Europe's central bank to hold off on another rate cut until it knows how bad the tariff blow will be
The ECB has already cut rates eight times since June of last year and President Christine Lagarde said after the last policy meeting June 5 that the central bank is 'getting to the end of a monetary policy cycle.' The monetary authority for the 20 countries that use the euro currency has been lowering rates to support growth after raising them in 2022-2023 to snuff out inflation caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the rebound after the pandemic.
With the bench mark rate now at 2%, down from a record high of 4%, analyst think there could be one more rate cut coming, but only in September.
The reason, say analysts: The ECB's policymakers simply don't know the outcome of talks between the EU's executive commission and the Trump administration. Trump first set a 20% tariff for EU goods, then threatened 50% after expressing displeasure at the pace of talks, then sent the EU a letter informing officials of a potential 30% tariff. EU officials earlier held out hope of winning at least the 10% baseline that applies to almost all trade partners, and analysts think that the actual rate may be lower than Trump's tariff threats. The talks are up against an Aug. 1 deadline, but earlier deadlines have slipped as the sides kept talking.
The decision to hold rates unchanged will be 'uncontroversial' among members of the bank's rate-setting council, said analysts at UniCredit's Investment Institute.
'In light of recent events, the risk of an adverse tariff scenario has increased since the June ECB meeting. The 30% tariff on EU goods threatened by the US is much higher than generally expected,' the UniCredit analysts wrote. 'However, the response of financial markets to US President Donald Trump's letter to the EU has been muted, and this seems to reflect expectations that the landing point for tariffs on EU goods will be materially below 30%.
With signs of economic activity holding up reasonably well, 'the ECB can afford to wait and see what the outcome of trade negotiations will be.'
The ECB's rate cuts have helped support economic activity by lowering the cost of credit for consumers and businesses to purchase goods. Higher rates have the opposite effect and are used to cool of inflation by reducing demand for goods.
Growth in the eurozone was relatively strong at 0.6% in the first quarter - though that was partly due to rushed shipments of goods trying to beat the tariffs. Inflation has fallen from double digits in late 2022 to 2% in June, in line with the ECB's target. A stronger euro, which lowers the price of imports, and softer global prices for oil have helped keep inflation moderate.
The stronger euro, up 13% this year at $1.17, has attracted attention as a potential damper on growth and ECB Vice President Luis de Guindos said any rapid moves over $1.20 could be 'much more complicated.' But the ECB typically does not target the exchange rate, and the euro's rise is considered to be less the result of Europe's strength and more the result of a weaker dollar weighed down by investor uncertainty about the future path of inflation, growth and government debt in the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New ETC report demonstrates that wind and solar-dominant power systems are competitive, reliable, and technically and economically feasible
LONDON, July 29, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Energy Transitions Commission (ETC) has today published a landmark report, Power Systems Transformation: Delivering Competitive, Resilient Electricity in High-Renewable Systems. The report sets out that global power systems dominated by wind and solar generation can reliably deliver electricity at costs comparable to or lower than today's fossil fuel-based power systems in most parts of the world. Electricity is projected to provide up to 70% of global final energy consumption in a decarbonised energy system, growing from around 20% today. Total global electricity demand could potentially triple, reaching 90,000 TWh by 2050 compared to 30,000 TWh today, and be met with new generation predominantly from wind and solar. A Global Opportunity The report shows that many countries can operate power systems with 70% or more electricity from wind and solar, using proven technologies available today, like battery storage, other energy storage, long-distance transmission, and flexible energy use. It highlights significant regional opportunities: "Sun belt" countries – including India, Mexico, and much of Africa – are best-positioned to cut power system costs by transitioning to low-cost, solar-led systems, which mainly require day-night balancing. In contrast, "wind belt" countries – such as the UK, Germany, and Canada – that rely on higher shares of wind face higher balancing costs, but can still achieve affordable, stable systems through smart policy and innovation. In many regions, long-distance transmission lines can be one of the most cost-effective solutions to balancing supply and demand, and should be maximised where feasible. Rapid electrification of buildings, transport and industries and decarbonisation of power systems must advance together to keep costs per kilowatt-hour affordable for consumers and businesses. "Multiple technologies, including nuclear and geothermal, may play a role in zero-carbon power systems. But wind and solar will be the dominant source of power in most countries, providing 70% or more of electricity at costs at or below today's fossil-based systems. In particular, in the global sun belt, the collapsing cost of solar PV and batteries makes possible far cheaper and more rapid growth in green electricity supply than seemed feasible 10 years ago. But wind belt countries can also achieve cost-effective decarbonisation by leading in offshore wind, long-duration storage, and grid innovation." said Adair Turner, Chair of the Energy Transitions Commission. Key Findings: It is technically possible for wind- and solar-dominant systems to be stable and resilient with the right mix of balancing and grid technologies. These systems are no more likely to experience blackouts than thermal generation-dominated systems. High wind and solar systems can be competitive with today's wholesale prices and grid costs. Sun belt countries could see costs more than halve to $30-$40/MWh by 2050. Wind-dependent country costs (e.g., UK) are higher, but in the future could be comparable to current levels. The "last mile" of decarbonisation will be the most expensive, particularly