump's tone has changed. Usually, he has his supporters eating out of his hand. Now, he's reduced to begging them not to be 'taken in' by a 'hoax' he endorsed.
But this isn't a rebrand. It's fear.
Trump's scared. Because his supporters are asking questions he can't answer with a soundbite or a slogan.
And the timing couldn't be worse for him. Public frustration over Epstein hasn't faded – it's deepened.
It's not just that Epstein was a monster, although he was. It's that the system seemed to protect him. He maintained his network of powerful friends even after conviction. He secured sweetheart deals.
And he died before a trial could truly begin and victims could get even a whiff of justice.
The result, instead of accountability, is a vacuum, into which QAnon and other conspiracy movements poured.
The thirst is twisted into the kind of pure fantasy that defined 'pizzagate' – a satanic cabal of baby-eaters apparently led by Hillary Clinton in secret bunkers under a pizza shop – and Trump as the saviour. Total fiction, rooted in real fury.
But the emotional truth remains: people feel that the powerful get away with everything.
Trump capitalised on that anger. Now, he's the one looking over his shoulder.
The nature of their friendship, the timeline, and when exactly Trump stopped calling the paedophile financier a 'terrific guy' are all under scrutiny.
The same scrutiny that was, in Trump's own way, the fair questions that he demanded be asked of the Democratic elite.
Now, with Trump in power once again, Republican lawmakers have voted to block a Democratic effort to force the release of the Epstein files, which amounts to a mythological cache of apparently undisclosed information about the convicted sex offender at the centre of American politics for over three decades.
The Epstein files may be buried, but the case is still open – if not legally, then morally. Survivors are still waiting. Names are still redacted. And trust in institutions is still on life support.
Trump doesn't now get to call this 'boring'. More Trending
He wanted to be the one to expose the rot. He told his base he was the only one who would clean it up.
Now, faced with their anger, he shrugs and calls it dull.
He isn't bored. He's terrified.
And he should be.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Ross.Mccafferty@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Ragtag Zohran Mamdani protest likened to Netflix comedy sketch
MORE: John Torode doesn't remember using racist language – that's a problem
MORE: The Great British Sewing Bee is back – but I miss Kiell Smith-Bynoe
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C32%2C0%2C31%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
What we know about the ‘shouting match' between Trump and Netanyahu
President Donald Trump reportedly engaged in a 'shouting match' with Benjamin Netanyahu on 28 July, disputing the reality of starvation in Gaza. The argument stemmed from Netanyahu's public denial of starvation in Gaza, which Trump countered by stating he had seen evidence of "real starvation" among children. Netanyahu's office quickly dismissed reports of a shouting match as "total fake news," while a White House spokesperson refrained from commenting on private discussions. A US official briefed on the call described it as a "direct, mostly one-way conversation about the status of humanitarian aid," with Trump doing most of the talking. The tense exchange led to special envoy Steve Witkoff travelling to the region to address humanitarian aid efforts, particularly concerning the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has faced criticism and a UN boycott.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
European leaders push to secure seat for Ukraine at Trump-Putin talks
Update: Date: 2025-08-11T07:57:56.000Z Title: Morning opening: Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine Content: A group of European leaders insisted over the weekend that 'the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine' amid growing concerns about the US president Donald Trump's plans to strike a deal with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, when the pair meets in Alaska on Friday. A hastily arranged statement signed by the leaders of Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, the UK, and the European Union reiterated that 'a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests.' Speaking to the German broadcaster ARD, German chancellor Friedrich Merz said he hoped and assumed that Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, would also be involved in Friday's summit in Alaska and that he made representations to Trump on this issue. 'We cannot accept in any case that territorial questions are discussed or even decided between Russia and America over the heads of Europeans and Ukrainians,' he said. 'I assume that the American government sees it the same way.' EU foreign ministers are meeting virtually for an emergency meeting today to discuss the next steps. On Sunday, Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy welcomed the support, saying on X: 'The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations. But there are still no guarantees as to what will happen next and what concessions Trump might be willing to agree to, leaving Kyiv and most European capitals deeply uncomfortable ahead of the summit on Friday, and they will want to use every minute to influence the US position. Let's see what the day brings. Elsewhere, I will be also keeping an eye on another extreme heatwave in parts of Europe, with Spain and France among countries expecting to see temperatures close to or above 40 degrees Celsius once again. I will bring you all the key updates here. It's Monday, 11 August 2025, it's Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live. Good morning.
