
‘Sheridan's arguments are very, very wrong,' says Sophie Toscan du Plantier family in shock new claims as film premieres
THE family of Sophie Toscan du Plantier have said an Irish filmmaker's 'arguments' about her murder are 'totally wrong' and 'complete fantasy'.
They also fear a new movie inspired by the
Advertisement
6
Ian Bailey was arrested over Sophie's murder at her holiday home
Credit: AFP
6
Sophie was murdered on December 23, 1996, near Schull in Co Cork
Credit: PA
6
Jim Sheridan's new film, Re-Creation, premiered in New York earlier this month
Credit: Getty
Jim Sheridan's new film, Re-Creation, premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York earlier this month.
He said that it was not intended to cause any distress to the Toscan du Plantier family, adding: 'I'm not trying to upset them, I'm not trying to do anything to them.'
Advertisement
But he says there's not a 'shred of evidence' against
The 39-year-old had suffered brutal injuries in a gruesome killing that shocked both Ireland and France.
The
A French court convicted Bailey in absentia in 2019, but he was never extradited over there after the High
Advertisement
Sophie's uncle Jean-Pierre Gazeau insists he does not want to react to everything Sheridan says.
But in an interview with The Irish Sun, Jean-Pierre said on one occasion he spoke to Sheridan, who told him about a 'scenario' and he insisted it was 'complete fantasy.'
He explained that the problem with Sheridan's movie is that it will be watched by many people not aware of the evidence against Bailey.
Jean-Pierre told us: 'Many people are going to listen to him, agree with him, but without any deep knowledge of the investigation file.
'A LOT OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE'
'There was a very high level of circumstantial evidence against Bailey. There is no direct proof like DNA, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence.
Advertisement
'I think, to some extent, we cannot at all agree with the current behaviour of Jim Sheridan.'
Two investigations remain ongoing in Ireland, one by a local team of
Jean-Pierre went on: 'Jim Sheridan has his own opinion. Of course, we completely disagree. We disagree about the fact he's made a movie while there are still investigations continuing in Ireland.
'There are two teams, you know, and they are really doing a lot of work. So I think the most reasonable attitude would be to wait.
'We heard arguments given by Sheridan many times, which are wrong, totally wrong.'
Advertisement
Jean-Pierre pointed towards the interviewing of Sophie's estranged husband Daniel and also that a witness in the case, Marie Farrell, had not been called over for the French proceedings.
Ms Farrell claimed that she saw Bailey at Kealfadda Bridge near the murder scene on the night in question. But she later retracted statements given to gardai.
'IT'S NOT TRUE'
Jean-Pierre added: 'When Jim Sheridan says that Daniel Toscan du Plantier was never interviewed by the Gardai, it's not true.
'He went to Ireland to be interviewed by the Gardai in 1998, so it's completely wrong.
'Another example is when he says that during the French trial, the French justice had to invite Marie Farrell to give her statement. It was the role of the defence to invite her as a witness. So it's completely wrong.'
Advertisement
Jean-Pierre explained that, to 'some extent', the question of who killed Sophie was solved in 2019 at the French trial.
But he insists it was the 'responsibility' of Bailey himself and Irish authorities to extradite him to defend himself in fresh proceedings.
He said: 'If Bailey had been expelled to come to France, he would have had the right of a new trial with a full defence.'
Sheridan said the new movie, which stars Aidan Gillen and Colm Meaney, will reveal new info about Sophie's death.
6
Sophie's uncle Jean-Pierre Gazeau insists he does not want to react to everything Sheridan says
Credit: PA
Advertisement
6
Sheridan said the new movie, which stars Aidan Gillen and Colm Meaney, will reveal new info about Sophie's death
Credit: PR Handout image
6
Sophie was murdered at the house in 1996
Credit: Arthur Edwards / The Sun

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Killers Tom and Molly Martens can now live and travel freely as parole terms come to end
Killer father and daughter Tom and Molly Martens have officially concluded their parole terms following their release from prison for the voluntary manslaughter of Irish businessman Jason Corbett.


Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Why a smartphone ban in schools must be properly explored
The incident came a month after a teenager killed a student in a similar incident at a school in Nantes. The French government is blaming harmful content on social media and Macron says France can't wait any longer to ban social media for children under 15. Easier said than done though as even a European heavyweight will have to take on EU regulators, privacy rights groups, social media platforms – and the ingenuity of kids. Netflix series Adolescence, which looked at the dangers posed by the internet on impressionable teenagers, has sparked a debate about a clampdown in the UK and Ireland. Tánaiste Simon Harris recently floated the idea of a ban on under-16s using social media here, citing an Australian law set to do so from November. Given Ireland is home to the headquarters of many major tech firms, it remains to be seen if the Government has the bottle to take on such a powerful lobby. Into this dynamic comes research from CyberSafeKids on the prevalence of smartphones with internet and social media access among schoolchildren. More than half of eight-year-olds from disadvantaged areas now own a smartphone – twice the rate of eight-year-olds from wealthier backgrounds. And kids from poorer backgrounds have a higher level of exposure to harm than those in better-off districts. The exposure of young children to social media is also highlighted. More than nine out of 10 eight-year-olds from disadvantaged areas have created a social media account, which is well above the seven out of 10 from middle-class areas. Almost a third of primary-school pupils aged eight to 12 in Deis schools have posted videos of themselves online. Three in 10 have experienced cyber bullying, while four in 10 have public accounts on social media and almost a third say they play over-18s games. A previous study from the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) drew similar socioeconomic conclusions. But it also found kids who own a phone at nine perform less well in school tests at age 13. Mobile-phone ownership at such a young age was an individually identifiable factor in lower school performance, outside 'many of the factors which typically influence test scores such as socioeconomic class'. The research suggests awareness programmes on the damage mobile phone and social-media usage causes to children is not reaching all sectors of society. Regardless of the gap between rich and poor, these research papers illustrate the grip the tech sector has on our children. Measures such as the funding for mobile phone pouches for schools is a start. Policies to push individual schools towards limits on phone usage can also develop while still allowing schools to be independent. Keeping smartphones out of the schoolyard is a priority.


Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Life Hack: The signs of some common scams you should know about
Unfortunately, online scams have become a persistant problem of modern life. While you may think yourself savvy, others in your life may fall for 'obvious' scams, and other more sophisticated techniques may catch you unawares. If you or someone you know have been the victim of a scam, you should report it to your local Garda station, and use the online reporting service of the website or forum on which you were scammed, if applicable. Bring copies of all emails, account details, and any other relevant information you may have to the gardaí. Retailer Chums has shared some of the biggest scams that impact Irish people and the signs to know that show someone has fallen victim to a scam. Unexpected messages Fake bank alerts, unfamiliar login notifications, or missed delivery notifications about parcels you didn't order can often try to lead you into giving personal details or making a small payment. These phishing scams can use your data to create false accounts or make larger payment withdrawals using your bank details. Always contact the bank or business directly to confirm if the message is legitimate. Contest wins Have you received a 'you're a winner' message for a competition you don't remember entering? This is most likely a scam designed to steal your personal information or social media login details. If you receive a notification like this, check your previous emails and/or messages to confirm if you actually entered a competition — and if you can't find a record of entering, it is best to ignore these messages. Browser pop-ups Most internet users are familiar with pop-ups warning of computer infections and slow performances, or, again, competition wins. It is best to ignore browser pop-ups. Clearing your cache, history, and cookies will help remove them and you can take your device to a trusted device repair shop if the issue persists. Unusual online adverts Spotted an advert with a deal that's too good to be true? It probably is. Online ads that offer products at unusually low price could be promoting fake websites designed to steal your payment information. Instead, look for products on trusted and familiar sites, and always ensure you are ordering from the official site – not a dupe or scam site. 'Mammy' texting from an unknown number Some scammers will play on emotions, particularly the urge to help friends and family in trouble. Often, scammers will send feigned messages of distress asking for financial help, including some sophisticated scams that involve cloning voices and deepfake videos. Before replying, check that the messages are legitimate by contacting that person on their usual number, on social media, or through another loved one. Unusual links If you see a friend or family member sharing a strange link on social media, either in a post or direct message, their account may have been hacked. Never click on the link and instead contact them directly through a different channel, such. Send a text message or make a phone call, to confirm if they sent the link. Flag these messages or posts to the social media platform too. Putting on the pressure Scammers often use urgency to pressure their targets into making immediate decisions, hoping to prevent them from thinking clearly. Legitimate businesses and organisations will never rush you. If a business or caller is trying to pressure you, tell them you will call them back and end the call. Contact a trusted person or organisation to confirm if the caller is legitimate. Generic greetings in emails Any email that does not attempt to use your name is something to be suspicious of, especially if they are trying to make claims about your banking or services. Scammers will often use titles and address you as 'Sir' or 'Madam' instead of using your name. Legitimate organisations, especially your bank or service providers, will typically know your name. Never give away your personal information to these individuals, and if they cannot confirm your identity contact the organisation they are claiming to be directly, and check if the call is genuine. Attempts to isolate you If you're contacted by a scammer, and when you try to speak to someone else, such as a friend or family member, scammers will typically try to keep you on the phone or prevent you from discussing the situation with others. This is a major red flag. Never hesitate to consult with a trusted friend or family member before making any decisions, and feel confident in ending calls and contacting the organisation they claim to be directly, using a number or email from their official website. Read More Life Hack: How to avoid injuring yourself while doing DIY jobs at home