Congress is on summer break. Funding 'chaos' awaits.
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) said on social media last month that the 'deal' to get House fiscal conservatives to support final passage of the GOP domestic policy megabill in July was that funding for the new fiscal year would be 'at or below' current levels. 'That is already negotiated,' insisted Roy, a member of the House Freedom Caucus.
The House and Senate are already endorsing drastically different funding levels in the appropriations bills they have been able to advance so far. The funding measures House Republicans rolled out earlier this summer would meet spending-cut demands by cleaving non-defense agencies by almost 6 percent overall and keeping the Pentagon's budget flat. Senate lawmakers, on the other hand, have proposed $20 billion more for the military and at least modest funding increases for most non-defense agencies.
If House conservatives get their way in September, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer will be under intense pressure from his base to threaten a government shutdown unless the GOP agrees to some concessions. Republicans need Democratic votes in the Senate for any legislation to clear the 60-vote procedural hurdle to move forward, and the New York Democrat already endured a political drubbing in March after helping advance a Republican funding bill days before the start of a shutdown he worried would end up empowering Trump.
'If we have to swallow a House-only radical Republican bill, that's going to be a problem,' said Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.).
Schumer has to balance the desires of his progressive base with the demands of his more centrist flank. In a floor speech Saturday morning, he praised the Senate-passed funding package as 'an example of how the funding process could work if the other side is willing to work in good faith, instead of listening all the time to Donald Trump and Russell Vought and the extreme right.' But he also warned, 'the onus is on the Republican Majority ... to ensure this process stays bipartisan in the fall.'
And least one member of his caucus said he's not interested in Democrats playing hardball: Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) has vowed, 'I'm voting to keep the government open.'
In the meantime, Thune is already mulling how to pass a second tranche of funding bills. That next bundle could include some of the largest, and most contentious, appropriations measures containing money for the Pentagon, as well as dollars for key Democratic priorities like labor, education and health agencies. He is also predicting that the Senate bill will, on the whole, freeze or cut funding compared to current levels — a possibly winning pitch to his own fiscal hawks and those in the House.
Yet even with signs pointing to future conservative strong-arming, Senate Democrats are warily leaning into bipartisan funding negotiations after Republicans burned them last month by passing Trump's request to claw back $9 billion from public broadcasting and foreign aid.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Fleeing Texas Dems side with Newsom as redistricting standoff continues: ‘All out war'
Advertisement California Gov. Gavin Newsom said he is ready to fight 'fire with fire' as state Republican lawmakers try to enact redistricting in Texas, opposing the move though promising to pursue similar measures if needed. At a press conference on Monday, Newsom said he supports independent redistricting, as well as a national framework, and a proposal being advanced in the legislature reinforces what he supports. 'The proposal that we're advancing with the legislature has a trigger only if they move forward, to dismantling the protocols that are well-established,' the governor said. 'Would the state of California move forward in kind? Fighting? Yes, fire with fire.' When asked about a meeting between California Democrats on Sunday night, during which time they drafted or were almost done with the draft of redistricting maps, and whether he had seen those maps, Newsom said he had not. Advertisement But he said there has been an ongoing series of conversations into the evening last night, which continued on Monday morning and will continue until Democrats land on a process. 'That process has to have the concurrence, the support of two-thirds of the legislature,' he said. 'The maps, we believe, should be transparent. They should be provided in a transparent way to the public, and as a consequence, those maps are being processed and will be brought to light.' 6 California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference with Texas lawmakers at the Governor's Mansion on July 25, 2025 in Sacramento, California. Getty Images At the end of the day, though, Newsom said the people of California will have the ultimate say. Advertisement 'We will offer them the opportunity to make judgments for themselves, again, only if Texas moves forward,' Newsom said. 'I'll reinforce that we believe it should be a national model, independent national redistricting, and it would revert back to its original form, but it's done in response to the existential realities that we're now facing. Things have changed, facts have changed, so we must change.' 'They've triggered this response and we're not going to roll over and we're going to fight fire with fire, but we're going to do so not just punching with the weight of the fourth largest economy, the most populous state in our union, the size of 21 state populations combined,' he continued. 