
Before caste census, the first steps: how to count the OBCs, general category castes
Will Other Backward Classes (OBCs) be counted as per the Central or state lists? Should every caste group — even those in the general category — be counted separately?
These are the key questions before the government as it moves to operationalise its decision to include caste in the next Census, former officers involved with the Census exercise tell The Indian Express. The final decisions on these challenges, they add, will be 'political calls'.
Unlike the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), who are enumerated based on official lists notified under constitutional orders of 1950, there is no unified or single list for OBCs. The SC or ST lists, which currently include 1,170 SC castes and 890 ST communities, are periodically updated through parliamentary amendments.
In the case of the OBCs, two separate lists are maintained. The National Commission for Backward Classes has a Central list that is used for reservations in Central government jobs and educational institutions. Simultaneously, each state maintains its own OBC list that differs from — and is often more extensive than — the Central list.
The government now faces a critical choice: whether to limit OBC enumeration to the Central list of 2,650 communities or to expand the exercise by incorporating the various state lists — a decision that is as politically sensitive as it is administratively complex.
The second key question is whether caste enumeration should cover all castes, including those in the 'general category'. Currently, during the Census, SC and ST respondents specify their particular caste or tribe, which enumerators then match against pre-approved lists. However, the general category is enumerated as one single bloc.
The recent caste surveys done by Bihar and Telangana counted individual caste groups under the general category.
The Bihar caste survey counted 214 castes in total as per the state government list. This included 22 in the SC category and 32 and 30 in the ST and OBC groups, respectively. While 113 castes were identified as Extremely Backward Classes, seven were placed in the Upper Caste category .
In Telangana, the caste survey enumerated individual groups in the general or Other Castes (OC) category. While the findings of the survey placed the general category population in the state at 15.79% of the population, the full caste survey report, including a breakdown of specific dominant caste groups such as the Reddys, has not been released.
The state government has said it cannot disclose the Telangana numbers due to 'personal data protection guidelines.'
While carrying out the surveys in Bihar and Telangana, individuals were not asked for documents or proof of caste.
'The submission on caste was made purely on a voluntary basis. We believe that people do not lie about their caste, so we went by what they revealed,' said a senior official who was involved with the caste survey in Telangana.
The process and the timeframe
While the caste enumeration announcement might have given a boost to the BJP 's narrative of making big policy moves, the Congress and the Opposition are now asking for a timeframe for when the Census to which it is linked will finally be carried out. The last Census exercise was conducted in 2011.
Sources in the Registrar General and Census Commissioner's office say the process is expected to mirror the preparation undertaken for the 2020 Census, which was eventually suspended due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
By conservative estimates, the government will need at least six months of preparation before it can begin enumeration.
The first step is to issue a notification in the Official Gazette declaring its intent to conduct the Census. This must then be followed by similar notifications from all state governments — a process that could take up to two months. Once these are in place, the proforma for the house listing and population enumeration phases will have to be formally notified.
The suspended 2021 Census was set to be the first to use digital enumeration, with officials collecting data via electronic forms rather than pen and paper. With the inclusion of caste as one of the columns, the software will now need to be updated to include a new field for OBCs, along with a drop-down menu of sub-categories.
Enumerators will also need to be retrained, with many involved in the previous exercise now retiring. Training alone typically takes up to two months, sources said.
'Nearly 80% of the work will have to be done during the preparation phase. Only 20% is after data collection. The adoption of technology will significantly reduce the manual effort required to tabulate data, which earlier took months — sometimes years,' an officer said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Modi remains silent on Trump ceasefire claim: Rahul Gandhi in Bihar
Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi Friday while targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi claimed that US President Donald Trump has repeated '11 times that he compelled him (the PM) to surrender', referring to a ceasefire understanding with Pakistan after four days of hostilities. Addressing a Constitution-themed meeting in Rajgir, Nalanda, Gandhi said, 'Whenever we use little pressure on PM Modi, he caves in easily. You know he has the habit of surrendering. Trump has said at least 11 times that he compelled Narendra Modi to surrender. Narendra Modi did not say that Trump is not speaking the truth.' This was Gandhi's fifth visit to Bihar in the last five months. Regarding the caste census, Gandhi again batted for the Telangana model and vowed that the 50% quota cap 'barrier will be broken' in whichever part of the country his party came to power, and cited examples of Telangana and Karnataka, where his party is in power. Contrasting the 'two models of caste census', Gandhi said, 'In the BJP model, officers prepare the questionnaire from their offices. In the Telangana model, we took questions from over 3 lakh people belonging to SCs, STs, EBCs and OBCs.' Attacking the Chief Minister Nitish Kumar-led government, he said Bihar has become 'crime capital' of India from being the land of 'truth, justice and non-violence'. Santosh Singh is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express since June 2008. He covers Bihar with main focus on politics, society and governance. Investigative and explanatory stories are also his forte. Singh has 25 years of experience in print journalism covering Bihar, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka. ... Read More


