Would you drive 30km/h to reduce road deaths?
Unsafe roads are forcing parents to drive children less than one kilometre to school, say safety advocates pushing for lower speed limits.
Restricting cars and trucks to 30km/h would be the norm for neighbourhood streets under proposed laws being unveiled on Wednesday.
The change comes amid rising fatalities on Australian roads in the face of a national goal to eliminate all road deaths and serious injuries by 2050.
While nine out of ten people die when hit by a vehicle driving at 50 km/h, nine in ten people survive when hit at 30 km/h, safety advocate Jennifer Kent says.
Inner-city Melbourne and parts of suburban Sydney have adopted the lower limits but Dr Kent views the varied approaches across Australia as unfair for children, parents and the elderly.
"Why should my son be safe walking to school but my cousin who lives in Brisbane is not?" the spokeswoman for advocacy group 30 Please told AAP.
"It's not fair that some people's lives are more important than others, so why wouldn't we do this on a national scale."
Kobi Shetty lives in an inner Sydney area where the speed limit is more than 30 kilometres an hour.
"I see a lot of neighbours who live near me drive their kids to school less than a kilometre," she told AAP.
"They drive their kids to school because they don't feel safe letting them walk or cycle."
That perspective has helped push the NSW Greens MP to introduce a bill to enact a statewide 30km/h limit on residential roads.
She says it's the "most impactful" way to protect motorists, cyclists and pedestrians from road accidents as drivers will be forced to travel slower in high traffic areas.
If adopted, NSW would follow Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in lowering limits to such levels.
In those areas, communities have seen a 40-per-cent reduction in fatalities on roads that have these limits, Ms Shetty said.
The cost to motorists was meanwhile between 30 seconds to one minute for each journey, research suggested.
"Most people would understand that it's worth spending an extra 30 seconds sitting in a car and saving a life," Ms Shetty said.
Premier Chris Minns however doubled down on opposition to 30 km/h caps first aired in 2024.
"I think that's too slow," he told reporters on Wednesday
Ms Shetty's bill will be debated at a later date.
Unsafe roads are forcing parents to drive children less than one kilometre to school, say safety advocates pushing for lower speed limits.
Restricting cars and trucks to 30km/h would be the norm for neighbourhood streets under proposed laws being unveiled on Wednesday.
The change comes amid rising fatalities on Australian roads in the face of a national goal to eliminate all road deaths and serious injuries by 2050.
While nine out of ten people die when hit by a vehicle driving at 50 km/h, nine in ten people survive when hit at 30 km/h, safety advocate Jennifer Kent says.
Inner-city Melbourne and parts of suburban Sydney have adopted the lower limits but Dr Kent views the varied approaches across Australia as unfair for children, parents and the elderly.
"Why should my son be safe walking to school but my cousin who lives in Brisbane is not?" the spokeswoman for advocacy group 30 Please told AAP.
"It's not fair that some people's lives are more important than others, so why wouldn't we do this on a national scale."
Kobi Shetty lives in an inner Sydney area where the speed limit is more than 30 kilometres an hour.
"I see a lot of neighbours who live near me drive their kids to school less than a kilometre," she told AAP.
"They drive their kids to school because they don't feel safe letting them walk or cycle."
That perspective has helped push the NSW Greens MP to introduce a bill to enact a statewide 30km/h limit on residential roads.
She says it's the "most impactful" way to protect motorists, cyclists and pedestrians from road accidents as drivers will be forced to travel slower in high traffic areas.
If adopted, NSW would follow Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in lowering limits to such levels.
In those areas, communities have seen a 40-per-cent reduction in fatalities on roads that have these limits, Ms Shetty said.
The cost to motorists was meanwhile between 30 seconds to one minute for each journey, research suggested.
"Most people would understand that it's worth spending an extra 30 seconds sitting in a car and saving a life," Ms Shetty said.
Premier Chris Minns however doubled down on opposition to 30 km/h caps first aired in 2024.
"I think that's too slow," he told reporters on Wednesday
Ms Shetty's bill will be debated at a later date.
Unsafe roads are forcing parents to drive children less than one kilometre to school, say safety advocates pushing for lower speed limits.
