logo
‘The Beast Within': A startlingly true-to-life Delhi Police drama

‘The Beast Within': A startlingly true-to-life Delhi Police drama

Scroll.in14-06-2025
'Cause of death: Haemorrhage and shock due to penetrating injury to heart as a result of piercing by metal spikes.'
A servant girl is found dead in Srivastavas's plush mansion in South Delhi's elite Panchsheel Park. No more than 17 years old and a confirmed orphan with no family, Jyoti's death should cause no ripple in the city's vast and terrifying crime scene. Moreover, her 'friendliness' with the Srivastavas' driver, Rajesh, makes the death an even trivial matter – it must be a case of spurned love, and now discarded by a rogue man, the girl has killed herself. Plain and simple. On top of everything, Rajesh is fleeing. There is no case at all – of course, this is suicide; at most, abetted.
At first, the Srivastavas' impressive wealth and connections safeguard them from aggressive scrutiny of the law but Prashant Kumar of Delhi Police's Crime Branch suspects something is amiss. A brief look at the dead child's photograph overwhelms him – this was a girl who had her whole life ahead of her; her death, however, convincingly explained, does not make sense to him. Haunted by his own ghosts, Kumar's instinct says that she died in a house of horrors and the Srivastavas aren't as genteel as they pretend to be.
The team
But Kumar is no superhero. Being in the police does not mean that doing the right thing is easy and there is enough bureaucratic red tape to ensure that justice is never served on time. Moreover, this is not a solitary mission – Kumar has other personnel on his team, his boss keeps a close eye on them, and worst of all, the Srivastavas have their fingers wrapped tightly around the top boss's neck. The first – and the best – thing to do is give up.
On Kumar's team are the freshly minted SI Meera, a former wrestler, and a brash, muscle-flexing Parveen who takes his caste and vegetarian identity very seriously. He is not entirely pleased about having a woman on his team and reporting to his female boss, ACP Sofia Ahmed – and he makes no attempt to conceal it. Meera, on the other hand, is unbothered by the likes of Parveen – she has faced enough ostracisation in her time as a wrestler. She's excited to do some real investigation and make a difference. Above all, she's a sportsperson, she cannot let inconsequential things weigh her down.
The Srivastava women seem ill at ease in their own homes. The young daughter seems to have seen something while the wife is clearly harbouring secrets. Still, gut feelings and shifty behaviour do not count as evidence and as Kumar and his team move in secret to dig up the truth, they'll realise that Jyoti's death is only the tip of a toxic, rotting iceberg.
Unlike other novels in the genre, The Beast Within dishes out only a small amount of action. Instead, what the author does is illuminate the frustratingly sluggish pace with which investigations are done in the country. As the police sit around and bid time, their professional and personal relationships fray and unravel from the frictions of betrayal, envy, and grief. As each pursues their leads, they collide with prejudices and the presumptions that take them down the wrong route. Kumar's unhappy marriage, Parveen's crassness, and Meera's naivety become obstacles in their respective professional lives. The many diversions and dead ends that the team tackles month after month wear them out, to the point that it feels like nothing more than a wild goose chase.
The fatigue of the system
Rudraneil Sengupta very astutely observes the fatigue of the system. Even with basic safety measures in place, informants and committed personnel, it is almost impossible to act swiftly because of how greatly it is dependent on the cooperation of the bureaucracy and grassroots networks – an association that is bound to fail, aided by the wide chasm of class and psychological differences. The police network, though intricate and adequately equipped, struggles to do its job thanks to internal powerplay and a serious affinity for wasting time.
Instead of making it a linear pursuit for the 'truth', Sengupta also probes the various directions that truth can take you. For a good part of the book, the death lies forgotten as the police chase other important matters – still, these are not mindless quests. These little truths, over time, will condense into something big and explosive but in the meantime, they must remain patient.
The personality sketches of the police were especially well done. The reader is taken to the dinghy interrogation rooms and sterile drawing rooms of the rich, and they are also invited to imagine Kumar's troubled family life or Parveen's violence against his wife. It feels almost absurd that these are the men who have vowed to seek the truth – a tangle of professional duty and personal flaws complicates the reader's understanding of allyship and justice.
The Beast Within not only unveils the ferocious, apathetic beast that is the police system but also the beasts within us that each of us believes we have tamed – in the end, only the luckiest of us manage to survive them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi Schools In Najafgarh, Malviya Nagar Receive Bomb Threat Emails
Delhi Schools In Najafgarh, Malviya Nagar Receive Bomb Threat Emails

