CRWV vs. PLTR vs. NVDA: Which Is the Best AI Stock to Buy Now, According to Analysts?
Confident Investing Starts Here:
CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) Stock
CoreWeave, a cloud provider that specializes in AI infrastructure, is experiencing strong traction for its offerings amid the ongoing AI boom. The company has been in the news for its strategic deals. Notably, CoreWeave struck a $11.9 billion 5-year cloud computing contract with ChatGPT-maker OpenAI. The two AI companies also signed an expanded agreement of up to $4 billion to meet the growing demand for high-performance computing.
Furthermore, CoreWeave is reportedly powering the recently announced cloud deal between Alphabet's Google (GOOGL) and OpenAI. CRWV stock has rallied by a staggering 359% from its IPO (initial public offering) price of $40.
Is CRWV a Good Stock to Buy?
Recently, Bank of America analyst Bradley Sills downgraded CoreWeave stock to Hold from Buy on valuation concerns, following the stellar rally in the AI infrastructure stock in reaction to the Q1 earnings. The 4-star analyst highlighted that CRWV stock is trading at an elevated valuation of 2027 EV/EBIT (enterprise value-to-earnings before interest and taxes) of 25x.
While Sills noted several positives, like the expansion of CoreWeave's partnership with OpenAI and impressive revenue momentum, he pointed out the company's huge capital expenditure ($46.1 billion through 2027). Consequently, the analyst expects $21 billion of negative free cash flow through 2027.
Turning to Wall Street, CoreWeave stock scores a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on six Buys, 11 Holds, and one Sell recommendation. The average CRWV stock price target of $78.53 indicates a significant downside risk of 57.2% from current levels.
Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR) Stock
Data analytics company Palantir Technologies is considered one of the hottest AI stocks. PLTR stock has rallied more than 81% so far in 2025. The company's revenue is growing at a rapid pace across its Government and Commercial businesses. Palantir's AIP (Artificial Intelligence Platform) offering is bolstering its business.
Palantir's market-beating first-quarter results reinforced the strength of its AI-powered offerings. Notably, Q1 2025 revenue increased by 39% year-over-year to $884 million, while adjusted EPS (earnings per share) jumped 62%. Additionally, the company raised its full-year guidance, as it believes that it is in the 'middle of a tectonic shift' in the adoption of its software, mainly in the U.S.
Is Palantir Stock a Buy?
While several analysts are cautious on Palantir stock due to its lofty valuation, Loop Capital analyst Mark Schappel reiterated a Buy rating and boosted the price target from $130 to a Street-high of $150. Following a meeting with management, the 5-star analyst stated that he is more convinced about PLTR's AI growth story and his bullish investment thesis.
Schappel believes that Palantir is an early software leader in enterprise AI, which he thinks is at a 'tipping point,' as small-scale pilots move into production and AI use cases increase exponentially across all industries. Trading at 48x EV/2027 revenue, the analyst agrees that PLTR stock is 'not for the faint of heart.' That said, he contends that investors should look at the big picture, which indicates that Palantir is exposed to a massive AI opportunity.
With 10 Holds, three Buys, and four Sells, Wall Street has a Hold consensus rating on Palantir Technologies stock. The average PLTR stock price forecast of $104.27 indicates a possible downside of 24.1% from current levels.
Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) Stock
After a tough start to the year due to concerns about rising competition in the AI space, chip export restrictions, and tariff woes, Nvidia stock has recovered 21% over the past three months and is up 7.1% year-to-date. While uncertainty around chip exports and competition from custom AI chips remain an overhang, the semiconductor giant continues to gain from robust demand for its GPUs (graphics processing units) in the AI space, as reflected in the market-beating first-quarter results.
Looking ahead, the demand for NVDA's Blackwell platform is expected to boost its top-line growth. Moreover, the company's focus on 'sovereign AI,' which it defines as a country's ability to develop and deploy AI, could drive its revenue higher. In this regard, Nvidia's lucrative deals, like the recently announced agreement with Saudi Arabia and Germany, are worth noting.
