Oil surge, market jitters expected after U.S. hits Iran facilities
NEW YORK CITY, New York: The U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites has cast a shadow over global markets, with investors bracing for a sharp spike in oil prices and a potential flight to safety when trading resumes next week.
Though Sunday saw a relatively muted response in Gulf equity markets, analysts and fund managers said the escalation marked a turning point, dragging the United States directly into the Israel-Iran conflict and raising the prospect of broader economic fallout.
In a national address, U.S. President Donald Trump declared the strike a "spectacular military success," saying Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "completely and totally obliterated." Trump warned of further military action unless Tehran agrees to a peace deal.
Iran responded sharply, vowing "everlasting consequences." Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said from Istanbul that Tehran would consider diplomacy only after retaliation.
The broader market reaction will hinge on Iran's next steps. "Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days," said Saul Kavonic, energy analyst at MST Marquee. He warned that Tehran could strike U.S. interests or disrupt oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz — a vital corridor for global energy trade. "This could set us on a path towards $100 oil," he added.
The Strait lies between Iran and Oman and is the main export route for Gulf oil producers like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Kuwait. A disruption there could have sweeping consequences for inflation and global supply chains.
Even before the U.S. attack, Brent crude had climbed 18 per cent since June 10, reaching $79.04 — a five-month high. A further surge could complicate central banks' efforts to tame inflation and delay expected interest rate cuts.
"I think oil will open higher," said Mark Spindel of Potomac River Capital, adding that the lack of a clear endgame would weigh on investor sentiment. "We're engaged. And uncertainty will blanket the markets."
Retail investor confidence may already be wobbling. Ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency, dropped 8.5 per cent on Sunday, down 13 per cent since Israel's initial strikes on Iran on June 13.
Despite the tensions, Gulf stock markets appeared largely unshaken. Benchmarks in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait were flat or slightly up. Israel's Tel Aviv 125 index touched a record high.
Still, some see a path to resolution. Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group said the attack might force Iran into negotiations. "With this demonstration of force... they've lost all of their leverage," he said. "They'll likely hit the escape button to a peace deal."
History offers some reassurance: past Middle East flareups, like the 2003 Iraq war and the 2019 Saudi oil facility attack, triggered brief equity selloffs, but markets recovered within months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. Federal Reserve should consider cutting rates as soon as July, governor says
U.S. Federal Reserve governor Michelle Bowman on Monday said the central bank should consider cutting its key interest rate as soon as its next meeting in July, underscoring deep divisions among Fed officials as they endure sharp criticism from the White House. Ms. Bowman said that President Donald Trump's tariffs have so far not caused the jump in inflation that many economists feared, and any upcoming increase in prices would likely be just a one-time rise. 'It is likely that the impact of tariffs on inflation may take longer, be more delayed, and have a smaller effect than initially expected,' Ms. Bowman said in a speech Monday in Prague. 'Should inflation pressures remain contained, I would support lowering the policy rate as soon as our next meeting,' which is scheduled for July 29-30. Ms. Bowman, who was appointed to the Fed's board of governors by Mr. Trump in 2018, is the second high-profile official to express support for a potential July cut in as many days. On Friday, Christopher Waller, also a Trump appointee to the Fed's board, said in a television interview that the Fed should consider cutting borrowing costs next month. The blunt calls for rate cuts by Mr. Waller and Ms. Bowman differ from Fed Chair Jerome Powell's suggestion in a news conference last week that the central bank would monitor the economy over the summer and see how inflation responded to tariffs before deciding whether to reduce borrowing costs. U.S. futures price in more rate cuts in 2026 than Fed's latest projections The comments arrive as President Trump has repeatedly criticized Mr. Powell for not cutting rates, calling the Fed chair a 'numbskull' and a 'fool' for not doing so, raising concerns about the Fed's independence from politics. The president claims Fed cuts would reduce the government's borrowing costs, though the rates the government pays are mostly set by market forces, not the Fed. Ms. Bowman appeared particularly dismissive toward the threat of tariffs, which many economists say could slow growth, particularly if companies absorb the cost of the duties rather than passing them on to consumers. Doing so would cut their profit margins, which would reduce their ability to hire and invest in new business. 