Georgia jails three opposition politicians, including bank founder
(Reuters) -Three Georgian opposition politicians were sentenced to months in prison on Monday, the first to be convicted in a series of prosecutions targeting government critics who refused to give evidence to lawmakers.
Mamuka Khazaradze and Badri Japaridze, leading figures in the opposition Lelo for Georgia party, were both sentenced to eight months, while Zurab Japaridze of the Coalition for Change bloc received seven months.
Khazaradze is a co-founder of London-listed TBC Bank, one of Georgia's largest.
Authorities have launched a string of cases against people accused of refusing to testify to a parliamentary commission investigating alleged wrongdoing under jailed ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili, who led the South Caucasus country from 2004 to 2012. Four other people are also being prosecuted.
Georgian authorities have moved to clamp down on leading figures of the pro-European Union opposition as street protests continue over a disputed October election and a subsequent government decision to halt talks on joining the EU.
Khazaradze and both Japaridzes, who are not related, were also banned from holding public office for two years, the Interpress news agency reported.
Their parties rejected last year's election result and accused the ruling Georgian Dream party of rigging the poll in order to win a fourth term. The government denies that allegation, but two U.S. pollsters said there was evidence of manipulation.
In a post on X, Khazaradze rejected the court's ruling, saying the parliamentary commission "has no real function" and pointing out he did not hold public office during the period the body is investigating.
Spokespeople for the parties of the jailed politicians did not immediately reply to requests for comment.
Traditionally one of the most pro-Western countries to emerge from the Soviet Union, Georgia has taken a sharply authoritarian turn in recent years, critics say. Georgian Dream has passed a slew of laws clamping down on foreign-funded organisations operating in the country, and on LGBT people.
Georgian Dream says it still wants to join the EU but also wants to preserve the country's traditional values and keep peace with its huge northern neighbour, Russia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
Conservative network Newsmax agrees to pay $67 million in defamation case over bogus 2020 election claims
The conservative network Newsmax will pay $67 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defaming a voting equipment company by spreading lies about President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss, according to documents filed Monday. The settlement comes after Fox News Channel paid $787.5 million to settle a similar lawsuit in 2023 and Newsmax paid what court papers describe as $40 million to settle a libel lawsuit from a different voting machine manufacturer, Smartmatic, which also was a target of pro-Trump conspiracy theories on the network. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis had ruled earlier that Newsmax did indeed defame Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems by airing false information about the company and its equipment. But Davis left it to a jury to eventually decide whether that was done with malice, and, if so, how much Dominion deserved from Newsmax in damages. Newsmax and Dominion reached a settlement before the trial could take place. The settlement was disclosed by Newsmax on Monday in a new filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. It said the deal was reached Friday. A spokesperson for Dominion said the company was pleased to have settled the lawsuit. The disclosure came as Trump, who lost his 2020 reelection bid to Democrat Joe Biden, vowed in a social media post Monday to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines such as those supplied by Dominion and other companies. It was unclear how the Republican president could achieve that. The same judge also handled the Dominion-Fox News case and made a similar ruling that the network repeated numerous lies by Trump's allies about his 2020 loss despite internal communications showing Fox officials knew the claims were bogus. At the time, Davis found it was "CRYSTAL clear" that none of the allegations was true. Internal correspondence from Newsmax officials likewise shows they knew the claims were baseless. "How long are we going to play along with election fraud?" Newsmax host Bob Sellers said two days after the 2020 election was called for Biden, according to internal documents revealed as part of the case. Newsmax took pride that it was not calling the election for Biden and, the internal documents show, saw a business opportunity in catering to viewers who believed Trump won. Private communications that surfaced as part of Dominion's earlier defamation case against Fox News also revealed how the network's business interests intersected with decisions it made related to coverage of Trump's 2020 election claims. At Newsmax, employees repeatedly warned against false allegations from pro-Trump guests such as attorney Sidney Powell, according to documents in the lawsuit. In one text, even Newsmax owner Chris Ruddy, a Trump ally, said he found it "scary" that