
If Trump abandons Ukraine, can Europe help Kyiv fight on? The clock is ticking to answer that
LONDON: President Donald Trump is pushing Ukraine to cede territory to Russia to end the war, threatening to walk away if a deal becomes too difficult — and causing alarm bells in Europe about how to fill the gap.
Ukraine's European allies view the war as fundamental to the continent's security, and pressure is now mounting to find ways to support Kyiv militarily — regardless of whether Trump pulls out.
Trump has repeatedly lashed out at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, accusing him of prolonging the 'killing field' by pushing back on his demand that Ukraine hand over occupied Crimea to Moscow.
Trump's land-for-peace plan would mark a significant shift in the post-World War II order, ripping up conventions that have long held that borders should not be redrawn by force.
'It took a World War to roll back de jure annexations and 60 million people died,' said François Heisbourg, special adviser at the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris, referring to the pre-war annexation of Austria by Nazi Germany.
'Europeans will not accept it" and Ukraine will not either, he said.
Can Ukraine fight without U.S. support?
Diplomats and experts described various scenarios if the U.S. decides to walk. They range from the U.S. ceasing direct aid to Ukraine — but allowing European nations to pass on critical American intelligence and weapons to Kyiv — to Trump banning transfers of any American technology, including components or software in European weapons.
Any withdrawal of U.S. military aid to Ukraine could create serious difficulties for Europe, analysts and diplomats told The Associated Press. Kyiv's ability to keep fighting would depend on European political will to muster money and weapons — and how quickly the gaps left by Washington can be filled.
If it were easy, Europe would 'already be doing things without America,' said a European diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.
Where would the money come from?
No new U.S. aid package for Ukraine has been approved since Trump came into office, even as European nations have collectively provided Ukraine with more aid than Washington, according to the Keil Institute.
Europe has contributed around $157 billion, some $26 billion more than the U.S., although Washington slightly outpaces Europe when it comes to military aid, the Germany-based institute said.
It will be hard, but there are ways Europe can find cash to fund Ukraine — including seizing frozen Russian assets — but 'money isn't what you shoot bullets with,' Heisbourg said.
Europe's "big mistake" was undertaking major military downsizing following the Cold War and thinking 'this war started in February 2022 and not in February 2014,' when Moscow invaded and then annexed Crimea, said Thomas Gomart, director of IFRI, a French international affairs think tank.
Europeans are scrambling to acquire weapons for themselves and for Ukraine, while confronting constraints on production capacity, a fragmented defense industry and a decades-long reliance on the U.S.
Some extra production capacity could come from Ukraine, which has ramped up manufacturing of ammunition and drones since Russia's invasion. Much harder to replace, experts said, are advanced American weapons, including air defenses.
Can U.S. weapons systems be replaced?
Russia has attacked Ukraine almost nightly since Putin's forces invaded in February 2022, flooding the skies with missiles and drones, including dummy attack drones to exhaust Ukraine's limited air defenses. In April, at least 57 people were killed in multiple strikes.
The death toll from the Russian attacks would 'inevitably' be higher without the American Patriot air-defense missile systems protecting Ukraine's skies, said Douglas Barrie, senior fellow for military aerospace at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.
The Patriots can track and intercept Russian missiles, including the hypersonic Kinzhal, which Putin has boasted was unstoppable. Kyiv uses them to protect critical infrastructure, including the country's energy grid.
Earlier this month, Zelenskyy asked to buy 10 Patriots, a request Trump dismissed. 'You don't start a war against someone 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles," he said, a day after a Russian strike on the Ukrainian city of Sumy killed 35 people.
France and Italy have given Ukraine their Aster SAMP/T air-defense system but the issue is not 'quality, it's quantity,' Barrie said, pointing to the larger U.S. defense industrial base and greater U.S. stockpiles.
Although Trump criticized Putin over the weekend for his missile strikes and suggested imposing more sanctions on Russia, for Europe it remains a wait-and-see game.
The whiplash of Trump's aggressive foreign policy means nothing is off the cards, experts said.
