China summons chip giant Nvidia over alleged security risks
Nvidia is a world-leading producer of AI semiconductors, but the United States effectively restricts which chips it can export to China on national security grounds.
A key issue has been Chinese access to the "H20", a less powerful version of Nvidia's AI processing units that the company developed specifically for export to China.
The California-based firm said this month it would resume H20 sales to China after Washington pledged to remove licensing curbs that had halted exports.
But the firm still faces obstacles. U.S. lawmakers have proposed plans to require Nvidia and other manufacturers of advanced AI chips to include built-in location tracking capabilities.
And Beijing's top internet regulator said Thursday it had summoned Nvidia representatives to discuss recently discovered "serious security issues" involving the H20.
The Cyberspace Administration of China said it had asked Nvidia to "explain the security risks of vulnerabilities and backdoors in its H20 chips sold to China and submit relevant supporting materials".
The statement posted on social media noted that, according to US experts, location tracking and remote shutdown technologies for Nvidia chips "are already matured".
The announcement marked the latest complication for Nvidia in selling its advanced products in the key Chinese market, where it is in increasingly fierce competition with homegrown technology firms.
CEO Jensen Huang said during a closely watched visit to Beijing this month that his firm remained committed to serving local customers.
Huang said he had been assured during talks with top Chinese officials during the trip that the country was "open and stable".
"They want to know that Nvidia continues to invest here, that we are still doing our best to serve the market here," he said.
Nvidia this month became the first company to hit $4 trillion in market value: a new milestone in Wall Street's bet that AI will transform the global economy.
Jost Wubbeke of the Sinolytics consultancy told AFP the move by China to summon Nvidia was "not surprising in the sense that targeting individual U.S. companies has become a common tool in the context of US-China tensions".
"What is surprising, however, is the timing," he noted, after the two countries agreed to further talks to extend their trade truce.
"China's action may signal a shift toward a more assertive stance," Wubbeke said.
Beijing is also aiming to reduce reliance on foreign tech by promoting Huawei's domestically developed 910C chip as an alternative to the H20, he added.
"From that perspective, the US decision to allow renewed exports of the H20 to China could be seen as counterproductive, as it might tempt Chinese hyperscalers to revert to the H20, potentially undermining momentum behind the 910C and other domestic alternatives."
New hurdles to Nvidia's operation in China come as the country's economy wavers, beset by a years-long property sector crisis and heightened trade headwinds under US President Donald Trump.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has called for the country to enhance self-reliance in certain areas deemed vital for national security, including AI and semiconductors, as tensions with Washington mount.
The country's firms have made great strides in recent years, with Huang praising their "super-fast" innovation during his visit to Beijing this month.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
43 minutes ago
- India.com
ChatGPT Launches Study Mode Feature For Students In 11 Indian Languages; Heres How To Use It Free
ChatGPT Study Mode Feature: OpenAI has launched a new Study Mode in ChatGPT for free, designed to assist students with learning, revision, and exam preparation. This dedicated mode is now available for free in India, offering a major educational boost to millions of users. The AI-powered study assistant is accessible to logged-in users across Free, Plus, Pro, and Team plans. The new Study is available in 11 Indian languages with multimodal support, bringing voice, image, and text together to make AI learning accessible for diverse learners. Meanwhile, the ChatGPT Edu users will also get access in the coming weeks. This move comes as a response to growing concerns and conversations around the use of AI in education, aiming to make learning more accessible and effective for students. The new Study Mode in ChatGPT helps students learn more effectively. They can get simple explanations, ask subject-specific questions, and even take quizzes — all within one interface. Whether it's math, essays, or science, Study Mode makes studying easier, more personalized, and more helpful. The new mobile-friendly design ensures that students from any part of the country, whether urban or rural, can use it easily, making high-quality learning support widely accessible. ChatGPT 'Study Mode: How To Use It For Free Step 1: Go to the ChatGPT app or website and sign in to your account. Step 2: On the home screen, look for the 'Study Mode' banner or icon. Step 3: Tap or click the banner to switch to Study Mode. Step 4: Choose what you want to study, like English, History, or Physics. Step 5: Ask questions, get simple explanations, or try quizzes and practice material. How To Use ChatGPT Study Mode For Academic Success The new mode helps students make the most of their study time. You can ask the AI to break down your syllabus into daily, bite-sized lessons, making learning more manageable. Students can practice regularly by using the quiz feature to test themselves before exams and stay sharp. If any topic feels confusing, simply request a simplified explanation or an easy-to-understand analogy. To enhance your preparation, you can copy AI-generated summaries into your personal study notes or journal. Adding further, students can easily switch between topics based on their needs and requirements.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