News18

time30 minutes ago

  • News18

Delhi Schools In Najafgarh, Malviya Nagar Receive Bomb Threat Emails

Last Updated: Two schools in Delhi's Najafgarh and Malviya Nagar received bomb threats via email on Wednesday, prompting a swift police response. Two schools in Delhi, one in Najafgarh and another in Malviya Nagar, received bomb threats through email on Wednesday morning. The Delhi Police immediately swung into action, pressing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) into place. Security teams rushed to both schools, cordoned off the premises, and began detailed checks. view comments First Published: August 20, 2025, 07:52 IST News india Delhi Schools In Najafgarh, Malviya Nagar Receive Bomb Threat Emails Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...

How CBI case against Arvind Kejriwal ex-aide hit a wall in approver's bank locker
How CBI case against Arvind Kejriwal ex-aide hit a wall in approver's bank locker

Indian Express

time4 hours ago

  • Indian Express

How CBI case against Arvind Kejriwal ex-aide hit a wall in approver's bank locker

It started with a raid nearly a decade ago. On December 15, 2015, sleuths from the CBI searched the office and residence of former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's ex-Principal Secretary Rajendra Kumar in a case related to the award of contracts worth Rs 9.5 crore between 2007 and 2014 to a private company in alleged violation of rules. The CBI also searched 14 locations linked to eight other accused in this case. Among the accused was A K Duggal, who was a managing director at the time of Intelligent Communication Systems India Limited (ICSIL), a PSU through which the contracts under probe were allegedly awarded to Endeavour Systems Pvt Ltd (ESPL). While Duggal was initially an accused, he was granted a pardon by a Delhi Court in November 2016 after the CBI named him an approver. Along with the houses and offices raided, the CBI also searched the bank lockers of all the accused. While the contents of the lockers of all accused persons were eventually made known to the court and to the other accused, what was found inside Duggal's locker still remains a mystery. 'What was in the locker?' Special Judge Manisha Khurana Kakkar, who is hearing the corruption case at Rouse Avenue Court, asked the CBI on July 22 — close to a decade after the case was lodged. 'We don't know, your honour,' came the response of the CBI's counsel. The judge asked the CBI to clarify whether the missing material was 'untraceable'. 'Otherwise, the matter won't proceed further,' she said. Issuing notice for the Investigating Officer to appear, the judge listed the matter for August 26. Court records trace the locker mystery back to 2015 when the CBI submitted a compliance report before the court mentioning that they had seized a 'stainless locker key of a locker maintained at SBI Civil Lines' from the accused Kumar's residence. A similar search conducted at Duggal's residence resulted in two locker keys being found: 'one Locker Key of Canara Bank, Vikas Puri' and another 'Locker Key No. 20756 of State Bank of Patiala, near Janak Cinema Hall, Janak Puri', the agency said. Records show that the mystery unfolded in a series of court hearings: September 2018: The CBI told the court that they were preparing a list of 'un-relied' documents — ie, records not used by the prosecution to build its case but can be accessed by the accused. July 2019: Advocates Rahul Tyagi and Mathew M Philip, who represented Kumar, asked for a list of 'un-relied' documents and a list of all witnesses whose statements were recorded during investigation. April 2022: The court directed the CBI to supply a list of 'un-relied' documents, holding that the accused were 'entitled for the same'. August 2022: The court took on record the list of 'un-relied' documents. In Duggal's case, this included printouts of emails, a debit card intimation, a vehicle insurance certificate, bank documents, receipts of purchase of jewellery, such as diamonds, and a duplicate vehicle registration. What was allegedly found in his bank locker was not mentioned. February 2023: Kumar's counsel approached the court, this time seeking a copy of the compliance report of all the searches and seizures done by the CBI. November 2024: The court directed the CBI to provide a copy of the report — it had no mention of the 'locker operation memo', a record of the contents of Duggal's bank locker. May 8, 2025: Kumar's counsel contended that the absence of the 'locker operation memo' in the CBI's compliance report cast 'a shadow on whether due process was followed by the IO during investigation'. In its reply, the CBI told the court: 'Locker Operation Memos… as seized from the residence of Shri A K Duggal on 15.12.2015 are not traceable despite thorough searches. It is submitted that the aforesaid two locker keys pertaining to Shri A K Duggal have already been returned to him.' The reply further stated that locker operation memos pertaining to all the other accused had been provided. In three of these lockers, nothing had been found, the CBI told the court. It further stated that the original IO who was investigating the case had retired from service and subsequent IOs had left the CBI. '…no articles were seized and the aforesaid both keys pertaining to Shri A K Duggal had already been returned to him…As such, there was no mention of the Locker Operation Memo in the list of un-relied documents. There was nothing intentional for not mentioning the Locker Operation Memo in the list of un-relied documents…the accused Petitioner is lingering the matter by filing such baseless petitions,' the CBI's reply said. On July 22, the CBI counsel told the court: 'The locker operation memo is not part of relied or un-relied upon documents.' It was at this juncture that the judge decided to pause and call for the IO to be present at the next date. The case is significant for the CBI because it was among the first allegations of corruption that was levelled against Kejriwal's aides by the Centre at the time. Rajendra Kumar, a 1989-batch IAS officer who was described by the CBI as the 'kingpin' of the alleged scam, was arrested in July 2016 and later granted bail. The chargesheet in the case was filed in December 2016. According to the CBI, the alleged scam led to a loss of Rs 12 crore for the Delhi government. ESPL, the agency alleged, was a 'front company' floated by Kumar in 2006 along with his purported 'schoolmate' Ashok Kumar. The private firm, along with its directors Sandeep Kumar and Dinesh Gupta, was also named as accused. When contacted, Rahul Tyagi, counsel for Rajendra Kumar, asserted that 'the only plausible reason for not disclosing what was found in the lockers of Duggal is that had these been disclosed, no court would have allowed Duggal to become an approver'. 'It is a travesty that the person, who has awarded the contracts, is a witness and a highly decorated and honest officer like Rajendra Kumar, against whom nothing incriminating has been found, has been made an accused,' Tyagi said.