Trump was meeting with Powell. Dominion was at the heart of many of the wild claims aired by guests on Newsmax and elsewhere, who promoted a conspiracy theory involving deceased Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez to rig the machines for Biden. The network retracted some of the more bombastic allegations in December 2020. Though Trump has insisted his fraud claims are real, there's no evidence they were, and the lawsuits in the Fox and Newsmax cases show how some of the president's biggest supporters knew they were false at the time. Trump's then-attorney general, William Barr, said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. Trump and his backers lost dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud, some before Trump-appointed judges. Numerous recounts, reviews and audits of the election results, including some run by Republicans, turned up no signs of significant wrongdoing or error and affirmed Biden's win. After returning to office, Trump pardoned those who tried to halt the transfer of power during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and directed his Department of Justice to investigate Chris Krebs, a former Trump cybersecurity appointee who had vouched for the security and accuracy of the 2020 election. As an initial trial date approached in the Dominion case earlier this year, Trump issued an executive order attacking the law firm that litigated it and the Fox case, Susman Godfrey. The order, part of a series targeting law firms Trump has tussled with, cited Susman Godfrey's work on elections and said the government would not do business with any of its clients or permit any of its staff in federal buildings. A federal judge put that action on hold, saying the framers would view it as "a shocking abuse of power. "
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Michelle Caruso-Cabrera: Biggest question is what does security guarantee look like
CNBC's Eamon Javers and Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, MCC Global Enterprises CEO, join 'Power Lunch' to discuss what to expect from President Trump's meeting with Ukraine President Zelenskyy and EU leaders today at the White House.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
London councils will be ‘unable to provide basic services' after government funding shake-up, warn businesses
Government reforms to the way councils are funded could leave London's town halls hundreds of millions of pounds worse off, risking core services and undermining the capital's competitiveness, business leaders have warned. BusinessLDN – which represents more than 170 of the city's largest employers – urged ministers to ensure that the proposed Fair Funding Review takes into account the city's higher living costs and areas of deprivation. Analysis by umbrella group London Councils suggests boroughs will receive £700 million less than they would under current funding arrangements if the reforms go ahead. BusinessLDN said the capital's councils had already seen spending power 'squeezed significantly' since 2010. For example, Camden Council has experienced a 13% fall in real terms over that period, despite increasing council tax. In a letter to Local Government Minister Jim McMahon, Chief Executive of Business LDN John Dickie warned that under the latest funding formula proposals, other inner London town halls could see further cuts of 11–12% in real terms over the next three years, even if they raise council tax to the maximum level permitted level. 'It would be deeply concerning if local authorities in the city were left without the resources they need to provide the basic services that their residents and businesses rely upon,' Mr Dickie said. 'This would undermine the perception of London as an attractive place to live, work and invest – and in turn, jeopardise the Government's growth mission and the ambition for the UK to be the most rapidly growing country in the G7. 'We urge you to ensure that the Fair Funding Review 2.0 takes these factors into account and delivers a reformed system that works for London and the whole UK.' He highlighted rising pressures on social care, special educational needs, and homelessness, alongside London housing costs that are among the highest in the country. Despite the capital's relatively high average incomes, one in four households lives in poverty once housing costs are considered, Mr Dickie added. BusinessLDN said cuts to services such as planning, environmental management and street cleaning could damage the city's ability to attract investment. The government has said it wants to 'strengthen and simplify' town hall budgets and bring 'an end to wasteful, competitive bidding for funding pots and move towards multi-year financial settlements that give local leaders the certainty and stability they need to plan for the future'. But London Councils has challenged the plans. The group is 'gravely concerned' about what it describes as unevidenced proposals that had not been properly road-tested. Claire Holland, the chair of London Councils, said: 'This would have major implications for our most vulnerable groups of residents: London has the highest rate of poverty in the country once housing costs are factored in, and one in 50 Londoners is homeless and living in temporary accommodation.'