India–China thaw: Strategic signalling, not concession
Earlier this month, it was announced that India is resuming the issuance of tourist visas for Chinese citizens. Just before this, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval visited China for meetings of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar travelled to China shortly after and met with Chinese President Xi Jinping. This was the first such meeting since the Galwan Valley clash of 2020. This is a strategic signal from India amidst new circumstances created by some of the most powerful states in the existing international system. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's recent uptick in diplomatic ties with China is not a concession; instead, it reflects India's calculated posture of strategic signalling. With the bilateral trade agreement with the US currently stalled and the global economic landscape shifting rapidly, India is engaging with China not to resolve old disputes but to gain strategic leverage through the creation of optics. Since late 2024, India and China have entered into a deliberate but structural phase to engage with each other to reduce tensions along the Himalayan border. After experiencing four years of protected standoff following the deadly Galwan face-off, the diplomatic levers have shifted. The latest phase began with an important breakthrough on October 21, 2024, when both countries agreed on a border pact, letting each other patrol at previously restricted friction points like Depsang and Demchok. The agreement helped significantly in restoring trust and establishing communication between two powerful neighbours. After this agreement there has been a flurry of diplomatic exchanges between both the powers. These consistent meetings, though, suggest a pattern in which both nations are trying to reduce mistrust and restore a dialogue to prevent further crisis. Both nations are engaging at a greater pace than they ever were doing. For India, this is about asserting sovereignty while avoiding conflict. For China, it is about projecting stability along its southern frontier as it faces growing pressure in the Western Pacific and domestic economic headwinds. Yet the question remains: Why is India doing this now when the Line of Actual Control (LAC) is still contested? New Delhi is pursuing economic de-risking, not decoupling from China. Despite all the geopolitical friction, India remains deeply entwined with Chinese capital, tech, and rare earth dependencies. India acknowledges this fact and is opting for stability management. Chasing a compartmentalised relationship that seeks to discuss boundary questions without foreclosing economic activities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, India finds itself in utmost precarity when China also responded with bans and curbs on rare earth materials. Additionally, in an attempt to limit technology transfers to India, along with skilled workers, the Chinese government has recalled hundreds of Chinese engineers and technicians from Foxconn's iPhone factories in India. Foxconn is meeting the shortages by bringing in Taiwanese technicians. India is neither unaware nor unresponsive. Similarly, the suspicion runs through: Will this ongoing round of discussions succeed in producing lasting peace, or is it merely a tactical de-escalation? Historical experience suggests otherwise. The Galwan incursions occurred in the backdrop of the Wuhan summit in 2018 and the Chennai informal summit in 2019, which were also celebrated as turning points. Also, the fundamental issue, the differing perceptions of the LAC, remains unresolved. Confidence-building is underway, but confidence itself remains fragile. The recent diplomatic engagements in Beijing, including discussions on 'de-escalation' and 'normalising people-to-people exchange', occur against a backdrop where India perceives the complete resolution of the border issue as a prerequisite for normal relations, while China prefers to compartmentalise the border issue, pushing for cooperation while maintaining territorial claims and even military posturing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While both sides have expressed a desire for a 'positive trajectory' and optimism for 'stable and constructive ties', the talks were steered towards managing disagreements rather than fundamentally resolving them. Opening direct air services and the Kailash Manasarovar yatra are positive steps but do not address the core issue of strategic and territorial disputes. Beijing, on the other hand, strongly objected to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's public birthday greeting to the Dalai Lama in July 2025, reiterating its opposition to any official engagement with the Tibetan spiritual leader. While both nations appear to agree on the need for immediate stability, their long-term goals diverge. India seeks a restoration of the pre-2020 border status and a rules-based order in Asia and elsewhere; China, meanwhile, aims to assert regional influence with and without direct confrontation, and examples range from Doklam to Galwan to China trying to wipe out the identity of Tibet, building the biggest dam on the Yarlung Tsanpo to throttle the downstream Brahmaputra River in India, and so on. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Operation Sindoor also served as an indirect test of tensions between India and China. Beijing's response, calling India's retaliation against terrorism 'unfortunate', caused a rift in New Delhi. While urging 'restraint on all sides", China notably refrained from denouncing the terror provocation or addressing India's security concerns. After Operation Sindoor, the deputy chief of army staff for India also issued a warning on Sino-Pakistan collusion during the operation. If there's one significant shift in India's approach, it is a more layered diplomacy—engaging China bilaterally but also within the framework of multilateral forums like the SCO and Brics, while continuing strategic balancing elsewhere. It is not containment nor alignment, but calibrated coexistence. For Beijing too, stabilising ties with Delhi serves a larger goal: preventing a second front while managing the US pressure in East Asia. Given that the US has lifted export restrictions on Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) tools and software bound for Chinese buyers, and the EU is desperately engaging with China, there is no clarity on whether India can ever count on Western powers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India understands China as a threat and has been at the receiving end of more conflicts, military and otherwise, with China than any other country in the world. However, it is also a neighbour and a powerful one, with which India will have to manage its relationship. There is no better way in such a complex scenario except diplomacy and optics. Sriparna Pathak is a professor of China Studies at OP Jindal Global University and a senior fellow at the Jindal India Institute. Gaurav Sen is a senior research fellow at the School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi. He is the author of the book 'Peril of the Pacific: Military Balance and Battle for Taiwan'. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.


Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian-origin woman advocates working ‘14+ hours a day… It's baseline'; internet reacts
An Indian-origin woman and founder of a US-based startup has stirred a heated discussion online after claiming that working 80 hours a week is not excessive but simply the 'baseline'. Neha Suresh, the founder of April – a US-based AI voice assistant app – posted a timelapse video on X (formerly Twitter), showing her working from early morning until late at night. In her now-viral post, Suresh wrote: 'If you're not spending 14+ hours a day working on your dream, you're ngmi.' She added, 'You can't build a world-changing product on 9–5 energy. 80-hour weeks aren't extreme. It's baseline.' Her comments, which have racked up over 65,000 views, sparked a range of responses from users — from admiration to criticism. One person asked, 'What do you do to decompress after an 80-hour week? Physically. What actually works?' Another replied with sarcasm, 'Why just 14 hours? Make it 24.' Some shared personal experiences. 'I burned out chasing 80-hour weeks. Found I actually build better products when I'm rested and thinking clearly,' a user wrote. Another commented, 'Wow, another person who's never had to pay bills or have a social life telling me how to live my best life.' The post has since fuelled a wider conversation about work-life balance and the pressure of hustle culture in startups and tech. Joining the ongoing conversation about work-life balance, India-origin tech leader Dharmesh Shah had offered a frank take on the reality of building a successful startup. Shah, who is the founder and Chief Technology Officer of HubSpot, shared his thoughts in a post on X (formerly Twitter) in March, where he spoke openly about the challenges of managing both work and personal life in the startup world. He acknowledged that maintaining balance is difficult, especially when aiming for high levels of success. "Wanting work-life balance is OK. Wanting to build a breakthrough startup is OK. But you shouldn't expect both," he wrote. 'In 30+ years and knowing hundreds of founders, I've never met a single founder that built a breakthrough startup while maintaining work-life balance. Any competitive human endeavor requires sacrifice to stand-out. Whether it's athletics, arts or entrepreneurship. Raw talent is not enough. You have to toil,' Shah wrote. 'Unhappiness comes from expecting more out of the system than you put in. Either path is totally OK, as long as you understand that you picked a path. Two roads diverged in a wood, and if you take the one most traveled by, don't think that won't make a difference,' Shah said.