Is Nvidia Stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell?
Earlier this month, Bank of America Securities analyst Vivek Arya reiterated a Buy rating on Nvidia stock with a price target of $180. Following a meeting with management, the 5-star analyst noted that the tone of the team was very positive regarding demand for Nvidia's products and continued customer interest across cloud and enterprise, backed by a full-scale supply ramp.
Arya believes that management addressed three key investor debates that have been weighing on NVDA stock over the past year – Blackwell rack ramp and execution, AI diffusion and sovereign demand, and China AI shipments. The analyst stated that Nvidia stock remains a top sector pick for Bank of America, as it is 'best positioned' to benefit from the ongoing AI boom, bolstered by a multi-year lead in 'performance (AI scaling), pipeline, incumbency, scale, and developer support.'
Despite near-term challenges, Wall Street has a Strong Buy consensus rating on Nvidia stock based on 35 Buys, four Holds, and one Sell recommendation. The average NVDA stock price target of $173.19 indicates 20.4% upside potential from current levels.
Conclusion
Wall Street is highly bullish on Nvidia stock, cautiously optimistic on CoreWeave, and sidelined on Palantir stock. Currently, analysts forecast further upside in chip giant Nvidia's stock while they see possible downside risk in the other two AI stocks. The optimism of most analysts on Nvidia stock is backed by its strong fundamentals, robust demand for its AI chips, continued innovation, and solid execution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks the U.S. Government Is Actively Backing in 2025
Key Points Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth outlined a vision for the U.S. government to leverage more software across its operations. So far this year, data analytics platforms Palantir Technologies and have been notable beneficiaries in the public sector. Both companies' software is deployed across numerous government agencies, but I see one of these high-flying AI stocks as the clear winner. 10 stocks we like better than Palantir Technologies › When it comes to artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, chances are investors' thoughts may turn to semiconductors, massive data centers, or cloud computing infrastructure. This is great news for chip powerhouses and hyperscalers like Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, Broadcom, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Microsoft, Amazon, or Alphabet, but investors could be overlooking emerging opportunities beyond the usual suspects. Enterprise-grade software will become an increasingly vital layer atop the hardware stack. The commercial angle is to market AI-powered software to large corporations with complex needs spanning data analytics, logistics, human resources, cybersecurity, and more. But there is another opportunity outside of the private sector: how AI is redefining one of the largest and most sophisticated enterprises of all, the U.S. government. Earlier this year, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a plan to allocate more spending toward the Software Acquisition Pathway (SWP), a strategy first deployed in 2020. Its stated aim is to "provide for the efficient and effective acquisition, development, integration, and timely delivery of secure software." Let's explore how Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) and (NYSE: BBAI) are capitalizing on AI's shift from hardware to software and how each company is approaching the opportunity with SWP. 1. Palantir Technologies: The AI darling of the U.S. government Palantir has been at the center of several notable deals with the federal government throughout 2025. In late May, it deepened its relationship with the Department of Defense (DOD) through a $795 million extension featuring its Maven Smart System (MSS). This brought the total value of the MSS program to $1.28 billion, making it a long-term revenue driver. More recently, the company won a deal with the Army reportedly worth up to $10 billion over the next 10 years. Palantir's wins extend beyond the U.S. military as well. The company is building the Immigration Lifecycle Operating System -- often referred to as ImmigrationOS -- for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Signing multiyear billion-dollar deals provides Palantir with high revenue visibility, keeps its customer base sticky, and opens the door to upsell or cross-sell added services down the road. The ability to parlay its defense expertise into other government functions also expands Palantir's public sector footprint and reinforces the breadth of its capabilities -- solidifying its role as a ubiquitous AI backbone for the U.S. government. 