Aging Well With Dr. Sandi Scheinbaum
7% of Americans are metabolically healthy.
Dr. Sandi Scheinbaum, author of Your Health Coach Will See You Now , is a
75-year-old health coach who inspires others to make lasting lifestyle changes. She joins Janice to discuss why focusing on nutrition, movement, and stress management becomes increasingly important as we age. Dr. Scheinbaum explains how she empowers people to become their own 'health detectives,' helping them discover what truly works for their unique bodies. Janice emphasizes that Dr. Scheinbaum's journey is proof that it's never too late to take charge of your health and inspire others to do the same.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Buyer Beware: The Alcohol Level on Your Wine's Label Might Be Lying to You
That '12% ABV' might not mean what you think. U.S. rules let wines under 14% alcohol vary by ±1.5%, so a bottle labeled 12% ABV could actually be anywhere from 10.5% to 13.5% ABV — a swing that changes both the buzz and roughly 20 calories per glass. Many wines miss even that generous target. Annual federal spot-tests show 1 in 5 bottles exceed the legal limit, yet enforcement is thin, giving wineries plenty of room to round up or down for marketing, tax, or cost reasons. U.S. labels lag the rest of the world. The EU and dozens of other countries allow only ±0.5% wiggle room (and often require fuller ingredient lists), underscoring how U.S. drinkers are forced take every pour on you be mad if you found that your favorite chocolate chip cookie had 20 more calories than the package indicated? Or if the light cocktail you ordered was poured strong enough to impair your judgment, coordination, and motor skills? That might be happening when you enjoy a glass of your favorite wine, even if you've done your research and read the label. One in three U.S. adults wears a fitness tracking device, according to a study conducted by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Nearly 80% review the Nutrition Facts panel regularly when deciding what food to buy, according to the USDA. More adults are making consumption calls based on what they believe to be a product's nutritional value, calories, and alcohol. But what if your wine label is lying to you? As it turns out, it may be. And it's perfectly legal for it to do so. 'There is more flexibility with labeling regulations in the U.S., compared to the much more strict European Union,' says Annie Edgerton, a wine appraiser, writer, educator, and consultant who works at Flatiron Wines & Spirits in New York City. 'And because producers long ago bemoaned the necessity and expense of having to print new labels if their ABV [alcohol by volume] differed slightly from one batch to another, the TTB [Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau] allowed for some wiggle room.' There's a lack of clarity all around. The TTB, a federal agency within the Department of Treasury, is responsible for regulating alcohol and tobacco products. The agency makes a series of opaque statements on its website regarding the stipulations around ABV levels. Requirements differ considerably, depending on the percentage of alcohol. Wines between 7–14% ABV aren't required to display a numerical alcohol content level, if it's labeled either 'table wine' or 'light wine,' according to the TTB. However, for imported and domestic wines labeled with numerical alcohol content levels, those between 7–14% are allowed 1.5% wiggle room, plus or minus the stated amount. So a wine that says it's 12% may actually be 13.5% or 10.5% ABV. And yes, that 1.5% changes the calorie count by around 20 calories per serving, but also potentially its effect on your body. For wines that contain 14% or more per volume, the wiggle room narrows to just 1%, which still presents a noticeable difference in nutritional value and impact. Related: What Determines How Much Alcohol Is in Wine? The reasons that wineries might print inaccurate information on their label are numerous. One may be marketing: More consumers now seek to decrease their alcohol consumption, so a 12.5% ABV wine may sound more compelling than a 14% bottling. Another may be cost: Wines with more than 16% ABV are taxed at a much higher rate than those lower in alcohol. Wines with 16–21% ABV are taxed at $1.57 per gallon for the first 30,000 gallons. If a wine is at 16% ABV or less, the rate drops to $1.07 per gallon for the first 30,000 gallons. It could also be tied to logistics: By posting an average alcohol content on wine labels at bulk, there is less need to revise or reprint those labels should future bottlings contain an allowable variation from that percentage. But whatever the reason, it still presents confusion for customers. It's also unclear how strict the enforcement is on those ABV percentages and allowable variances. Each year, the TTB conducts an alcohol beverage sampling program, where both random wines and risk-based samples are tested. Typically, this includes testing a few hundred products. Non-compliance rates are high, even with the allowable wiggle room. One recent assessment put violators at 20%, while another had the rate at 26%. Such leeway in the regulations, Edgerton says, can 'definitely be enough for sensitive drinkers to notice. But the majority of U.S. wineries produce under 1,000 cases a year, so most of them are 'small potatoes' and unlikely to be called to task.' While some may not willfully take advantage, enforcement is paper-thin, Edgerton says. Like an artisan cracker seller at a farmers market who claims their product to be gluten free, there's no way for consumers to verify it beyond simple trust. Winemakers like Brian Pruett of Dry Creek Vineyard in Healdsburg, California, go out of their way to ensure accuracy. 