&w=3840&q=100)
Tales of influence, ambition: 3 books about tech, politics and big business
Germany's big businesses profited thanks to their collaboration, and after the war most executives escaped blame, keeping much of the plundered wealth even after millions died
UNIT X: How the Pentagon and Silicon Valley Are Transforming the Future of War, OWNED: How Tech Billionaires on the Right Bought the Loudest Voices on the Left, PROFITS & PERSECUTION: German Big Business in the Nazi Economy and the Holocaust
NYT
By Max Chafkin UNIT X: How the Pentagon and Silicon Valley Are Transforming the Future of War
Author: Raj M Shah and Christopher Kirchhoff
Publisher: Scribner
Pages: 319
How did Donald Trump win over the technology industry? How did the country's most future-minded companies — managed and staffed by immigrants, and led by CEOs who had embraced corporate diversity policies — come to embrace a nationalistic, transactional view of power and a president whose scattershot trade war threatens their hugely profitable businesses? Put simply: What happened to Silicon Valley?
A tempting answer is Elon Musk. But three recent books suggest that Musk's right-wing turn is probably more symptom than cause, the latest manifestation of reactionary forces that have simmered, mostly unnoticed, within the tech industry.
Blessedly, Musk is not the main character in Unit X, a chronicle of efforts by the authors — Shah, an entrepreneur, and Kirchhoff, a tech adviser — to persuade Silicon Valley companies to make surveillance and weapons systems for the government.
The book reveals how a left-leaning industry became enthusiastic about the military-industrial complex. When rank-and-file Google employees put up an early resistance to weapons work, Amazon and Microsoft saw an opportunity to double down on military contracts. Some tech leaders at companies like Palantir and Anduril were always on board.
Shah and Kirchhoff were hired to run the Pentagon's Defense Innovation Unit (Unit X for short) shortly after its creation under Barack Obama in 2015. Their goal was to make inexpensive consumer technologies, like tablets and productivity software, easily available to the military.
But, as Unit X shows, it's not a huge leap to go from using AI to analyse drone footage to using AI systems in weapons. Anduril, backed by another Palantir co-founder, Peter Thiel, and staffed by several of Thiel's close allies, recently announced that it had agreed to take over an Army contract worth up to $22 billion. Given the company's close ties with the new administration, it seems almost certain there will be more money to come.
Tech industry reporters tend to view the power of Silicon Valley billionaires as a byproduct of their addictive apps. In Owned, Higgins, a tech journalist, makes a compelling case that more attention should be paid to the campaign to influence their critics. He focuses on two targets of Musk and Thiel's patronage, the journalists Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi.
Greenwald and Taibbi were seen as leftists early in their careers. Their evolution, Higgins argues, was spurred on by money from conservative sources. Greenwald is paid to produce videos on Rumble, the anti-woke video platform that counts Thiel and Vice President JD Vance as investors; Taibbi's move to the right coincided with his becoming, in Higgins's account, essentially an in-house journalist at Elon Musk's X. (Neither man's work is monolithic. Greenwald has been critical of the Trump administration's immigration policies; Taibbi fell out with Musk over his management of X.)
When Jeff Bezos revamped The Washington Post's opinion page and Mark Zuckerberg began tossing out Facebook fact checkers, it was hard to say whether these moves suggested that Bezos and Zuckerberg had finally revealed their true selves, or whether they had changed tack because it seemed inadvisable to do otherwise. (It's worth remembering that last summer, while running for president, Trump threatened to throw Zuckerberg in prison for life and his company is on trial for alleged antitrust violations.)
Either possibility is grim, as are the parallels one can find in Profits & Persecution by Hayes, a Holocaust scholar. Studying the relationship between the Nazi state and about 100 of the largest German companies, Hayes convincingly shows that German businessmen were sceptical of the Nazis, but tended to approach Hitler's rise with an eye to the bottom line, seeking to preserve their financial advantages within the regime and, in doing so, slowly acquiescing to its most insidious demands.
His book is both horrifying and riveting, in part because the rationalisations offered by business leaders will sound eerily familiar. Of course, these impulses helped prop up a government that destroyed the free-market capitalism it once sought to protect.
