
Romania's Călin Georgescu announces withdrawal from politics
Călin Georgescu, the controversial populist whose bid for Romania's presidency last year resulted in the annulment of an election in the European Union and NATO member country, has announced he is stepping away from political life.
Georgescu upended Romania's political landscape last November when he ran as an independent and unexpectedly surged to frontrunner in the first round of the presidential election, going from an obscure candidate to beating the incumbent prime minister.
"I choose to be a passive observer of public and social life," the 63-year-old said in a video posted online late on Monday.
"I choose to remain outside any political party structure … I am not affiliated with any political group in any way."
Despite denying any wrongdoing, Georgescu was barred from the tense election rerun held in May, won by pro-EU candidate Nicușor Dan, who was officially sworn in on Monday.
Dan, a mathematician and former Bucharest mayor, beat the hard-right nationalist George Simion, who became Georgescu's nominal successor.
Georgescu said he made his decision to take a step back following the conclusion of the presidential race, which for him indicated "the sovereignist movement has come to a close."
"Even though this political chapter has ended, I am convinced that the values and ideals we fought for together remain steadfast," he said.
"My dear ones, I have always said that we would make history, not politics."
The outcome of Georgescu's success in last year's chaotic election cycle sent shockwaves through Romania's political establishment.
It also left many observers wondering how most local surveys had put him behind at least five other candidates.
Despite what appeared to be a sprawling social media campaign promoting him, Georgescu had declared zero campaign spending.
A top Romanian court then made the unprecedented move to annul the election after allegations emerged of electoral violations and Russian interference.
In February, prosecutors opened criminal proceedings against Georgescu, accusing him of incitement to undermine the constitutional order, election campaign funding abuses, and founding or supporting fascist, racist, xenophobic, or antisemitic organisations, among other charges.
On Tuesday, he was due to appear at the prosecutor's office in Bucharest.
Once a member of Simion's hard-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians, Georgescu left the party in 2022 after a period of infighting. He was accused by colleagues of being pro-Russian and critical of NATO, the US-led military alliance to which Romania belongs.
He sparked controversy for describing Romanian fascist and nationalist leaders from the 1930s and 1940s as national heroes. He has also praised Russian President Vladimir Putin in the past as "a man who loves his country" and has questioned Ukraine's statehood, but he claims not to be pro-Russian.
After Romania's decision to cancel the election last year, Georgescu became a cause célèbre among nationalists, with support coming from figures such as US Vice President JD Vance and tech billionaire Elon Musk, who both criticised Romania for annulling the vote.
Georgescu has argued the election was "cancelled illegally and unconstitutionally," and after he was barred from the May rerun, he accused authorities of "inventing evidence to justify the theft" of the elections.
Earlier this year, thousands of protesters took to the streets of Bucharest in a show of support for Georgescu, who cemented his status as a persecuted anti-system candidate, railing against a corrupt political class.
"I deeply understand what many of you have gone through: you suffered, you were harassed, humiliated, wronged, and marginalised," Georgescu said on Monday, adding he might return to politics "if a serious opportunity arises that could bring real benefits to Romania and the Romanian people."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
40 minutes ago
- France 24
No, the New START nuclear deal did not enable Ukraine to carry out the 'Spider's Web' attack
04:41 Issued on: 04:41 min From the show Since Ukraine's surprise 'Spider's Web' attack on Russian bombers, some internet users have been coming up with theories about how Kyiv carried them out. Some allege that Ukraine took advantage of a requirement laid out in a nuclear deal between Russia and the U.S. But as France 24's Charlotte Hughes explains, their claims are not rooted in the facts of the deal.


