logo
Megha Promoter Duo to Engineer Family Settlement

Megha Promoter Duo to Engineer Family Settlement

Time of India09-06-2025
Live Events
The two principal shareholders of Megha Engineering and Infrastructure MEIL ), the Reddy uncle-nephew duo, are finalising a family settlement, said people with knowledge of the matter. This will see PV Krishna Reddy buying out uncle Pamireddy Pitchi Reddy's controlling interest three decades after the two started their entrepreneurial journey with small pipes for municipalities. It's since become a $5-billion, privately held infrastructure conglomerate that's among the largest in the country, said the people in the know.Krishna Reddy, with a net worth of $2.2 billion as per Forbes, is in talks with financial institutions to raise as much as ₹12,000-15,000 crore to buy out his uncle's 51% stake in the holding company. Krishna Reddy owns the remaining 49%.According to the people cited, the services of a former chief justice of India were used to finalise the terms of settlement, which has been in the works for over two years. These have now been formalised and the valuations agreed upon, they said.The deal has to be wrapped up by March 2027.Krishna Reddy is planning to raise part of the funds from private structured credit and special situation funds such as Kotak Alternate Asset Managers, Varde and Farallon. He's also in discussions with global banks such as Deutsche Bank.He aims to partly or fully monetise some assets to raise the residual financing. One such asset is a power transmission project in western Uttar Pradesh, for which offers have come from domestic infrastructure groups, said officials involved. The nephew expects to raise almost half the settlement amount—about ₹7,000 crore—from the sale of the interstate transmission lines and the substation network.Negotiations have also been taking place with some of the largest global funds to divest the city gas unit. Megha City Gas Pvt Ltd is operational in 62 districts across eight states including Punjab, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. While the transmission network has been on the block, a deal is yet to be clinched, insiders said. Against a payment schedule for the ₹15,000 crore settlement amount, only about ₹1,000 crore has been paid so far.The operations and maintenance wing of Olectra Greentech, the only listed entity of the group, may also be hived off to raise funds, said the people cited. Megha Engineering is the promoter of the company that makes e-buses and composite polymer insulators with a 50% stake. Between July 2023 and February 2024, the stock of Olectra Greentech more than doubled in value, sending it to an all-time high of over Rs 2,200. The stock was down 45% from those levels at the Friday close.Krishna Reddy declined to comment. PP Reddy didn't respond to queries.Clinching the settlement was not easy, said the people cited, given that there was interest from one of the country's richest men—whose conglomerate is invested heavily in infrastructure—in the 51% stake of Reddy senior. According to people in the know, Krishna Reddy sought the aid of top political leaders to ward off this bid.The flamboyant uncle, PP to his friends, comes from humble origins in the Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh. Within two years of starting the business, he roped in his nephew. After initial success in irrigation projects, the group diversified into natural gas distribution, roads, dams, tunnelling, engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) and hydrocarbons, among others.In 2006, the company's name was changed to the current one from Megha Engineering Enterprises. 'Megha is a classic case study of the rise of the Telugu businessman under YSR Reddy's irrigation boom,' said the managing director of another Hyderabad-based diversified group, referring to the deceased chief minister of the undivided state. 'Like several of their peers in business and community, they started doing PWD (public works department) contracts only to become massive. It's a similar trajectory taken by other families that run GMR, IVRCL, Navayuga, NCC, Ramky etc. Several amassed enormous wealth but succumbed to debt pressures. Megha has only grown bigger.'This meteoric rise brought them into the national spotlight but also into regulatory and corporate crosshairs. Following the disclosure that Megha had bought electoral bonds worth ₹966 crore, allegations of a quid pro quo for government contracts surfaced. The company has always denied any reciprocity.Krishna Reddy was responsible for expanding operations, acquiring companies in Italy for instance, said the people cited. This has helped the group expand in Asia, Africa and Latin America and form joint ventures such as the one with China's BYD for electric vehicles (EVs). However, the joint venture's plan to make EVs in India has been stuck for years due to Press Note 3, which mandates government approval for investments from countries that share a land border with India. This is specifically aimed at China due to the testy ties between the two.One of the reasons for the uncle stepping aside is age, said people who know him.'PP is turning 70 soon and he wants to now retire and lead the good life,' said a long-time family friend. 'Krishna is firmly in the saddle and the family, instead of bickering, came to an understanding. There were initial differences in terms of valuations, but that is very common. Now Krishna is busy organising funds to fast-track the buyout. I will not rule out an IPO down the line as well. The asset sales will also help prune the vast portfolio.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Consumer commission fines photographers for deficient wedding services
Consumer commission fines photographers for deficient wedding services

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Consumer commission fines photographers for deficient wedding services

