logo
Why The Russian Earthquake Caused A Weaker Tsunami Plus 4 Other Facts

Why The Russian Earthquake Caused A Weaker Tsunami Plus 4 Other Facts

Forbes4 days ago
An 8.8 magnitude earthquake was a major hazard in Russia this week. Scientists believe it is the most powerful earthquake in the Kamchatka Peninsula in over seventy years. The quake also prompted tsunami warnings throughout the Pacific region, but thankfully, it was weaker than expected. Over my three decades as an atmospheric scientist, I have noticed a lot of interest and misunderstanding about tsunamis. Here are five things that you should know about them, including expert analysis on why the recent once was rather muted.
They Are Not Weather Phenomena
As a meteorologist, I am often asked about tsunamis by the media and the public. I think the word 'tsunami' sounds meteorological to many people. However, tsunamis are geologic and oceanographic hazards. What is a tsunami anyhow? The NOAA Tsunami Warning Center website stated, 'It is a series of extremely long waves (multiple waves tens-to-hundreds of miles between crests) caused by a large and sudden displacement of the ocean.' That displacement of the ocean is typically caused by an earthquake, landslides or volcanic eruption. The site went on to say, 'Tsunamis radiate outward in all directions from the point of origin and can move across entire ocean basins. When they reach the coast, they can cause dangerous coastal flooding and powerful currents that can last for several hours or days.'
How This Tsunami Ranks Historically
The memes have already started on social media as many people perceived that the tsunami threat did not match the level of warnings. I am of the 'better safe than sorry' mentality when it comes to hazards, but I digress. Previous strong earthquakes in that region have generated significant tsunami hazards. Because of its location in the ring of fire, the region is known for earthquakes. In fact, the fifth strongest earthquake in history (magnitude 9.0) happened there in 1952. Two weeks ago, Kamchatka had a magnitude 7.4 earthquake, according to Science News. Preliminarily, this earthquake ranks as the sixth strongest of all time, according to the BBC.
In this seismic hot spot, the dense Pacific Plate is trying to thrust itself beneath the North American Plate. Geologists have referred to this particularly tremor as a 'megathrust earthquake." Earthquakes Canada website defined that type of seismic activity as, 'A very large earthquake that occurs in a subduction zone, a region where one of the earth's tectonic plates is thrust under another.'
Why The Recent Tsunami Was Relatively Weak
A tsunami certainly happened, but why was it relatively muted? Gauges in Hawaii measured wave heights in the 4 to 5 feet range. U.S. Geological Survey expert Rich Briggs told Science News writer Nikk Ogasa, 'To push a big wave all the way across the Pacific, you really need a monster source, and this one is just knocking on the door of that.' Other factors that may have suppressed the tsunami include seafloor characteristics, coastline attributes, and the interaction of waves.
University of Southhampton expert Lisa McNeill told the BBC, "The height of the tsunami wave is also affected by local shapes of the seafloor near the coast and the [shape]
of the land where it arrives." Some studies have shown that if the quake is at shallow depth the tsunami is larger than if the shock is deeper. McNeill also said that with this earthquake, warning models may have been conservative with the depth information.
They Don't Look Like Large Breaking Waves At The Coast
According to NASA, 'Between 1998 and 2017, the global death toll from tsunamis exceeded 250,000, according to the WHO. 227,000 of those deaths came from the devastating Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004.' Perceived risk from a tsunami can vary because of dangerous misperceptions about them.
I often use the visual of throwing a rock in a pond and watching waves ripple away from the center as an analogy to a tsunami. However, with a tsunami, the waves are traveling beneath the water. It becomes apparent when it reaches a coastline. NOAA noted, 'When a tsunami reaches the coast, it may look like a fast-rising flood, or a wall of water (bore). Its appearance may differ at different points along a coast. It will not look like a normal wind wave.' One dangerous misperception is that tsunamis will look like large breaking waves seen at surf competitions. That misperception is also associated with hurricane storm surge. NOAA cautioned, 'Sometimes, before the water rushes on land, it will suddenly recede, showing the ocean floor, reefs, and fish like a very low, low tide.'
Multiple Observation Systems And Models Track And Predict Tsunamis
So how do scientists track and predict tsunamis? The Tsunami Warning Centers uses seismic networks to determine magnitude, depth, location, and other earthquake characteristics. Water-level networks such as the Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunami (DART) system and a system of coastal water-level stations detect changes in water level. Satellites with special altimetry instruments can also detect subtle changes in wave heights from space.
In the same way that meteorologists like me use numerical models to predict changes in the atmospheric fluid in time (a forecast), scientists feed information about earthquake magnitude, depth, and location into forecast models to predict tsunami motion across the ocean and potential coastal impacts. Information from seismic and water-level networks are important to the forecast models. For more information on the warning, watch and advisory messaging process, the NOAA Tsunami Warning Center FAQ page is a great resource.
There Are Meteotsunamis, But They Are Different
By the way I joked earlier about people asking meteorologists about tsunamis. There is actually something called a meteotsunami. I wrote about one in Florida many years ago. Meteotsunamis are caused abrupt jumps in atmospheric pressure often associated with strong weather fronts or other mesocale storm systems.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are Potatoes Healthy? 3 Surprising Benefits, From Fiber to Antioxidants
Are Potatoes Healthy? 3 Surprising Benefits, From Fiber to Antioxidants