A worst-case scenario could see a ban on American weapons exports and transfers to Ukraine, which would bar European nations from buying U.S. weapons to give to Kyiv or transferring weapons with American components or software, Barrie said.
That could mean countries, including Germany, that have already given American Patriots to Ukraine would be prohibited from doing so. Such a move would seriously hamper Europe's ability to support Kyiv and mark a fundamental shift in America's relationship with its allies.
'It's one thing for the U.S. to cease to be an ally, it is another for the U.S. to be an enemy,' Heisbourg said, noting that such a step could also damage the U.S. defense sector if weapons purchases were perceived to be unusable on Trump's political order.
Filling the gap on intelligence sharing
In March, the Trump administration suspended intelligence sharing with Ukraine in a bid to force Zelenskyy to accept a truce with Russia. The about weeklong suspension impacted Ukraine's ability to track and target Russian troops, tanks and ships.
There are certain capabilities, including 'higher-end' surveillance and reconnaissance using satellites that 'only the United States can provide,' said Matthew Kroenig, vice president of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security in Washington.
While the extent of intelligence sharing between the U.S. and Ukraine is not known, experts said it likely shows Kyiv near real-time buildup of Russian troop deployments and helps target long-range strikes.
Ukraine's allies do not have as much satellite capability as the U.S. but could launch more, or Ukraine could use commercial systems if Trump cuts off intelligence again, experts said. The latter would likely have to come from a European provider — in March, the American satellite imagery company Maxar Technologies confirmed it temporarily suspended access to unclassified satellite images following the administration's decision to pull intelligence sharing.
Ukraine also needs an alternative to Elon Musk's satellite network Starlink, which is critical for Ukrainian defensive and civilian communications. European defense companies are discussing creating a satellite alliance but don't currently have an alternative on the same scale.
Would Ukraine collapse without U.S. support?
If Trump walks away, or if Kyiv rejects a deal and keeps fighting with European support, it won't necessarily mean "the collapse of Ukraine" although more people will almost certainly die if the U.S. pulls its air defenses and intelligence-sharing capabilities, Heisbourg said.
Trump has jolted European leaders into awareness that they need to take responsibility for their own defense, regardless of who occupies the White House, experts said.
That means European nations need to invest more in defense, work together to scale up military production and build trust to share intelligence.
'This issue is not a question about the next two months or the next two years. This issue is about the next two decades,' Gomart said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump to Restore Names Honoring Confederates at Army Bases
President Donald Trump said he would restore the names of military bases renamed by his predecessor Joe Biden, undoing an effort to make the armed forces more inclusive and halt the commemoration of former Confederate officers. 'We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee,' Trump said Tuesday during a visit to Fort Bragg in North Carolina to celebrate the 250th birthday of the US Army. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts. It's no time to change. And I'm superstitious, you know? I like to keep it going, right,' he added. Fort Bragg is also a military facility that has been renamed under Trump. The base was previously named to honor a Confederate general, Braxton Bragg, but its name was changed to Fort Liberty under former President Biden's administration, part of a broader effort to stop honoring individuals who took up arms against the US government during the Civil War. That effort to rename military bases came after a national reckoning on race spurred by the killing of George Floyd, a Black man in Minneapolis at the hands of police. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth renamed the installation Fort Bragg in February, but in honor of a different Bragg, this time commemorating Roland L. Bragg, a World War II veteran who was awarded the Silver Star and Purple Heart for bravery during the Battle of the Bulge. The fort had become a flashpoint for Trump and his supporters, who have been scrapping diversity, equity and inclusion practices within the federal government, and offers an example of how the new administration is moving to put its stamp on the armed forces and turn to the military to demonstrate his presidential powers and promote his agenda. Trump devoted a sizable portion of his remarks to criticizing his predecessor and offering justification for his decision to deploy US troops to Los Angeles in response to protests over his deportation policies, mobilizing 700 Marines and augmenting National Guard personnel already on the ground despite the objections of state and local leaders. 