Think lemon water is always healthy? Here's what you are not being told
What You Need to Know About Lemon Water's Risks
Live Events
Tooth Enamel Erosion: A Hidden Danger
Can Lemon Water Worsen Heartburn or Acid Reflux?
Too Much Lemon Water Can Upset Your Stomach
Citrus Allergy: When Lemon Water Isn't Safe
Vitamin C Overload: Is It Possible?
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
: Lemon water has become a go-to wellness drink; it's everywhere on TikTok, splattered all over health blogs, and endorsed by everyone from your yoga teacher to your celebrity idol. A glass of water with some fresh-squeezed lemon sounds like the simplest health hack of all, and though it can do a lot of good for you, it still has some downsides, as per a Real Simple report.While lemon water does contain many health benefits, it's not exactly the miracle beverage that is nowadays being portrayed, according to the report. If a person is consuming lemon water daily, there are a couple of things they might want to know about, particularly when it comes to their teeth, their stomach, and what their body actually requires, as per the Real Simple report.ALSO READ: Vince Gilligan's Pluribus, starring Rhea Seehorn to premiere on Apple TV—Release date, teaser, cast, plot and details you need to know! Even though lemon water has multiple benefits, like hydrating the body, being rich in antioxidants, boosting immunity, improving blood pressure, easing joint pain, promoting anti-ageing skin, and much more, as rpeorted by Real Simple. It could even cause more harm than good to the body if you are not paying attention to these potential risks, according to the report.The Real Simple report has compiled the following potential downsides that one must know:Tooth enamel erosion: The acidity in lemon water can erode tooth enamel over time, so it is best to drink it with a straw to avoid contact with one's teeth, as per the report.ALSO READ: Next Chernobyl? Experts warn Soviet-era nuclear plant at Armenia could explode at any moment Heartburn or acid reflux: As lemon water is very acidic, it means that it can worsen symptoms if a person is already struggling with acid reflux or heartburn, according to the Real Simple report. However, experts suggest that a small amount mixed with warm water and honey can actually help, as reported by Real Simple.Stomach upset: Excessive consumption of lemon water can even cause indigestion, characterised by an upset stomach or cramps, because of the acidity of the lemons, as per the report.Allergic reactions: Some people might also be allergic to lemons, known as citrus allergy, in which case, lemon water is not the right choice, as it can cause the person more harm, according to the Real Simple report.Too much vitamin C: Overconsumption of vitamin C, which lemon water contains, might even cause nausea or kidney stones, as reported by Real Simple.Lemon water can help you stay hydrated but should be had in moderation, as per the Real Simple report.Using a straw helps protect your teeth from the acidity, so it's a good habit to develop.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Private hospital ordered to pay Rs 34 lakh compensation for delaying ICU treatment over consent
Patient was not shifted to ICU despite signs of deterioration Hospital said consent for ICU admission was denied Panel rejects hospital's argument, says emergency care must be given Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Wockhardt Hospitals in Nashik to pay ₹34 lakh in compensation to the father of a young man who died in 2010 after the hospital failed to provide timely ICU care. The panel held that emergency medical care is a part of the right to life under the Constitution, and hospitals and doctors must provide such treatment immediately, even without the patient's or relative's consent, a TOI report case involved Ravindra Naidu, who was admitted to Wockhardt Hospitals late on April 15, 2010, after a nosebleed. Ravindra, who had a complicated medical history including hypertension, chronic smoking, and occasional alcohol use, reportedly fell in the bathroom and complained of chest pain and uneasiness around 3 to the complaint filed by his father, Vijay Dashrath Naidu, the hospital did not immediately shift him to the ICU or provide proper treatment. He alleged that ICU admission was delayed until around 7 am, and the family was not informed of his condition between 7am and 11 am. He believed his son had died around 8.30 am on April 16 but said treatment continued until 12.30 pm to create false Hospitals and its doctors claimed that Ravindra's death was caused by pre-existing medical issues and his own decision to stop prescribed anti-hypertensive medication. They said he had accelerated hypertension, which led to a fatal cardiovascular event. The hospital further claimed that ICU admission had been advised at the time of admission but was declined by the patient and his relatives, as recorded in the ICU state consumer commission rejected the hospital's argument about consent. 'A relative's consent is generally not legally required for admitting a patient to ICU. If the patient is critically ill and needs emergency care, the hospital and doctors can admit the patient to ICU under the doctrine of implied consent,' the panel the commission acknowledged that the treating doctors appeared to have acted with qualification and skill, it concluded that the hospital failed in its duty to provide timely emergency care, which amounted to medical negligence Earlier complaint was dismissed by Nashik district forumVijay Dashrath Naidu had initially approached the Nashik District Consumer Forum, which dismissed his complaint of medical negligence. He later appealed to the state commission, which overturned the forum's order and held the hospital accountable for lapses in emergency care compensation of ₹34 lakh was awarded as relief for the hospital's failure to admit the patient to the ICU in time, resulting in his death.
