
New ranking reveals the most American-made cars for 2025
While the site has compiled its America-Made Index for more than a decade, President Trump's announcement of tariffs on foreign-made vehicles has created keen interest in just how 'American' a car is.
The Cars.com analysis assigned scores based on five factors: percentage of U.S. and Canadian parts, location of final assembly, country of origins for available engines, U.S. manufacturing workforce and country of origin for available transmissions.
'Being on this list is crucial as the auto industry becomes more and more global and consumers' desire to use their dollars to support their neighbors increases,' the report states. 'No matter where a vehicle ranks, simply being on the list means it has some component of final assembly in the U.S., ultimately still contributing to the U.S. economy.'
At the top of the ranking was the Model 3 by Tesla, which has factories in California and Texas, among other sites. At the bottom of the ranking, in 99th place, was the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, which fell from the 65th spot in the 2024 ranking.
The top 20 most-American cars, according to Cars.com, are:
See the full list on the Cars.com site.
Despite President Trump's 25% tariffs on imported cars and parts, the widely-feared spike in car lot prices has not yet materialized.
Car shoppers paid $48,799 on average in May, which was $12 less than in April, according to Kelley Blue Book (KBB). Experts don't expect that trend to last, however.
'Price hikes are coming slowly in part because many dealerships keep months' worth of new vehicles in stock, so they still have cars to sell that they imported at pre-tariff prices,' according to KBB reporter Sean Tucker.
Tucker wrote that Trump's tariff announcement prompted a flood of early car sales as buyers tried to snatch up the vehicles already on lots in the U.S., but that wave of sales has ended. Discounts offered by major automakers are also starting to fall off.
So if the tariffs remain in place, experts suggest that now may still be a good time to buy a car.
'So far there's a mismatch between the expectation of what would happen, and the reality of what has happened with prices,' Ivan Drury, director of insights at Edmunds.com told CNN. 'But I still think we're still going to prices start to take off in two to three months.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Flowers Foods Trims Annual Outlook As Bread Demand Softens
Flowers Foods, Inc. (NYSE:FLO) shares are trading lower on Friday. The company reported a second-quarter adjusted earnings per share of 30 cents, which is in line with the analyst consensus estimate. Quarterly sales of $1.242 billion (+1.5% year over year) missed the Street view of $1.266 billion. 'Macroeconomic uncertainty and shifting consumer demand have continued to pressure the bread category,' said Ryals McMullian, chairman and CEO of Flowers decreased 1.2% in the quarter under review, while volume declined 2.4%. Net income decreased 12.8% to $58.4 million, representing 4.7% of sales, an 80-basis point decrease, primarily due to greater outside purchases, increased workforce-related costs, and higher interest expense. Adjusted net income decreased 16% to $63.4 million. View more earnings on FLO Adjusted EBITDA decreased 4% to $137.7 million. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 11.1% of net sales, down 60 basis points. 'We are proactively working to mitigate this weakness with disciplined cost savings efforts,' the CEO added. Simple Mills contributed $61.4 million in net sales, with a net loss of $2.1 million. The company exited the quarter with cash and equivalents worth $11.045 million. Long-term debt as of quarter-end expanded to $1.749 billion, compared with $1.021 billion as of December 28, 2024. Outlook Flowers Foods cut its FY2025 adjusted EPS forecast to $1.00–$1.10, down from its prior view of $1.05–$1.15. The revised outlook compares with the consensus estimate of $1.09. The company also lowered its FY2025 sales guidance to a range of $5.021 billion–$5.083 billion from $5.079 billion–$5.170 billion. This new sales forecast falls short of the Street's expectation of $5.310 billion. Price Action: FLO shares are trading lower by 2.63% to $16.11 at last check Friday. Read Next:Photo by Kritchai7752 via Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Flowers Foods Trims Annual Outlook As Bread Demand Softens originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway
