Didn't order closure of 'Kabutarkhanas', says Bombay HC, 'but people's health is important'
Bombay High Court
on Thursday said it had not passed any order directing the closure of '
Kabutarkhanas
' (pigeon-feeding spots) in the city, but only refrained from staying the closure order of the municipal corporation.
A committee of experts can study whether the old Kabutarkhanas in the city should continue, but "
human life
is of paramount importance", it said.
"If something affects the larger health of senior citizens and kids, then it should be looked into. There has to be a balance," the court said.
Earlier this week, sheets were placed covering the Kabutarkhanas in the city, leading to protests.
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis
had then claimed that the Kabutarkhanas were closed following the high court's order.
A bench of Justices G S Kulkarni and Arif Doctor on Thursday clarified that it had not passed any order.
"It was the BMC's (
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation
) decision (to close Kabutarkhanas) which was challenged before us. We did not pass any order. We only did not grant any interim relief," the HC said.
But the judges also noted that human health is of paramount importance and concern, and it would consider appointing a committee of experts to study the issue and submit recommendations to the government.
"We are only concerned about
public health
. These are public places where thousands of people are residing....There has to be a balance. There are few who want to feed (pigeons). It is for the government to now take a decision. There is nothing adversarial in this," the bench said.
It was for the government and BMC to take an informed decision to ensure that the constitutional rights of every citizen are upheld and not just those of a few interested individuals, it added.
"All medical reports point at irreversible damage caused by pigeons. Human life is of paramount importance," the HC said.
The court was not an expert to decide the issue, and hence a scientific study needs to be conducted before any decision is taken, it stated.
Posting the matter for further hearing on August 13, the HC asked the Advocate General of Maharashtra to remain present, so that an order setting up an expert committee could be passed.
There is a wealth of medical material that needs to be looked into and the court is not an expert to examine the same, it said, adding that an expert committee can decide if the BMC's decision was right.
"Hence, in our opinion, the state can consider appointing a committee as it is the guardian and custodian of public health and of the citizens," HC added.
If the committee opines that the BMC's decision was right, then a suitable alternative for the birds can be looked into, it further said.
The court was hearing a bunch of petitions filed by people who feed pigeons challenging the civic body's decision to ban such feeding and close Kabutarkhanas.
The high court had last month refused any interim relief to the petitioners, but asked the authorities to not demolish any heritage Kabutarkhanas. PTI
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Dr. Payal Tadvi suicide: HC slams Maha govt over SPP removal, seeks to know if he wishes to return
The Bombay High Court on Monday questioned the Maharashtra government over the manner in which erstwhile Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Pradip Gharat was removed from the trial in the case related suicide of Dr Payal Tadvi in 2019, allegedly due to harassment by her seniors. The court asked the government lawyer to check with Gharat and inform if he was willing to come back to represent the state as SPP in the case. A bench of Justices Ravindra V Ghuge and Gautam Ankhad was hearing plea by Abeda Tadvi, mother of late Payal, who had challenged the March 7, 2025 notification issued by state law and judiciary department that removed Gharat as SPP with immediate effect and appointed another lawyer Mahesh Mule. The mother alleged that the decision was 'arbitrary and illegal' and will lead to delay in trial and risk of losing crucial evidence' and violative of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Payal's three seniors at TN Topiwala National Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital Dr Bhakti Mehare, Dr Ankita Khandelwal and Dr Hema Ahuja are named as accused in the case. Gharat in February had filed an application before sessions court to add the then head of gynaecology department at the Hospital Dr Yi Ching Ling as accused for overlooking the harassment and ragging complaint by Tadvi. The trial court on February 28 ordered Ling's addition as an accused in abetment of suicide case. 