Fortnite says it's offline on Apple's iOS around the world
FILE - Shoppers look at Apple products in the Apple Store at the Walden Galleria in Buffalo, NY, on Saturday, Nov. 30, 2024. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)
By WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS and MICHAEL LIEDTKE
Fortnite says it's now unavailable on Apple's iOS globally because the tech giant blocked a bid to rerelease the popular video game for iPhone users in the U.S. and Europe.
'Apple has blocked our Fortnite submission so we cannot release to the U.S. App Store or to the Epic Games Store for iOS in the European Union," Epic Games-owned Fortnite wrote on X early Friday — claiming that Apple's move would now prevent the game's iOS availability around the world.
'Sadly, Fortnite on iOS will be offline worldwide until Apple unblocks it,' Fortnite said.
In a statement sent to The Associated Press, Apple said it had specifically asked Epic Sweden to resubmit the app update 'without including the U.S. storefront of the App Store so as not to impact Fortnite in other geographies.' But, the company added, it "did not take any action to remove the live version of Fortnite from alternative distribution marketplaces.'
Fortnite's exile from the iPhone app store is the latest twist in a yearslong feud between Apple and Epic. Back in 2020, Apple pulled Fortnite from its app store and Epic filed an antitrust lawsuit against the company in the U.S., alleging the technology trendsetter was illegally using its power to gouge game makers.
After a monthlong trial in 2021, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled against most of Epic's claims, but ordered Apple to loosen its previously-exclusive control over the payments made for in-app commerce and allow links to alternative options in the U.S. for the first time — threatening to undercut sizable commissions that Apple had been collecting from in-app transactions for over a decade.
After exhausting an appeal that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, Apple last year introduced a new system that opened the door for links to alternative payment options while still imposing a 27% commission on in-app transactions executed outside its own system.
Epic fired back by alleging Apple was thumbing its nose at the legal system, reviving another round of court hearings that lasted nearly a year before Gonzalez Rogers delivered a stinging rebuke last month — which held Apple in civil contempt and banned the company from collecting any commission on alternative payment systems.
That ruling cleared the way for Epic to finally return to the iPhone app store in the U.S., a reinstatement the video game maker was anticipating before Apple's latest move.
Fortnite's availability in the EU, meanwhile, is under an alternative store for iPhone users — now called the Epic Games Store. Apple last year cleared the way for this last year under new regulatory pressures. As a result, Fornite and other Epic games had been available for download on iPhones using this store in the EU since August 2024.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
3 days ago
- Japan Today
Google to appeal online search antitrust ruling
The judge's decision on potential remedies is expected by August 2025 Google said Saturday it will appeal a ruling against it for anti-competitive practices in online search, a day after urging a U.S. judge to reject the suggestion it spin off its Chrome browser. "We will wait for the Court's opinion. And we still strongly believe the Court's original decision was wrong, and look forward to our eventual appeal," the tech giant wrote on X. Google was found guilty in the summer of 2024 of illegal practices to establish and maintain its monopoly in online search by a federal judge in Washington. The Justice Department is now demanding remedies that could transform the digital landscape: Google's divestiture from its Chrome browser and a ban on entering exclusivity agreements with smartphone manufacturers to install the search engine by default. It is also asking that the California-based company be forced to share the data used to produce search results on Chrome. The department's proposal "reserves the right for the government to decide who gets Google users' data. Not the Court," Google said Saturday. "While we heard a lot about how the remedies would help various well-funded competitors (w/ repeated references to Bing), we heard very little about how all this helps consumers," Google added, referring to the Microsoft-owned search engine. The firm has proposed much more limited measures, including giving phone manufacturers the possibility to pre-install its Google Play app store but not Chrome or the search engine. The Friday hearing devoted to arguments marked the end of the trial to determine Google's penalty. The judge's decision is expected by August. © 2025 AFP
Asahi Shimbun
3 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Kore-eda all in favor of digital tech, but also reveres old ways