'We have an instrument in our lab that analyzes alcohol and is quite accurate,' says Pruett. 'We analyze each lot individually and then at every step of the blending process. We calibrate this instrument with an outside lab to ensure our numbers are accurate. There are times when we round up or down to the nearest half-percent, but we are trying to have the most accurate analysis on the label so that our consumers know exactly what's in the bottle.' Related: Why the U.S. Surgeon General Is Calling for Harsher Warnings on Alcohol As Edgerton says, other countries have less leeway on their printed numbers. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, the E.U., India, Israel, Korea, Mexico, New Caledonia, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey, and the U.K. only allow 0.5% room for error, according to an analysis from the American Association of Wine Economists. Canada, China, Japan, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, and Thailand allow for 1% variance, while the U.S., Australia, and New Zealand allow for 1.5% deviation. 'The E.U.'s labels offer a lot more quantifiable detail of alcohol content, and actually how a wine is made, what it's made with and where it comes from,' says Alexandra Thomas, wine director and head sommelier at Chicago's Adalina. 'Labeling in the U.S. can be heavily mysterious with its contents and rely more on marketing. There are no transparency laws in the U.S., so wine brands can put other ingredients to manipulate, like color, dyes, and flavors; [or to] stabilize, like extra sulfites and preservatives; and even grapes they don't own or farm themselves without disclosing that.' Related: Shop Smarter: Here's How to Read a Wine Label Like a Pro American wine labels that bear an appellation only need to include 85% of their grapes from that American Viticultural Area (AVA). And despite the vintage or year stated on the label, they may contain up to 5% of grapes from another year. Only 75% of a wine needs to be from a certain grape to be labeled as a single-variety wine. What does this mean for consumers? Unfortunately, it's buyer beware. To purchase wines from estates you trust is one option, but that's not always realistic if you've dashed out 30 minutes before guests arrive for some 'emergency' supplies. In that case, you can ask for guidance at a bottle shop. In the end, unless you've got a hydrometer or refractometer to compare what's on the label with what's in your glass, you're going to have to trust the label and be aware that, in this case, numbers may indeed lie. Read the original article on Food & Wine
Medscape
18 minutes ago
- Medscape
Emotional Response to Music May Enhance Memory Specificity
Music that evokes an emotional response may influence the specificity of memory recall, new research suggests. Investigators found that participants who were shown a series of images of everyday items before listening to music were more likely to remember only general details of the photos if they experienced a more emotional response to the music, while those who had a moderate emotional response were more likely to recall specific details. Stephanie L. Leal, PhD 'Most people think that emotional things are better remembered, but they actually aren't. It's just parts of the memory that are affected, not the whole memory,' co-investigator Stephanie L. Leal, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Integrative Biology & Physiology at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), told Medscape Medical News . 'One size doesn't fit all when it comes to music and memory.' Interestingly, familiarity with a song was not associated with either general or detailed memory. 'We played the same songs for everybody, but importantly, everyone responded differently. So I think personalization and taking individual preferences into account is going to be important for interventions,' said Leal, who is also director of the Neuroscience of Memory, Mood, and Aging Laboratory at UCLA. The findings were published online on July 23 in The Journal of Neuroscience . Memory Complexities As previously reported by Medscape Medical News , previous research has shown that both music appreciation and participations are tied to improvement in executive function and memory. For this study, researchers wanted to dive into the complexities of memory, including the possible connection between music and differing aspects of memory. 