Opec+ set to make another accelerated oil output hike for August
LONDON: The world's largest group of oil producers, Opec+, is set to announce another big increase of 411,000 barrels per day in production for August as it looks to regain market share, four delegates from the group said.
If the increase is agreed, it would bring the total rise in supply from Opec+ to 1.78 million bpd so far this year, equivalent to over 1.5% of total global demand. The group has not yet increased production by the volumes agreed because some members are compensating for previous overproduction and others need longer to bring output back online.
The group has made a radical change in policy this year, after several years of output cuts totalling more than 5 million bpd. This came when eight members started to unwind their most recent output cut of 2.2 million bpd starting in April and accelerated the production hikes in May, June and July, despite the extra supply weighing on crude prices.
The change came after some members, such as Kazakhstan, produced way over their targets, angering other members that were sticking more closely to agreed cuts. Opec and its allies including Russia, together known as Opec+, are also seeking to win back market share during the period of cuts when rival producers such as the United States boosted production.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that Opec+ projects rising global demand, especially in the summer, suggesting the group may continue with big output hikes.
The group of eight, which includes Saudi Arabia, Russia, Kuwait, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, Kazakhstan, Oman and Algeria, will meet on July 6.
Analysts at Energy Aspects and Helima Croft at RBC Capital Markets expect an August hike of 411,000 bpd.
"We do think the group is most likely to still go ahead with the August accelerated unwinding," said Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at Energy Aspects.
Two sources familiar with Opec+ discussions who spoke on condition of anonymity said the group may discuss a more than 411,000 bpd increase for August, although it was not clear that all members supported such a move.
One complicating factor for the talks is the potential for more supply from Iran after the Israel-Iran ceasefire. US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the US had not given up its maximum pressure on Iran, but signalled a potential easing in enforcement to help the country rebuild.
Oil hit a five-month high above $81 on June 23 after the US attacked Iran's nuclear facilities, only to fall back to $68 on Friday as the Israel-Iran ceasefire reduced tensions and supply risks. In April it fell to a four-year low below $60 after Opec+ said it was tripling its output hike in May and as Trump's tariffs raised concerns about global economic weakness.
Opec+ pumps about half of the world's oil. As of their decision for July output, the Opec+ eight have made or announced production increases totalling 1.37 million bpd, or 62% of the 2.2 million bpd cut they are unwinding.
The UAE is also increasing output by 300,000 bpd, bringing the total hike to 2.5 million bpd. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
7 hours ago
- Observer
The connection: Supply chains and geopolitics
Over the decades, the supply chains have become a highly integrated web of interconnections driven by globalization. However, the global supply chain landscape is experiencing constant reorientation and stress in recent years due to the increasing strain of disruptions. The key events that have impacted the supply chain from all fronts are the Covid-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Palestine war, China-US Trade War 1, and Trade War 2, which was initiated by sweeping tariffs introduced by the trump administration in his current second term. Now, the US bombing of three of Iran's nuclear facilities, and the retaliatory response of Iran bombing the US air base in Doha, Qatar, has put the entire Middle East and the world in a state of heightened uncertainty and could trigger a significant disruption of supply chains and a probable spike in oil prices. Energy analysts fear a specter of panic buying in the international energy market if the situation escalates further. To get a perspective, the Strait of Hormuz is the world's most strategic and critical chokepoint, a narrow stretch of water with Iran to the north and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Oman to the south linking the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is a vital vein for the passage of Oil and gas shipments. The Strait of Hormuz is critical as 20% of the world's oil and a third of liquefied petroleum Gas (LNG) pass through this narrow strait. The Strait handles 20.3 million barrels of oil daily, making it crucial for global trade and supply. The Middle East region is experiencing protracted uncertainty that could affect the global energy markets. The recent US attack on key Iranian enrichment facilities to destroy Iran's nuclear ambitions could affect the movement of ships in this region. The Strait of Hormuz is also a primary export route of Qatari LNG, with a fifth of the global LNG supply passing through this strait last year. This handout natural-colour image acquired with MODIS on NASA's Terra satellite taken on