Restricting cars and trucks to 30km/h would be the norm for neighbourhood streets under proposed laws being unveiled on Wednesday.
The change comes amid rising fatalities on Australian roads in the face of a national goal to eliminate all road deaths and serious injuries by 2050.
While nine out of ten people die when hit by a vehicle driving at 50 km/h, nine in ten people survive when hit at 30 km/h, safety advocate Jennifer Kent says.
Inner-city Melbourne and parts of suburban Sydney have adopted the lower limits but Dr Kent views the varied approaches across Australia as unfair for children, parents and the elderly.
"Why should my son be safe walking to school but my cousin who lives in Brisbane is not?" the spokeswoman for advocacy group 30 Please told AAP.
"It's not fair that some people's lives are more important than others, so why wouldn't we do this on a national scale."
Kobi Shetty lives in an inner Sydney area where the speed limit is more than 30 kilometres an hour.
"I see a lot of neighbours who live near me drive their kids to school less than a kilometre," she told AAP.
"They drive their kids to school because they don't feel safe letting them walk or cycle."
That perspective has helped push the NSW Greens MP to introduce a bill to enact a statewide 30km/h limit on residential roads.
She says it's the "most impactful" way to protect motorists, cyclists and pedestrians from road accidents as drivers will be forced to travel slower in high traffic areas.
If adopted, NSW would follow Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in lowering limits to such levels.
In those areas, communities have seen a 40-per-cent reduction in fatalities on roads that have these limits, Ms Shetty said.
The cost to motorists was meanwhile between 30 seconds to one minute for each journey, research suggested.
"Most people would understand that it's worth spending an extra 30 seconds sitting in a car and saving a life," Ms Shetty said.
Premier Chris Minns however doubled down on opposition to 30 km/h caps first aired in 2024.
"I think that's too slow," he told reporters on Wednesday
Ms Shetty's bill will be debated at a later date.
Unsafe roads are forcing parents to drive children less than one kilometre to school, say safety advocates pushing for lower speed limits.
Restricting cars and trucks to 30km/h would be the norm for neighbourhood streets under proposed laws being unveiled on Wednesday.
The change comes amid rising fatalities on Australian roads in the face of a national goal to eliminate all road deaths and serious injuries by 2050.
While nine out of ten people die when hit by a vehicle driving at 50 km/h, nine in ten people survive when hit at 30 km/h, safety advocate Jennifer Kent says.
Inner-city Melbourne and parts of suburban Sydney have adopted the lower limits but Dr Kent views the varied approaches across Australia as unfair for children, parents and the elderly.
"Why should my son be safe walking to school but my cousin who lives in Brisbane is not?" the spokeswoman for advocacy group 30 Please told AAP.
"It's not fair that some people's lives are more important than others, so why wouldn't we do this on a national scale."
Kobi Shetty lives in an inner Sydney area where the speed limit is more than 30 kilometres an hour.
"I see a lot of neighbours who live near me drive their kids to school less than a kilometre," she told AAP.
"They drive their kids to school because they don't feel safe letting them walk or cycle."
That perspective has helped push the NSW Greens MP to introduce a bill to enact a statewide 30km/h limit on residential roads.
She says it's the "most impactful" way to protect motorists, cyclists and pedestrians from road accidents as drivers will be forced to travel slower in high traffic areas.
If adopted, NSW would follow Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in lowering limits to such levels.
In those areas, communities have seen a 40-per-cent reduction in fatalities on roads that have these limits, Ms Shetty said.
The cost to motorists was meanwhile between 30 seconds to one minute for each journey, research suggested.
"Most people would understand that it's worth spending an extra 30 seconds sitting in a car and saving a life," Ms Shetty said.
Premier Chris Minns however doubled down on opposition to 30 km/h caps first aired in 2024.