Germany's big businesses profited thanks to their collaboration, and after the war most executives escaped blame, keeping much of the plundered wealth even after millions died. In many respects, Hayes makes clear, they won the war, even when Germany lost.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pete Hegseth faces hiring woes: At least three prospects say no to joining former Fox host at the Pentagon
The White House wants to hire a new chief of staff and top advisers for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, but it's hard to find anyone who wants the job. At least three people have already refused to take jobs under Hegseth, as per reports. These Pentagon jobs are normally considered important and attractive, but not this time. Hegseth fired two of his senior aides in April on live TV, accusing them of leaking classified info in a Fox News interview. After that, his chief of staff was removed, and a press aide quit, saying the office was in "total chaos", as stated by an NBC News report. Vice President JD Vance and Trump's chief of staff Susie Wiles are helping Hegseth find new staff, but he and the White House don't agree on who should be hired, Hegseth has rejected some of the White House's picks, and the White House has blocked some of his choices. Some people were not picked for the job because they didn't fully support the MAGA. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo The exit of Hegseth's Team In April, two of Hegseth's close friends, Dan Caldwell and Darin Selnick, were removed from the Pentagon because of a leak investigation. They, along with Colin Carroll, said the process was unfair and that they weren't told what the allegations were. Hegseth later went on Fox News and blamed Caldwell, Selnick, and Carroll for both the leaks and the NYT story, but didn't give any proof, as mentioned by the Fox News. In May, the White House removed Hegseth and his lawyer, Tim Parlatore, from managing the investigation. The job was handed over to Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg, which showed the White House doubted Hegseth's fairness. Live Events As no proof of leaks was found, officials started thinking maybe the firings were a mistake. Infighting among remaining Hegseth staff continues, and Hegseth is now mostly isolated, working with only a small group of close advisers, as stated by NBC News report. Hegseth's new pick rejected too Hegseth now relies on Ricky Buria, a former military aide who hoped to become his chief of staff. But the White House said no, since Buria was seen as inexperienced and had privately criticized Trump and Vance. The fights inside his office have delayed the 'Golden Dome' missile defense project, Trump's big national defense idea. There's still no Pentagon budget, and Republicans in Congress are frustrated. Some officials, including Vance, are worried this report could hurt Hegseth even more. But Hegseth's allies believe he'll stay in the job despite everything, according to the NBC News report. FAQs Q1. Why is Pete Hegseth struggling to hire staff? Because of past firings, office problems, and fights over who should be hired. Q2. Who decides on Hegseth's new team? Both Hegseth and the White House want a say, but they don't agree.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Musk: Billionaire investor Michael Moritz' advice to Silicon Valley, 'One of them is a medical monarch...'
Silicon Valley investor Michael Moritz took Elon Musk's side and said Trump's budget truly is abomination. Longtime Silicon Valley investor Michael Moritz said the tussle between Donald Trump and Elon Musk was inevitable as one of them is a medieval monarch and another is a revolutionary. In his column on Financial Times, Mortiz wrote that one man approached the government like a company and the other considers the government his company and Silicon Valley knows which to choose. Calling the eruption between Elon Musk and Donald Trump mortifying for those in Silicon Valley, Moritz backed Musk and said he is right in calling Donald Trump's budget an abomination. "I feel more than a tinge of sympathy for Musk. Unlike others, I don't believe he threw himself into this battle for personal gain or to wangle deals for his companies. He, like many, was disenchanted with a Democratic party that had lost its moorings, mismanaged California and whose leader, Joe Biden, let vanity conquer virtue. Sadly, he misjudged the character of the man with whom he threw in his lot," Mortiz wrote. Elon Musk is undoubtedly the most accomplished business builder of his generation, Moritz said. "But the government is not a company". Moritz said Musk failed to understand that Trump was more interested in the daily news cycle than in reform. "Musk is the revolutionary, the president the monarch". Musk also underestimated the way in which Trump's "cabinet and advisers, and all the targets in his crosshairs, were determined to fight him. He was the outsider. They were the occupants of the swamp." "What is the result of this meeting of company builder and medieval monarch? It's the opposite of what was promised: a US budget that has ballooned, debt levels that will only rise and crushing interest payments that make the country vulnerable to its largest creditors — Japan and China." Moritz took Elon Musk's side and said his reputation is now tarnished and his business interests hurt but Donald Trump's family business inked deals for new hotels and golf courses around the world. "One word of advice for those in Silicon Valley who followed Musk's lead and sided with Trump. Leave. Don't delude yourself that you are working to make crypto a part of global finance, minimising artificial intelligence regulation, helping start-up companies or protecting the interests of Silicon Valley. You have no sway. You are just cannon fodder," Moritz said.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
US stock market today: S&P 500 flat, Dow Jones down, Nasdaq‑100 up— biggest gainers, losers as Wall Street eyes US-China trade talks and potential tariff deal