February 5, 2025 shows the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz. — AFP If Iran stops the movement of ships through this Strait, it would be economic suicide for the world. While they have not done it, they are taking actions to interfere with energy shipments by jamming the GPS signals of tankers in this region. According to maritime intelligence reports, 23% of the region's vessels, approximately 1600 ships, have experienced signal jamming. Many shipping giants have temporarily issued standby instructions to their vessels or rerouted them in anticipation and fear of further geopolitical escalations. The closure or any restrictions to this trade route will have far-reaching implications for the world. It could also strain diplomatic relationships, increase energy prices, sharply raise inflationary pressures, and cause shipment delays. Over the years, the US has been worried about the vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz and has gradually reduced its dependency on Middle East oil. It has grown to become one of the world's largest oil-producing nations. Now, the US imports only 10-11% of its oil requirement from Iraq and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East. However, 84% of Hormuz's shipped oil goes to Asia. The strait is 21 miles wide at its narrowest point, with shipping lanes only 2 miles across. A blockade could halt 20% of global oil instantly. Businesses exploring diversifying logistic pathways face significant operational, economic, and geopolitical hurdles. The Strait of Hormuz remains irreplaceable for bulk shipments; it is, in fact, the most viable option for global trade shipments. Given the geopolitical escalations, trade wars, regional instability, and unpredictability of political decisions, the Strait of Hormuz is more than a strategic trade gateway; it has become a geopolitical weapon, magnifying its significance for sustainable international trade and global supply chains.
Observer
7 hours ago
- Observer
Zelensky calls US as pilot killed in Russian attack
KYIV: A Ukrainian F-16 fighter pilot died in a crash while repelling a Russian air attack that involved hundreds of drones, cruise and ballistic missiles, authorities said on Sunday, as Moscow intensifies night-time air barrages in the fourth year of war. President Volodymyr Zelensky called for more support from Washington and Western allies to bolster Ukraine's air defences after the attack, which damaged homes and infrastructure across the country and injured at least 12 people, according to local authorities. In Kyiv, families huddled in metro stations for shelter after air raid sirens rung out. Machine-gun fire and explosions were heard across the capital and in the western city of Lviv, where such attacks are less common. The governor of the Lviv region, bordering Poland, said the raid targeted critical infrastructure. Ukraine has now lost three F-16s since it began operating the U.S.-made jets last year. Kyiv has not revealed the size of its F-16 fleet, but they have become a central and heavily used part of Ukraine's defences. The pilot flew the damaged jet away from a settlement but did not have time to eject before it crashed, the Ukrainian Air Force said. "The pilot used all of his onboard weapons and shot down seven air targets. While shooting down the last one, his aircraft was damaged and began to lose altitude," the Air Force said on Telegram. The Ukrainian military said in total Russia launched 477 drones and 60 missiles of various types to Ukraine overnight. Ukrainian forces destroyed 211 of the drones and 38 missiles, it said, while 225 more drones were either lost due to electronic warfare or were decoys that carried no explosives. "Moscow will not stop as long as it has the capability to launch massive strikes," Zelensky said on X. He said Russia had launched around 114 missiles, 1,270 drones, and 1,100 glide bombs just in the past week. Russia's state-run RIA Novosti news agency said one person was killed by a Ukrainian drone in the Russian-controlled part of Ukraine's Luhansk region. Both Ukraine and Russia say they do not attack civilian targets. Ukraine says recent attacks highlight the need for further support from Washington, which under President Donald Trump has not committed to new military aid for Ukraine. Trump said he was considering a Ukrainian request for more Patriot missile batteries after he met Zelensky at a NATO summit last Wednesday. "This war must be brought to an end - pressure on the aggressor is needed, and so is protection," Zelensky said in his X post on Sunday after the attack. "Ukraine needs to strengthen its air defence — the thing that best protects lives." He said Ukraine was ready to buy the American air defence systems and it counts on "leadership, political will, and the support of the United States, Europe, and all our partners." Russia has launched large scale strikes on Ukrainian cities every few days in recent weeks, causing widespread damage, killing dozens of civilians and injuring hundreds more. During the latest barrage, explosions were heard in Kyiv, Lviv, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Cherkasy and the Ivano-Frankivsk regions, witnesses and regional governors said. The Ukrainian military said air strikes were recorded in six locations. Eleven people, including two children, were injured in the central Cherkasy region, the governor Ihor Taburets said on Telegram. Three multi-storey buildings and a college were damaged in the attack, he said. One woman was injured in western Ivano-Frankivsk region. Rescuers evacuated residents from apartment blocks with charred walls and broken windows, images released by authorities in Cherkasy showed. Industrial facilities were hit in the southern Ukrainian Mykolaiv and central Dnipropetrovsk regions, officials said. Railway infrastructure was damaged in Poltava city in the centre of the country. — Reuters