"I think that's too slow," he told reporters on Wednesday
Ms Shetty's bill will be debated at a later date.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
NT cattlemen dealt blow in compensation push over Gillard government live export ban after judge shoots down $600 million claim
Northern Territory cattlemen have been dealt a blow in their bid for compensation over the Gillard government's decision to ban live cattle exports in 2011. The federal court has ruled the government is only liable for the loss of income suffered in one year, not three years as sought by the cattlemen. Former Labor agriculture minister Joe Ludwig announced the ban on June 7, 2011. It was lifted on July 6 the same year, but cattlemen argued the impact of the decision lasted far longer as the relationship between Australia and Indonesia soured. The ban followed an investigation by Animals Australia and Four Corners into the treatment of cattle in Indonesian abattoirs, that prompted large protest rallies in Melbourne and Sydney. The cattlemen launched a class action over the decision arguing it had cost them up to $600 million across the supply chain. In 2020, Federal Court justice Steven Rares ruled in favour of the lead applicant, the Brett Cattle Company. Justice Rares found Senator Ludwig had acted recklessly when he implemented the ban, as he awarded the company $2.94 million in damages. For the past five years, the cattlemen and the federal government have been locked in legal argument about how much compensation should be paid to the other members of the class action. The government made an offer of $215 million to settle the case, saying the ban had only affected the export of about 88,000 head of cattle in 2011. The cattlemen rejected the offer, arguing the ban impacted the number of cattle Indonesia would except from 2011 until 2013 as they sought up to $600 million in compensation. But late on Thursday, Justice Thomas Thawley ruled the quota of cattle accepted by Indonesia had only been impacted in 2011. He said a drop in the quota in 2012 and 2013 was due to the Indonesian government's policy to pursue greater self-sufficiency in its beef market, not because of the fallout from the Australian government's 2011 ban. His decision means the amount of compensation awarded is likely to be closer to the government's $215 million offer, than the $600 million the cattlemen had sought. Justice Thawley placed a 48-hour embargo on the publication of the full reasons for his decision. In a statement NT Cattlemen's Association chief executive officer Romy Carey acknowledged the court's decision. 'While the judgment marks a significant milestone in a legal battle that has spanned more than a decade, we are still working through the detail and assessing its full implications both for the families directly affected and the wider cattle industry,' she said. 'At the request of the Commonwealth, the Federal Court has placed the reasons for judgment under a 48-hour embargo. 'Accordingly, we have not yet been provided with access to the full decision and will refrain from further comment until we are in a position to respond responsibly and with the complete facts before us.'
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
'An Important lesson': Tasmanian no confidence motion highlights ‘damage' that occurs when Labor and Greens align, MP claims
The decision to back a no confidence motion in Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff highlights the 'damage' that occurs when Labor gets together with the Greens, a federal MP has claimed. Tasmania is preparing to head to its second election in just 14 months after a narrow majority of MPs voted to support a no confidence motion in Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff. Labor's no confidence motion passed the Tasmanian lower house on a vote of 18 to 17 after Speaker Michelle O'Byrne – a Labor MP – broke with parliamentary convention to support the motion. Premier Rockliff has slammed the 'recklessness' of the motion and is asking the state's Lieutenant-Governor to call an election (Tasmanian Governor Barbara Barker is currently out of the state). Speaking to Sky News Australia on Thursday, federal Liberal MP Zoe McKenzie said the events in Tasmania were an 'important lesson' for the rest of the country. 'I think the message that the rest of the country should take is this is what happens when Labor gets together with the Greens,' she said 'We're seeing what's happening in Canberra at the moment in relation to the taxing of superannuation… now we've seen what damage they can do in Tasmania, and that's an important lesson for everyone to take away from today.' Ms McKenzie said an election was the last thing Tasmanians need. 'They've just come off the back of a federal election, and they only had their own state election 14 months ago,' she said. 