Samsung confirms Exynos 2600 will be the first 2nm chipset on the market Comments
A
I will avoid any phone with Exynos 2600, unless there is cataclysmic event and it wipes the floor of the competition.
The S22 Ultra has been plagued with all sort of issue, including dying after the firmware update. Exynos is not a flagship chipset, mid-range at best.
i
hopefully not "first on the market and first to fail"
Z
Nobody cares about temu quality soc
S
15 % better gpu for playing a game btw, I thought Apple had already secure the 2nm from Qualcomm? Though I'm not really sure if they are using Fin-Fet? Does GAA even allow such low pitch when going down to sub 2nm?
Anonymous, 1 hour ago this is comedy, the first 2nm but not used by the ultra Samsung can easily put the Exynos back in the Ultra, like they did in the S22 Ultra. Would people accept it? That's the more important question to answer.
6x efficiency units? Well, I expect a solid, if not impressive, battery life from phones with it.
H
Anonymous, 1 hour ago this is comedy, the first 2nm but not used by the ultra Qualcomm 2nm is superior and efficient.
There is nothing crazy about those funny marketing "2mm", "3mm" claims, no chip really contains elements of these sizes. It's just the gate pitch going from around 48mm gate pitch and 24mm metal pitch (for those so called "3mm" chip) to respectively 45mm and 20mm (for "2mm").
I wonder how they will call that beyond "1mm". But who would buy a 45mm or even 20mm advertised chip nowadays...
?
this is comedy, the first 2nm but not used by the ultra
I Am GoD 9, 2 hours ago "Pixel Tensor 6 to ship with Exynos 2600 based chip for Pixel " Thankfully no, Google has moved away from Samsung fab.
"Exynos 2600 is expected to debut on the Galaxy S26 Pro and S26 Edge, while the S26 Ultra should stick with Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite 2."
So, once again they know their own chipset isn't capable enough to stand a chance against Qualcomm's best, even though it's going to be the first 2nm chipset on the market.
I
"Pixel Tensor 6 to ship with Exynos 2600 based chip for Pixel "
?
The Exynos 2500 has terrible energy efficiency, as can be clearly seen in the test of the new Flip. Over the past 10 years, they have never managed to achieve good energy efficiency with their Exynos processors, so why should it be any different with the new 2600?
The main thing is that I get a Snapdragon in the S-ULTRA model in my market. Otherwise, I'll switch to the new Chinese models, which are already miles better.
?
Heating and hot chpian, less battery backup then display green line
t
Wesker, 3 hours ago Could be 0.1mm for all i care, it'll still be an overheating-gens behind-battery hog. Sam... more .1mm chips were used around 50 years ago. Any modern chip of that size is gonna be shit lol
Z
People sont care its 2nm or even 1nm they promise big in perfomance,heat management and battery life but all remain in papers only
Could be 0.1mm for all i care, it'll still be an overheating-gens behind-battery hog. Samsung's only goal with Exynos is to make more money per unit sold, it's not and was never to make better phones.
?
i can already see how much money they will put in marketing trying to wash their bad image, overpaying all kind of reviewers trying to convince is this time is not a flop
a
This only thing it means is that it'll be better than Samsung's previous processs since these "Xnm" numbers are now purely marketing anyway.
It'd be much more interesting to know the actual transistor density
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
The Galaxy Buds 3 FE, Tab S10 Lite, and Samsung's whole Fan Edition program make zero sense to me
While I can totally understand if some of you don't find them as exciting as the recently released Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 or the upcoming Galaxy S26 series, the just-unveiled (properly, that is) Galaxy Buds 3 FE and undoubtedly fast-approaching Galaxy Tab S10 Lite caught my attention for (at least) one simple reason. I've been a fan of Samsung's Fan Edition (no pun intended) initiative right off the bat, but as the product roster has expanded from affordable high-end phones to affordable smartwatches, tablets, and wireless earbuds, I feel like the world's top handset vendor is losing its focus and direction rather than truly enlarging the program's mass appeal. I know what you're inclined to answer strictly based on that name - folks who can't afford the Galaxy Buds 3 or Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. After all, the Galaxy S24 FE's target audience consists of Samsung fans unable to buy the Galaxy S25 , S25 Plus, S25 Edge , or S25 Ultra, and we can expect the same type of relationship to be formed (relatively) soon between the Galaxy S25 FE and the S26 family. There's only one problem with that argument. The Galaxy Buds 3 Fan Edition is priced higher than the "vanilla" Galaxy Buds 3 model. Yup, you read that right, these "budget-friendly" new earbuds are set to cost $150 in the US starting in a few weeks, while the non-Pro 2024-released Buds 3 can be had at the time of this writing for as little as $125 (with no trade-in) straight from their manufacturer. Am I the only one who doesn't understand why the Galaxy Buds 3 FE are so expensive? | Image Credit -- Samsung Technically, of course, $125 is not the regular price of the Galaxy Buds 3, so it may not feel fair to compare that with how much the Galaxy Buds 3 FE will cost at launch. But that's exactly what prospective buyers are going to be looking at when deciding what to spend their money on. The Galaxy Buds 3 FE's other (possibly bigger) issue is that the first-gen Galaxy Buds FE are "typically" available for $99.99 and very frequently discounted to $69.99 and even less. Now, I get that the new edition is vastly improved (which is why it's not called Galaxy Buds 2 FE), but let's all imagine a 50 percent more expensive Galaxy S25 FE (or, heck, Galaxy S26 FE) than the S24 FE. That's not the same thing, I know, but