Cop jailed for wasting Delhi court's time
Cop jailed for wasting Delhi court's time

Hindustan Times

time5 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Cop jailed for wasting Delhi court's time

A Delhi court on Tuesday sent a Delhi Police sub inspector to jail for wasting the court's time and not paying an amount of ₹10,000 for cancelling a bailable warrant issued against him. A Delhi court on Tuesday sent a Delhi Police sub inspector to jail for wasting the court's time Special judge (Pocso) Ramesh Kumar passed the order while presiding over an application moved by sub inspector Sandeep Rawal of Kalyanpuri police station, requesting cancelling of a bailable warrant issued against him earlier in the day after he failed to appear before the court during the prosecution examination stage of a Pocso trial. In his defence, the officer later appeared in person and told the court that he had gone to the Saket court to file a supplementary chargesheet in connection with another case lodged at Govindpuri police station. Therefore, he could not attend the proceedings. The court said, 'Despite service of warrant, IO (investigating officer) did not appear before this court, rather he had gone to other court to file supplementary chargesheet'. The judge said that the conduct of the IO showed that he has no regard for the process of the court and that there was no sufficient ground to cancel the warrant. However, the court said the warrant may be cancelled subject to payment of an amount of ₹10,000. The IO then told the court that he will have to go to an ATM to get the money. At around 3pm, the court noted that despite giving time to the IO to fetch the money, he didn't get the amount. The court noted, 'Despite taking time from the court to pay the amount of bailable warrant, IO has not paid the amount of bailable warrant. He has wasted the time of the court.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store