'We also will punch above our weight in terms of the impact of what we're doing, and I think that should be absorbed by those in the Texas delegation. Whatever they are doing will be neutered here in the state of California, and they will pay that price.' 6 California Gov. Gavin Newsom met with Texas lawmakers to push back on Texas's redistricting maneuver that aims to tilt the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections and on how California plans to respond. Getty Images California GOP Chairwoman Corrin Rankin told Fox News Digital that Newsom's actions could threaten the constitutional rights of Californians while also setting a dangerous precedent. Advertisement 'While Governor Newsom frames this redistricting as a defensive move, it undermines California's nationally respected, voter-approved Citizens Redistricting Commission, and if successful, sets a dangerous precedent that voters' choices can be overruled whenever politicians find it politically convenient,' Rankin said. 'Our primary concern is safeguarding Californians' constitutional rights against partisan manipulation disguised as defending democracy; true democracy means empowering voters, not politicians, to decide representation.' Dozens of Texas Democrats fled their state and went to Chicago and New York on Sunday night in an effort to block a redistricting vote on Monday. 6 President Donald Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott participate in a round table event at the Hill Country Youth Event Center to discuss last week's flash flooding on July 11, 2025 in Kerrville, Texas. Getty Images Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has since threatened to arrest and expel the lawmakers if they do not return by Monday afternoon. Shortly after Abbott released his statement, the Texas House Democratic Caucus issued a simple response, writing: 'Come and take it.' The statement also described Republicans' proposed districts, which would potentially secure five new GOP US House seats in next year's midterm elections, as a 'racist mid-decade redistricting scheme.' Abbott criticized the Democrats' dramatic departure, saying that 'real Texans don't run from a fight.' On Monday evening, Illinois lawmakers hosted Texas Democrats for a press conference, during which time none of the lawmakers took a single question from the press. Advertisement 6 Abbott speaks to a group of event attendees for his Parent Empowerment Night event where he advocated for school choice and vouchers at Temple Christian School in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 6, 2025. TNS Still, Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Ill., welcomed her colleagues and said they could stay as long as they wanted because they believed in what they were doing. 'What you're doing and what…they're trying to do in Texas affects you guys, but it affects the whole country,' she said. 'When you want to remove five Democrats…that hurts us in the House.' She explained that when there are not enough Democrats, things like the Big Beautiful Bill, or as she referred to it as 'the Big Ugly Bill,' and other Republican initiatives get through. Advertisement 'They are trying to destroy our democracy, destroy fairness in our country,' Kelly said. 'And unfortunately, they're starting with Texas. But we want you to know, we stand by your side.' Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., accused Abbott of not stepping up for the people affected by devastating floods in the Hill Country region of Texas. 6 The Texas State Capitol in Austin, Texas, on Monday, Aug. 4, 2025. Bloomberg via Getty Images Specifically, he accused Abbott of not having a special session to help families rebuild, but instead of doing 'the bidding' of President Donald Trump to 'banish Democrats' from the federal delegation. Advertisement Krishnamoorthi then directed his comments to Abbott, saying, 'don't mess with Texas,' because the people standing with him represent Texas. 'You can silence them. You can smear them. You can saddle them with debts and fins. But you cannot intimidate them,' Krishnamoorthi said. 'You can gerrymander the hell out of that map. Guess what? Two can play that game. That's right. Other states will do exactly the same thing and neutralize what you're trying to do in Texas.' Other lawmakers standing side-by-side in Illinois chose to accuse Trump's policies of being race-driven. Texas State Rep. Ana-Maria Rodriguez Ramos said Trump's policies hurt working families. Advertisement 'That is nothing short of racism,' she said. 'He is coming after all of us who don't look like him and his Republican colleagues in the Texas House.' Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, followed Rodriguez Ramos with more accusations of racism, saying Republicans are doing what Trump has insisted be done. 'I want you to know that we didn't introduce the race card when this message was sent by and through the Justice Department to the State of Texas, to our attorney general,' he said. 'They mentioned the race card because they talked about racial gerrymandering. They brought it up, and when they brought it up, they did it, knowing that this was a buzz word. It was a trigger.' 'They know that that's a buzz word that people would respond to in Texas, but we are going to respond to that buzz word by telling them that your racism is not going to change democracy in the state of Texas,' Green continued. 