Markets react to Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminium imports
Shares of steelmakers in Asia mostly fell on Monday, save for those with operations in the United States. The dollar rose and U.S. Treasury yields ticked higher.
Here is what market participants are saying:
"Trump and tariffs causing a huge amount of uncertainty, and no one likes that!
"The market...is trying to digest Trump and the economy."
CHARU CHANANA, CHIEF INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, SAXO, SINGAPORE
"These threats appear legitimate and within Trump's power to implement on the basis of national security. The old playbook can't be used because China is no longer a significant supplier of steel to the U.S. after the 2018 tariffs. Instead, the impact will be more pronounced on countries like Canada, Mexico, the EU, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Brazil.
"The immediate concern, however, might not be inflation, as there could be counter effects such as demand slowdown. The bigger concern is the uncertainty and the shift towards a more protectionist world."
TONY SYCAMORE, MARKET ANALYST, IG, SYDNEY
"It's been a very different reaction. This week started like last week did - we've seen tariff headlines, but the reaction has been somewhat different across asset classes... U.S. equity futures are trading higher, and in fact, even the ASX 200 has bounced somewhat off its early lows. The Aussie dollar is still struggling a little bit, but my feel is that... after the whipsaw ride we saw last week, there's going to be less of a temptation now to shoot first and ask questions later."
DANIEL HYNES, SENIOR COMMODITY STRATEGIST, ANZ, SYDNEY
"I suspect U.S. manufacturers will have to wear higher prices as a result of these 25% tariffs. Its import reliance is high, around 40-45% for aluminium and 12-15% for steel.
"I suspect we see regional pricing react first. U.S. prices are likely to be big higher, with traders anxious to secure metal before the tariffs are applied. "
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump must change course on tariff madness
When America sneezes, the world catches a cold. With US tariff rates due to hit their highest level since the 1930s, President Donald Trump's vendetta against perceived one-sided trading relationships is set to deal a considerable blow to consumer spending. The result was a wave of red across financial markets, and further speculation on interest rate cuts. The first quarter of this year saw US firms ramping up imports to stockpile products ahead of tariff announcements. When these tariffs were paused, this position unwound slightly, and GDP rose again. With tariffs now back on the table, growth is likely to weaken. The effects of this uncertainty may already be visible in labour markets. Figures from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) showed 73,000 new jobs in July, well below expectations of 110,000. Figures for May and June, meanwhile, were revised downwards by a huge margin. Mr Trump can claim to have made several major correct calls in his presidency. His victories in the culture wars arguably helped to trigger a global preference cascade that shifted the tone of conversation meaningfully to the Right, while his evisceration of wasteful US bureaucracies set an example of what could be achieved by leaders willing to ignore the squealing from state employees. On European affairs, moreover, he has been resolute and correct, telling our leaders the home truths they work furiously to deny. On migration, defence spending and the costs of net zero, Mr Trump has time and again pointed towards common sense conclusions seemingly beyond the grasp of our elite class, and on Israel and Gaza he has been a rare voice of moral sense. His two great errors, however, have been appalling. The first was his disastrous attempt to force Kyiv into striking a deal with President Putin. This has failed, and Mr Trump has, belatedly, come around to realising the threat posed by Moscow. The second was the imposition of tariffs on friendly nations. As a tool for decoupling from China, there is merit to Mr Trump's view. Within the West, however, it is an error, and one which he is now beginning to compound with his decision to sack the 'Biden Appointee' responsible for overseeing the BLS, and his desire to replace the official with 'someone much more competent and qualified'. As the travails faced by Britain's Office for National Statistics demonstrate, high quality economic data is not a given. This knee-jerk firing, however, is no way to bring about improvements that financial markets can trust. Mr Trump risks, instead, further undermining confidence in the US economy – and his presidency.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Republicans tell Trump to ‘grow up' after he sacks data chief
Republicans have told Donald Trump to 'grow up' after he sacked the US government's top statistician over underwhelming jobs numbers. The president said on Friday he would remove Erika McEntarfer as commissioner of the Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) shortly after government figures indicated the economy was performing worse than expected. The move has prompted a rare backlash against Mr Trump from members of his own party. Cynthia Lummis, a Republican senator for Wyoming, told NBC News that deciding to sack Ms McEntarfer before establishing the accuracy of the employment figures was 'kind of impetuous'. 'If the president is firing the statistician because he doesn't like the numbers but they are accurate, then that's a problem,' she continued. 'It's not the statistician's fault if the numbers are accurate and that they're not what the president had hoped for.' Thom Tillis, who represents North Carolina, said: 'If she was just fired because the president or whoever decided to fire the director just did it because they didn't like the numbers, they ought to grow up'. In the past, Mr Trump has taken an uncompromising attitude to critics in his own party, publicly threatening to back primary challenges to replace them with loyalists. Mr Tillis said in June that he would not run for re-election. Rand Paul, a Kentucky senator and former presidential primary contender, raised concerns about the politicisation of government data. 'We have to look somewhere for objective statistics. When the people providing the statistics are fired, it makes it much harder to make judgments that you know, the statistics won't be politicised,' he said. 'I'm going to look into it, but [my] first impression is that you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting.' Democrats have also condemned the president's move. Chuck Schumer, the party's leader in the Senate, criticised Mr Trump's 'shoot the messenger' response in a speech on Friday. Mr Trump has long been suspicious of the BLS, claiming last year that it inflated the jobs numbers during former president Joe Biden's administration in an attempt to swing the election for the Democrats. He announced via social media on Friday that he was sacking Ms McEntarfer, labelling her a 'Biden political appointee' even though she is a career civil servant and was confirmed by a bipartisan vote in January 2024. Among those who voted to confirm her were former senators JD Vance, now the US vice-president, and Marco Rubio, the secretary of state. Some Republicans have backed the president's move, including Roger Marshall, a Kansas senator, who was one of the 85 senators who confirmed her last year. 'Her cooked-up numbers have misled the American people for too long,' he claimed. The US created just 73,000 new jobs in July, considerably fewer than the predicted 110,000, while the figures for May and June were slashed by 258,000 combined, according to the BLS report released on Friday. Mr Trump hit out at the bureau as stock markets tumbled, branding the figures revision a 'major mistake' and adding: 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' Ms McEntarfer would be replaced with 'someone much more competent and qualified', he said, insisting the economy was 'BOOMING'. For now, BLS deputy commissioner William Wiatrowski is serving as acting commissioner.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats, government sources say
NEW DELHI, Aug 2 (Reuters) - India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. On top of a new 25% tariff on India's exports to the U.S., Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. But the sources said there would be no immediate changes. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions. However, during a regular press briefing on Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. He has threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35% of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 - when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow - due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp ( opens new tab, Hindustan Petroleum Corp ( opens new tab, Bharat Petroleum Corp ( opens new tab and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd ( opens new tab have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Nayara Energy - a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft ( opens new tab, and major buyer of Russian oil - was recently sanctioned by the EU. Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported last week.