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Can energy drinks trigger panic attacks? Top US doctor explains
A TikTok user's claim about experiencing panic attack symptoms after consuming a Celsius energy drink has sparked widespread concern. Medical experts caution that high caffeine levels in energy drinks, sometimes exceeding 500 milligrams, can trigger anxiety and heart palpitations, especially in individuals unaccustomed to such stimulants. Energy drinks may be doing more harm than good. People often consume these drinks to stay awake, improve focus, or boost energy. But are these energy drinks stimulating our nervous system more than it is supposed to? A video of a woman (@quensadillareturns) is going viral on TikTok after she claimed that drinking an energy drink left her on the verge of panic attacks. 'Has anyone ever tested the Celsius energy drink for methamphetamines? Because I drank one five hours ago and I still feel like I'm about to have a panic attack,' the woman said in the video . The video has garnered thousands of views and raised questions about whether these popular beverages could have unexpected effects. So, can these energy drinks trigger a panic attack? Let's take a look. What are energy drinks Energy drinks are marketed as products that boost energy and enhance mental alertness and physical performance. There are two kinds of energy drink products. One that comes in containers similar to regular soft drinks - a 16-oz. bottle. The other is known as 'energy shots', which is sold in small containers - 2 to 2½ oz of concentrated liquid. Best and Worst Drinks for Stress Relief Revealed Caffeine is a major ingredient in energy drinks. The caffeine levels can range from 70 to 240 mg in a 16-oz. drink and 113 to 200 mg in an energy shot. Some drinks may also contain ingredients such as guarana (another source of caffeine sometimes called Brazilian cocoa), sugars, taurine, ginseng, B vitamins, glucuronolactone, yohimbe, carnitine, and bitter orange. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Home Could Fund Your Goals- Borrow up to $400k NerdWallet Learn More Undo Can energy drinks really cause panic attacks Energy drinks are consumed by thousands of people across the world. While some turn to energy drinks to prevent falling asleep, others consume them for their supposed energy-boosting properties. But are these popular beverages really wreaking havoc on our health? Dr. Joe Whittington, a board-certified emergency medicine physician based in California, has now explained how energy drinks could provide more than just energy. 'So what she's feeling is coming from the caffeine levels. A can of Celsius has about 200 milligrams of caffeine,' the doctor said, referring to the condition of the woman in the video. Speaking of the stimulant in the drink, he added, 'One of the main ingredients in energy drinks is caffeine, which is a stimulant that can increase mental and physical performance. The caffeine content in energy drinks can vary widely, with some brands containing as much as 500 milligrams per serving, which is equivalent to about 5 cups of coffee.' He also cautioned about being aware of the caffeine content in some of the popular energy drinks. 'Compared to other beverages, a can of Coke has about 35 milligrams of caffeine. A Monster drink, 150 milligrams. But it's less than a Rockstar, which sits at about 250 milligrams of caffeine,' he said. 'If your body's fairly naive to this much caffeine in a short amount of time, it can make you feel extremely jittery and exacerbate severe anxiety. So be careful with these drinks,' he added. King Charles' Secret Health Battle EXPOSED | Monarch's Rare Update Shocks Nation The doctor also emphasized the importance of only taking energy drinks in moderation: 'It is important to consume energy drinks in moderation and be aware of the caffeine content, as consuming too much caffeine can have negative health consequences such as insomnia, anxiety, and heart palpitations.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a day ago
- First Post
Why is the Trump administration destroying nearly $10 million worth of contraceptives?