'It is very easy to say that the public has great trust in the judiciary. These are testing times These are examples where it is tested. Now the impression of the petitioner is, for some reason, because Mr. Gharat acted strictly, he was removed. When order comes in your favour, Gharat is back and when order is adverse, Gharat is removed,' Justice Ghuge orally remarked. Additional Public Prosecutor (APP) SV Gavand for the government submitted that the state government was well within its right and domain to take a decision of removal and claimed that Gharat's appointment too was made by state on its own and not at the mother's instance. However, advocate Lara Jesai for the petitioner mother denied the same and submitted that she too had filed an application for his appointment. The bench expressed displeasure over the justification given by the government to remove Gharat as SPP and said that the same was 'not in a good taste'. The judges questioned the government lawyer, 'Gharat is a seasoned prosecutor. Such a senior advocate who has worked so hard for the state, got you (state government) so many convictions… He put so much hard work in that journalist's (J Dey murder) case. That time he was nice… Entire trial was conducted by him and you got a conviction for nine accused. Who is this officer who writes like this? Therefore, the petitioner wants us to scrutinise the decision (to remove Gharat as SPP) because her faith in the law is shaken.' 'We know it is in your domain but should be done judiciously,' the HC remarked. 'Show him what is written (justification for removal) and make an impression whether he would want to come back,' it told APP Gavand. The court also sought to know who had made an application for Gharat's removal as SPP in January, and along with the file of such correspondence and posted further hearing to August 13.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Straying from reason
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. Why two-judge SC bench directions on street dogs urgently need a close second look by top court Monday's Supreme Court direction on stray dogs raises several troubling questions. First, parts of the directives issued by the bench contradict existing rules. Animal Birth Control rules, under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, clearly state that strays cannot be relocated. Various SC orders, including one passed recently, have upheld these rules. There's an existing advisory from the Animal Welfare Board on this. For another SC bench to direct authorities to 'forget the rules' is extraordinary. One of the top court's key roles is to ensure rules are followed. Parenthetically, let's note that, as reported by TOI on Monday, an earlier order by the same SC bench criticising HC judges drew the disapproval of CJI Gavai and Justice Surya Kant. Second, Monday's directives on strays are unimplementable. Animal welfare experts point out that for Delhi's strays, thousands of shelters will have to be built, in areas without human habitation. Land acquisition of this scale in a crowded city or in the wider NCR area will be impossible. Even assuming that's done, costs of building the shelters, training and employing thousands of people to run the shelters and feeding the strays will run into thousands of crores over time. Which authority is fiscally prepared to do this? The answer is obvious. That Delhi government ministers have said they will implement these directives means little. If ministers don't realise now the impossibility of the task, they will soon do so. Third, the issue that made the SC bench take suo motu notice of this case was rabies deaths. But forcible relocation of street dogs won't solve this. It will simply engender heart-breaking cruelty. The solution is upgrading Delhi's ABC centres that are mandated to perform sterilisation and immunisation. This is doable and for authorities, budget-wise affordable. SC has in recent past reviewed its own decisions – in the Bhushan steel case and the HC judges case mentioned earlier. The directives on stray dogs is a fit case for an urgent and close second look. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Maharashtra to revamp 60 prison libraries
Pune: Maharashtra government on Sunday announced that 60 prison libraries across the state will each receive a new bookcase and book rack. The initiative, aimed at fostering a reading culture among inmates and supporting their rehabilitation, will be executed under the Raja Rammohun Roy Library Foundation's (RRRLF) Matching Grant Scheme, in collaboration with the State Directorate of Libraries. Police-stand-guard-outside-the-high-security-Yerwada-Jail-where-Pakistan-born-Mohammed-Ajmal-Kasab-the-sole-surviving-gunman-of-the-2008-Mumbai-attacks-was-hanged-in-Pune-AFP The decision follows a proposal placed before the state library planning committee during its meeting on December 13, 2024, which explored ways to extend the benefits of RRRLF's schemes to libraries in Maharashtra. The furniture will be delivered to prison libraries in the coming weeks, said officials. 'Access to books can open a window to new perspectives, self-improvement, and a better future,' chief minister Devendra Fadnavis had said, adding that prison reforms must go hand-in-hand with opportunities for education and personal growth. The Raja Rammohun Roy Library Foundation, headquartered in Kolkata, is a central government institution that supports the development of public libraries across India through grants, infrastructure support, and literacy programmes. Its grant scheme enables state governments to receive funds for library development projects, with the cost shared between the state and the foundation. State library authorities have urged other public and community libraries in Maharashtra to apply for such schemes to enhance facilities, promote reading culture, and make libraries vibrant community spaces.