'In the United States of America, racism is going to be met with our taking a stand for democracy. You take a stand for racism, we will stand for democracy, and we will win.' 6 Abbott criticized the Democrats' dramatic departure, saying that 'real Texans don't run from a fight.' Bloomberg via Getty Images Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, said she was pleased that states like California and New York were standing up for Texas Democrats because, once it happens in Texas, it will spread to other states. She called the issue a 'national war,' and 'an all-out war' in which everything is on the table. 'We come from a state of great pride, and I never thought as a Texan, as an elected member of the Texas House of Representatives and now as an elected member from Texas to the United States House of Representatives, that I would see the governor of the proud state of Texas bend a knee to a felon from New York,' Johnson added. 'I never thought I'd see the day, but here we are.' Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, was also standing with fellow Democrats in Illinois and accused Abbott of talking 'a lot of noise.' She also accused Republicans of being 'weak.' 'The difference is they expect Democrats to kind of be the nice guys that we are,' Crockett said. 'They expect us to take the punch and say thank you. Well, I am here to tell you not only are we going to punch back, but we about to beat you down.' Still, Abbott told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday that Texas is doing what it is allowed to do by law. He also accused state Democrats of doing something 'un-Texas' by turning their back on Texans and not dealing with the flooding issues still echoing across the state. Abbott said four of the five seats that could change because of redistricting will be primarily Hispanic. 'These are seats where Democrats are having to come to grips with reality,' he said, explaining that Democrats are losing votes to Hispanics and Black voters in Texas. He also said Democrats are 'freaking out' because they are realizing Texas has the authority to redistrict. 'Texas will continue to fight for what is right,' Abbott said. Fox News Digital's Anders Hagstrom and Elizabeth Pritchett contributed to this report.
UPI
14 minutes ago
- UPI
On This Day, Aug. 5: South African leader Mandela begins 27-year-long imprisonment
1 of 7 | Nelson Mandela raises his fist to the crowd at the Washington Convention Center during his introduction June 26, 1990. The South African anti-apartheid activist was arrested on August 5, 1962, spending 27 years imprisoned. File Photo by Martin Jeong/UPI | License Photo Aug. 5 (UPI) -- On this date in history: In 1861, U.S. President Abraham Lincoln approved the first federal income tax. A wartime measure, it was rescinded in 1872. In 1944, Polish underground forces freed hundreds of Jewish prisoners from the Gęsiowka Nazi work camp in an attempt to retake Warsaw from the Germans, a battle known as the Warsaw Uprising. In 1949, an estimated 6,000 people were killed and about 20,000 injured in an earthquake that destroyed dozens of towns in Ecuador. In 1957, Dick Clark's American Bandstand began airing nationally. Clark, who hosted the show for decades, as well as New Year's Rockin' Eve, died April 2012. In 1962, police arrested South African anti-apartheid activist Nelson Mandela on charges he incited worker strikes and left the country without permission. The future president was released from prison 27 years later and won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to end apartheid. In 1962, Marilyn Monroe died of an overdose of barbiturates. She was 35. UPI File Photo In 1974, U.S. President Richard Nixon admitted ordering the Watergate investigation halted six days after the break-in. Nixon said he expected to be impeached. In 1981, by executive order, U.S. President Ronald Reagan fired 11,359 air-traffic controllers on strike over failed negotiations to raise their pay and shorten their workweek. In 1991, Iraq said it misled U.N. inspectors about secret biological weapons and also admitted extracting plutonium from fuel at a nuclear plant. In 2003, U.S. Episcopal officials approved election of the church's first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire. In 2007, U.S. President George W. Bush signed into law a bill to allow government eavesdropping of telephone conversations and email of U.S. citizens without a warrant if there's "reasonable belief" that one party isn't in the United States. In 2010, the U.S. Senate cleared the way for Solicitor General Elena Kagan to become the newest member of the Supreme Court when it voted 63-37 to confirm her nomination by President Barack Obama. She was sworn in two days later to succeed the retiring John Stevens. File Photo by Roger L. Wollenberg/UPI In 2012, a gunman police described as a white supremacist shot six people to death, injured four others, then killed himself at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wis. The victims were one woman and five men, and ranged in age from 39 to 84. Police treated the shooting as a domestic terrorism incident. In 2016, the Summer Olympics opening ceremony kicked off in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In 2019, the Indian government announced plans to strip autonomy from the predominantly Muslim Kashmir region. In 2024, Bangladesh's embattled prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, resigned and fled the country after protesters stormed her official residence in Dhaka amid a growing revolt that began over quotas for government jobs. Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus was named head of the interim government in her stead. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can Texas Gov. Greg Abbott remove lawmakers who left the state?
