
House Democrats launch bid to subpoena Justice Department for Epstein files
Democrats on a subcommittee of the powerful House Committee on Oversight made a motion for the subpoena Wednesday afternoon, just hours before the House was scheduled to end its July work session and depart Washington for a monthlong break.
The subcommittee's Republican chairman, Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana, postponed a vote on the matter until the end of the meeting. While several Republicans on the panel are members of a right-wing faction and have called for the release of the files, it was not clear whether they would vote for the subpoena.
During a brief break in the meeting, Higgins told reporters he expected the motion for the subpoena to pass with some changes.
'If the Republican Party, if our colleagues on this committee don't join us in this vote, then what they're essentially doing is joining President Donald Trump in complicity,' Rep. Summer Lee, the Pennsylvania Democrat who made the motion for the subpoena, told reporters outside the hearing room.
The move by Democrats showed how they were doing practically everything in their power to force Republicans to act on the Epstein files. House Speaker Mike Johnson — caught between demands from Trump and clamoring from his own members for the House to act — has resisted calls for action and prepared to send the House home a day early.
Johnson told reporters earlier Wednesday there was no need to vote on legislation calling for the release of the Epstein files this week because the Trump administration is 'already doing everything within their power to release them.'
Yet Democrats have delighted this week in pressing Republicans to support the release of the files. Their efforts halted the GOP's legislative agenda for the week and turned attention to an issue that Trump has unsuccessfully implored his supporters to forget about.
'They're fleeing our work, our job and sending us back home because they don't want to vote to release these files. This is something that they ran on. This is something that they talked about: the importance of transparency, holding pedophiles accountable,' Lee said.
Democratic leaders are hoping to make the issue about much more than just Epstein, who died in his New York jail cell six years ago while he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges.
'Why haven't Republicans released the Epstein files to the American people? It's reasonable to conclude that Republicans are continuing to protect the lifestyles of the rich and the shameless, even if that includes pedophiles,' said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries at a news conference. 'So it's all connected.'
It comes as both parties are gearing up to take their messaging to voters on Trump's big multitrillion-dollar tax breaks and spending cuts bill. For Republicans, it's 'beautiful' legislation that will spark economic growth; for Democrats, it's an 'ugly' gift mostly to the richest Americans that undermines health care for low-income people.
Yet as furor has grown on the right over the Trump administration's reversal on promises related to Epstein, several Democrats have seized on the opportunity to divide Republicans on the issue.
'This goes to a fundamental sense of, 'Is our government co-opted by rich and powerful people that isn't looking out for ordinary Americans? Or can we have a government that looks out for ordinary Americans?'' said Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who has put forward a bipartisan bill meant to force release of the files.
Republican leaders accuse Democrats of caring about the issue purely for political gain. They point out that the Department of Justice held on to the Epstein investigation through the presidency of Democrat Joe Biden.
Trump's Justice Department is also seeking the release of testimony from secret grand jury proceedings in the Epstein case, though that effort is unlikely to produce new revelations.
The House Oversight Committee, with support from Republicans, also advanced Tuesday a subpoena for Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, for a deposition.
However, those lawmakers who want Congress to take a stronger role in the Epstein files have cautioned that Maxwell, who is serving a prison sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls, may be an unreliable witness.