'Small and one-off price increases this year should translate only into a small drag on real activity,' Ms. Bowman said. 'I also expect that less restrictive regulations, lower business taxes, and a more friendly business environment will likely boost supply and largely offset any negative effects on economic activity and prices.' When the Fed lowers the short-term interest rate it controls, it often reduces borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and business loans. Yet sometimes financial markets keep longer-term rates higher: The Fed cut its rate a full percentage point last year, to about 4.3 per cent, but mortgage rates only declined slightly. On Friday, Mr. Waller told CNBC that with inflation remaining tame and the economy potentially slowing, the Fed should consider a rate cut next month. He pointed to rising unemployment among recent college graduates as a sign of possible weakening in the economy, and said it was better to cut before the labour market noticeably worsened. 'I'm all in favour of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don't want to wait until the job market tanks before we start cutting,' Mr. Waller said. Still, at last week's Fed meeting, seven of the 19 officials who participate in the central bank's interest-rate decisions supported keeping rates unchanged for the rest of this year, and two pencilled in just one cut. Inflation has steadily cooled this year despite widespread concerns among economists that Trump's tariffs would boost prices. The consumer price index ticked up just 0.1 per cent from April to May, the government said last week, a sign that price pressures are muted. Prices for some goods rose last month, but the cost for many services such as air fares and hotels fell, offsetting any tariff impact. Compared with a year ago, prices rose 2.4 per cent in May, up from 2.3 per cent in April. Trump has slapped a 10-per-cent duty on all imports, along with an additional 30-per-cent levy on goods from China, 50 per cent on steel and aluminum, and 25 per cent on autos. Still, many economists say it is likely that tariffs could push inflation higher in the coming months. Also Friday, Mary Daly, president of the Fed's San Francisco branch, said on CNBC that she looked 'more to the fall' as an appropriate time to cut rates.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The Republican attempt to discourage Trump lawsuits has hit a big obstacle
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans have hit a roadblock in an effort that could deter nonprofits, individuals and other potential litigants from filing lawsuits to block President Donald Trump over his executive actions. As Trump faces lawsuits nationwide, GOP lawmakers had sought to bar federal courts from issuing temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions against the federal government unless the plaintiffs post what in many cases would be a massive financial bond at the beginning of the case. The proposal was included in the Senate version of Trump's massive tax and immigration bill, but ran into trouble with the Senate parliamentarian, who said it violates the chamber's rules. It is now unlikely to be in the final package. Federal judges can already require plaintiffs to post security bonds, but such funds are commonly waived in public interest cases. The GOP proposal would make the payment of the financial bond a requirement before a judge could make a ruling, which critics said would have a chilling effect on potential litigants who wouldn't have the resources to comply. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer hailed the parliamentarian's ruling in a press statement and called the GOP effort 'nothing short of an assault on the system of checks and balances that has anchored the nation since it's founding.' 'But Senate Democrats stopped them cold,' Schumer said. Lawmakers are running scores of provisions by the Senate parliamentarian's office to ensure they fit with the chamber's rules for inclusion in a reconciliation bill. The recommendations from Elizabeth MacDonough will have a major impact on the final version of the legislation. On Friday, she determined that a proposal to shift some food stamps costs from the federal government to states would violate the chamber's rules. But some of the most difficult questions are still to come as Republicans hope to get a bill passed and on Trump's desk to be signed into law before July 4th. Republicans could still seek to include the judiciary provision in the bill, but it would likely be challenged and subject to a separate vote in which the provision would need 60 votes to remain. The parliamentarian's advice, while not binding, is generally followed by the Senate. Republicans and the White House have been highly critical of some of the court rulings blocking various Trump orders on immigration, education and voting. The courts have agreed to block the president in a number of cases, and the administration is seeking appeals as well. In April, the House voted to limit the scope of injunctive relief ordered by a district judge to those parties before the court, rather than applying the relief nationally. But that bill is unlikely to advance in the Senate since it would need 60 votes to advance. That's left Republicans looking for other avenues to blunt the court orders. 