Who Is Scott Jenkins, the Former Virginia Sheriff Pardoned by Trump
President Donald Trump made headlines on Memorial Day with his pardon of former Virginia sheriff Scott Jenkins, who was convicted on
The president
In announcing the pardon, Trump called Jenkins, formerly the sheriff of Culpeper County, Virginia, a 'victim of an overzealous Biden Department of Justice.'
'Sheriff Scott Jenkins, his wife, Patricia, and their family have been dragged through HELL by a Corrupt and Weaponized Biden DOJ,' Trump
'He will NOT be going to jail tomorrow, but instead will have a wonderful and productive life.'
Jenkins Case
Convicted in December 2024, Jenkins, 53, was sentenced in March on charges of accepting more than $72,500 in bribes in exchange for auxiliary deputy sheriffs' appointments.
He was
Related Stories
5/26/2025
5/14/2025
Jenkins was eventually found guilty on one count of conspiracy, four counts of honest services fraud, and seven counts of bribery.
The jury found him guilty of accepting bribes in the form of campaign contributions from multiple individuals in exchange for positions in the sheriff's department, including badges and credentials.
'The bribe payors were not trained or vetted and did not render any legitimate services to the Sheriff's Office,' the Justice Department
Jenkins was also accused of pressuring local officials to approve the petition filed in Culpeper County Circuit Court by a convicted felon to restore his right to possess a firearm, falsely stating that he resided in Culpeper County.
Following his conviction, Jenkins appealed directly to Trump for relief, saying at an April webinar hosted by the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association: 'I believe wholeheartedly in the president.
'I believe if he heard the information, I know he would help if he knew my story.'
After issuing the pardon, Trump cited U.S. District Judge Robert Ballou's denial of Jenkins's attempt to offer certain evidence in his defense, saying
the judge 'refused to allow it, shut him down, and then went on a tirade.'
Sheriff's Career
The former Virginia law enforcement officer was elected as sheriff in 2011 and took the oath on Jan. 1, 2012. He won reelection twice before losing his position in 2023 while under investigation for the crimes for which he was eventually convicted. During his tenure as an elected official, he ran as both a Republican and an independent.
While serving as sheriff, Jenkins was known for his advocacy for Second Amendment rights.
In 2019, the sheriff made headlines when he promised to deputize residents of his county if the newly elected Democratic majority state Legislature passed certain gun restrictions.
While he was in leadership in Culpeper County, the Sheriff's Office implemented active shooter training for public school employees. His office also offered free concealed-carry training to citizens in the area. Jenkins formed the county's first SWAT team and served as a firearms and tactics instructor.
Reactions to the Pardon
U.S. pardon attorney Ed Martin reacted to Trump's decision on X,
'Congratulations, Sheriff Jenkins: Do great things and make us proud.'
Abigail Spanberger, former member of Congress and current gubernatorial candidate, who previously represented the county where Jenkins was sheriff, expressed an opposing view.
She said Jenkins 'abused his power, violated his oath, committed multiple federal crimes, and was to be held accountable for his crimes.'
'He was convicted by a jury of his peers. ... He was supposed to report to prison this week for a 10-year sentence,' she said.
'The president just pardoned him in an affront to the oath he swore, the community he betrayed, the laws he broke, and the law enforcement officers who investigated this case and hold themselves to the highest ethical standard every day.'
Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's tariffs are 'not going away' amid legal battles, White House says
Trump's tariffs are 'not going away' amid legal battles, White House says Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump doubling tariffs on foreign steel President Trump, during a visit to a U.S. Steel facility in Pennsylvania, announced he will double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump's tariffs are "not going away," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said, downplaying a pair of recent court decisions that declared the bulk of the president's tariffs illegal and momentarily paused the levies. Lutnick's June 1 comments on Fox News Sunday came days after the Court of International Trade ruled that Trump lacked the authority under the emergency power he cited on April 2 to impose reciprocal tariffs on imports from most countries. An appeals court later said Trump can continue to levy the tariffs while challenging the ruling. Lutnick predicted Trump would win on appeal. But he also referenced other tariff authorities if the higher courts agree with the trade court that Trump can't invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to bypass Congress to issue the tariffs. Trade whiplash: Appeals Court allows Trump to keep tariffs while appeal plays out "Rest assured, tariffs are not going away," Lutnick said. "He has so many other authorities that even in the weird and unusual circumstance where this was taken away, we just bring on another or another or another." In addition to the trade court's ruling, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the Trump administration from collecting tariffs from a pair of Illinois toy importers, also ruling that the same 1977 law didn't grant Trump the powers to impose tariffs as he claimed. Trump addressed the legal battles in a Sunday post on Truth Social: "If the Courts somehow rule against us on Tariffs, which is not expected, that would allow other Countries to hold our Nation hostage with their anti-American Tariffs that they would use against us. This would mean the Economic ruination of the United States of America!" Amid the tariff whiplash from the court rulings, Trump announced on May 30 that he's doubling his tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from a 25% rate to 50%. 'Nobody's going to get around that': Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50% "I think it cost us a week ‒ maybe cost us a week," Lutnick said of the court decisions, arguing that other countries still want to make trade deals with the United States. "Everybody came right back to the table. Everybody is talking to us. You're going to see over the next couple of weeks really first-class deals for the American worker." For two months, Trump and White House officials have boasted about their prospects of using tariffs to secure trade agreements with other nations. So far, the administration has only secured a deal with the United Kingdom, in addition to a pact with China to slash massive tariffs on each other for 90 days. Trump later accused China of violating the tariff agreement on May 30, White House officials: Trump and China's Xi Jinping to speak soon, iron out trade fight Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that he expects Trump to soon talk with Chinese President Xi Jinping, expressing confidence trade issues will be "ironed out," including over critical minerals he said Beijing is refusing to open to trade. "They are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement," Bessent said. "Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system. Maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman." The Chinese government said Xi has not spoken to Trump since his Jan. 20 inauguration. "I believe we'll see something very soon," Bessent said when asked whether a meeting is scheduled for Trump to talk to Xi. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Clash with Harvard Sparks Debate — This Week in Your Words
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. We're back with a fresh roundup of your highlighted comments of the week — and this time, one topic has taken center stage. President Donald Trump's ongoing clash with Harvard has ignited passionate discussions across the board. From sharp insights to thoughtful critiques, your comments have brought fresh perspectives that deepen the debate. Whether you agreed, challenged, or expanded the narrative, your voices once again brought this story to life in unexpected ways. Here are some of your highlighted comments from the past week. U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to... U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to Trump and led the Department of Government Efficiency, announced he would leave the Trump administration to refocus on his businesses. (Photo by) More Getty Images On the Latest on Donald Trump's Clash with Harvard Original Article: Donald Trump Says Harvard is 'Getting Their A** Kicked' Background: Trump and his administration have cracked down on Ivy League institutions, such as Harvard and Columbia University, since taking office in January. Original Comment: "I'm not sure what Trump is trying to prove here. It's silly to think he is just hurting Harvard, he is permanently damaging the International reputation of the US and damaging its reputation for those that want to study in the US. And for what? A couple protests and some DEI policies. Trump decided that's worth tanking 10 Billion dollars in research from arguably the best university in the US. And he's proud of it." - KevinBer702 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter cuts straight to the heart of the broader consequences behind Trump's actions. Rather than focusing solely on the political optics, they highlight the potential damage to America's global reputation and its standing in higher education. On Plans for Trump's Administration to Revoke Visas for Chinese Students Original Article: Marco Rubio Announces New Plan to Revoke Chinese Student Visas Background: Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a new plan on Wednesday to "aggressively revoke" student visas issued to international students from China. Original Comment: "Another court challenge that will end up as another loss for Trump. Can't single out students based on their race or national origin for blanket visa revocation, and any decision must be rooted in credible and sufficient evidence of some tangible threat to national security concerning the specific student. Nearly all Chinese students at Harvard are the very cream of the crop, and actually add significant value to US university education. National security threats are managed by our security