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Are Potatoes Healthy? 3 Surprising Benefits, From Fiber to Antioxidants

Potatoes are the most commonly consumed vegetable in the U.S., yet they often get a bad rap. Most are eaten the form of fries or chips, so many people consider them an unhealthy food. It doesn't have to be that way. Eating one medium-size potato a day can be part of a healthy diet and doesn't increase cardiometabolic risk — the chances of having diabetes, heart disease or stroke — as long as the potato is steamed or baked, and prepared without adding too much salt or saturated fat, research shows. One 2020 study found that consuming non-fried potatoes also led to higher potassium and fiber intake compared to eating refined grains, like white rice, white bread or pasta. 'Certainly eating chips or french fries should be discouraged, but there are healthy ways to prepare potatoes, so I do think that lumping them all together is a little bit unfair to the poor potato,' Emily Johnston, Ph.D., study co-author, told in 2020. 'We don't want people to fear the potato, but we want to make sure that they eat it in a healthful way and in a controlled portion size.' Research on Potatoes and Health For the 2020 study, researchers looked at the effect of eating potatoes every day, compared to eating the same number of calories in refined grains. They recruited 50 healthy adults, whose baseline blood pressure and arterial stiffness were measured at the start of the study, and whose blood samples were checked for fasting glucose, cholesterol, insulin and other markers. Those checks were repeated throughout the study. The participants were then randomly assigned to replace their usual main meal starchy side dish with a study side dish: either 200 calories worth of potatoes or refined grains, as prepared by the Metabolic Diet Study Center at Penn State. They ate this way every day for four weeks. After a break of at least two weeks, they switched to the opposite study side dish, eating it with their main meal every day for a month. Potato side dishes consisted of steamed or baked red, white and gold spuds. Refined grain options included Spanish rice, pasta, garlic bread and naan, Johnston, who is now a research assistant professor in NYU's department of medicine, said. All were prepared with minimal added salt, saturated fat or sugar, though some ingredients were minimally added for taste, including scallions, onions, breadcrumbs and cheese. There was no evidence eating potatoes increased fasting glucose levels, and there was no difference in cholesterol, insulin or other markers, the authors noted. All in all, there were no adverse cardiometabolic consequences. 'We certainly want people to eat more non-starchy vegetables because we know the average American intake is well below recommendations,' Johnston said. 'But starchy vegetables and refined grains do contribute some important nutrition as well. It's just that we need to make sure we eat them in balance.' The Alliance for Potato Research and Education, a non-profit funded by the potato industry, provided money for the study, but didn't have any say in any aspects of it, the authors wrote. Potatoes Nutrition According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, one medium potato contains: 100 calories 26 grams carbohydrates 2 grams of fiber 3 grams of protein 0 grams of fat 1 gram of sugar 620 milligrams of potassium (18% DV) 40 milligrams vitamin C (45% DV) Health Benefits of Potatoes Potatoes are high in many vitamins and minerals and when prepared by steaming, baking or roasting with the skin on, they can be a more nutritious option than refined carbs, research has found. Potassium Potatoes are a rich source of potassium, which is important for blood pressure regulation, but most Americans don't get enough of in their diet, Johnston said. Almost half of adults in the U.S. have hypertension, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In Johnston's 2020 study, the participants' potassium was significantly higher when they ate potatoes, compared to refined grains Their diet quality was also higher, driven by a higher vegetable intake. Fiber White potatoes can pack in a surprising amount of fiber when eaten with the skin on. A medium potato with the skin on can have 2-4 grams of fiber, according to Mayo Clinic. The fiber is both soluble and insoluble, meaning it both feeds the good bacteria in the gut and helps keep you regular. Vitamin C A medium potato can have 20-40 milligrams of vitamin C, almost half of the daily recommended amount, according to Cleveland Clinic. Your body doesn't produce vitamin C so you need to get it from your diet. This micronutrient is an antioxidant that can reduce risk of disease, boost the immune system and increase collagen production, per UCLA Health. The Healthiest Ways to Eat Potatoes Make potatoes a side dish composing about one-fourth of your whole plate, Fernstrom advised. Be careful about the portion size: One medium potato is about the size of a computer mouse, Johnston noted. Restaurant baked potatoes can be much bigger, so consider eating half. Stick to baking, roasting or steaming: Boiling potatoes doesn't add any calories or fat, but it leaches potassium out of them. Frying is a nutritional deal-breaker. Whether you bake or microwave, keep the skin on to optimize the nutrients and fiber. Skip the extras: Don't load your potato up with butter, sour cream or bacon bits. Go easy on the salt. This article was originally published on

