Pakistan, Troubled By Thoughts Of A Deterrent For BrahMos, Looks Beyond China
New Delhi:
Ever since India's precision strikes first destroyed its terror infrastructure and later its air bases and military installations during Operation Sindoor, one question has kept Pakistan worried and puzzled at the same time - How to defend itself against India's BrahMos missile?
Though India has not officially stated the use of the BrahMos during Op Sindoor, Pakistan's prime minister Shehbaz Sharif had publicly admitted to its airbases being hit by the supersonic cruise missile.
LOOKING BEYOND CHINA
Disappointed with the Chinese air defence systems - HQ-9 and HQ-16 - which failed to stop India's drone and missile strikes, and was totally ineffective against the BrahMos, as claimed by Pakistan itself, Islamabad is now looking beyond China to find a worthwhile solution.
Pakistan is reportedly exploring a possibility of acquiring a German-made advanced air defence system which has proven to be effective in Ukraine against a Russian cruise missile similar to that of the Brahmos.
GERMAN ENGINEERING
Last month Ukraine claimed that the recently-inducted German air defence system - IRIS-T SLM - had successfully shot down 60 incoming missiles over the last one year. Developed by Germany's Diehl Defence, the air defence system performed well against the Russian P-800 Oniks missile, considered somewhat similar to India's BrahMos.
IRIS-T SLM, which stands for Infrared Imaging System - Tail/Thrust Vector Controlled - Surface-Launched Missile, is a medium-range air defence system. First developed in 1990, the system has been upgraded several times. It includes a radar, an operation centre, and multiple launchers.
According to news agency Reuters, in 2023, Germany purchased six IRIS-T air defence systems for its air force at a total cost of some 900 million euros ($971.73 million). It has a range of approximately 40 kilometres (25 miles) and a 360 degree view.
INDO-GERMAN DEFENCE TIES
According to a report in the Economic Times, Pakistan's plans skip Chinese air defence systems and instead purchase them from Germany, comes at a time when the company that manufactures the IRIS-T - Diehl Defence - has partnered with Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems, that is engaged in defence projects in India. Together, Diehl and Thyssenkrupp are working to supply Interactive Defence and Attack Systems or IDAS for six Indian Navy submarines being made in India under the Rs. 70,000 crore Project 75I.
Moreover, as per the Economic Times, India's Reliance Defence, a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure, has entered into a strategic cooperation agreement with Diehl Defence. Together they will manufacture the precision-guided munition system Vulcano 155mm - and advanced, long-range artillery shell, in India.
This might make it difficult for Pakistan to deal with the German firm.
MISPLACED PRIORITIES?
Despite its economy tanking and nearly 45 per cent of its citizens now below the poverty line and 16 per cent living in extreme poverty, Pakistan, in its annual budget today upped its defence spending significantly while lowering spending on nearly everything else. However, in the last month alone, cash-strapped Pakistan has managed to secure a billion-dollar loan from the IMF and another $800 million from the Asian Development Bank or ADB.
Additionally, Pakistan's budget saw a whopping 20 per cent hike in defence spending, while the overall expenditure has been slashed by 7 per cent. Some reports suggest that Pakistan's government has scrapped development projects worth nearly 1,000 billion Pakistani Rupees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Mystery Aussie from Sydney bags entire $100m Powerball jackpot, gets tax office warning
Lottery officials' advise to winner Live Events Australian Taxation Office issues warning (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A search is underway for the Australian who has won Powerball's entire $100m jackpot. Sydneysiders are being urged to check their tickets as the numbers were revealed. According to media reports, the winning numbers in Thursday night's (June 12) draw 1517 were 28, 10, 3, 16, 31, 14 and 21 and the Powerball was to Lottery officials, the individual winner from Sydney claimed the whole division one prize but might not even know it, because they weren't registered and hadn't come forward. "There are 100 million reasons why all Sydney players who had an entry in this week's draw should check their ticket as soon as possible," The Lott spokesperson Matt Hart said in a statement, according to media Lott spokesperson advised the winner to call 131 868 as soon as possible to start claiming their prize. "Someone has become an overnight midweek multi-millionaire but possibly doesn't know it yet," he said. "We can't wait for them to discover this winning news! Just imagine how $100 million might change your life and the lives of your nearest and dearest."Only six people in Australia have won a lotto prize of this size previously, 9 News reported. Another 3,056,245 winning entries across the other divisions took home more than $60 million in Thursday night's Australian Taxation Office (ATO) warned about the potential implications of winning the lottery after one lucky person walked away as the sole jackpot the country closes in on tax time there are a few stipulations worth considering as to how a huge sum of cash like this can affect the winner. "You don't need to declare your winnings to us, and you won't pay tax on them," the tax office said, according to Yahoo Finance. "But, any interest earned on the winnings will need to be included in your assessable income."In the case of the sole winner of the jackpot, if the amount is kept sitting in a savings account with a 5 percent interest rate, an income of around $5 million will be generated in just one year. Come tax time next year, the lottery winner would have to pay tax on that big amount of money.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Boeing shares fall 4.2 per cent after deadly Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad
The crash of an Air India 787-8 Dreamliner jet minutes after taking off on Thursday led to Boeing shares falling about 4.2 per cent on Thursday reported Reuters. Shares of Spirit AeroSystems, a key supplier, and GE Aerospace, which makes engines for the jet, also fell about 2 per cent each. Also Read: Air India plane crash: CCTV footage shows bone-chilling video of fatal incident The deadly crash, which has led to 241 confirmed deaths out of the 242 passengers, comes ahead of the Paris Air Show next week where Boeing would participate. The crash, which is one of the worst in aviation history has damaged Boeing's reputation further, after its planes were involved in several other crashes this year. Also Read: Moments of terror: Locals run for cover after Air India flight crash in Ahmedabad Boeing has been involved in three high-profile accidents involving the 737 MAX aircraft in recent years, including two fatal crashes. The Air India plane that crashed in the city of Ahmedabad is more than a decade old. Also Read: Donald Trump breaks silence on Ahmedabad plane crash, says Air India accident 'worst in aviation history' It first flew in late 2013 and was delivered to Air India in January 2014. Since then, it accumulated more than 41,000 flight hours, including 420 hours during 58 flights in May and 165 hours during 21 flights in June, according to Cirium, an aviation data analytics firm. The widebody 787 planes, one of the most modern passenger aircraft in service, have never had a fatal crash until the Air India incident. They were grounded in 2013 due to battery issues, but no one was reported injured. Boeing as well as the airline Air India have stated that they will fully cooperate with an investigation into the cause of the crash.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
With the US slapping tariffs around, international trade is like the Wild West now: Gene M. Grossman
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The WTO system got blown up starting with the first Trump administration when many appellate body judges stepped down — since every major country can veto appointments, the US vetoed all replacements. That stopped the adjudication of disputes. Currently, many countries — some led by the US — see fit to do what they want and don't abide by WTO agreements . Gene M. Grossman is Jacob Viner Professor of International Economics at Princeton University. Speaking to Srijana Mitra Das, he discusses trade — in the time of Trumpian tariffs:A. I am an international trade economist. I've worked over 46 years on various aspects of trade, from the relationship between it and the environment to links between trade and growth, outsourcing, political economy and the effects of trade policy A. There was a focus on supply chain disturbances as a result of the pandemic — that event made those concerns very salient and there was a lot of thought about how to make supply chains more resilient. This was the topic du jour until the US Presidential election — that turned everything on its head. Now, we are all talking about tariffs.A. No. The US has benefitted enormously from international trade. This is an international regime we set up to serve many of our goals, some economic, some political. It led to the development of a rules-based system and a great deal of liberalisation and while US trade barriers might be a tiny bit less than those in Europe or Japan, the differences are miniscule. Claims about international trade having been unfair to the US are absurd, in my opinion.A. Earlier, we had a system that wasn't perfect but it worked reasonably well — countries made commitments at the World Trade Organization (WTO) and subscribed to policies of other countries. If someone thought another country wasn't abiding by what they promised, they would take their case to a WTO panel and then, an appellate body and a decision would be made. Countries would be asked to change their policies if these weren't in conformance with what they'd promised. It wasn't perfect — there was perhaps a bit of judicial overreach by appellate judges but, by and large, it did discipline what countries were doing and most nations obeyed those rulings, at times, with some foot-dragging. The whole thing got blown up starting with the first Trump administration when many of the appellate body judges stepped down. Since every major country can veto appointments, the US vetoed all replacements until there were only two judges left — three judges are needed to hear a case, so that stopped the adjudication of Biden also did not overturn that. Currently, many countries, some led by the US, see fit to do what they want and don't abide by any agreements. We see the thinnest veneers of excuses made, including national security, emergencies, etc., with no real effort to show those are operative in several US is now slapping trade policies and tariffs all over the place without any attention to the commitments it made in the WTO — that is the Wild West. There is no will to abide by WTO agreements — the organisation has no enforcing abilities and is reduced to sitting on the sidelines now.A. Trade has been a catalyst for the spread of knowledge around the globe — that's been very beneficial to innovation. The limitations on the movements of people through visa tightening and immigration restrictions, and curbs on the movement of goods, will be detrimental to global growth and innovation.A. It has some grain of truth — and a vast overstatement. All the research points to enormous skill-based technological progress in the US. Trade played a strong role in certain industries and locales and mostly benefitted low-income consumers who tend to buy imported goods more than proportionately. The claim that trade is the cause of adverse trends in income distribution is overstated.A. I wouldn't bet against it. It depends on how these trade policies play out — that is anybody's guess, given how they seem to change every few days. I do see the uncertainty, chaos and volatility that's been created as a hindrance to investment. There will be lowered demand as well once these tariffs do hit prices in the stores. So, I'm concerned about a recession at least in the US. If there is enough cooperation, this could be avoided in other countries — however, when a shock hits the system, nations take steps they think will protect them but collectively, they get harmed. I see Europe building barriers, for instance — that could spread. If I were a betting man, I'd say the chances are 50-50.(Views expressed are personal)
