logo
27-year-old lost $80,000 of his savings trading stock options: I was 'devastated'

27-year-old lost $80,000 of his savings trading stock options: I was 'devastated'

CNBC24-04-2025

While many investors may have gotten nervous watching the stock market plummet and bounce back amid President Donald Trump's recent tariff announcements, some may have seen an opportunity.
Paul fell into the latter camp.
In early April, the 27-year-old saw news of upcoming auto tariffs and believed it would send stock prices down for major carmakers like Tesla. He thought he could make some money on that movement, he told self-made millionaire Ramit Sethi in an episode of his "Money for Couples" podcast, which was recorded live on April 8. Paul and his wife Vicki's last names were not used.
Paul was initially successful, earning around $4,000 trading Tesla options, he said. But then his "obsession" with making more tempted him to place an even bigger bet, and he woke up the next day to an $80,000 loss, he said.
Options are contracts that give an investor the option of buying or selling an asset, like a stock, at a certain time and price point. It's considered a riskier investment strategy than buying and holding stocks because it's speculative and relies on the investor timing the market — which even the most seasoned investors can't do with perfect precision.
"I thought I had enough information to make the right choice with the money that we had in our brokerage account and it ended up not being the right choice," Paul said.
He started options trading in 2021, and said he is currently "in the red" on that front. "If I were to put all the money that I lost into an index fund, we would be sitting really really pretty," he said.
The couple earns $169,000 a year and the $80,000 Paul lost came from their emergency savings. They still have $110,000 in their retirement accounts and $23,000 left in their emergency savings after Paul's recent loss.
The couple's situation illustrates why a "boring" investing strategy makes sense for most people, Sethi said.
As Paul knows, options trading can come with a major payoff, but not without taking on significant risks.
"Options trading can be incredibly risky for casual investors because it often requires a deep understanding of market mechanics, volatility and timing," says Douglas Boneparth, a certified financial planner and founder of Bone Fide Wealth. "Unlike simply owning a stock, options are leveraged instruments. This means small moves in the market can have outsized consequences, both gains and losses."
This isn't the first time Paul has lost a significant amount of money on options trading, he said. He enjoys it for the income potential — he made $80,000 in about three months when he was first starting out in 2021, he said — and the rush he gets from seeing his money move around. But waking up to his recent loss "devastated" him, he said.
"For most retail investors, options trading is not a good strategy," Boneparth says. "It's often misunderstood, and many people treat it like a lottery ticket or a quick-win gamble. In reality, successful options trading requires discipline, experience, and often, access to tools and data."
Investing should be boring for most people, Sethi said on the podcast. That often means setting up automatic contributions to investment accounts and utilizing passive strategies like index funds, which offer automatic diversification.
Passive investing strategies are often cheaper than active strategies because they typically have lower fees. They also regularly outperform actively managed portfolios, according to research from S&P Dow Jones Indices.
Sethi has witnessed this firsthand with the couples he interviews. "By the time [investors] are talking to me, they've probably lost a lot of money in active trading," Sethi said. "Meanwhile, their passive trading is crushing it."
For Paul, losing $80,000 was a turning point, he told Sethi. He acknowledged he needed to stop options trading altogether, something he's said in the past as well.
Losing that money felt like losing "the feeling of freedom" it offered as an emergency fund, Paul's wife Vicki said. "With the loss of that comes the loss of security, not just in the betrayal of trust, but the loss of that [safety net]," she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Latest Donald Trump approval ratings: new poll finds good news for president
Latest Donald Trump approval ratings: new poll finds good news for president

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Latest Donald Trump approval ratings: new poll finds good news for president

Registered voters like what they see from President Donald Trump, according to a new poll. A survey released by Napolitan News Service found that 51% of respondents approve of Trump's handling of the presidency. Of those respondents, 30% said they 'strongly' approve of the work Trump has done so far, while 21% said they just 'slightly' approve. The poll also found that 46% of respondents disapprove of Trump's work in the Oval Office. Among those who said they disapprove, 35% said they 'strongly' disapprove, while 11% said they only 'somewhat' disapprove. Only 2% of respondents said they were not sure about how Trump has handled the job of the presidency, according to the poll. The poll was conducted between May 27 and June 3 with a sample size of 3,000 registered voters. The poll's margin of error is plus or minus 1.8%. The Napolitan News Service is part of the Napolitan Institute, founded by veteran Republican pollster Scott Rasmussen, The organization bills itself as involved in 'rigorous, unbiased polling,' providing 'deep insights into American sentiment.' These numbers represent an incremental improvement in Trump's approval rating when compared to Neapolitan News Service's previous poll, conducted between May 20 and May 29. In that poll, 50% of respondents said they disapproved of Trump's handling of the presidency, while 49% said they approved. The previous poll's sample size also was 3,000 registered voters. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8%. The last time a Napolitan News Service poll found that a clear majority of respondents approved of Trump's handling of the presidency was in May. The poll, conducted between May 7 and May 15, found that 52% of respondents expressed approval, while 48% expressed disapproval. Like the other two polls, the survey's sample size is 3,000 registered voters and has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8%. Other polls conducted around the same time as the Napolitan News Service poll offer mixed results for the president's approval rating. A YouGov/Economist poll conducted between May 30 and June 2 found 49% of respondents disapproving of the job Trump is doing as president, while 45% approve of the work he is doing. The poll's sample size is 1,610 U.S. adults. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2%. A CBS News/YouGov poll conducted between June 4 and June 6 found that a majority of respondents (55%) disapprove of Trump's work as president compared to 45% who said they approve. The CBS News/YouGov poll's sample size is 2,428 U.S. adults. Its margin of error is plus or minus 2.4%. Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed 'sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Can the Mass. GOP flip this Taunton state House seat? | Bay State Briefing ABC News suspends correspondent over social media post critical of President Trump Read the original article on MassLive.