2. A niche player helping the public sector Another AI software developer that has signed deals with the U.S. government this year is In February, it won a contract with the DOD to design a system to assist national security decision-making by analyzing trends and patterns in foreign media. Shortly thereafter, the company won a $13.2 million deal spread over three and a half years to support the Joint Chiefs of Staff's force management and data analytics capabilities. In May, the company partnered with Hardy Dynamics to advance the Army's use of machine learning and AI for autonomous drones. Lastly, has a deal with U.S. Customs and Border Protection to deploy its biometric AI infrastructure system, called Pangiam, at a dozen major airports across North America to help streamline arrivals and improve security protocols. Which is the better stock: Palantir or Between the two stocks, I see Palantir as the clear choice. has proved it can win meaningful government contracts, but its work is more niche-focused and smaller in scale compared to Palantir's multibillion-dollar deals across multiple platforms. In my view, popularity is largely with retail investors who are hoping that it becomes the "next Palantir." Smart investors know that hope is not a real strategy. Prudent valuation analysis -- and not speculation -- is required to know which stock is truly worth buying. While some on Wall Street may argue that Palantir stock is cheap based on software-specific metrics such as the Rule of 40, I'm not entirely bought into such a narrative. Traditional approaches to valuation, such as the price-to-sales ratio (P/S), show that Palantir is the priciest software-as-a-service stock among the businesses in the chart above -- and its valuation expansion means that shares are becoming even more expensive as the stock continues to rally. Palantir is an impressive company that has proved it can deliver on crucial applications, but the stock is historically expensive. I think that investors are better off waiting for a more reasonable entry point and paying a more appropriate price down the road. Should you buy stock in Palantir Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Datadog, Microsoft, MongoDB, Nvidia, Palantir Technologies, ServiceNow, Snowflake, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks the U.S. Government Is Actively Backing in 2025 was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Wire
43 minutes ago
- Business Wire
LFMD Investors Have Opportunity to Join LifeMD, Inc. Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of LifeMD, Inc. ('LifeMD' or 'the Company') (NASDAQ: LFMD) for violations of the securities laws. The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. LifeMD announced its Q2 2025 financial results on August 5, 2025. The Company revealed higher customer acquisition costs had added pressure on the business, especially related to its RexMD telehealth platform. Analysts from KeyBanc Capital Markets indicated that the Company 'took its eye off the ball' in the quarter, leading to its share price to drop more than 44.8% on the next day. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.
Digital Trends
43 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
I've tested OpenAI's claims about GPT-5 — here's what happened
OpenAI recently launched GPT-5, its latest large language model and a huge update to ChatGPT. While the new update has a lot going for it, claims are one thing, and reality is another. GPT-5 is said to be faster, less prone to hallucination and sycophantic behavior, and able to choose between fast responses and deeper 'thinking' on the fly. How many of OpenAI's claims are actually visible when using the chatbot? Let's find out. Claim #1: ChatGPT is now better at following instructions My main problem with ChatGPT, as well as one of the reasons why I recently unsubscribed, is that it's often pretty bad at following basic instructions. Sure, you can prompt engineer it to oblivion and get your desired results (sometimes), but even semi-elaborate prompts often fail to produce desired results. Recommended Videos OpenAI claims that it improved 'instruction following' with the release of GPT-5. To that, I say: I don't see it yet. Luckily for me, on the very day I sat down to write this article, I had a fitting interaction with ChatGPT that proves my point here. It's not the only one, though, and I have generally noticed that the longer a conversation goes on, the more ChatGPT forgets what was asked of it. In today's example, I tested ChatGPT's ability to fetch simple information and present it in the required format. I asked it for the specs of the RTX 5060 Ti, which is a recent gaming graphics card. Chaos ensued. To make my prompt even more successful, I showed ChatGPT the exact format I wanted to get my information in by sharing specs for a different GPU. They included things like the exact process node and the generation of ray tracing cores and TOPS. Long story short, it was all pretty specific stuff. Initially, the AI told me that the RTX 5060 Ti doesn't exist yet, which I kind of expected to happen based on its knowledge cutoff. I told it to check online. What I got