clearance system and controlling access to secret and top secret information, not by the visa system." - Metteyya What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter challenges the policy with a clear, informed perspective, arguing that targeting students undermines both legal standards and the strength of U.S. academia. On Calls for Universities to Align with the Trump Administration Original Article: Linda McMahon Says Colleges Must Be 'In Sync' with Trump Administration Background: Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in an interview that U.S. colleges and universities should be "in sync" with the Trump administration. Original Comment: "Only in a totalitarian nation-state would any university be REQUIRED to be "in-sync" with the presidential administration. Universities by definition are autonomous regarding academic rigor and freedom; they are apolitical." - countryman_1776 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter argues for the principle of academic independence, warning against political interference in universities. They highlight concerns that requiring alignment with the administration could undermine the core values of academic freedom and institutional autonomy. Further Reflections on Universities Aligning with the Trump Administration Original Comment: "The American university system has been the envy of the world for decades. That's due in large part to the deeply rooted tradition of academic freedom. The expectation that a university be in sync with the administration is antithetical to the idea of academic freedom." - vasant073 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: This reader emphasizes the global reputation of the American university system, attributing its success to long-standing traditions of academic freedom. They challenge the notion that universities should conform to political agendas, reinforcing why such expectations conflict with academic ideals. On Asian Colleges Trying to Woo Harvard Students – and The Possible Fallout Original Article: Asian Colleges Aim to Woo Harvard International Students Background: As Harvard University faces looming restrictions on enrolling international students, colleges across Asia are positioning themselves to attract some of the world's brightest minds. Original Comment: "So the US has an advantage in research, medicine and AI but if you are telling potential students to go somewhere else, the money that foreign tuitions that could be used for us citizens scholarships would also disappear. This is unironically the biggest mistake you can make." - What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter points out the potential economic and academic fallout of pushing international students away. They highlight a less discussed consequence: that lost tuition could also impact scholarship support for domestic students. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and keeping the conversation alive. Your insights help us see these stories from new angles and remind us why open dialogue is so important. Keep the comments coming—we look forward to hearing more from you next week.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Variety report claims 'The Boys' and 'Handmaid's Tale' imaginary fascist worlds are becoming reality
Michael Schneider, executive editor for Variety's TV section, claimed in an article published Friday that the imaginary fascist worlds of Amazon Prime's "The Boys" and Hulu's "The Handmaid's Tale" are becoming reality. Schneider argued the fictitious worlds created in the TV series "don't seem so far-fetched anymore" in President Donald Trump's America. "The Boys," a TV series based on a group of superheroes who cause more chaos than they do good, recently rolled out a marketing campaign jokingly referring to the show as a documentary. In a 2022 interview with Rolling Stone, showrunner Eric Kripke confirmed the series' "evil-Superman-style character," Homelander, was created as a "direct Trump analogue." The Variety editor wrote that the superhero series "feels a lot less fictional every season it's on the air." 'Handmaid's Tale' Showrunners Say Their Series' 'Warning' Was 'Ignored' Based On Trump's Re-election "That's why the cheeky 'The Boys' ads tout its campaign for 'Best Documentary Series.'" he wrote. "Sure, the 'documentary' is crossed out, and 'drama' is hastily written above it, like it was a last-minute mistake. But we've been making that joke for years." Read On The Fox News App Schneider then shifted his focus to "The Handmaid's Tale," claiming the frightening events that take place in the series "don't seem so far-fetched anymore." He featured quotes from the show's creators to reinforce his point that the authoritarian dystopia featured in the series is now becoming reality. The show's executive producer, Eric Tuchman, recalled that some writers for the show were concerned about the possibility of Roe v. Wade being overturned when Trump won the presidency in 2016. He felt that it sounded "kind of alarmist and extremist … I could not have been more wrong, obviously." Tuchman claimed the show's creators weren't focused on calling attention to "the political situation in the country," but said "it was just uncanny how much it ended up being a mirror of what was happening in the real world." Another showrunner, Yahlin Chang, said before she joined the production, she "did all this research into what happens when parents and children are separated in conflict zones." She conducted this research in preparation for a scene in which one of the characters is allowed to visit her estranged daughter for only 10 minutes under government supervision. America Now Worse Than 'Make Believe' 'Handmaid's Tale' Because Of Abortion, Actress Claims "My research focused on conflict zones like Liberia, Cambodia, Bosnia. I never imagined that that would happen in our own country. But by the time I wrote this scene in 2017, and by the time it aired in 2018, it aired the week that we were separating parents and children at the border," Chang said. She claimed "by doing research on what authoritarian regimes do," the show's creators "somehow predicted what would happen" in the real world. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Schneider noted that, "Ironically, just as things get even worse here in the United States," the imaginary land of Gilead in the series is poised for a revolution. In closing, the Variety editor left readers with his hopes for the future. "A revolution and a happy ending for 'The Handmaid's Tale?' Here's hoping the real world can imitate art in this way, too," Schneider article source: Variety report claims 'The Boys' and 'Handmaid's Tale' imaginary fascist worlds are becoming reality