Investors are in wait-and-see mode. Fed watchers have had quite a week, getting a hot Producer Price Index, a tame Consumer Price Index, and solid retail sales data out today. As it stands, markets are still betting on that September rate cut from the Jerome Powell-led Federal Reserve. There have been a few earnings stumbles in CoreWeave (CRWV), Applied Materials (AMAT), and Cava (CAVA), but a few bright spots from the likes of Cisco (CSCO). The Bullish (BLSH) IPO saw an enthusiastic response. And now markets cast their gaze to the highly anticipated meeting today between President Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. The outcome of this meeting could have a host of surprises that bullish investors haven't even thought about! Stock analysis: Intel The Trump administration is reportedly in talks to have the US government take a stake in Intel (INTC). An Intel spokesperson didn't comment directly on this to me, but offered this: "Intel is deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership. We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump Administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation.' The questions here are numerous. Why would the administration even want a stake in an Intel that is far behind chief rivals Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)? I encourage Trump to compare Nvidia's earnings report on Aug. 27 to the last disaster from Intel a few weeks ago. The president isn't known to hitch his ride to losers. Intel has been a loser and may stay that way in the chip game for some time. Then again, why would Intel want to get in bed with the government when embattled CEO Lip-Bu Tan and the board must act quickly to reorganize the company? I find it hard to believe the government will be a quiet minority shareholder! Intel has billions in cash and doesn't need the money that comes with terms from any government deal. There is a lot at stake here, as Intel should be a beacon of US chip-making, not the punching bag in tech circles. The company's financials have taken a major hit, with sales down for more than three straight years and earnings evaporating in the process. "[A stake would] be a big step for Intel, but right now Intel is on a horse and buggy compared to the Godfather of AI Jensen [Huang] and Nvidia," Wedbush tech analyst Dan Ives told me. Roundtable analysis: More tech When a Wall Street analyst who has been a bear on a stock for a while suddenly issues an upgrade, it always catches my attention. Today, we have that situation on Salesforce (CRM). DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria lifted his rating on Salesforce to Neutral from Underperform. Luria said investor sentiment has declined sharply on Salesforce in recent months as questions mount around the company's acquisition strategy and near-term margins. But what may not be factored into the stock is new activist investor activity, Luria said. Luria pointed out that noted activist investor Starboard Value — led by Jeff Smith — increased its stake in Salesforce by 47% this quarter, according to new 13F filings. Starboard pushed for big changes at Salesforce three years ago, which ultimately led to a new focus on margin expansion by CEO and co-founder Marc Benioff. Luria said, "We believe this is a signal there will be another round of investor activism and increased pressure on management to refocus on growth of the core business, additional margin expansion and hold off on dilutive M&A." Meanwhile, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold 20 million shares of Apple (AAPL) during the period, according to a new 13F filing. Berkshire's Apple holdings remain its largest equity stake by market value, despite dropping by about $9.2 billion in the second quarter. Is Buffett signaling he is concerned about Apple's tariff exposure? Perhaps. After all, Apple did warn tariffs would hit its profits by $1.1 billion in the current quarter. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump might push for a US gov't. stake in Intel
Intel (INTC) stock is popping following reports that the US government is considering taking a stake in the legacy chipmaker after Trump's meeting with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. Slatestone Wealth chief market strategist and host of Yahoo Finance's Trader Talk, Kenny Polcari, and Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Allie Canal join Opening Bid to take a closer look at what the reported government partnership could mean for the US, Intel, and the evolving chip landscape. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. All right, let's fire up, uh, my stock of the day. The Trump administration is reportedly in talks with Intel to have the US government take a stake. Uh, Intel declined to comment specifically on this to me, but they did say this, uh, quote, Intel's deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. Uh, the questions here are many though. One, why would the administration even want to stake in an Intel that is scary behind chief rivals Nvidia and AMD? President Trump has interacted a lot with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and has got a taste as to what it means to be a leader in semiconductors. Two, why would Intel want to get in bed with the government at a time in which CEO Lipu Tang and the board must act quickly to reorganize the company. I find it hard to believe the government will be a quiet minority shareholder. There's a lot of stake here, as Intel is and should be a beacon of US chip making, not the punching bag it has become. The company's financials have taken a major hit with sales down for more than three straight years and earnings evaporating in the process. A lot going on there. Still with me, my round table, Kenny, Paul Kerry, uh, Slate Stone Wealth chief market strategist, David Seif, Nomora chief economist, and Yahoo Finance reporter, senior reporter, Allie Canal. Kenny, I want to go over to you. Um, any interest in going long in Intel on news like this, uh, even in the, uh, keeping the back of your mind, or maybe just putting the front of your mind that this is a fundamentally, uh, just wrong company. I mean, nothing's going right for them. Uh, uh, agree. So Intel's not a name that I've ever owned, uh, and we don't own it here. But look, I it's certainly has a pop because of the news. But is the pop temporary? I'm not even sure. And I agree with you. Why would you want to get, why would the government want to now be partners with Intel? Why would Intel want to be partners with the government? And what does that say about future opportunities? Is the government now going to start this Trump going to start the stick his hand in other companies? Kenny, it's like the auto bailout. I mean, it reminds me of when they took a stake in GM, what, 15, 20 years ago. 100%. And so I'm a little bit I'm a little bit confused about that. But Intel's not a name that I ever owned at all. I think there's other places to put your money in the space. But so this news does nothing in terms of getting me excited about, oh, I got to jump on this Intel bandwagon. I do not. David, does the, does it benefit, um, the US economy to have a healthy Intel? Or at this point, the semiconductor industry led by Nvidia, AMD, and of course, Taiwan semiconductor, they have just passed this company by, and our economy can go chugging along relying on chips from these three companies. Yeah, I mean, you know, I don't have much to say about individual companies, but certainly, um, you know, the US has a multi-century track record of doing well by sort of not sticking its nose into things and allowing, allowing the private market to go where it may. Um, to the extent that Intel has been lagging behind, uh, it it may be the best thing for the economy to simply allow it to, uh, continue to either wither or sink or swim, so to speak, um, and allow the current leaders to continue to lead and only lose their lead if they actually get out competed. Uh, Allie, uh, we're just about almost two weeks away from that Nvidia earnings report. And it will look starkly different to what Intel put up a few weeks ago. And it's night and day. I mean, these are, these companies both might be making computer chips, but they couldn't be more different. Couldn't be more different. And Intel, I just feel like it's too late for the company to really catch up to AMD, to Nvidia. Of course, for the Trump administration, they're viewing this as an issue of national security, that they really want to make sure that Intel can survive through this volatile time. We did have the that CEO meeting with President Trump, and really we've seen that across the board of big tech, right? Apple CEO, Tim Cook, met with Trump recently. And then out of that meeting was a $100 billion investment in the US. So that is President Trump's goal. He wants to bring manufacturing production, all the things, including all the chip makers back onto the domestic soil. But they also have other types of agreements that they're rolling out that are very unique and really unprecedented. One of those being that revenue share agreement with Nvidia and AMD. They're letting them sell some of their chips to China for a kickback, for some of the revenue to the federal government. So there's just a lot of moving parts and moving pieces to this. It's still an unconfirmed report. Intel did say that they are looking forward to working with the government, but they didn't confirm whether or not this was actually happening. So it feels like the US is just going to continue to be involved in some of these companies, at least throughout the term of Trump's presidency. What ultimately comes from that and the legacy that leads and how it really changes what we view the the chip supply chain as at this current moment, that remains to be seen. Related Videos How Trump's meeting with Putin impacts investors Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold Apple shares. Should you? Intel Soars as Trump Considers US Stake in Chipmaker 3 AI chip stocks that are best positioned right now Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data