Times of Oman
7 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Shifting sands: Why our defence future lies in East, not in West
The recent escalating conflicts in Palestine and the wider Iran-Israel tensions have laid bare a stark reality for nations in our region: Reliance on Western arms suppliers and alliances comes with significant geopolitical strings attached, strings that consistently pull in favour of Israel. We have seen, for instance, in the context of the Ukraine conflict, how the political will of supplying governments can dictate the terms of use, the types of targets permissible, and even the timely delivery of crucial armaments. This raises a profound concern: Can we truly depend on weapons systems whose operational deployment might be constrained by the strategic preferences of their Western government benefactors, especially if our national interests diverge from theirs, particularly concerning Israel? It is time for us to fundamentally reassess our defence strategy and look eastward, drawing lessons from nations like Iran in developing indigenous capabilities, particularly in advanced drone and rocket technology. For decades, the West has positioned itself as the primary provider of advanced weaponry and security partnerships. Yet, the unfolding crises demonstrate a clear pattern: When push comes to shove, the deep-rooted alliances between Western powers and Israel supersede any commitments to other regional partners. We have witnessed a consistent siding with Israel, often at the expense of regional stability and justice, regardless of the humanitarian consequences. This bias is not merely a matter of policy but is intrinsically linked to the very nature of their strategic relationships and arms industries. This predicament leaves us vulnerable. To truly safeguard our sovereignty and security, we must cultivate self-reliance. And in this pursuit, Iran, despite its own complex geopolitical standing, offers invaluable insights, particularly in the realm of asymmetric warfare capabilities. Sanctions and isolation have forced Iran to become a formidable innovator in drone and missile technology. Their consistent development and deployment of increasingly sophisticated drones and precision-guided missiles, from the 'War of the Cities' to recent advancements in loitering munitions and air defense systems, demonstrate a remarkable capacity for indigenous military industrial growth. They have not waited for external suppliers, but rather have invested heavily in reverse-engineering, research, and domestic production. This includes a robust ballistic missile programme, and advancements in systems like the Majid air defense system, designed to counter modern aerial threats. Imagine the strength of our air defence if we were to emulate this strategic independence. By investing in our own scientific and engineering talent, establishing dedicated research and development centrrs, and fostering local manufacturing, we can build a defence apparatus tailored to our specific needs and threats, free from external influence. This does not mean isolating ourselves, but rather diversifying our partnerships and prioritising self-sufficiency. Going East for our defence needs also offers opportunities for more equitable partnerships. Nations in the East, many of whom have also faced the challenges of developing independent defence capabilities, may offer more favourable terms, facilitate technology transfer, and respect our strategic autonomy. Such collaborations would allow us to acquire necessary hardware while simultaneously building the expertise to maintain, adapt, and eventually produce our own. Crucially, this eastward shift also opens avenues for broader strategic alignment and cooperation with nations like Iran, China, Pakistan and Russia. As these powers increasingly advocate for a multi-polar world order, their strategic interests often converge on resisting singular global hegemony and fostering a more balanced international system. For our region, aligning with these nations offers a robust counterbalance to established biases and strengthens our collective voice and security when it comes to shared regional and global challenges. The current geopolitical climate is a wake-up call. We cannot afford to be passive recipients of security dictated by the priorities of others. The time has come to forge a new path, one that prioritizes national resilience and independent defense. By learning from the experiences of nations like Iran in developing sophisticated, homegrown drone and rocket capabilities, and by looking to the East for strategic partnerships and broader geopolitical alignment, we can secure a truly independent and robust defense for our future.
