
After Stablecoins, Tokenized Assets Will Be The Next Major Institutional Play in Blockchain: By Darren Carvalho
Major institutions such as JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and BlackRock have begun integrating stablecoins into their operations. These TradFi heavyweights are utilising stablecoins for transactions, settlements, and as intermediaries bridging TradFi with DeFi. No other blockchain innovation has been adopted by traditional finance players to this extent, underscoring stablecoins' legitimacy as a bona fide financial instrument.
So what comes next? Which new blockchain creation will capture the attention of TradFi or do stablecoins represent the pinnacle of blockchain's integration into the mainstream? It would appear that we already have a clear answer to this question: Tokenization.
SEC Roundtable assesses Tokenization
Like stablecoins, tokenization enables new market functions that are unfeasible in the traditional financial system. Tokenization, in the simplest terms, is the process of digitally representing real-world assets, including stocks, bonds, and real estate, on the blockchain in the form of a token, and its applications have already begun to pique the interests of private and public institutions.
This was no more evident than during the US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) public roundtable in May. The event brought together industry leaders, regulatory experts, and academics to discuss the potential of moving traditional assets onto blockchain-based platforms.
Executives from BlackRock, Apollo, Fidelity, Invesco, to name just a few, emphasised that tokenization is a significant technological advancement, enabling programmable ownership and providing real-time settlements. Such potential benefits make tokenization particularly attractive for institutions seeking improved market dynamics.
Tokenization is a technological shift
An interesting theme raised at the SEC roundtable is that tokenization should be seen through the lens of a shift as opposed to the creation of entirely new asset classes. Conversations highlighted how tokenization could address various inefficiencies within traditional markets, including costly intermediaries and limited market access - not dissimilar to how stablecoins have overhauled and simplified traditional methods of processing cross-border payments, facilitating greater financial inclusion.
Additionally, panelists emphasised the transformative potential of tokenization in automating compliance processes through smart contracts. They also noted that tokenization was a greater enabler of fractional investments, reducing the minimum purchase price of historically exclusive asset classes, bringing access to a broader range of investors, and therefore increasing liquidity in these tokenized assets.
It is clear that tokenization's promise lies in its radical transformation of existing financial infrastructures. By leveraging blockchain's inherent transparency and immutability, tokenization can enhance investor trust and regulatory oversight while reducing systemic inefficiencies, fundamentally reshaping how assets are traded, settled, and owned in traditional markets.
Challenges facing tokenization
Participants at the SEC roundtable agreed that tokenization offers clear advantages to current market dynamics, but not without drawbacks that must be urgently addressed to enable the kind of institutional adoption seen with stablecoins. Issues such as custody arrangements and the need for regulatory clarity emerged as critical factors.
Fortunately, we're beginning to see Web3 companies that have built tokenization platforms actively address many of the concerns raised by SEC panellists. Standard compliance checks such as Know Your Customer (KYC) and other Anti-Money Laundering safeguards are becoming increasingly standardised across the tokenization ecosystem, reinforcing trust among both retail and institutional investors.
Some tokenization organisations have gone a step further in regulatory compliance by securing full Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) licenses from central banks in their regions of operation. These legal advancements are helping to create compliant secondary markets for tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), allowing investors to buy, sell and trade property-backed tokens within a safely regulated framework.
Of course, there are still areas that need development if tokenization is to reach the scale of institutional adoption seen with stablecoins. While stablecoins have benefited from growing regulatory attention and standardised frameworks, many jurisdictions still lack clear guidelines on how tokenized securities or property-backed tokens are classified, taxed or traded. Interoperability also remains a challenge, with a need for more tokenization protocols and platforms that can integrate across chains and legacy systems, much like how stablecoins operate across exchanges, wallets and DeFi protocols.
After stablecoins, tokenisation can be the next blockchain hit
From reading coverage of the SEC Roundtable, it's clear that institutions recognise the immense potential of tokenization to reshape traditional asset markets - provided regulatory frameworks and technological standards evolve in tandem. Tokenization platforms are already scaling to meet some of these requirements. While certain growing pains still need to be addressed, tokenization is well on its way to becoming the next major institutional opportunity in blockchain technology, with the capacity to redefine the future of financial markets, much like stablecoins have begun to do.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
What you should know about tipping on cruises
Cruise fares often do not include tips, known as gratuities or "crew appreciation," which are instead often added daily, per passenger and can significantly increase the overall cost. Daily gratuity rates vary by cruise line and cabin type, typically ranging from $16 (£12) to $20 (£15) per day for standard cabins and up to $27 (£20) per day for suites. While not compulsory, these tips are expected to reward various crew members, including those not directly seen by passengers. Some cruise lines, particularly British-focused ones like P&O Cruises and Marella, include gratuities in the initial fare, while others, such as Royal Caribbean, add them daily. Passengers can request to remove or reduce automatic gratuities at guest services, though this can be an awkward process, and additional tips can be given for exceptional service.


Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
How hedge funds performed in turbulent July
LONDON/NEW YORK, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hedge fund returns climbed in July as many were lifted by rising stock markets that hit record highs, though others were caught in turbulence sparked by U.S. trade uncertainty, according to a Goldman Sachs report and sources familiar with the funds. Hedge fund stockpickers returned almost 1.5% in July and are up roughly 7.8% for the year so far, said Goldman Sachs in a note to clients on Monday seen by Reuters. Systematic hedge funds trading stocks were on track to deliver their worst monthly performance on record before rebounding after July 25 to claw back half of their losses, finishing with a negative 2% return, said Goldman. These funds were up 10% for the year so far, however, added the bank. While stockpickers benefited by piling into already crowded trades, hedge funds using algorithms to create systematic trading strategies were hurt by busy trades, said Goldman. The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab hit record highs during July, but only returned 1.38%. The biggest multi-strategy funds posted muted returns, including Schonfeld Strategic Advisors' flagship fund Strategic Partners, which was down 0.3% in July and is now up 5.8% for 2025, according to a source familiar with the matter. Schonfeld's Fundamental Equity fund gained 1.4% last month and was up 7.1% in the year, the source added. The $76.9 billion British hedge fund Marshall Wace returned a negative 0.2% in its Market Neutral TOPS fund, bringing its half-year performance to roughly 11%. Its Eureka fund returned 1.6% in July and is up 6.1% for 2025 so far, said another source familiar with the fund's results. *result as of Aug 4 **class B shares, as of July 25


Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Reactions to Trump demanding Intel CEO's resignation
Aug 7 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump has demanded the immediate resignation of Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab CEO Lip-Bu Tan over concerns of his extensive investments in Chinese firms, just months after he assumed leadership of the struggling chipmaker. Tan has invested in hundreds of Chinese technology firms, including at least eight with links to the People's Liberation Army, Reuters reported in April. On Wednesday, Reuters exclusively reported that Republican Senator Tom Cotton questioned Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former company Cadence Design (CDNS.O), opens new tab. Some analysts and investors said Tan's deep knowledge of the Chinese semiconductor landscape is a strategic asset. Others see the political pressure as a sign of growing uncertainty around Intel. Here are some key quotes. "I believe that POTUS shouldn't be calling for any CEO to be stepping down, especially not one who just took the job this year. I think this all boils down to Lip-Bu's past involvement and investment in Chinese semiconductors, which is also what makes him so valuable as CEO." "He's more aware than most people on earth of China's capabilities and should be an asset to the U.S. and Intel." "While I can understand that many investors likely believe that President Trump has his hand in too many cookie jars, it's just another signal that he's very serious about trying to bring business back to the U.S. He has momentum from the Apple deal and now hoping that a few more businesses fall into place." "I think Trump is mostly attacking Lip-Bu because he wanted to stop the manufacturing business if Intel 14A doesn't work out with external customers. More speculation whether Trump is making some deals with TSMC to do something with Intel. I think it's very much a political move." "Investors remaining focused on issues like these hint that the company's manufacturing turnaround, and long-term viability, may be dependent on factors external to the company and thus increase long-term uncertainty." "It's not surprising. I mean we're seeing the administration step in and point fingers at private or corporate CEOs. It's not the first time he's done it, it's likely not the last time he'll do it." "It would be setting a very unfortunate precedent. You don't want American presidents dictating who runs companies, but certainly his opinion has merit and weight. The board of Intel will have to determine if that's something they would consider in their evaluation." "But this CEO is fairly new. So on one hand, I don't think the U.S. president has the ability to do that. I'm not sure that that's a good idea for any political official." "But certainly, when you look at where the company stands today, it hasn't benefited greatly over the last few years. And I think it's more than just a CEO issue here. It's the company's need for real, radical change."