France 24
41 minutes ago
- France 24
US slaps sanctions on four ICC judges over Israel, US cases
The four judges, all women, will be barred entry to the United States and any property or other interests in the world's largest economy will be blocked -- measures more often taken against policymakers from US adversaries than against judicial officials. "The United States will take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our sovereignty, that of Israel, and any other US ally from illegitimate actions by the ICC," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. "I call on the countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to fight this disgraceful attack on our nation and Israel," Rubio said. The court swiftly hit back, saying in a statement: "These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe." Two of the judges, Beti Hohler of Slovenia and Reine Alapini-Gansou of Benin, took part in proceedings that led to an arrest warrant issued in November for Netanyahu. The court found "reasonable grounds" of criminal responsibility by Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant for actions that include the war crime of starvation as a method of war in the massive offensive in Gaza following Hamas's unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. The two other judges, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, were part of the court proceedings that led to the authorization of an investigation into allegations that US forces committed war crimes during the war in Afghanistan. Neither the United States nor Israel is party to the Rome Statute that established the International Criminal Court. But almost all Western allies of the United States as well as Japan and South Korea, the vast majority of Latin America and much of Africa are parties to the statute and in theory are required to arrest suspects when they land on their soil. Return to hard line Trump in his first term already imposed sanctions on the then ICC chief prosecutor over the Afghanistan investigation. After Trump's defeat in 2020, then president Joe Biden took a more conciliatory approach to the court with case-by-case cooperation. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken rescinded the sanctions and, while critical of its stance on Israel, worked with the court in its investigation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. ICC judges in 2023 issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin over the alleged mass abduction of Ukrainian children during the war. Both Putin and Netanyahu have voiced defiance over the ICC pressure but have also looked to minimize time in countries that are party to the court. The ICC arrest warrants have been especially sensitive in Britain, a close US ally whose Prime Minister Keir Starmer is a former human rights lawyer. Downing Stret has said that Britain will fulfill its "legal obligations" without explicitly saying if Netanyahu would be arrested if he visits. Hungary, led by Trump ally Viktor Orban, has parted ways with the rest of the European Union by moving to exit the International Court. Orban thumbed his nose at the court by welcoming Netanyahu to visit in April. Set up in 2002, the ICC seeks to prosecute individuals responsible for the world's gravest crimes when countries are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. The United States, under both Republican and Democratic administrations, has argued that it has its own independent judiciary that eliminates the need for an international court of last resort.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
War in Ukraine: What's in the Russian memorandum?
The short peace talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul on Monday lasted about an hour and ended with the announcement of a new exchange of prisoners and the return of the bodies of soldiers who died at the front. However, Moscow did release the memorandum that Russian diplomats had been discussing for several weeks. This document publicly sets out Russia's conditions for ending its military offensive and provides an insight into the Kremlin 's war aims as its "special operation" enters its fourth year. Sent to the Ukrainians at the last minute, it was made public by the Russian press agency Tass. Here are the document's main provisions. Terms of settlement: Russian conditions - Signature of an agreement to implement provisions for a final settlement. - International recognition of Crimea, Donbas and 'Novorossia' ("New Russia", a colonisation project developed in the Russian Empire in the 18th century) as part of Russia. - A guarantee that Ukraine ensure the full rights, freedoms and interests of its Russian speakers. - Designating Russian as an official language of Ukraine. - A legislative ban on any glorification or propaganda of Nazism and neo-Nazism. - Lifting of all restrictions on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. - Ukrainian neutrality, meaning: a pledge not to join military alliances or coalitions and a ban on any military activity by third countries in Ukrainian territory and on the deployment of foreign military forces, military bases or military infrastructure there. - A direct ban on the acceptance, transit or deployment of nuclear weapons in Ukraine. - Caps on the strength of the armed forces, weapons and military equipment. - The lifting of all existing sanctions by Ukraine against Russia and a mandatory pledge not to impose new ones. - The waiver of mutual claims with Ukraine in connection with damage caused by hostilities. -The phased restoration of diplomatic and economic relations with Ukraine, including gas transit. Ceasefire Conditions The document gives Ukraine two ceasefire options: Option 1: - The complete withdrawal of the Ukrainian army from the DPR (Donestk oblast), LPR (Luhansk oblast), and the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. - From the moment the Ukrainian military begins to withdraw from Russian territory, including Donbas and 'Novorossia', a 30-day ceasefire will be established. - The withdrawal must be completed within 30 days of the ceasefire. Option 2: - A ban on the redeployment of the Ukrainian armed forces, except for movements for withdrawal to an agreed distance from the borders of Russia. - All Western arms supply to Ukraine shall be halted; the same applies to the provision of intelligence data. - The military presence of third countries in the territory of Ukraine must be excluded. - Participation of foreign specialists in military operations on behalf of Ukraine must be stopped. - Cancellation of martial law by Kyiv. - A bilateral centre for monitoring and controlling the ceasefire is to be established. - Mobilisation is to be halted and demobilisation begun in Ukraine to achieve a ceasefire. - The document also calls for the dissolution of nationalist formations in Ukraine. - Amnesty for political prisoners. - Release of military personnel and civilians. Terms and procedure for signature of the peace treaty - The 'signing of a memorandum on a ceasefire with specific dates for the implementation of all its provisions and the determination of the date for the signing of a future treaty on a final settlement' will take place after Russia has transferred 6,000 bodies of deceased military personnel to Ukraine. - That done, a 30-day ceasefire is to be established. - Next comes "the holding of elections, the formation of authorities on the territory of Ukraine", followed by "the signing of the treaty". - The Ukrainian authorities must announce the date of the presidential and parliamentary elections, due to take place no later than 100 days after the lifting of martial law. - The peace treaty between Russia and Ukraine shall be approved by a legally binding resolution of the UN Security Council.