
Mike Waltz pledges to make UN ‘great again' at Senate confirmation hearing
During his Senate confirmation hearing to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Waltz echoed the priorities of his bosses — President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio — of pursuing major reforms to the 80-year-old world body.
It was the first time senators could grill Waltz since he was ousted as Trump's national security adviser in May after he mistakenly added a journalist to a private Signal chat used to discuss sensitive military plans. He denied Tuesday that he was removed from the post, while laying out his plans to bring 'America First' to the U.N.
'We should have one place in the world where everyone can talk — where China, Russia, Europe and the developing world can come together and resolve conflicts,' Waltz told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about the U.N. 'But after 80 years, it's drifted from its core mission of peacemaking.'
The U.N. is pursuing its own reforms while the Republican administration has spent the last six months reshaping American diplomacy and working aggressively to shrink the size of the federal government, including recent mass dismissals at the State Department.
On the agenda for Waltz would be combating China's influence, reviewing U.S. funding to U.N. agencies with 'often duplicative and wasteful mandates,' as well as rooting out what Waltz called deep antisemitism within the U.N. system.
The U.N. post is the last one to be filled in Trump's Cabinet following months of delay, including the withdrawal of the previous nominee.
The Signal episode — in which Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other high-level officials faced intense criticism — didn't come up at the hearing for more than an hour.
It was revealed in March that Waltz added The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg to a private text chain on an unclassified messaging app that was used to discuss planning for strikes on Houthi militants in Yemen.
'We both know Signal is not an appropriate and secure means of communicating highly sensitive information,' said Democratic Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, who was first to raise the issue.
He added that Waltz shared 'demonstrably sensitive information' in an improper manner. Fellow Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia called it 'an amateurish move.'
Waltz, a former Florida congressman, said the chat met the administration's cybersecurity standards, 'no classified information was shared' and the military was still conducting an ongoing investigation.
Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey blasted what he called a 'lack of accountability' from Waltz and other administration officials.
'I've watched this hearing, and I've been really disappointed,' Booker said. 'What's been troubling to me about your nomination from the beginning is your failure to just stand up and take accountability for mistakes that you made.'
If confirmed, Waltz would arrive at the U.N. at a moment of great change. The world body is reeling from Trump's decision to slash foreign assistance — affecting its humanitarian aid agencies — and it anticipates U.S. funding cuts to the U.N. annual budget.
Facing financial instability, the U.N. has spent months shedding jobs and consolidating projects while beginning to tackle long-delayed reforms. The U.N. is also facing growing frustration over what critics describe as a lack of efficiency and power in delivering on its mandate to end conflict.
'With Waltz at the helm, the U.N. will have what I regard as what should be its last chance to demonstrate its actual value to the United States,' said Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. 'Instead of progressive political virtue signaling, the Security Council has the chance to prove its value, and settling disputes and brokering deals.'
Waltz said U.N. revenue 'has quadrupled in the last 20 years' but that it hasn't been commensurate with increased peace.
'The U.S. must ensure that every foreign aid dollar and every contribution to an international organization, particularly the U.N., draws a straight and direct line to a compelling U.S. national interest,' Waltz said.
He said the administration's diplomatic strategy would be focused on cutting costs to what he called 'waste, fraud, and abuse that are endemic to the U.N. system.'
Waltz also accused the U.N. of 'pervasive antisemitism.' He testified that the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, has been promoting 'antisemitic hate' in its schools in Gaza.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres appointed a British human rights activist on Tuesday to carry out a strategic review of UNRWA.
Israel has alleged that 19 out of UNRWA's roughly 13,000 staffers in Gaza participated in the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks that launched the war. UNRWA said it fired nine workers after an internal U.N. investigation. Israel later alleged that about 100 other Palestinians in Gaza were Hamas members but didn't provide evidence to the United Nations.
Waltz has spent the last few months on the White House payroll despite departing as national security adviser. The latest list of White House salaries, current as of July 1, includes Waltz as an adviser earning an annual salary of $195,200.
A White House official, granted anonymity to discuss personnel matters, said Waltz stayed on to 'ensure a smooth and successful transition given the extreme importance of the role of NSA.'
Sen. Jacky Rosen, a Democrat from Nevada, questioned why Waltz was still being paid by the administration.
'Throughout this year, you've made (assertions) that, if confirmed, you would root out waste and unnecessary overhead at the U.N. So can you confirm for us whether you've been receiving a salary from the White House since being let go as the NSA?'