'What you're witnessing in California is a full blown assault on peace, on public order and a national sovereignty carried out by rioters bearing foreign flags with the aim of continuing a foreign invasion of our country. We're not going to let that happen,' Trump said. US law generally bars the use of the active-duty US military — the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines — from carrying out domestic law enforcement. The state of California is suing the administration, saying that Trump's deployment of the National Guard was unlawful. Earlier: US Deploys Marines to LA as Trump Standoff With Newsom Escalates Trump in his first term also sought to lean on the military as a show of force but was blocked by members of his Cabinet. This time, the president has stocked his team with loyalists less resistant to those efforts. Trump's visit to Fort Bragg is part of a week of festivities aimed at celebrating the Army, culminating in a large-scale military parade on Saturday in Washington, DC, that also coincides with his own 79th birthday. Saturday's military parade in Washington will be the showcase for the celebrations over the Army's birthday. The parade is expected to involve thousands of soldiers as well as 150 military vehicles and 50 aircraft, and the US Army estimates the festivities will cost between $25 million and $40 million. Trump on Monday defended the plans and the costs, claiming he and other donors would be personally covering many of the expenses and hailing it as an opportunity to 'celebrate our military.' The president told reporters at the White House there would be 'tanks all over the place' and that 'thousands and thousands of soldiers going to bravely march down the streets.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Newark airport videos: Delhi formally takes up matter with US Embassy
The Ministry of External Affairs has formally raised the matter with the US Embassy in New Delhi in the wake of social media videos purportedly showing an Indian national being handcuffed and pinned to the ground at the Newark airport. The Indian Consulate in New York has also been in touch with the US authorities to ascertain the details of the incident, as per sources. Posted on X by Indian-American entrepreneur Kunal Jain, the videos and photographs showed an unidentified young man being restrained by officers from the Port Authority Police Department (PAPD), the agency responsible for law enforcement across major transport hubs in New York and New Jersey Sunday night. Jain had tagged the Indian Embassy in Washington DC and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar in his series of posts. During a call from The Indian Express to Port Authority Police Department at Newark International Airport, an officer said that 'the PAPD doesn't get involved in deportations'. 'The Ministry has formally raised the matter with the US Embassy in New Delhi. Our Embassy in Washington DC and the Indian Consulate in New York have also been in touch with the US authorities to ascertain the details,' sources in the Ministry said. 'We have so far have not received any details about the incident or the circumstances under which he was restrained, the flight he had to board or boarded and his final destination,' sources said, adding that the ministry will continue to follow up on the matter. There is still no information if the person has left Newark or has arrived in India, as per those aware of the matter.


New Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump-Musk farce: Egos can chip away at American enterprise
Behind the bravado lies real power. Musk's companies, including SpaceX, Tesla, and Starlink, have benefited enormously from government contracts—SpaceX alone has received over $20 billion since 2008. A fuming Trump threatened to terminate these deals to save 'billions.' Musk impulsively countered, saying he would decommission the Dragon spacecraft that transports astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. Though he quickly backtracked, the message was clear: he is willing to use public services as leverage in a personal feud. This is where the drama turns truly dangerous. That a single billionaire can disrupt America's space programme or potentially affect national defence operations reveals just how fragile this public-private dependency has become. What once were collective public endeavours—space travel, defence, innovation—are now at the mercy of erratic personalities. The US has no near-term replacement for SpaceX's Falcon 9 or Dragon capsules, and Musk knows it more than anyone else. The political stakes are no smaller. Musk has donated nearly $300 million to Republicans in the past year, money the party will sorely miss if he withdraws or, worse, turns it against them. Trump's inner circle remains tied to regulatory agencies investigating Musk's companies, from Tesla's driverless taxis to labour practices. With both men capable of inflicting institutional damage, their unravelling alliance is already spilling beyond rhetoric. This isn't just an elite squabble. It's a warning. When two men with oversized egos and overlapping empires fall out, it's the public that pays the price. The Trump-Musk drama may play out on social media, but its consequences are real and dangerously far-reaching.