'We tend to remember more of the gist of something emotional that happened and not as much of the details. So we wanted to see if music could boost certain parts of memory but not all of the parts,' she said. Many previous music studies have included older individuals, especially those with dementia. For this project, investigators chose instead to assess a younger population because they wanted to use their data as a 'baseline' before moving on to further research in groups that are older and/or have impaired conditions such as depression or Alzheimer's disease, Leal said. 'We wanted to see what happens in healthy people first and then apply it to other populations,' she said. The study included 130 healthy undergraduate students between the ages of 18 and 35 years from Rice University, Houston. During the initial phase of memory formation — called the 'encoding' phase — each participant was shown 128 images of common household objects and asked to choose whether the object should be considered as an indoor or outdoor item. Participants then donned headphones and listened to 10 minutes of classical music pieces, ambient soundscapes, or silence while they filled out questionnaires about their medical history. After the music ended, participants spent about 20 minutes filling out additional questionnaires, including a rating of the music or sounds they heard on the basis of emotional arousal, positive or negative reaction, or familiarity. They then viewed a set of 192 images that included some they hadn't seen before (foils) and others that were identical (targets) or similar (lures) to the photos viewed earlier. Participants were asked to classify an image as old or new, allowing the researchers to measure target recognition — a measure of general memory — or lure discrimination — a measure of detailed memory. Big-Picture Recall General recall of the images was greater among those who experienced either low or high emotional response to music than among those who experienced moderate changes in emotional arousal ( P for both < .001). More detailed memories were reported by those who reported only a moderate emotional response to music than those who reported a low or high emotional response ( P for both < .001). There were no significant associations between memory of the images and song familiarity or whether a song was happy or sad. 'Overall, music modulated both general and detailed memory, but individual differences in emotional response were crucial — participants listened to the same music yet responded differently,' the investigators wrote. 'These findings suggest that music interventions may not uniformly enhance memory, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches in treating memory and mood impairments,' they added. The research suggests that a high emotional response may cloud details more than a moderate response. 'Yes, the idea is that if something is very emotionally arousing, maybe we don't want to remember the details associated with it. Maybe we just want to remember that general feeling or the bigger impact of that event, whether it's positive or negative,' Leal said. 'Maybe we just want to take the 'big picture' from that.' Early Days Commenting on the findings for Medscape Medical News , Daniel L. Bowling, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, noted that the study 'follows the general trend' of research that breaks down large concepts, such as memory, into specific features. Daniel L. Bowling, PhD Bowling, who is also director of the Music and Brain Health Lab at Stanford, was not involved with the current study. 'This showed different levels of responses to music that were differentially related to varying types of memory that you might want to target,' Bowling said. For example, if a clinician's purpose is cognitive training, with more of an emphasis on details, 'you might want more moderate levels of [emotional] arousal. But if you want more big-picture stuff, which could be critical when asking people about their life, then higher levels of arousal may be better,' he added. He noted that because the researchers used almost a 'pretreatment,' with music used before the recall task, it would be interesting to know if using such a pretreatment before taking a test could possibly improve performance. There are interventions, some of which Bowling is involved with, that are looking at supporting arousal and attention during studying. A controlled study comparing these things and looking systematically into effects on different types of memory would be helpful, 'but we're really at the beginning of figuring all of this stuff out,' he said. Although the current study has some limitations and needs to be replicated, 'any kind of talk toward systematic effects of different musical parameters or emotional modeling starts to help us bring this into the scientific-medical realm. And that's a real strength here,' Bowling concluded.
Washington Post
36 minutes ago
- Washington Post
I assumed I'd never need Medicaid. I was wrong.
Madison Chapman is a cancer survivor and a federal worker in D.C. I never expected to go on Medicaid. I grew up in a comfortable household, had worked since high school, and was a generally healthy 24-year-old public policy graduate student. I also never expected the stubborn lump above my collarbone would be Hodgkin's lymphoma.