Waltz denied the fact that he had been fired, saying he was being paid as an adviser 'transitioning a number of important activities.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's U-Turn on Nvidia Spurs Talk of Grand Bargain With China
(Bloomberg) -- Only a few years ago, the Biden administration declared export controls a 'new strategic asset' to help the US maintain 'as large a lead as possible' over China in advanced technology. President Donald Trump is now upending that approach. The Dutch Intersection Is Coming to Save Your Life Advocates Fear US Agents Are Using 'Wellness Checks' on Children as a Prelude to Arrests LA Homelessness Drops for Second Year Manhattan, Chicago Murder Rates Drop in 2025, Officials Say In a reversal this week, the White House told chipmaker Nvidia Corp. it could soon resume sales of its less advanced China-focused H20 artificial intelligence accelerator. Advanced Micro Devices Inc. received similar assurances from the US Commerce Department. Explaining the decision, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the administration wanted Chinese developers 'addicted' to American technology, while insisting the US wouldn't sell China 'our best stuff.' That, he said, required a more balanced policy that would keep the US 'one step ahead of what they can build so they keep buying our chips.' The shift in strategy, which angered China hawks in Washington, raises a key question as Trump sets the stage for a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this year: How far will the US go in rolling back a range of measures restricting business between the world's biggest economies imposed in the name of national security? 'The apparent loosening of export control on the H20 chips could be a sign of things to come,' said Kevin Xu, a tech investor and founder of US-based Interconnected Capital who formerly worked in the Obama administration. 'A wide range of bargaining chips are on the table now for a potential US-China tech grand bargain: Semiconductor manufacturing equipment, rare earths, battery technology, AI chips, even mutual market access.' While the US is a long way off from dismantling the bulk of restrictions on China, spanning everything from export controls to investment curbs to sanctions, Trump's recent actions open the door to redefining the economic relationship between the nations mere months after his imposition of 145% tariffs took them to the brink of decoupling. Talks in Geneva and London then led to a truce in which the US agreed to lower tariffs and ease export controls in return for rare-earth magnets used to make goods like smartphones, electric vehicles and high-tech weapons. Even though Trump's first term changed the conversation in Washington to focus on the threat posed by China, the US president has always been transactional and less rigid on traditional national security issues. Trump has downplayed privacy issues over TikTok and on the campaign trail made comments welcoming Chinese automakers to build plants in the US. 'He is not ideologically fixated on the need to have controls everywhere,' said Dominic Chiu, a senior analyst at Eurasia Group. 'So, if he sees that as a bargaining chip that he can use to gain concessions from China on rare earths and other things, then he would do it.' The move adds to the goodwill built over a recent flurry of diplomacy, including a cordial meeting between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Malaysia. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who led the previous trade talks, expects to meet his counterpart, Vice Premier He Lifeng, within 'the next couple of weeks' and has signaled the US will likely extend an Aug. 12 deadline for the snapback of sky-high tariffs. The two sides are now inching toward what could be a series of agreements, if not a single grand deal, ahead of a potential leaders' meeting that analysts speculate could happen around the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit that kicks off in late October in South Korea. After meeting his Chinese counterpart last week, Rubio said such a sit-down was likely without suggesting a timeframe, saying the two sides will have to 'build the right atmosphere and the right deliverables.' He added that 'there's a strong desire on both sides to do it.' For the Trump administration, the objectives may look a lot like the president's first-term playbook: securing large-scale Chinese purchases of American goods to address the persistent trade deficit. He may also demand more Chinese action to curb the flow of fentanyl precursors — an area where Trump on Wednesday praised Beijing for already making 'big steps.' Washington is also seeking a resolution to the future of video app TikTok's US operations and assurances that Beijing won't weaponize its control over rare earths and other critical minerals. China, for its part, has an ambitious wish list. Among them is the complete rollback of US tariffs, including the 20% duties linked to fentanyl and the legacy tariffs from Trump's first term that were upheld by Biden. Beijing may also push for an easing of investment restrictions and, crucially, further concessions on US export controls, which it views as a direct attempt to stifle its technological advancement. Kurt Tong, a former US consul general in Hong Kong and a partner at The Asia Group, said while Biden adopted a non-negotiable 'small yard, high fences' approach to technology, Trump has a different focus and is looking to show his transactional tack can bring results for the American people. 'He cares about trade, deficits, investment in the United States and getting along with China,' Tong said. That could make welcoming Chinese investment in the US — which would also help rebalance bilateral trade — an appealing notion to Trump, as he alluded to in his campaign remarks. 'In general, in this town, that is a forbidden suggestion,' said Washington-based Gerard DiPippo, associate director at the RAND China Research Center. 'However, if there's one president who might go for it, it's Trump.' --With assistance from Josh Xiao. (Updates with more details in 10th paragraph.) What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All Forget DOGE. Musk Is Suddenly All In on AI The Quest for a Hangover-Free Buzz How Hims Became the King of Knockoff Weight-Loss Drugs ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Douglas Murray: A 50-day deadline is 50 days to kill. Force Putin's hand now