The US has landed in soup following its decision to destroy women's contraceptives worth nearly $10 million. The decision has been condemned by doctors and aid groups alike, with some calling it a wasteful attack on women's rights read more Research has estimated that the USAID cuts will lead to the deaths of 14 million people by 2030. File image/AP The US administration's decision to destroy nearly $10 million worth of women's contraception products has sparked furious condemnation from doctors and aid groups, who have slammed the move as a wasteful attack on women's rights. The contraceptives are being stored in Belgium and are reportedly planned to be incinerated in France. Both European countries are under pressure to prevent the destruction. What has the US announced? On July 18, British newspaper The Guardian cited two US Congress sources as saying that President Donald Trump's administration planned to destroy $9.7 million worth of contraceptives, which are mostly long-acting, such as IUDs and birth control implants. The contraceptives — intended for some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa — are stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD They are to be incinerated at the end of July, according to The Guardian report. A US State Department spokesperson told AFP this week that 'a preliminary decision was made to destroy certain' birth control products from 'terminated Biden-era USAID contracts'. Trump's administration dismantled USAID, the country's foreign aid arm, after returning to the White House in January, replacing President Joe Biden. The State Department spokesperson said the destruction will cost $167,000 and 'no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed.' Why? The spokesperson pointed AFP to a policy that prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that perform or promote abortions. The Mexico City Policy, which critics call the 'global gag rule', was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984 and has been reinstated under every Republican president since. The Trump administration has also slashed foreign aid, with the Senate this month approving a package that cut around $8 billion in international funding, much of it intended for USAID. Research has estimated that the USAID cuts will lead to the deaths of 14 million people by 2030. Doctors Without Borders called it a 'callous waste'. Pixabay Earlier this month, the US also incinerated nearly 500 metric tons of high-nutrition biscuits, which were meant to keep malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan alive. Trump has also repeatedly moved to restrict abortion access in the United States, taking credit for the Supreme Court overturning the nationwide right to abortion in 2022. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US State Department also suggested to the Guardian that the contraceptives were nearing the end of their shelf life. However, media reports have since said that the products expire between April 2027 and September 2031. What are the alternatives? Belgium's foreign ministry told AFP that it has 'initiated diplomatic efforts with the United States embassy in Brussels' about the contraceptives. The government 'is exploring all possible avenues to prevent the destruction of these products, including temporary relocation solutions,' it added. The international organisation MSI Reproductive Choices said it had offered to 'purchase, repackage, and manage logistics at our expense, ensuring the products reach those in need'. However, this offer was repeatedly rejected, it said in a statement. The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) made a similar offer at 'no cost to the US government' that was also turned down. What are people saying? New Hampshire's Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan 'is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse'. Shaheen and Democratic Senator Brian Schatz have introduced a bill aiming to prevent further US aid from being wasted. The IPPF said the contraceptives plan is 'an intentional act of reproductive coercion'. Doctors Without Borders called it a 'callous waste'. MSI advocacy director Sarah Shaw said it was 'an ideological assault on reproductive rights, and one that is already harming women'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The head of the French Family Planning group, Sarah Durocher, observed that last year, France became the first country to enshrine the right to abortion in its constitution. 'France has a moral responsibility to act,' she said. French Green leader Marine Tondelier signed an open letter calling on President Emmanuel Macron to stop the contraceptives from being destroyed. 'Our country cannot be complicit, even indirectly, in retrograde policies,' the letter read. Contacted by AFP, the office of the French presidency declined to comment.