was pretty barebones. ChatGPT omitted at least four things that I asked for, and gave me the wrong information for one of the specs. Next, I asked it to specify a few things. It gave me the exact same list in return while claiming to have fulfilled my request. The same happened on the third attempt. You can see it in the screenshot above where ChatGPT claims to have included the generation of TOPS and TFLOPS in the list — it clearly did not. Finally, semi-frustrated, I pasted a screenshot from the official Nvidia website to show it what I was looking for. It still got a couple of things wrong. My initial prompt was semi-precise. I know better than to speak to an AI like it's a person, so I gave it about 150 words' worth of instructions. It still took me several more messages to get something close to my expected result. Verdict: It could still use some work. Claim #2: ChatGPT is less sycophantic ChatGPT was a major 'yes man' in previous iterations. It often agreed with users when it didn't need to, driving it deeper and deeper into hallucination. For users who aren't familiar with the inner workings of AI, this could be borderline dangerous — or, in fact, actually extremely dangerous. Researchers recently carried out a large-scale test of ChatGPT, posing as young teens. Within minutes of simple interactions, the AI gave those 'teens' advice on self-harm, suicide planning, and drug abuse. This shows that sycophantic behavior is a major problem for ChatGPT, and OpenAI claims to have curbed some of it with the release of GPT-5. I never tested ChatGPT to such extremes, but I've definitely found that it tended to agree with you, no matter what you said. It took subtle cues during conversation and turned them into a given. It also cheered you on at times when it likely shouldn't have done so. To that end, I have to say that ChatGPT has gone through an entire personality change — for better or worse. The responses are now overly dry, unengaging, and not especially encouraging. Many users mourn the change, with some Reddit users claiming they 'lost their only friend overnight.' It's true that the previously ultra-friendly AI is now rather cut-and-dry, and the responses are often short compared to the emoji-infested mini-essays it regularly served up during its GPT-4o stage. Verdict: Definitely less sycophantic. On the other hand, it's also painfully boring. Claim #3: GPT-5 is better at factual accuracy The shocking lack of factual accuracy was another big reason why I chose to stop paying for ChatGPT. On some days, I felt like half the prompts I used produced hallucinations. And it can't all be down to my lack of smart prompting, because I've spent hundreds of hours learning how to prompt AI the right way — I know how to ask the right questions. Over time, I've learned to only ask about things I already had a vague idea about. For the purpose of today's experiment, I asked about GPU specs. Four out of five queries produced some kind of wrong information, even though all of it is readily available online. Then, I tried historical facts. I read a couple of interesting articles about the journey of Hindenburg, an airship from the 1930s that could ferry passengers from Europe to the U.S. in record time (60 hours). I asked about its exact route, the number of passengers it could house, and what led to its ultimate demise. I cross-checked the responses against historical sources. It got one thing wrong on the route, mentioning a stop in Canada when no such thing took place — the airship only flew over Canada. ChatGPT also gave me inaccurate information about the exact cause of the fire that led to its crash, but it wasn't a major inaccuracy. For comparison's sake, I also asked Gemini, and was told that it can't complete that task for me. Well, out of the two, GPT-5 did a better job — but honestly, it shouldn't have any factual inaccuracies in century-old data. Verdict: Not perfect, but also not terrible. Is GPT-5 better than GPT-4o? If you asked me whether I like GPT-5 more than GPT-4o, I'd have had a hard time responding. The closest thing that comes to mind is that I wasn't thrilled with either, but in all fairness, neither are strictly bad. We're still in the midst of the AI revolution. Each new model brings certain upgrades, but we're unlikely to see massive leaps with every new iteration. This time around, it feels like OpenAI chose to tackle some long-overdue problems rather than introducing any single feature that makes the crowds go wild. GPT-5 feels like more of a quality-of-life improvement than anything else, although I haven't tested it for tasks like coding, where it's said to be much better. The three things I tested above were some of the ones that annoyed me the most in previous models. I'd like to say that GPT-5 is much better in that regard, but it isn't — not yet. I will keep testing the chatbot, though, as a recently leaked system prompt tells me that there might have been more personality changes than I initially thought.