Mass. researchers test transcranial ultrasound to explore consciousness
Mass. researchers test transcranial ultrasound to explore consciousness

Axios

timea day ago

  • Axios

Mass. researchers test transcranial ultrasound to explore consciousness

A team of MIT researchers is exploring the depths of our consciousness — with help from ultrasounds for your brain. Why it matters: The experiments could one day help scientists find non-invasive ways to treat depression, PTSD, brain tumors and other conditions. Driving the news: MIT Lincoln Labs, a U.S. Department of Defense-funded research and development center in Lexington, recently received a low-intensity focused ultrasound from the company Openwater — the latest tool of its kind it'll use in its ongoing consciousness research. Lincoln Labs and labs on campus plan to launch experiments in the next year using the device on humans to analyze which neurons fire to stimulate vision and, ultimately, pain, pending university approval, says Daniel Freeman, a research scientist at Lincoln Labs. The intrigue: There's the goal to analyze how it could help understand or treat PTSD and mood disorders in veterans, and then there's the existential question that stumps neuroscientists — how does our human experience arise from brain activity? "I mean, some matter moves around in your head, and you feel something," Freeman tells Axios. "That remains a total mystery, and it's barely being studied." How it works: The Openwater device goes on someone's head like a headband, and the device directs the sound beams to hit a specific part of the brain. It's not the only transcranial focused ultrasound around, but it has a unique design and an ease with which the software processes MRI scans to direct the beams to the right spot. Zoom out: Transcranial ultrasounds have already been found to reduce micro clots in long-COVID patients (per an Openwater experiment) and even opiate addiction cravings. Openwater's leaders foresee the device one day being used by doctors to inject treatments into specific areas of the brain without surgery or using sound beams to treat certain brain conditions. What they're saying: "It's a great way to non-invasively aim this beam deep into the brain to affect research or even for medical treatments," says Scott Smith, vice president of community development at Openwater. What's next: Lincoln Labs plans to start with healthy subjects in its experiments with the Openwater device, and their findings may have larger implications for people with mood disorders or other conditions, including veterans with PTSD.