'It's a good idea, but it's not enough. It's not nearly enough,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who has pushed the bipartisan bill to pry the records from the Justice Department.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Olympics organizers willing to treat Trump like a toddler to protect 2028 LA Games
It's the oldest trick in the book for anyone needing to get something done when there's an active toddler or rambunctious puppy around: Give them a toy or a game, or get them to do a task by making them think it's their idea. The distraction keeps them busy and happy while you get some peace and quiet. So it is with President Donald Trump's new 'task force' for the Los Angeles Olympics. Trump signed an executive order Tuesday afternoon creating the task force, which will handle security and transportation issues for the 2028 Summer Games. Yes, there have been task forces for previous Olympics in the United States. But they were not chaired by the president, as this one is. But LA28 needs Trump not to gum up the works over the next three years. By letting him think he's in charge of … something, Games officials could avoid headaches over athlete visas and fan safety while keeping Trump from meddling elsewhere. "We are now focused more than ever on delivery (of the Games) and we can't do this alone. I want to thank President Trump and the entire administration for their support and their partnership as we work to bring these Games home," LA28 chairman Casey Wasserman said at the signing, where he doubled down on the flattery by presenting Trump with a set of the medals from the 1984 Games in Los Angeles. It should embarrass us all that the president of the United States can be so easily played. It should embarrass LA28 that it's willing to be party to it. Yet here we are. The LA Games, the first in the United States since the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, is a multi-billion-dollar effort more than a decade in the making. Organizers are painstaking in their planning, from venues to housing to sponsors. Yet Trump could ruin it all, the proverbial fly in the punchbowl, given his overreaches on immigration and squabbles with Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, both Democrats. Trump picks fights with Bass and Newsom every chance he gets, most notably when he needlessly sent the National Guard into Los Angeles. It's a certainty he'd grandstand in some similar manner during the Games if he didn't think it would make him look bad, too. Olympic athletes and their coaches are supposed to be exempt from Trump's latest travel ban, while Olympic fans are usually greeted with open arms by host countries. Yet the recent refusal to allow Cuba's women's volleyball team and Senegal's women's basketball team into the United States, along with ICE agents who target immigrants, as well as citizens and tourists, have raised concerns that Olympic athletes and fans won't have safe harbor for the Los Angeles Games. If those embarrassing visa problems and the harassment were to be pinned on Trump, however, they're less likely to occur. By creating the task force and putting Trump "in charge" of it, LA28 is letting him think he's an integral part of an event where his only real role should be that of a figurehead. It's organizers' way of making sure he has a vested interest in seeing athletes arrive without issue, fans don't wind up in Alligator Alcatraz and the Los Angeles Games go off without any humiliating sideshows. This isn't the stuff of normally functioning democracies, and no one should pretend it is. Los Angeles organizers also should not assume they've fully protected the Games from Trump's tirades and pettiness. Anyone who thinks they've won a permanent place in Trump's good graces should remember how well that worked out for Elon Musk. Sure enough, Trump was threatening to call in the National Guard and other members of the U.S. military to safeguard the Games before Tuesday's news conference was even over. Insulting Bass in the process for good measure. But with so much time and money already invested, this is also the least-worst option for LA28 and the International Olympic Committee. "We remain incredibly confident in our ability to deliver the greatest Games ever, and that starts with the support of this administration every step of the way," Wasserman said. And before anyone squawks about canceling the Games or moving them, save your breath. The IOC held two Olympics in the middle of a global pandemic and has done business with plenty of other unsavory leaders. It isn't going to be dissuaded by Donald Trump's awful policies or inept handling of global issues. The IOC and its host cities have made going along to get along an art form. Trump's task force is just more of the same, a reminder that the price tag for the Games includes more than money. Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Biden ‘Politburo' aide Bruce Reed blames ex-prez's debate fiasco on his stutter
WASHINGTON — A member of former President Joe Biden's so-called 'Politburo' testified that his ex-boss's infamously bad debate performance was the result of his stutter during a closed-door transcribed interview with House Oversight Committee lawyers this week. Bruce Reed, 65, Biden's former deputy chief of staff for policy, delivered a spirited defense of the 46th president's cognitive abilities during his roughly six-hour-long transcribed interview Tuesday, The Post has learned. 'Mr. Reed claimed in his transcribed interview that Joe Biden's debate performance was the result of his stutter,' a source familiar with Reed's testimony told The Post. Advertisement 'When asked whether Americans' concerns about Joe Biden's mental acuity were legitimate, Mr. Reed responded that he believes Americans should not have had any concerns about the President's mental faculties.' 