a $50 price hike in the wireless earbuds arena is also clearly not equivalent to a $50 increase for a phone... or smartwatch. So, yes, even if the S25 FE or the Galaxy Watch FE's (hypothetical) sequel were to cost $100 more than their predecessors, we'd all be quick to discard their chances at racking up decent sales numbers. Now, I could compare the Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 FE's features and find that the newer and technically humbler model actually holds a few key advantages in departments like battery life and ambient noise reduction. But I believe that's beside the point. Let's face it, a lot of people tend to do little to no research when shopping for a new gadget, so I'm afraid that the Galaxy Buds 3 FE are pretty much DOA due to their price tag and, well, name. If these were called Galaxy Buds 4 (with the exact same design, capabilities, and recommended pricing), this discussion would have an entirely different tone, but alas, here we are. Technically, the unreleased mid-range tablet that essentially holds no more secrets after yesterday's incredibly detailed leak is not part of the Fan Edition family. But I feel like the Galaxy Tab S10 Lite is very much part of Samsung's larger product branding and release problems, looking set to see daylight just a few months after the Galaxy Tab S10 FE with an annoyingly similar design and a terribly confusing name. While I initially felt like the Tab S10 FE's existence made the Tab S10 Lite unnecessary, I've started to think over the last couple of days that the situation might actually be reversed. The Galaxy Tab S10 Lite should have been released under the Galaxy Tab S10 FE name, which would have allowed Samsung's non-flagship slate to better compete against Apple's surprisingly affordable 2025 iPad Air duo. The Tab S10 Lite might be humbler than the Tab S10 FE, but this Coral Red colorway is fire. | Image Credit -- WinFuture Yes, the Tab S10 Lite will come with humbler specs than the Tab S10 FE, but that Exynos 1380 SoC, those 8 and 5MP cameras, and the 25W charging speeds may well be advanced enough for plenty of hardcore Samsung fans on tight budgets. As things stand, unfortunately, I believe the Tab S10 Lite's impending announcement will only harm its maker's already confusing tablet portfolio, making it far too crowded and repetitive for many folks to understand what the best Android tablet option for their budget might be. Because it's probably too late to do anything about that, Samsung should take a few seconds months to find the best way to further expand and advance the Fan Edition program. This clearly ain't it, and I'd be really bummed out to see FE devices go the way of the dodo... or the Galaxy Note family soon due to brand dilution and a chronic lack of focus. Good news everyone! Over the past year we've been working on an exciting passion project of ours and we're thrilled to announce it will be ready to release in just a few short months. "Iconic Phones: Revolution at Your Fingertips" is a must-have coffee table book for every tech-head that will bring you on a journey to relive the greatest technological revolution of the 21st century. For more details, simply follow the link below! LEARN MORE AND SIGN UP FOR EARLY BIRD DISCOUNTS HERE
GSM Arena
an hour ago
- GSM Arena
Honor Magic V5 battery life and charging test results
Michail 19 August 2025 Honor Android Battery test Our Honor Magic V5 review is coming up, and we've already completed several of our in-house tests, including the battery life and charging components. The international version of the Magic V5 is equipped with a trendy Silicon-Carbon battery boasting a 5,820 mAh capacity (vs. 6,100 mAh on the Chinese model) and comes with 66W wired charging support. The phone did not disappoint when it comes to endurance, securing an Active Use Score of 11 hours and 52 minutes. bigpic/ data-battery2=33:45_9:46_14:06_7:36> The result positions the Magic V5 ahead of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Huawei Mate X6 and in the same ballpark as the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold. We also see a noticeable step up from last year's Magic V3. We also ran the tests on the external display with the main one folded. The V5 scored similar Active Use scores to its predecessor, but with different proportions, including noticeable gains in the calls and gaming components. Moving on to the charging test, Magic V5 showed some competent speeds and completed a full charge in exactly 53 minutes. The phone was sitting at 36% after 15 minutes on the charger and reached 67% at the half-hour mark. These results place the Magic V5 in the right behind key competitors like the Oppo Find N5 and vivo X Fold3, which boast faster 80W and 120W charging support.
GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite new color and full specs surface online
Siddharth, 19 August 2025 Samsung's Galaxy Tab S10 Lite is expected to launch later this year alongside the Galaxy Tab S11 and Tab S11 Ultra. Recently, images of the Tab S10 Lite in gray and pinkish color options had leaked. Now, a new set of renders have surfaced online showing us another color variant. The Galaxy Tab S10 Lite is rumored to be available in gray, red/pink, and silver colors. The latest leak shows the tablet in all three colors and also includes its full specifications. According to the latest leak, the upcoming mid-range tablet will offer a 10.9-inch LCD display with a refresh rate of 90Hz and 2112 x 1320 pixels resolution. The tablet will be equipped with the Samsung Exynos 1380 SoC, paired with 6/8GB of RAM and 128/256GB internal storage. It will also feature a microSD card slot for storage expansion. The Galaxy Tab S10 Lite will offer an 8MP rear camera and a 5MP camera on the front for selfies and video calls. It is said to pack an 8,000mAh battery with support for 25W fast charging. It is rumored to run on Android 15-based One UI 7 out of the box, offer IP42 ingress rating, and support S Pen. Source