Koppal: The District Consumer Redressal Commission has ruled in favour of a couple who lodged a complaint against photographers for failing to provide promised wedding services. The commission has ordered the photographers to pay compensation and costs for the deficient service. According to consumer complaint No. 72/2024, Lekhana and Arpan from Koppal, hired Roshan Christopher and Emmanuel of Wedhoods Woollex, BTM Layout, Bengaluru, to provide photography and videography services for their pre-and post-wedding ceremonies. A contract was signed for Rs 1.2 lakh to cover the wedding ceremonies in Sakleshpur and Chikkamagaluru from Nov 28 to Nov 30, 2022, with Rs 1 lakh paid through UPI transactions. However, the couple later approached the consumer commission, alleging that the services provided by the company failed to meet the agreed terms. The commission, chaired by GE Saubhagyalakshmi and member Raju N Maitri, directed the photographers to pay Rs 25,000 as compensation to the complainants, along with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the complaint until the amount was paid. Additionally, Rs 5,000 was ordered to cover complaint expenses. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !

Inferior quality headphones not replaced, forum asks e-tailer to pay consumer Rs31k
Inferior quality headphones not replaced, forum asks e-tailer to pay consumer Rs31k

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Inferior quality headphones not replaced, forum asks e-tailer to pay consumer Rs31k

Ghaziabad: Over a year after a Loni resident felt at the receiving end of a "faulty delivery" from an e-commerce platform, he has got relief from the consumer forum. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DCDRC) has directed Amazon to collect the product from Sankalp Dhama and refund Rs 26,989, which was taken in advance for a premium headphone. Dhama had filed the complaint in June 2024, a month after the delivery of the product. A bench of DCDRC, comprising president Praveen Kumar Jain and members Shailja Sachan and RP Singh, on July 17 also directed the company to pay compensation of Rs 5,000 for mental agony and litigation costs within a period of 45 days from the date of the order. Failing this, an interest at 6% on the outstanding amount until the last date of payment must be paid. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida | Gold Rates Today in Noida | Silver Rates Today in Noida The commission had issued notices to the company, but in the absence of any response, heard the matter ex-parte. While reviewing the documents filed by the applicant, the commission observed that the e-commerce company acknowledged the complaint of faulty delivery through an email but did not replace the headphone or return the cost taken. "Under these circumstances, we conclude that Amazon must return the money and take back the headphone delivered to the customer. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pierce Brosnan's Wife Lost 120 Pounds - This Is Her Now Undo Since they are found guilty of deficiency in service by delaying the process, they also must pay compensation of Rs 5,000," the commission ruled. Filing an application before the commission on June 27, 2024, Dhama said that he booked a noise-cancelling headphone — WH1000XM5 Sony headphone — on the e-commerce platform by paying Rs 26,989 on May 12, 2024. "I got a booking confirmation the next day and on the evening of May 14, the delivery boy brought the product to my address," Dhama told the commission. He said that when he opened the packet, it contained a JBL Quantum 100 headphone, which is not only cheaper but also not equipped with the necessary functionalities that he was looking for. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !

'Drishyam 2' producer Kumar Mangat Pathak granted bail by Patiala House court
'Drishyam 2' producer Kumar Mangat Pathak granted bail by Patiala House court

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Drishyam 2' producer Kumar Mangat Pathak granted bail by Patiala House court

Producer has been granted anticipatory bail by the Patiala House court in Delhi with regard to an FIR lodged by . Rajinder had alleged that he transferred money to the tune of INR 75 lakhs for the dubbing of 'Drishyam 2' for its release in the Chinese market, including China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court found no substance in the allegations against Kumar Mangat Pathak after considering the facts, circumstances, and evidence on record. The court observed in the ledger entries that the payment made to the corporate account of Panorama Studios International Limited by Rajinder Goel was for a Gujarati film, and not for 'Drishyam 2.' The producer's legal team said in a statement, "It is categorically stated that Mr. Kumar Mangat Pathak on behalf of his company Panorama Studios International Limited (PSIL) has never entered into any transaction or agreement with Mr. Rajinder Goel, and as such, he has never invested any money with Mr. Kumar Mangat Pathak or PSIL. His allegations are false, baseless, concocted and appear to be an afterthought designed to create a misleading and malicious narrative with intentions to malign the reputation of Kumar Mangat Pathak and PSIL. It is further clarified that any dealings , transactions done by Mr. Rajinder Goel were solely with a third party and not with Mr. Kumar Mangat Pathak or his company. Any attempt to link Mr. Kumar Mangat Pathak to such transactions is wholly unfounded and malicious." Following the bail, Kumar Mangat Pathak has instructed his legal team to initiate Rs 100 crore defamation suit against Rajinder Goel. The producer's advocate, Vineet Dhanda, said, "We also urge members of the press to act with responsibility and refrain from publishing or circulating unverified and false narratives that can cause unwarranted harm to Mr. Pathak's reputation and standing in the film industry." "The legal team will take all necessary steps, including legal proceedings, against any individual or entity found propagating such falsehoods," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store