Who would ever have thought that dealing with the Middle East would look easy? But that is what President Trump has shown since he came into office. And though there is still needs to be a hostage-return and cease-fire deal in Gaza, the President's strong and decisive action against the mullahs in Iran helped pacify the world's least pacifist region. By contrast, the other great foreign policy challenge President Trump inherited remains as complicated as hell. The president and vice president's duffing-up of President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office in February might have been a low point in US-Ukraine relations. But in the months since then it is Vladimir Putin who has started to annoy President Trump. Because it is Putin who has been so completely unwilling to budge. Every time a cease-fire has looked close, the Russian president has sent even more rocket and drone barrages towards Ukraine. As the months have progressed Trump has admitted to losing patience with his Russian counterpart. That culminated this week in the president's announcement of two new steps in his efforts to stop the war. The first, mentioned alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the White House, is for America to sell high-quality US weapons to America's European allies, who will in turn pass them on to the Ukrainians. This is a clever move on the president's part — making sure that Ukraine continues to be able to defend itself without committing the financial resources that Trump has repeatedly told his voters he wouldn't send. The second announcement was that America could impose secondary tariffs on Russia. Again, it is a smart idea. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The allegedly 'stringent' sanctions that the Biden administration placed on Russia since the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine in 2022 have failed to work. The Russian economy has not faltered. It has gone onto a wartime footing and a full armaments-producing capability. And while America and other Western allies might not have any dealings with the Russian economy, much of the rest of the world still does. In fact, despite all the tough talk from Europe, there are reports that EU countries bought more Russian natural resources in the past year than they sent in financial aid to Ukraine. Talk about mixed messaging. But for the past three years, Russia has had plenty of other countries it can still sell its oil and natural gas to. These include Turkey, India and South Korea. So Trump suggested this week that he is considering putting secondary tariffs on such countries. That is, if countries want to help fund Putin's war efforts by buying his natural resources then they will have to pay at least 100% tariffs when dealing with the United States. In effect these countries would have to choose which market they'd rather operate in. Would they rather have access to the greatest market in the world — the US — or would they like to continue to barter at Vladimir Putin's decrepit trade stall? It's a smart policy, and we'll see if the president follows through on it. But in the meantime there is one vast, looming problem. The president has given Russia 50 days' notice on the secondary tariffs issue. As President Zelensky said in an exclusive sit-down with The Post this week, this gives Putin 50 days to continue escalating the conflict. As Zelensky said to Caitlin Doornbos, 'Fifty days, for us, is just — every day is scary.' He is right. It is hard to communicate to readers living in the realm of peace just what a 'normal' night is like even in the capital of Kyiv these days. Even a quiet night will include the sound of multiple Russian drones and UAVs flying at the city, plus the bursts of gunfire as under-equipped Ukrainian forces try to shoot the Russian weapons down from the sky. Putin has shown before that he likes to 'outsmart' Trump. In March, the two leaders agreed to an immediate cease-fire against all energy and infrastructure. Within hours, Putin carried out one of his biggest attacks to date on Ukraine's energy facilities. It is almost certain that if Putin thinks he has 50 days before anything happens he will use those 50 days to up his attacks and then stall for more time. Perhaps Trump can do with Putin what he so successfully did with the Iranian mullahs. Which was to offer to count to 10 and then go ahead and surprise them. We'll see. The battle is not just a fight for Ukraine's survival. It is also a battle of nerves between two of the most steel-nerved leaders in the world. How many voters really care about Epstein? Twitter (X) is not the real world. Who knew? If you were on the social media site for the past week you'd have thought that the most important issue to American voters is the dead criminal Jeffrey Epstein. There´s a huge amount we still don't know about the convicted sex offender. And there's plenty about him — the sources of his wealth, high-profile connections, and manner of his death — the public deserve to know about. But outside the Twitter-sphere Epstein isn't the story at the moment. Some MAGA influencers have decided that the release or otherwise of all known information about Epstein is a 'make or break' issue between them and the President. The President has expressed understandable frustration that he should be distracted from matters like, say, the economy, and keep getting asked about Epstein. Online personalities threaten that Trump is going to lose all support from his base unless every file relating to Epstein is released. And yet despite this bragging threat, the polls show otherwise. President Trump's approval rating among Republican voters actually went up this week, according to two separate polls. So whether or not the administration is right in its attitude towards the files, Trump himself is absolutely wise to look at his Twitter critics and say, 'Oh yeah, you and whose online army?'


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani is giving NYC businesses fair notice: He's coming after them
Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani is giving business leaders fair warning: He promised he'd tax them and wealthy New Yorkers if elected — and he means to keep that promise. He basically dared them to leave the city if he did. Say goodbye to city tax revenue and jobs and hello to a downward spiral, if that happens. Advertisement On Tuesday, the Dem front-runner met with 100 of the city's top business leaders and made absolutely no attempt to hide his plans. 'He didn't back away from any policy position,' one attendee told The Post. As The Post's Charles Gasparino reproted, many top business honchos are now 'looking for an exit strategy rather than a strategy to deal with a mayor Mamdani.' Advertisement Who can blame them? The far-left Democrat is already on record saying that billionaires shouldn't exist. For years, Mamdani and his socialist pals have plotted to take power in 'the center of US capitalism,' and now they're on the verge of getting 'a chance to flex its muscles.' Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement The city's bankers and business elite are understandably worried. Mamdani is also looking to freeze or cut NYPD funding, destroy the housing market with a rent freeze and have government take over private businesses like supermarkets. Plus, he's likely to bring a whole pack of lefty Democratic hacks and a passel of Democratic Socialist extremists into City Hall with him. Advertisement What businesses would want to remain here? The irony, of course, is that if they leave, they'll take their tax revenue and jobs with them. Where will Mamdani & Co. get the money to fund all the freebies he wants to offer when that happens?