'Elections are expensive, they are distracting, they are divisive, (and this comes) at a time exactly when the Tasmanian people need certainty, need strong measures to address cost of living.' The no confidence motion, put forward by Labor leader Dean Winter, was also backed by the five Greens MPs, as well as independents Craig Garland and Kristie Johnston, and Jacqui Lambie Network MP Andrew Jenner. Joining the Liberals in opposing the motion were independent David O'Byrne, as well as ex-Lambie Network turned independent MPs Rebekah Pentland and Miriam Beswick. Explaining her decision to back the motion, Speaker O'Byrne acknowledged there is a longstanding Westminster parliamentary convention that the speaker should use their casting vote to maintain the status quo, which would mean voting down the motion. However in an emotional speech, Ms O'Byrne said there was a tradition of speakers breaking the parliamentary convention, and that as a Labor MP she could not be expected to vote in favour of a Liberal government. "I am a member of the Labor Party. When I was elected to this position, it was made clear to this house and the public that despite no longer attending the caucus and strategy meetings of the Labor Party, that I would always vote with them,' she said. "No one in this chamber could realistically expect me to provide confidence to a Liberal government.' 'If I was not in the chair and the government had held this position, the vote would be won on the floor… the die is cast and the state is on the inexorable path to another early election.' Premier Rockliff described the events as a 'sad day' yet accepted the parliament's decision. 'In my personal opinion, this is a very sad day for Tasmania, it is a sad day as well because I put a lot on the line for this parliament,' Mr Rockliff lamented. 'It wasn't easy to get a 35-seat parliament over the line, but I believed it was the right thing to do. And I still believe it was the right thing to do. The embattled premier also took aim at the state's Labor leader for proposing the motion. 'The Leader of the Opposition has not only diminished this parliament, himself, his party. You might get rid of me today, but I'll tell you what, they are coming for you as well because you will always be known as a wrecker,' he said. 'I will also advise that if Mr Winter cannot command a majority in the place, most reluctantly, we must go to an election.' This seems all but certain since the Labor leader has ruled out an offer to form a minority government with the Greens.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
'Sad day' as state faces fourth election in seven years
Tasmanians are set to return to the polls with Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirming he will seek an election after losing a no-confidence motion. The Liberal leader's grip on power was lost after a marathon two-day debate in parliament finished on Thursday afternoon. The motion brought by Opposition Leader Dean Winter passed by the barest margin, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting a deciding vote. With Governor Barbara Baker absent, Mr Rockliff spoke with her lieutenant, Christopher Shanahan, before announcing he would reconvene parliament on Tuesday to pass an emergency funding bill for public servants' wages. "It's at that point, when the bills go through both houses of parliament, that I will seek an audience with Her Excellency, the Governor of Tasmania, to call an election," he told reporters outside Government House. "But my most highest priority right now is to ensure that we continue to fund our essential services that all Tasmanians need, deserve and care about." In a speech following the vote, an emotional Mr Rockliff said it was a "sad day". "What we have in this parliament, as I've said over the course of the last 14 months, is an eclectic mix of people from all backgrounds, which is how parliament should be, in actual fact," he told the House of Assembly. "And I wanted it to work. I believed in it and I actually still do. "We've got most of our agenda through simply because of our negotiations between each other. And that's why I'm so disappointed, if not broken-hearted, frankly." Mr Winter brought the no-confidence motion following the Liberal minority government's budget, winning the support of the Greens and three crossbenchers for an 18-17 vote. Liberal MPs yelled out "weak" as the house divided for the vote. Mr Rockliff, premier since 2022, conceded the numbers were against him but vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. He said Tasmania did not want and could not afford its fourth state election in seven years. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power. I have a lot more fight in me," he said. "The only job Mr Winter is interested in is mine. And I am not going anywhere." Mr Winter, opposition leader since Labor's loss in 2024, said Tasmanians wanted to see the end of Mr Rockliff and the Liberals, who have governed under three different premiers since 2014. The 40-year-old brought the no-confidence motion following last week's budget, which forecasted deficits through the forward estimates and a debt blowout beyond $10 billion. "We are ready for an election," he said, flanked by his caucus outside a substation in Mt Wellington's foothills, a site chosen to press home arguments against privatisation. "We will not stand by and let this premier wreck our budget and sell the assets that Tasmanians have built." During the debate, Labor also lashed Mr Rockliff for delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Mr Rockliff called the motion "a selfish grab for power" but Mr Winter pushed back against claims of an opportunistic powerplay "The premier did confidence and supply agreements with the crossbench when he became premier ... and it was up to him to hold those agreements together," he said. "He couldn't do it. Those agreements have fallen apart." Tasmania went to the polls just 15 months ago in an election which returned the Liberals to power in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Some crossbenchers and the Greens have gripes with a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position it reiterated on