in countries which need ultra-long duration balancing to meet seasonal variations in supply and demand. Once countries have reached very low levels of carbon intensity (e.g., less than 50g per kWh), electrification is more important than rapid last-mile decarbonisation. Up to 30% of all global power demand could be time-shifted through demand-side flexibility. This requires the development of dynamic pricing and the use of smart management technologies. Grid costs per kWh can be kept stable. Total global grid length will need to more than double by 2050, reaching around 150–200 million km. Annual grid investment could rise from $370 billion in 2024, peaking at $870 billion in the 2030s. However, ~35% of grid expansion costs (equivalent to $1.3 trillion in Europe1) could be avoided between now and 2050 through the usage of innovative grid technologies. Delivering low-cost, high variable renewable energy power systems will require strategic vision and planning, including market reform to put all technologies on a level playing field, grid modernisation enabled by innovative technologies, supply chain development strategies and customer engagement. "Clean electricity is essential for climate action and is the most affordable way to power economic development. Countries can build resilient economies fit for the future by investing in renewables, grids, and flexibility now. Indeed it is their obligation to do so, according to the recent ICJ advisory opinion. Low-cost, clean power is what people, industry and businesses want. Countries must deliver it now, and this report shows that they can." said Christiana Figueres, Founding Partner, Global Optimism. Policymakers, the power industry, and financial institutions should collaborate to ensure: Appropriate planning of high wind/solar systems to expedite planning approvals and minimise deployment bottlenecks. Electrification of demand that keeps pace with generation and grid build-out to avoid the cost per kWh increasing for consumers. Accelerate power market reforms to unlock investment in critical technologies. Address workforce and supply chain bottlenecks to enable delivery at scale. "Renewables are the core of the global energy transition, delivering clean, reliable, and affordable power. Wind, solar, hydropower, geothermal, storage and modern grids are transforming electricity systems and opening new opportunities for growth, investment, and energy security. To keep this momentum, deployment must advance alongside grid expansion, market reform, and investment. Together, these build competitive, resilient systems that support jobs and economic progress. With governments leading and the private sector supporting, renewables will deliver a clean, secure, and just energy future." said Bruce Douglas, CEO at Global Renewables Alliance. The ETC also published a supplementary briefing, Connecting the World: Long-Distance Transmission as a Key Enabler of a Zero-Carbon Economy, focused on the role of cross-border interconnectors and long-distance transmission in accelerating the energy transition. Additional Quotes Additional quotes from Ausgrid, Iberdrola, Mission Possible Partnership, Octopus Energy, Schneider Electric, SSE, Ember, and Transition Zero are available here. About the ETC:Power Systems Transformation: Delivering Competitive, Resilient Electricity in High-Renewable Systems was developed in collaboration with ETC members from across industry, financial institutions, and civil society. The Energy Transitions Commission is a global coalition of leaders from across the energy landscape committed to achieving net-zero emissions by mid-century. This report constitutes a collective view of the ETC; however, it should not be taken as members agreeing with every finding or recommendation. Download the report: For further information on the ETC, please visit: 1 BNEF (2024), New Energy Outlook. Logo - View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Energy Transitions Commission Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump is right to move up his too-generous peace deadline for Putin
Kudos to President Trump for realizing that his 50-day deadline for Vladimir Putin to reach a peace deal with Ukraine was far too generous — and wholly unnecessary. On Monday, the prez told reporters he's giving the Kremlin just 10 to 12 more days to agree to a cease-fire — or face real consequences. 'There's no reason to wait' the full 50 days before pummeling Russia with sanctions, potentially including a whopping 100% tariff on countries that import Russian goods, Trump declared. Advertisement He's right. As we've pointed out, his original deadline of Sept. 2 just gave Russia more time to stack up more dead bodies. Putin's goal was never peace; it is and has always been the total obliteration of Ukraine. Mad Vlad has openly operated in bad faith, telling the president what he wants to hear in one-on-one calls and then unleashing hell on Ukrainians right after. Advertisement That was exactly Putin's response to Trump's original 50-day deadline: Hours after the threat, Russia hit civilian sites in Ukraine. The message was clear: You keep giving me more string, and I'll keep stringing you along. Moscow has played tough, with one top Russian official brushing off Trump's sanctions threat as 'a theatrical ultimatum.' Advertisement But the Kremlin should worry; Russia's economy is a house on wobbly stilts. Its population is shrinking, inflation is skyrocketing and Putin has poured at least 40% of the national budget into his war machine, even as his people struggle to buy basic goods. Russia's Minister for Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov is warning that the country is facing a recession. Meanwhile, China has been propping up Russia since the start of the war, buying hundreds of billions in goods and shipping in products of its own. India, too, imports Russian oil. Advertisement The threat of steep tariffs on these countries could get them to do business elsewhere. And that could deal a devastating blow to Russia. It's that logic that has fueled not only Trump's secondary-sanctions threat but a bill by Sen. Lindsey Graham that would slam buyers of Russian oil with a 500% tariff. Fact is, if Putin has his way, the war won't be over until Ukraine is entirely under his control. And hundreds of thousands more lives are lost. It's long past time for the West to ratchet up the pressure and make the war too costly for Putin to keep it going. Trump has no choice but to make the Russian strongman feel some real pain. And now's the time to do it.