How are the major indices performing? S&P 500 (SPY): Sitting steady at about 599.15, virtually unchanged from the previous close, remaining just under the 6,000 mark. Sitting steady at about 599.15, virtually unchanged from the previous close, remaining just under the 6,000 mark. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA): Dropping roughly 0.21% to 427.47, reflecting some investor caution. Dropping roughly 0.21% to 427.47, reflecting some investor caution. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ): Climbing around 0.16% to 530.77, fueled by strength in the tech sector. Which stocks are making the biggest moves? Warner Bros Discovery: Surging 7-9% following news of a company split. Surging 7-9% following news of a company split. IonQ: Up about 3% after announcing an acquisition of Oxford Ionics. Up about 3% after announcing an acquisition of Oxford Ionics. Merck: Rising 1.1%, boosted by positive trial results. Rising 1.1%, boosted by positive trial results. Nvidia: Gaining between 1.3% and 2.3%, riding the wave of AI enthusiasm. Gaining between 1.3% and 2.3%, riding the wave of AI enthusiasm. Qualcomm: Jumping 4.4% on completion of its Alphawave IP purchase. Jumping 4.4% on completion of its Alphawave IP purchase. Apple: Adding 0.7%, supported by new AI features unveiled at the WWDC event. Robinhood: Dropping 7.4% after being excluded from the S&P 500 index. Dropping 7.4% after being excluded from the S&P 500 index. Tesla: Down between 0.3% and 2%, impacted by a recent downgrade and fallout from Musk-related news. Down between 0.3% and 2%, impacted by a recent downgrade and fallout from Musk-related news. EchoStar: Falling 8.2% amid bankruptcy rumors. Live Events Why are the US and China meeting now — and what's at stake for the stock market? What's driving the stock market recovery in 2025? Are tariffs still in effect, and why does it matter now? Could US-China trade deals shape the next market trend? What's driving the market today? Trade talks between the U.S. and China in London continue to shape investor sentiment, contributing to the Dow's decline and a slight Nasdaq boost. in London continue to shape investor sentiment, contributing to the Dow's decline and a slight Nasdaq boost. Inflation concerns remain front and center , with traders awaiting this week's CPI and core PCE data releases. Expectations suggest the Federal Reserve may hold interest rates steady for now. , with traders awaiting this week's CPI and core PCE data releases. Expectations suggest the Federal Reserve may hold interest rates steady for now. Sector trends show technology stocks powering the gains, while healthcare lags behind. What should investors watch next? FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The US stock market opened slightly weaker on Monday, June 9, as Wall Street turned its attention to critical trade talks between the United States and China. Early trading saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average fall by 185 points, or about 0.5%, marking a cautious start to the week. The S&P 500 dipped 0.1%, while the Nasdaq Composite edged up slightly by 0.1% around 9:35 a.m. Eastern are closely watching the developments in London, where senior officials from both countries are meeting to ease long-standing trade tensions. The discussions aim to address a range of economic disputes and possibly roll back mutual tariffs that have been weighing on global supply chains for week's US-China trade talks are seen as pivotal for the global economy. Tariffs imposed in past years have disrupted everything from electronics to heavy equipment. Though those tariffs are currently paused, no permanent deal has been believe that progress in these talks could help avoid a potential economic slowdown or even a recession, especially if they result in the reduction or removal of tariffs on both sides. A positive outcome could also reignite investor confidence and fuel another leg up in the US stock market modest moves reflect investor hesitancy. Market players are clearly waiting for concrete news before making big decisions. The S&P 500 remains just 2.5% below its all-time high, buoyed by hopes that the US may reach trade agreements that roll back tariffs major factor behind the stock market's strong recovery has been the belief that President Donald Trump will reduce trade barriers as part of broader global deals. After plunging by nearly 20% from its peak two months ago, the S&P 500 has made a swift optimism is largely driven by expectations that smoother trade relations — particularly with major economies like China — will relieve pressure on multinational companies and bring stability back to supply both the US and China have put a pause on new tariffs, but existing ones remain. These tariffs have cost industries billions, increased consumer prices, and created uncertainty for global important now is whether these paused tariffs are finally lifted. This could significantly improve the flow of goods, lower costs, and potentially lead to more business investments, especially in sectors like tech, agriculture, and Any meaningful breakthrough in US-China trade negotiations could serve as a key catalyst for markets. Investors are looking for long-term clarity, not just temporary Monday's talks in London show signs of real progress, we could see increased investor confidence, reduced market volatility, and fresh momentum across Dow Jones, S&P 500, and without a deal, continued uncertainty could weigh on the markets in the coming should keep a close eye on the statements or outcomes from the US-China meetings. Any mention of progress on tariff rollbacks, trade agreements, or economic cooperation could trigger immediate market also worth noting that the Federal Reserve's next move, broader economic indicators, and the 2024 US election climate remain in focus as secondary factors influencing the market Dow Jones dropped due to investor caution ahead of the US-China trade talks aim to ease tariffs and settle long-running trade disputes affecting the global economy.