India's top think tank recommends easing investment rules for Chinese firms, sources say
ADVERTISEMENT Currently, all investment by Chinese entities in Indian companies need to gain a security clearance from both India's home and foreign ministries.
The think tank, NITI Aayog, has proposed that Chinese companies can take a stake of up to 24% in an Indian company without any approval being required, said the sources who were not authorised to speak to media and declined to be identified.
The proposal, reported for the first time by Reuters, is part of a plan to boost foreign direct investment in India and is being studied by the trade ministry's industries department, the finance and foreign ministries, as well as Prime Minister Narendra Modi's office, the sources said. And while not all of NITI Aayog's ideas are necessarily taken up by the government, the proposal comes at a time when India and China are seeking to mend ties that have been particularly strained since border clashes in 2020. Any decision to ease might be months away and will be taken by political leaders, two of the sources said. They added that the industries department is in favour of easing, but the other government bodies are yet to give their final view.
ADVERTISEMENT NITI Aayog, the ministries, the industries department and the prime minister's office did not reply to Reuters requests for comment.
ADVERTISEMENT The rules were put in place in 2020 after border clashes, including hand-to-hand fighting between the two neighbours. They only apply to land bordering nations, which affects Chinese companies the most. By contrast, companies from other countries can freely invest in many sectors such as manufacturing and pharmaceuticals, while some sensitive sectors such as defence, banking and media have restrictions.
ADVERTISEMENT Deals such as a 2023 plan by China's BYD to invest $1 billion in an electric car joint venture have been shelved due to the rules, sources have said. While foreign investment has slowed globally since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the rules hampering Chinese investment in India have been seen as a significant factor behind a large drop in the South Asian country's FDI. Net foreign direct investment in India tumbled to a record low of just $353 million in the past financial year, a fraction of the $43.9 billion logged in the year ended March 2021. An easing in military tensions since October has led to more efforts by both countries to mend ties, with plans for the resumption of direct flights and India seeking a "permanent solution" to their decades-old border dispute.
ADVERTISEMENT Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar's made his first trip to China in five years this week, telling his counterpart that the two nations must settle tensions along their border and avoid restrictive trade measures such as China's curbs on the supply of rare earth magnets.
The think tank has also recommended revamping the board that decides on foreign direct investment proposals, the sources said.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
(Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.
NEXT STORY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
13 minutes ago
- India.com
Ticking Water Bomb: How Chinas Brahmaputra Dam Puts India & Bangladesh On Edge? IN PICS
photoDetails english 2935013 Updated:Jul 22, 2025, 09:04 AM IST China's New Tibet Dam Sparks Alert 1 / 9 China officially began building a huge USD 167.8 billion dam scheme across the Brahmaputra River in Tibet, close to its border with India's Arunachal Pradesh. This ambitious hydropower project, in Nyingchi City at the lower reaches of the river (also called Yarlung Zangbo in Tibet), has put the downstream countries on high alert straight away, especially India and Bangladesh. Li Qiang Unveils $167.8B Yarlung Dam 2 / 9 Chinese Premier Li Qiang formally declared the start of the project on Saturday, as per reports from official media. This gigantic project is planned as the globe's largest infrastructure project, with five cascade hydropower stations to be built at a substantial total investment of around 1.2 trillion Yuan (roughly USD 167.8 billion). The selected location close to the "Great Bend" of the Yarlung Tsangpo is of strategic importance for hydropower development because the river has a steep 2,000-meter fall over a short distance of just 50 kilometers. To give a point of reference, China's largest dam at present, the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River, has an installed capacity of 22.5 gigawatts. Brahmaputra Dam Threatens Downstream Flow 3 / 9 The building of such a massive dam is causing great apprehensions in the lower riparian nations. The siting of the proposed dam, where the Brahmaputra makes a sudden U-turn before entering into Arunachal Pradesh (where it becomes known as Siang/Dihang) and then flowing into Bangladesh (as the Jamuna), stands to directly endanger the natural flow of the river. Brahmaputra Dam: Agri, Eco Threats Loom 4 / 9 This perturbation would have dire implications for agricultural yields, particularly for the critical crops of rice and jute, and would imperil biodiversity hotspots like ecologically fragile Eastern Himalayas. China highlighted the significance of the project to meet its renewable energy goals, while India and Bangladesh remain susceptible to the possibility of damage to water flow, environmental stability, and larger regional geopolitics. A River Across 4 Nations 5 / 9 The Brahmaputra is an important transboundary river, with its extensive basin covering about 580,000 square kilometers over four nations: China (50.5%), India (33.3%), Bangladesh (8.1%), and Bhutan (7.8%). In India alone, it extends over about 194,413 square kilometers, covering areas in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Sikkim, and West Bengal. River's Journey: Tsangpo to Jamuna 6 / 9 From its source in the Chemayungdung Glacier in the Kailash mountains of Tibet, east of Lake Mansarovar, the river drifts east for almost 1,200 kilometers as the Yarlung Tsangpo. It makes a unique 'U' bend at Namcha Barwa, popularly called the Great Bend, entering India by way of Arunachal Pradesh. Joining the Dibang and the Lohit rivers, it becomes the Brahmaputra. Its major right-bank tributaries in India are the Subansiri, Kameng, Manas, and Sankosh. The river further continues into Bangladesh close to Dhubri, Assam, and is called Jamuna after confluence with the Teesta, finally merging with the Padma before emptying into the Bay of Bengal. Power Potential vs. Floods 7 / 9 The flow of Brahmaputra is special; it flows in diametrically opposite directions – west to east in Tibet and east to west in Assam. In Tibet, it is less full of water and silt because of the cold and dry climate, but in its passage through India, it is supplemented with many rain-fed tributaries, resulting in heavy siltation, recurring floods, and the development of braided channels and river islands, such as Majuli, the largest in the world. Tibet's high gradient of a fall of some 4,800 meters in 1,700 kilometers provides enormous hydroelectric potential, a characteristic much diminished on its passage into the Assam Valley. India-China River Talks Stalled 8 / 9 Notwithstanding the shared character of the Brahmaputra, coordination processes between China and India on transboundary rivers seem to be limited and interrupted. For Ashok Kantha, a former Indian Ambassador to China, an umbrella Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on cooperation on transboundary rivers was signed in 2013 with no termination date, but "no activity" is presently being pursued under it, according to the Jal Shakti Ministry's website. Transboundary River Data Standoff 9 / 9 Two separate MoUs exist for the Brahmaputra and Sutlej rivers. The Brahmaputra MoU, renewable every five years, reportedly lapsed in 2023, with renewal processes ongoing through diplomatic channels. The Sutlej MoU, prompted by the Parechu incident, is pending renewal, with China not agreeing to year-round data provision. An Expert Level Mechanism, established in 2006 for annual meetings, has also seen interruptions.