Russian 8.8 magnitude earthquake hit on 'megathrust fault'
Russian 8.8 magnitude earthquake hit on 'megathrust fault'

USA Today

time2 days ago

  • USA Today

Russian 8.8 magnitude earthquake hit on 'megathrust fault'

SINGAPORE - The 8.8 magnitude quake off Russia that triggered tsunami warnings across the Pacific occurred on what is known as a "megathrust fault", where the denser Pacific Plate is sliding underneath the lighter North American Plate, scientists said. The Pacific Plate has been on the move, making the Kamchatka Peninsula area off Russia's Far East coast, where it struck, especially vulnerable to such tremors - and bigger aftershocks cannot be ruled out, they said. With its epicentre near the city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, it was the largest earthquake since the devastating Tohoku event in 2011, which caused a tsunami that led to the meltdown of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. "The Kamchatka seismic zone is one of the most active subduction zones around the Pacific Ring of Fire, and the Pacific Plate is moving westwards at around 80 mm (3 inches) per year," said Roger Musson, honorary research fellow at the British Geological Survey. "Subduction" events, in which one plate pushes under another, are capable of generating far stronger earthquakes than "strike slips", such as the one that hit Myanmar in March, where plates brush horizontally against one another at different speeds. The Kamchatka area is particularly vulnerable and experienced a magnitude 9 event in November 1952, wiping out the town of Severo-Kurilsk and causing extensive damage as far away as Hawaii, Musson told Reuters. Shallow "megathrust" events are more likely to cause tsunamis because they burst through the sea floor and displace huge volumes of water. Tsunami Risks With a relatively shallow depth of 20.7 km (13 miles), the earthquake on Wednesday, July 30 was always going to create such tsunami risks, experts said. "It is an offshore earthquake, and when you have offshore earthquakes, there is the potential for tsunamis," said Adam Pascal, chief scientist at Australia's Seismology Research Centre. "If you have a relatively shallow earthquake, it is more likely to rupture the surface of the ocean floor," he told Reuters. "We've seen in some cases you can have large earthquakes like this and not cause a tsunami because they are too deep and the shearing doesn't express itself at the surface." Tsunami waves of around 1.7 metres (5.5 feet) reached as far as Hawaii, less high than originally expected, but scientists warned that such waves do not have to be especially big to do damage to the relatively low-lying coastlines of Pacific island nations. Parts of French Polynesia were told to brace for waves as high as 4 metres (13 ft). The impact of a tsunami depends on its "run-up" as it approaches coastlines, Pascal said. "If you have a very long, shallow run-up to the coast, a lot of the energy can be dissipated over that run-up, but if it is a very steep shelf before you get to the coast, the wave height can be higher," he said. Foreshocks and Aftershocks July 30's quake has already triggered at least 10 aftershocks above magnitude 5, and they could continue for months, said Caroline Orchiston, director of the Centre for Sustainability at the University of Otago in New Zealand. "This demonstrates that large-magnitude earthquakes generate aftershock sequences that start immediately, and some of these can be damaging in their own right," she said. The 8.8 magnitude event came less than two weeks after a magnitude 7.4 earthquake in the same area, which has now been identified as a "foreshock." "Earthquakes by their nature are unpredictable," said Pascal. "There are no precursors that are scientifically consistent in earthquake sequences. Before this morning, those other ones were the main shocks." Bigger aftershocks cannot entirely be ruled out, he added, but their magnitude and frequency normally tend to decrease over time. "You can expect large aftershocks to continue for some time, but the frequency of large, damaging events will reduce as time goes on," he said. "There is always a chance of a larger event, but that larger event will usually occur relatively soon after, within days or weeks."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store