The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Justice Janarthanam's moments of glory
Justice M.S. Janarthanam had, at least, experienced a few moments of glory in the last 20-odd years. After the Supreme Court, in July 2010, provided one year to Tamil Nadu to come out with justification along with quantifiable data for the continuance of the 69% reservation for Backward Classes (BC), Most Backward Classes (MBC) and Scheduled Castes (SCs)/Scheduled Tribes (STs), Justice Janarthanam, as the head of the State BC Commission, had authored a report in support of the quota scheme, as provided in the Tamil Nadu Act 45 of 1994. Exactly a year later, the then AIADMK regime, at a Cabinet meeting, adopted the findings of the report and decided that 'there cannot at all be any doubt regards the fixity of reservation of 50 per cent to Backward Classes, 18 per cent to Scheduled Castes and one per cent to Scheduled Tribes.' On the matter of 'creamy layer' among the BC and MBCs, his take was that though the 1994 law had been in existence for well over 17 years, the Lakshman Rekha line had not been crossed, warranting the application of 'creamy layer' exclusion.' This opinion was also accepted by the government. It continues to be in force. Nearly 20 years ago, when the demand was made for creating special reservation for Arunthathiyars within quota of reservation for SCs, the government had turned to Justice Janarthanam to consider it. In November 2008, he, as the head of a committee, submitted a report to the then DMK government that the representation of the Arunthathiyars in Groups A, B and C services under the State 'has been found grotesquely inadequate.' Consequently, a three percent quota came into force. for the Aruthathiyars. This has withstood the test of judicial scrutiny, says G. Santhanam, who served as Secretary of the BC, MBC and Minorities Welfare Department about 15 years ago. In 2012, he gave an opinion to the government for providing a 10.5% quota to Vanniyars within the 20%.. Though this was acted upon by the previous AIADMK regime nine years later, the Supreme Court, in April 2022, quashed the move.

The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Stalin says Ministry of Home Affairs' remarks on delimitation are ‘vague'
Seeing a 'sinister design' by the Narendra Modi-led government in Census 2027 and the subsequent delimitation, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on Friday said the remarks of the Union Ministry of Home Affairs over the proposed delimitation exercise were 'vague' and further called for a 'clear Parliamentary commitment and a suitable Constitutional amendment.' Mr. Stalin also endorsed the edit published in The Hindu — 'Injustice in the delay - The announcement of the Census is welcome, but the delay is unjust'. On Thursday, a social media post of the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said Union Minister Amit Shah had clarified on many occasions that in the delimitation exercise, concerns of southern States would be taken care of and discussed with all concerned at an appropriate time. 'The MHA claims that the concerns of affected States will be addressed. But these are vague remarks. What is needed is a clear Parliamentary commitment and a suitable Constitutional amendment,' Mr. Stalin said in a social media post. Recalling the abrogation of Article 370, Mr. Stalin said: 'The Union government spoke of restoring Statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. Elections were held. Assurances were given in the Supreme Court. Yet, Jammu and Kashmir remains a Union territory. This is the track record of the BJP we are dealing with.' If the Union government proceeded with delimitation based on the Census 2027, the democratic power of peninsular India would be 'reduced to irrelevance,' Mr. Stalin contended. Taking a swipe at his party's rival, AIADMK, over their electoral alliance with the BJP, Mr. Stalin, also the DMK president, said: 'Even if betrayers like the ADMK [AIADMK] choose to kneel before the BJP for their political survival, the people of Tamil Nadu, led by the DMK, will never allow our State to be punished for its progress. Tamil Nadu will fight! Tamil Nadu will win!' Claiming that the delay in the Census was 'no accident', Mr. Stalin further said that the delimitation plan was 'no coincidence' and the danger that he warned of was 'at our doorstep.' There was a 'sinister design' in how the BJP-led Union government was implementing the national Census and the subsequent delimitation, Mr. Stalin said: 'Developed States, especially in the non-Hindi speaking south, which followed population control norms, will now be punished. Meanwhile, States that disregarded population control for decades are set to gain more seats in Parliament. This unfair shift skews the federal balance and rewards irresponsibility.' He also recalled his warning about this 'design' and referred to the contention of senior Congress leader and former Union Minister P. Chidambaram on 'how this sleight of hand is unfolding.' Mr. Stalin emphasised: 'The time has come not only to be vigilant but also to craft counter-strategies to safeguard the South's voice.' The Census 2027 would form the basis for the next delimitation, replacing the 1971 data, he said, and further asserted that this gave the Union BJP-led government the means to 'restructure Parliamentary representation to its advantage, at the cost of the southern States.'