The Texas Legislature attempted to meet Monday to consider a redistricting plan that would favor Republicans, but Democratic members who left the state over the weekend did not return, denying the quorum needed to convene the session. Gov. Greg Abbott vowed to take steps to remove those lawmakers from their seats, and Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he had signed civil arrest warrants for the absent Democrats. Republicans "can make idle threats, but as long as they are out of state, there's really nothing that they can do," said Mark Jones, a Rice University political science professor. More than 50 Texas House Democrats left the state on Sunday, leaving the chamber short of the two-thirds quorum needed to bring a vote to the floor. Democrats are protesting the President Trump-led effort by Republicans to redraw the state's U.S. House congressional map, which could net the GOP up to five more seats. "We are fighting for representative democracy, and whether or not that will continue, and so we're willing to face whatever consequences may come our way," Democratic state Rep. James Talarico told CBS News. "This House will not sit quietly while you obstruct the work of the people," Burrows said Monday. To assist Burrows, Abbott said Monday that he had ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to "locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans." But the Texas DPS does not have jurisdiction to arrest them out of state. Rep. Ann Johnson, a Houston Democrat, told CBS News' Ed O'Keefe in an interview Monday that "a quorum break is written into the Texas Constitution," and "the threat of arrest is something that should be an alarm for a lot of folks." Abbott claimed Monday on Fox News that the Democrats could face bribery charges if their costs while out of state are being covered by others. "I think based upon comments made by legislators themselves, they face a possibility of facing bribery charges, which is a second-degree felony in the state of Texas, there's one way to cure that, and that is if they get back to the state of Texas and make quorum today at a hearing that we have at 3 o'clock, they can cure themselves of any quid pro quo that would subject them to potential bribery charges," Abbott said. But Jones noted that "Texas, compared to other states, has very loose ethics laws." "The governor is certainly welcome to make that argument, and theoretically it has a limited level of potential to move forward, but at the end of the day, if you look at Texas ethics law and look at all of the things that are allowed under Texas ethics law … we would rank receiving money to pay a fine at the lower end at the potential for an ethics violation, let alone things that are illegal," Jones said. Abbott said Sunday that if members didn't return by 3 p.m. CT Monday, he'd "invoke Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0382 to remove the missing Democrats from membership in the Texas House." Abbott was citing a 2021 opinion from Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, which was written after a previous walkout when Democratic lawmakers left the state to protest a change in the voting laws. The opinion, which is nonbinding, says a "district court may determine that a legislator has forfeited his or her office due to abandonment and can remove the legislator from office, thereby creating a vacancy." But Jones noted that the only legal ways to remove a Texas lawmaker is either for the person to be expelled by a vote of two-thirds of the Legislature — which happened when legislators voted to expel Republican Rep. Byron Slaton over misconduct in 2023 — or by voters at the ballot box. Republican state Rep. Briscoe Cain posted on social media Monday that he would file a bill to declare a seat vacant if a legislator missed seven consecutive days of a session. But since there is no quorum, that bill can't receive a vote — at least for now. Abbott called a special session last month to take up the redistricting effort, along with 17 other issues, including relief for Texas flood victims, a review of the flood warning system and emergency preparedness, and a THC ban. Congressional redistricting, however, was to be considered first. Texas has a part-time legislature which meets for 140 days every other year. The governor has the right to call a 30-day special session to address certain topics. The current special session started on July 21. Abbott can call as many special sessions as he wants, which means that if Democrats run out the clock on this special session, he could call another one as soon as it ends. How safe is our Social Security safety net? Full Interview: 3 Democratic Texas lawmakers on fleeing state amid GOP redistricting push Number of butterflies decreasing across U.S. Solve the daily Crossword