Acclaimed film director Hirokazu Kore-eda makes clear he embraces cutting-edge digital tools but also cherishes what's old. That message rings loud and clear in his latest project. Shot entirely on the iPhone 16 Pro, 'Last Scene,' a 30-minute short, is currently streaming on Apple Japan Inc.'s YouTube channel and elsewhere. The story opens as screenwriter Kurata (played by Taiga Nakano) revises his script in a family restaurant. A woman who calls herself Yui (Momoko Fukuchi) speaks to him. She says she has come from 50 years in the future and is a granddaughter of an actress starring in a TV drama series Kurata is working on. She adds that TV dramas have disappeared from terrestrial channels in her world because of his work. Kore-eda said he was surprised most by the smartphone's Action Mode feature. 'The footage I shot while I was running looked steady as if they were shot (with a camera installed) on a rail,' he said. 'I didn't use the iPhone to record sound, but the sound quality is also remarkable.' Kore-eda clearly welcomes advances in technology. But at the same time, he wants to resist progress. 'In 1995, when I made a professional debut, films were shot on film. But now, they are shot, edited and screened digitally,' he said. 'I also want to cherish the inconvenient aspects of film. When things become convenient, it is difficult to think of answers on-site,' he added. While at the restaurant, Yui refuses to order from a tablet and demands a menu with the dishes written on paper. Although 'Last Scene' is streamed on YouTube, Yui has come to the present day to prevent the extinction of terrestrial TV dramas. 'I wanted to make it a story that isn't simple,' Kore-eda said. 'It is only natural to accept changes in a positive manner,' he continued. 'But I also want to cherish the affection for things that are disappearing.' 'I hope the audience shares the ambivalence the protagonist has.'
Japan Today
3 days ago
- Japan Today
Google makes case for keeping Chrome browser
The US antitrust case poised to weaken Google's dominance in online search comes as OpenAI, Perplexity and other rivals are putting generative artificial intelligence to work fetching information from the internet for users By Thomas URBAIN Google on Friday urged a U.S. judge to reject the notion of making it spin off its Chrome browser to weaken its dominance in online search. Rival attorneys made their final arguments before U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta, who is considering "remedies" to impose after making a landmark decision last year that Google maintained an illegal monopoly in search. U.S. government attorneys have called on Mehta to order Google divest itself of Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet. They also want Google barred from agreements with partners such as Apple and Samsung to distribute its search tools, which was the focus of the suit against the Silicon Valley internet giant. Three weeks of testimony ended early in May, with Friday devoted to rival sides parsing points of law and making their arguments before Mehta in a courtroom in Washington. John Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, told Mehta that there was no evidence presented showing people would have opted for a different search engine if no exclusivity deals had been in place. Schmidtlein noted that Verizon installed Chrome on smartphones even though the U.S. telecom titan owned Yahoo! search engine and was not bound by a contract with Google. Of the 100 or so witnesses heard at trial, not one said "if I had more flexibility, I would have installed Bing" search engine from Microsoft, the Google attorney told the judge. Department of Justice attorney David Dahlquist countered that Apple, which was paid billions of dollars to make Chrome the default browser on iPhones, "repeatedly asked for more flexibility" but was denied by Google. Google contends that the United States has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system. "Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition," said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston. "It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players, and leave users with worse products." The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence (AI) to work fetching information from the internet in response to user queries. The online search antitrust suit was filed against Google some five years ago, before ChatGPT made its debut, triggering AI fervor. Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings. Testimony at trial included Apple vice president of services Eddy Cue revealing that Google's search traffic on Apple devices declined in April for the first time in over two decades. Cue testified that Google was losing ground to AI alternatives like ChatGPT and Perplexity. Mehta pressed rival attorneys regarding the potential for Google to share data as proposed by the DoJ in its recommended remedies. "We're not looking to kneecap Google," DoJ attorney Adam Severt told the judge. "But, we are looking to make sure someone can compete with Google." Schmidtlein contended that the data Google is being asked to share contains much more than just information about people's online searches, saying it would be tantamount to handing over the fruit of investments made over the course of decades. "There are countless algorithms that Google engineers have invented that have nothing to do with click and query data," Schmidtlein said. "Their remedy says we want to be on par with all of your ingenuity, and, respectfully your honor, that is not proportional to the conduct of this case." © 2025 AFP