Times
44 minutes ago
- Times
JD Vance tells Europe to ‘step up and take a bigger role' in Ukraine
Europe needs to 'step up and take a bigger role' in funding Ukraine in its war against Russia, JD Vance, the US vice-president, said on Sunday. Speaking to Fox News, he claimed Americans were 'sick' of spending their tax dollars abroad and Washington was 'done funding' Kyiv. 'If you care so much about this conflict, you should be willing to play a more direct and a more substantial way in funding this war yourself,' he said. He spoke as European leaders again scrambled to build a united defence behind Ukraine, after President Trump suggested he may cut a deal with President Putin that could mean Ukraine has to concede territory. • Cotswolds hamlet on lockdown as JD Vance's holiday gets under way It is clear, however, that even if it remains unwavering in its diplomatic stance, Europe lacks the strength to back Kyiv in negotiating favourable terms in a future peace agreement or enforcing a ceasefire. The so-called 'coalition of the willing' — a multinational force led by the UK and France intended to support Ukraine and potentially monitor a ceasefire — looks highly unlikely to meet Sir Keir Starmer's original hopes of 64,000 troops on the ground. The Kremlin has also said it will not accept western troops in Ukraine, warning that their presence could trigger a new world war. Even if Putin were to agree, European defence ministers have said there is 'no chance' they could reach the 10,000 troops floated by the UK. Even 25,000 as a joint effort would 'be a push', The Times reported in April. 'Russia has 800,000 [troops],' Dovile Sakaliene, Lithuania's defence minister, told European counterparts. 'If we can't even raise 64,000 that doesn't look weak — it is weak.' It falls far short of the 200,000 troops that President Zelensky estimated in January were needed to credibly enforce peace across Ukraine's extensive front line and to prevent a new Russian attack after any ceasefire deal. Experts put the figure at closer to 600,000. The group consists largely of European and Commonwealth countries. So far, the UK and France are the only countries to have committed a specific number of troops. Finland is reportedly concerned that any deployment would 'dilute' its own border defences, while Poland, Spain and Italy have made clear they will not commit any soldiers. Estonia has said it may only be willing to send a company-sized combat unit of ground troops. Proposals have so far been hampered by shortages of manpower, political reluctance and logistical hurdles around the rules of engagement should Russia attack. Financially, Europe overtook the US as the biggest supplier of aid to Ukraine in June, with about €72 billion in military aid compared with the US's €65 billion, according to the Kiel Institute's Ukraine Support Tracker. The US has supplied the most sophisticated and lethal equipment, however, including advanced air-defence systems and precision munitions. Much of Europe's aid finances the purchase of US-made weapons, underscoring its dependence on the country. Zelensky said in January that about 40 per cent of Ukraine's weapons came from the US, about 33 per cent were produced domestically and less than 30 per cent came from Europe. Russia relies largely on its own resources, bolstered by partnerships with China and Iran. North Korea has also supplied between nine and 12 million artillery shells and rockets since 2023. Pyongyang allocates nearly 16 per cent of its government budget to defence, a proportion unmatched by any European state. Last year, EU members spent €326 billion on defence, about 1.9 per cent of GDP — a 30 per cent rise since 2021 — but the US spent nearly $1 trillion, or 3.4 per cent of GDP. To close the gap, the EU launched an €800 billion readiness plan aiming to modernise and integrate military capabilities. But progress is slow, hindered by fragmented industries, political divisions and lack of a shared strategy. The EU has imposed 14 rounds of economic sanctions on Russia since 2022, freezing more than €200 billion of Russian central bank assets and cutting energy imports. But Russia has adapted by deepening trade ties with China, India and other non-western partners, while Trump's promise to impose crippling secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian oil have largely failed to materialise. Europe could offer incentives, such as unfreezing Russian assets, as bargaining chips in any settlement. However, that relies on Putin seeing negotiation as preferable to continued war, something that is far from certain. • What's up for grabs at the summit — and can Trump outsmart Putin? Following an emergency summit on Saturday hosted by David Lammy, the foreign secretary, with Vance and senior European and Ukrainian officials, Kaja Kallas, the EU's policy chief, said she planned to convene an extraordinary meeting of EU foreign ministers on Monday. 'The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously,' she said, and any deal 'must have Ukraine and the EU included'. Kallas framed the talks as a matter for not just Ukraine's security, but the whole of Europe's. European diplomatic efforts are significant but, without military backing, risk being symbolic. The ability to uphold Ukraine's territorial integrity depends on sustained US commitment of weapons, troops and political will.