Wednesday in writing to the AFL. But the Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Tasmanians are set to return to the polls with Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirming he will seek an election after losing a no-confidence motion. The Liberal leader's grip on power was lost after a marathon two-day debate in parliament finished on Thursday afternoon. The motion brought by Opposition Leader Dean Winter passed by the barest margin, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting a deciding vote. With Governor Barbara Baker absent, Mr Rockliff spoke with her lieutenant, Christopher Shanahan, before announcing he would reconvene parliament on Tuesday to pass an emergency funding bill for public servants' wages. "It's at that point, when the bills go through both houses of parliament, that I will seek an audience with Her Excellency, the Governor of Tasmania, to call an election," he told reporters outside Government House. "But my most highest priority right now is to ensure that we continue to fund our essential services that all Tasmanians need, deserve and care about." In a speech following the vote, an emotional Mr Rockliff said it was a "sad day". "What we have in this parliament, as I've said over the course of the last 14 months, is an eclectic mix of people from all backgrounds, which is how parliament should be, in actual fact," he told the House of Assembly. "And I wanted it to work. I believed in it and I actually still do. "We've got most of our agenda through simply because of our negotiations between each other. And that's why I'm so disappointed, if not broken-hearted, frankly." Mr Winter brought the no-confidence motion following the Liberal minority government's budget, winning the support of the Greens and three crossbenchers for an 18-17 vote. Liberal MPs yelled out "weak" as the house divided for the vote. Mr Rockliff, premier since 2022, conceded the numbers were against him but vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. He said Tasmania did not want and could not afford its fourth state election in seven years. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power. I have a lot more fight in me," he said. "The only job Mr Winter is interested in is mine. And I am not going anywhere." Mr Winter, opposition leader since Labor's loss in 2024, said Tasmanians wanted to see the end of Mr Rockliff and the Liberals, who have governed under three different premiers since 2014. The 40-year-old brought the no-confidence motion following last week's budget, which forecasted deficits through the forward estimates and a debt blowout beyond $10 billion. "We are ready for an election," he said, flanked by his caucus outside a substation in Mt Wellington's foothills, a site chosen to press home arguments against privatisation. "We will not stand by and let this premier wreck our budget and sell the assets that Tasmanians have built." During the debate, Labor also lashed Mr Rockliff for delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Mr Rockliff called the motion "a selfish grab for power" but Mr Winter pushed back against claims of an opportunistic powerplay "The premier did confidence and supply agreements with the crossbench when he became premier ... and it was up to him to hold those agreements together," he said. "He couldn't do it. Those agreements have fallen apart." Tasmania went to the polls just 15 months ago in an election which returned the Liberals to power in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Some crossbenchers and the Greens have gripes with a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position it reiterated on Wednesday in writing to the AFL. But the Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Tasmanians are set to return to the polls with Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirming he will seek an election after losing a no-confidence motion. The Liberal leader's grip on power was lost after a marathon two-day debate in parliament finished on Thursday afternoon. The motion brought by Opposition Leader Dean Winter passed by the barest margin, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting a deciding vote. With Governor Barbara Baker absent, Mr Rockliff spoke with her lieutenant, Christopher Shanahan, before announcing he would reconvene parliament on Tuesday to pass an emergency funding bill for public servants' wages. "It's at that point, when the bills go through both houses of parliament, that I will seek an audience with Her Excellency, the Governor of Tasmania, to call an election," he told reporters outside Government House. "But my most highest priority right now is to ensure that we continue to fund our essential services that all Tasmanians need, deserve and care about." In a speech following the vote, an emotional Mr Rockliff said it was a "sad day". "What we have in this parliament, as I've said over the course of the last 14 months, is an eclectic mix of people from all backgrounds, which is how parliament should be, in actual fact," he told the House of Assembly. "And I wanted it to work. I believed in it and I actually still do. "We've got most of our agenda through simply because of our negotiations between each other. And that's why I'm so disappointed, if not broken-hearted, frankly." Mr Winter brought the no-confidence motion following the Liberal minority government's budget, winning the support of the Greens and three crossbenchers for an 18-17 vote. Liberal MPs yelled out "weak" as the house divided for the vote. Mr Rockliff, premier since 2022, conceded the numbers were against him but vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. He said Tasmania did not want and could not afford its fourth state election in seven years. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power. I have a lot more fight in me," he said. "The only job Mr Winter is interested in is mine. And I am not going anywhere." Mr Winter, opposition leader since Labor's loss in 2024, said Tasmanians wanted to see the end of Mr Rockliff and the Liberals, who have governed under three different premiers since 2014. The 40-year-old brought the no-confidence motion following last week's budget, which forecasted deficits through the forward estimates and a debt blowout beyond $10 billion. "We are ready for an election," he said, flanked by his caucus outside a substation in Mt Wellington's foothills, a site chosen to press home arguments against privatisation. "We will not stand by and let this premier wreck our budget and sell the assets that Tasmanians have built." During the debate, Labor also lashed Mr Rockliff for delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Mr Rockliff called the motion "a selfish grab for power" but Mr Winter pushed back against claims of an opportunistic powerplay "The premier did confidence and supply agreements with the crossbench when he became premier ... and it was up to him to hold those agreements together," he said. "He couldn't do it. Those agreements have fallen apart." Tasmania went to the polls just 15 months ago in an election which returned the Liberals to power in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Some crossbenchers and the Greens have gripes with a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position it reiterated on Wednesday in writing to the AFL. But the Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Tasmanians are set to return to the polls with Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirming he will seek an election after losing a no-confidence motion. The Liberal leader's grip on power was lost after a marathon two-day debate in parliament finished on Thursday afternoon. The motion brought by Opposition Leader Dean Winter passed by the barest margin, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting a deciding vote. With Governor Barbara Baker absent, Mr Rockliff spoke with her lieutenant, Christopher Shanahan, before announcing he would reconvene parliament on Tuesday to pass an emergency funding bill for public servants' wages. "It's at that point, when the bills go through both houses of parliament, that I will seek an audience with Her Excellency, the Governor of Tasmania, to call an election," he told reporters outside Government House. "But my most highest priority right now is to ensure that we continue to fund our essential services that all Tasmanians need, deserve and care about." In a speech following the vote, an emotional Mr Rockliff said it was a "sad day". "What we have in this parliament, as I've said over the course of the last 14 months, is an eclectic mix of people from all backgrounds, which is how parliament should be, in actual fact," he told the House of Assembly. "And I wanted it to work. I believed in it and I actually still do. "We've got most of our agenda through simply because of our negotiations between each other. And that's why I'm so disappointed, if not broken-hearted, frankly." Mr Winter brought the no-confidence motion following the Liberal minority government's budget, winning the support of the Greens and three crossbenchers for an 18-17 vote. Liberal MPs yelled out "weak" as the house divided for the vote. Mr Rockliff, premier since 2022, conceded the numbers were against him but vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. He said Tasmania did not want and could not afford its fourth state election in seven years. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power. I have a lot more fight in me," he said. "The only job Mr Winter is interested in is mine. And I am not going anywhere." Mr Winter, opposition leader since Labor's loss in 2024, said Tasmanians wanted to see the end of Mr Rockliff and the Liberals, who have governed under three different premiers since 2014. The 40-year-old brought the no-confidence motion following last week's budget, which forecasted deficits through the forward estimates and a debt blowout beyond $10 billion. "We are ready for an election," he said, flanked by his caucus outside a substation in Mt Wellington's foothills, a site chosen to press home arguments against privatisation. "We will not stand by and let this premier wreck our budget and sell the assets that Tasmanians have built." During the debate, Labor also lashed Mr Rockliff for delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Mr Rockliff called the motion "a selfish grab for power" but Mr Winter pushed back against claims of an opportunistic powerplay "The premier did confidence and supply agreements with the crossbench when he became premier ... and it was up to him to hold those agreements together," he said. "He couldn't do it. Those agreements have fallen apart." Tasmania went to the polls just 15 months ago in an election which returned the Liberals to power in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Some crossbenchers and the Greens have gripes with a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position it reiterated on Wednesday in writing to the AFL. But the Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk.