India.com
13 minutes ago
- India.com
Will Team India Boycott Pakistan In World Cup After WCL Snub? Salman Butt Dares BCCI
In a dramatic turn of events, the India vs Pakistan clash in the World Championship of Legends (WCL) was called off after several Indian players, led by Yuvraj Singh, withdrew from the high-voltage encounter. The move, which came amid rising nationalist sentiment and backlash over geopolitical tensions, has ignited a fiery debate over the future of Indo-Pak cricket—stretching even to global platforms like the ICC World Cup and the Olympics. What was expected to be a nostalgic face-off between cricketing legends turned into a diplomatic flashpoint. The game, slated for Sunday in Birmingham, was scrapped just hours before the toss, prompting accusations, finger-pointing, and some stinging commentary from the Pakistani camp. Salman Butt's Explosive Reaction: "Now Don't Play in World Cup or Olympics Either" Leading the charge was former Pakistan captain Salman Butt, who lambasted the Indian contingent for their decision to pull out. In a hard-hitting video on his YouTube channel, Butt accused India of politicizing sport and challenged them to maintain the same stance across all major events—including ICC tournaments and even the Olympics. 'Make this a promise now,' Butt declared. 'If you're boycotting here because of politics, don't face us at the World Cup, don't compete in the Olympics. Let the world see how consistent your nationalism really is.' Butt's comments have since gone viral across social media, fueling widespread discussion about the limits of sporting diplomacy and whether political decisions should dictate team participation in international fixtures. The Fallout: Pressure, Patriotism, and Public Sentiment The Indian players' decision to back out reportedly stemmed from the public backlash following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, which triggered a strong military response from India via Operation Sindoor. Key figures including Shikhar Dhawan, Suresh Raina, Harbhajan Singh, Irfan Pathan, and Yusuf Pathan are said to have withdrawn in solidarity, unwilling to be seen sharing a field with their Pakistani counterparts. While WCL organisers issued an apology, stating they had 'unintentionally caused discomfort' to Indian players, the damage was already done. What was meant to be a celebration of cricketing nostalgia quickly escalated into a diplomatic drama. Expert Take: National Identity vs Global Sporting Spirit From a broader lens, this episode raises critical questions: Should political tensions override sporting commitments? Can India-Pakistan matches exist in a vacuum, untouched by the historical baggage they carry? Analysts believe this controversy is just the tip of the iceberg. With major tournaments like the Asia Cup, ICC T20 World Cup 2026, and even the Champions Trophy 2025 on the horizon, calls for an official stance from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) are growing louder. 'Consistency is key,' said one cricket analyst. 'If India refuses to play Pakistan at one level, they'll face mounting pressure to do the same at all levels. But that also risks isolating cricket from global diplomacy, where such matches often act as soft-power engagement tools.'
New Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
A Rebel within
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: It was V S Achuthanandan's wont to see divides everywhere. Where none existed, he would create one. He would position himself on one side and wage a battle. He has won some; lost some, and transformed himself in the process. His political longevity has surprised and irked many, for he was the archetypal voice of opposition – in his party and the larger society. As CPM state secretary (1980-1992), he ruled with an iron fist. Later on, however, he transformed himself into a critical insider, waging pitched battles against power concentrated in the hands of one-time party proteges. He was a hawk, who wouldn't budge from his notions of doctrinal purity, no matter what. That essentially meant he had to swim against the organisational tide. Though he was one of the 32 founding leaders of CPM in 1964, his deviation from the party line began the very next year. In 1964-65, almost the entire CPM leadership was accused of being Chinese spies and jailed during the India-China war. As a prisoner at the Poojappura Central Prison, VS organised prisoners and exhorted them to donate blood for Indian soldiers. The party prison committee rejected his proposal saying it went against Marxist-Leninist principles.