Can $1,000 at birth change a child's future? A Republican proposal aims to find out
Can $1,000 at birth change a child's future? A Republican proposal aims to find out

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Can $1,000 at birth change a child's future? A Republican proposal aims to find out

WASHINGTON (AP) — When children of wealthy families reach adulthood, they often benefit from the largesse of parents in the form of a trust fund. It's another way they get a leg up on less affluent peers, who may receive nothing at all — or even be expected to support their families. But what if all children — regardless of their family's circumstances — could get a financial boost when they turn 18? That's the idea behind a House GOP proposal backed by President Donald Trump. It would create accounts for all babies born in the U.S. over the next four years with $1,000 that would accrue interest until the children reach adulthood. At age 18, they could withdraw the money to put toward a down payment for a home, education or to start a small business. If the money is used for other purposes, it'll be taxed at a higher rate. It builds on the concept of ' baby bonds,' which two states — California and Connecticut — and the District of Columbia have introduced as a way to reduce gaps between wealthy people and poor people. Rep. Blake Moore, a Republican from Utah, spearheaded the effort to get the initiative into a massive House spending bill. In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, he said wealth inequality has soured many people on capitalism. 'Trump Accounts,' as the proposal calls them, could be the antidote, he said. 'We know that America's economic engine is working, but not everyone feels connected to its value and the ways it can benefit them," Moore wrote. 'If we can demonstrate to our next generation the benefits of investing and financial health, we can put them on a path toward prosperity.' The bill calls for the money to be handled by investment firms. The bill would require at least one parent to produce a Social Security number with work authorizations, meaning the U.S. citizen children born to some categories of immigrants would be excluded from the benefit. But unlike other baby bond programs, which generally target disadvantaged groups, this one would be available to families of all incomes. 'When little baby is born they're gonna start off with a thousand dollars and if we do a good job of investing their money — we're going to go with one of the investing guidelines, who the hell knows if they're any good — but they have a chance to be very rich,' Trump said at a rally last week in Pittsburgh. 'It's going to be very cute to see.' Economist Darrick Hamilton of The New School, who first pitched the idea of baby bonds a quarter-century ago, said the GOP proposal would exacerbate rather than reduce wealth gaps. He envisioned a program that would be universal but would give children from poor families a larger endowment than their wealthier peers, in an attempt to level the playing field. The money would be handled by the government, not by private firms on Wall Street. 'It is upside down,' Hamilton said. 'It's going to enhance inequality.' Hamilton added that $1,000 — even with interest — would not be enough to make a significant difference for a child living in poverty. A Silicon Valley investor who created the blueprint for the proposal, Brad Gerstner, said in an interview with CNBC last year that the accounts could help address the wealth gap and the loss of faith in capitalism that represent an existential crisis for the U.S. 'The rise and fall of nations occurs when you have a wealth gap that grows, when you have people who lose faith in the system,' Gerstner said. 'We're not agentless. We can do something.' The proposal comes as Congressional Republicans and Trump face backlash for proposed cuts to programs that poor families with children rely on, including food assistance and Medicaid. Even some who back the idea of baby bonds are skeptical, noting Trump wants to cut higher education grants and programs that aid young people on the cusp of adulthood — the same age group Trump Accounts are supposed to help. Pending federal legislation would slash Medicaid and food and housing assistance that many families with children rely on. Young adults who grew up in poverty often struggle with covering basics like rent and transportation — expenses that Trump Accounts could not be tapped to cover, said Eve Valdez, an advocate for youth in foster care in southern California. Accounts for newborn children that cannot be accessed for 18 years mean little to families struggling to meet basic needs today, said Shimica Gaskins of End Child Poverty California. 'Having children have health care, having their families have access to SNAP and food are what we really need ... the country focused on,' Gaskins said. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Mark Cuban Reacts to Elon Musk-Donald Trump Feud
Mark Cuban Reacts to Elon Musk-Donald Trump Feud

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Cuban Reacts to Elon Musk-Donald Trump Feud

The escalating public feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has prompted a response from billionaire investor Mark Cuban. What Happened: Cuban's comment came during a brief exchange with TheStreet Roundtable on Friday. When asked about the Musk-Trump spat, Cuban simply replied, 'All I'll say is that I bought a bunch of popcorn.' The feud between Musk and Trump intensified this week after Musk publicly criticized Trump's administration over the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — In response, Trump threatened to terminate billions in government contracts with Musk's companies, including SpaceX and Tesla Inc. Musk further escalated the situation with a shocking social media post claiming that Trump is in the Epstein files. This revelation sent shockwaves across social media and markets, causing Tesla shares to drop by 14% and DJT, the stock tied to Trump's media company, to fall over 8%. Bitcoin also saw a near 4% slip. Despite the significant influence both Trump and Musk have in the crypto and tech markets, this public fallout has caught even their closest allies by It Matters: The feud between these two influential figures has the potential to impact not only their personal reputations but also the companies they represent. Musk's Tesla and SpaceX, as well as Trump's media company, are all at risk of financial repercussions due to this public spat. The significant drop in Tesla's shares and DJT stock following Musk's controversial social media post is a clear indication of the potential damage such public feuds can cause. Furthermore, the ripple effect on Bitcoin's value shows that the influence of these two figures extends beyond their respective companies and into the broader market. As the feud continues to unfold, investors and market watchers will be keeping a close eye on the potential fallout. Read Next: The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement — How do you compare? Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Image: Shutterstock/Kathy Hutchins UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Mark Cuban Reacts to Elon Musk-Donald Trump Feud originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store