3 Bruce Reed has been described as a policy wonk and was seen as a driving force behind much of former President Joe Biden's domestic agenda. Bloomberg via Getty Images Reed, who is now the ninth ex-Biden aide to appear before the panel, did not take questions from the press before his closed-door testimony. Biden struggled with a stutter during his youth, but he participated in numerous public debates over the past five decades where he seemed much more coherent. Advertisement Biden, 82, agreed to debate President Trump in late June of last year, far earlier than presidential verbal bouts have typically taken place during recent decades, usually in the fall. Reed, who has been described by Democratic operatives as a policy wonk, was among the advisers who helped prepare Biden for the notorious fumbling debate. Biden appeared on the debate stage borderline stonefaced at times and struggled to complete some of his thoughts, with his mouth agape during portions. The stunning display sparked a Democratic mutiny against Biden that led to him dropping out of the 2024 race. Advertisement 3 Former President Joe Biden has ripped into Republicans for questioning whether he actually made the decisions on how autopen was used. POOL/AFP via Getty Images 'During his interview, Mr. Reed stated that the decision to hold the debate early was a deliberate strategy to get ahead of early voting and the Olympics,' the source recounted. 'He emphasized that the campaign's push for the early debate was unrelated to concerns about President Biden's age.' The bombshell book 'Original Sin' described Reed as one of what the authors called Biden's 'Politburo,' the core inner circle of 'ultimate decision-makers' around the 46th president. He is now the last of the non-family 'Politburo' members described in the book to testify before the panel. Advertisement The 65-year-old has been a key figure in the Biden team and Democratic politics for years. In addition to his time as deputy chief of staff for policy during the Biden administration, Reed also served as Biden's chief of staff during the first half of his vice presidency and held key roles in the 2020 and 2024 campaigns. He also worked in the Clinton administration as the director of the Domestic Policy Council, a deputy campaign manager for policy during the 1992 Clinton campaign for the presidency, and a speechwriter for former Vice President Al Gore during his Senate days. Back in May, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) revived his probe into whether there was a 'cover-up' of Biden's mental cognition that he had opened last Congress. 3 Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer revived the probe into Joe Biden's acuity back in May. Getty Images The Kentucky Republican also expanded the probe to look at Biden's use of autopen to sign official documents after revelations emerged that the 46th president used the device very frequently. No lawmakers were present for Reed's transcribed interview. Biden has publicly ripped into aspersions from Republicans over his use of the autopen and insisted that he made every decision. Advertisement Other ex-Biden aides who sat before the Oversight panel, include former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain; former senior adviser Mike Donilon; former counselor Steve Ricchetti; Jill Biden's powerful former chief of staff Anthony Bernal; former presidential physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor; Ashley Williams, former special assistant to the president and deputy director of Oval Office Operations; and Neera Tanden, the former White House director of the Domestic Policy Council. Some of those ex-Biden aides who came before the powerful investigatory committee had been subpoenaed and opted to plead their Fifth Amendment, refraining from answering questions. Reed had agreed to a transcribed interview before the Oversight Committee and, therefore, wasn't able to plead the Fifth. The powerful investigatory panel is slated to hear from former senior adviser Anita Dunn on Thursday. There are at least four more ex-Biden aides scheduled to appear before the panel after Dunn.


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump call ahead of Russia sanctions deadline ‘productive': Zelensky
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday said that a call with President Trump ahead of a sanctions deadline for Russia was 'productive.' 'A productive conversation with President Trump, with the key focus of course being ending the war. We are grateful to @POTUS for all efforts toward a just and lasting peace,' Zelensky said in a post on the social platform X. 'It is truly a must to stop the killing as soon as possible, and we fully support this. Many months could have already passed without war, had Russia not been prolonging it,' he added. President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to go to Russia this week for what Ukraine has referred to as Moscow's 'last chance' to come to a peace deal before U.S. sanctions are imposed on countries that import oil from Russia. On Sunday, Trump said Witkoff 'may be going to Russia' on Wednesday or Thursday in an effort to lock down a ceasefire. Trump has become increasingly frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has ignored pressure from the president for a peace deal, and he moved up a deadline last week for Russia to come to a peace deal or face increased economic isolation. The president's latest deadline for Russia would technically run out Friday, but Trump has been flexible when it comes to imposing threatened tariffs on other countries. 'Today, we coordinated our positions – Ukraine and the United States. We exchanged assessments of the situation: The Russians have intensified the brutality of their attacks. President Trump is fully informed about Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities and communities,' Zelensky said in his X post Tuesday. 'Of course, we spoke about sanctions against Russia. Their economy continues to decline, and that's exactly why Moscow is so sensitive to this prospect and President Trump's resolve. This can change a lot,' he added.