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's trade wins shock the experts — who are blind to business reality
If America is in the midst of a trade war, the question we have to ask is: Are we tired of winning yet? President 'Donald Trump reaps $50bn tariff haul as world 'chickens out,'' reads the Financial Times headline. 'Only China and Canada have retaliated against US president's tariff war,' its subhead adds. 'In the Trump-dominated global economy, the US gets plenty but gives nothing in return,' reads a rueful post on X from Axios — another publication with an upmarket readership — promoting an article titled, 'Trump trade deals prove access to the US still matters above all else.' Populist publications have a different take on Trump's spate of trade victories. 'Trump's trade deal bloc — let's call it The Free World — now encompasses 57% of global GDP . . . 40% of total global trade in goods,' and '18% of the world's population,' according to Breitbart's John Carney. The president has only been in office six months, and his tariffs haven't even been in place that long, but already the results are undeniable. At a time when there otherwise seems to be no end to federal deficits, Trump's trade policy put the federal government in the black for the month of June, with a $27 billion surplus — and, as it happens, about $27 billion in tariff revenue. It's one thing that Trump so often surprises political opponents who underestimate him at election time and can't understand the root of his appeal. What's more remarkable is Trump seems to defy the very laws of economics — or rather, the law as laid down by economists. Other social sciences have lately lost credibility thanks to a 'republication crisis' that shows how the results reported in leading journals of psychology and other fields all too often fail to be repeated when experiments are conducted anew and data are re-examined. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Will the economics profession — whose mainstream is fervently in favor of free trade and is convinced tariffs are madness — face a similar reckoning for getting this test wrong? Trump can do things the economists say can't be done because he approaches trade the way he conducts his real-estate business: It's a negotiation, and leverage is what counts. Precisely because the United States has such an enormous trade deficit with the rest of the world — amounting to more than $918 billion in 2024 — other nations depend on access to our market as an outlet for their goods. The size and wealth of the American consumer base is unmatchable, and countries that get cut off from it can't easily make up the difference by selling more goods and services somewhere else. Whole industries in Europe and Asia would collapse without access to the American consumer. Trump is willing to give them access — for a price. Instead of using punitive tariffs to exclude foreign goods altogether, Trump is willing to strike a deal with anyone to allow goods to be sold in America at a price that makes the trade worthwhile for Americans and foreign companies alike. The hitch: The deal must be on terms favorable for American workers and industry. The president's arrangement with the European Union levies a 15% tariff on most EU goods — but that's peanuts compared to the 30% Trump was threatening if Europe didn't cooperate. The deal calls for new European investments of $600 billion in America, as well as for EU members to buy more energy and military equipment from us. The 15% tariff is higher than what European producers were paying before Trump returned to the White House — high enough that American producers will get some protective advantage, but not so high that foreign companies won't be able to compete. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters That's crucial because competition is what keeps prices down for American consumers. Foreign firms can't easily 'pass on' a tax on their goods — which is what a tariff is — to the Americans who buy their products when those same Americans can choose from domestic producers instead. The modest protection a 15% tariff affords gives more investors at home a reason to put their capital into American companies — which is good for our workforce and consumers alike. It means more jobs and more goods; more money in Americans' pockets and more stock on the shelves, which keeps prices down. There's risk in all this, but the upside opportunity is much greater, as entrepreneurs here and abroad recognize. For the Europeans, it's a no-brainer: The American market is so rife with profit possibilities that a 15% access fee is a very modest cost of doing business. American businesses should recognize their opportunity as well — they're native to a market the entire world is desperate to be in, and they should use that advantage to the fullest, investing at home and making the sales that foreign firms are so eager to make here. In this trade war, all Americans are winning — except, perhaps, the overeducated prisoners of the Ivory Tower. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.