'We are experiencing a constitutional crisis, a judicial coup d'etat,' Rep. Bob Onder, R-Mo., said during the House debate.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Oil sells off as traders calmly look beyond the bombs in the Middle East
NEW YORK (AP) — If oil prices are any measure, Iran just flinched. The price of oil tumbled Monday afternoon in an historical move as traders bet that Iran's decision to bomb a U.S. base in Qatar signals it is not planning to do the one thing that could really hurt America: Shut down the flow of oil by attacking crude shipments. 'When the response comes and it is muted, oil drops,' said Tom Kloza, chief market strategist at consultancy Turner Mason & Co, calling the limited Iran response far short of what many traders feared. 'This rivals some of the historic selloffs.' There's still plenty Iran could do to push prices back up, and the markets could be getting it all wrong, But oil analysts say there are plenty of reasons fear has receded. Scary then calm The price of West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, fell 7.2% to $68.51 per barrel on Monday after Iran announced a missile attack on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which the U.S. military uses. Traders were relieved because Iran said it had matched the number of bombs dropped by the U.S. on Iranian nuclear sites this weekend, a possible sign of a desire to deescalate the conflict. Markets were initially nervous as oil futures opened for trading Sunday. The price of Brent crude jumped 4% as traders anxiously watched the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway on Iran's southern border that legislators in Tehran were demanding be closed in retaliation. That would have walloped the global economy because much of world's crude and liquified gas passes through it. The drop in oil Monday brings the price back to where it was before fighting between Iran and Israel began over a week ago, when a barrel of U.S. crude was just above $68. That's good news for President Donald Trump who wants the Federal Reserve to stop worrying about inflation and start cutting interest rates. It's also good for motorists this summer if the trend holds. Drivers were already paying higher prices at the pump before the U.S. attack. The average price nationwide is $3.18 per gallon, according to GasBuddy surveys, about 10 cents more than two weeks ago. 'It would be suicidal' The question now is will Tehran continue to keep oil flowing. Some traders were doubtful Iran would try to close the Strait of Hormuz even before its limited attack Monday. They noted that much of country's own crude passes through the waterway — 1.5 million barrels a day — and oil is a big revenue generator for the country that they would be loath to disrupt. 'It's a silly notion that the Iranians would look to do that,' said Kloza. 'I've been covering oil for 50 years and we've never seen the Strait of Hormuz compromised.' Asked about the prospect of a shutdown on NBC's 'Meet the Press' Sunday, Vice President J.D. Vance put it more simply: 'I think that would be suicidal.' At current oil prices, Tehran receives roughly $40 billion in revenue annually from oil transiting the same waters. That is a tenth of what the entire of country produces in goods and services. Yes, but Andy Lipow, an Houston based oil analyst, says history suggests Iran won't disrupt its own flow of oil, but that countries, like people, don't always act in their economic interests. 'The question for the oil markets is, 'Is his time different?',' he said. 'You might have an emotional decision.' He notes also that Iran has other ways to push oil higher without completely closing off the waterway. Iran could jam navigational devices, slowing transit, or drop mines in the water, forcing the U.S. Navy to do more escorts. Or it could bomb a tanker, he said, sending the premiums that shippers need to pay insurers sky high. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Big gamble If traders are wrong and oil shoots back up, the impact could be widely felt. A surge in oil prices would come at a bad time. Trump insists that the inflation scare is largely over, but many economists think higher prices are still coming because the full impact of his tariffs are only now beginning to show up on everyday goods. Trump is clearly aware things could change fast. 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' he wrote on Truth Social Monday, adding. 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING!'
