Storm clouds gather as European leaders meet
EUROPEAN Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had planned for her second term of office, which began last December, to focus squarely on the competitiveness agenda to boost the EU economy. However, geopolitical challenges are fast crowding out her freedom of action.
This stark fact will be shown, yet again, this week (Jun 26-27) at the latest European Council meeting of 27 presidents and prime ministers from across the bloc. Economic competitiveness is last but one (item six of seven) on the agenda following adoption of the agenda; Ukraine; Middle East; European defence and security; and the EU in the world.
As European Council President Antonio Costa has highlighted, the goal of building a more competitive Europe has not become less important for von der Leyen. This economic agenda remains key to her political legacy and she would still like to deliver on much more of the agenda highlighted in last September's major competitiveness report released by former Italian prime minister and ex-European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi.
In his welcome letter to Europe's presidents and prime ministers ahead of this week's summit, Costa highlighted that 'the interplay between a challenging international context and our internal economic priorities, such as deepening the Single Market, is more important than ever. That is why I want us to discuss the geoeconomic challenges we are facing' at the meeting on Thursday and Friday.
Of course, it is not the case that the EU expected 2025 to be trouble-free. Especially following the election of US President Donald Trump for a second term last November, there was open acknowledgement in Europe of potential diplomatic fireworks to come.
Nevertheless, the scale of problems arising has taken many by surprise. The latest case in point is the challenges in the Middle East, following the US bombing of Iran last weekend.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Lack of political influence
The EU is frustrated by the lack of political influence it has over events in Iran, as also in Gaza too, with Israel and the United States acting largely unilaterally. This is a significant shift from the era of a generation ago when Europe had much broader influence in shaping events, including through Israeli-Palestinian peace processes such as the Oslo accords. Today, however, the EU's preferred goal of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on the two-state solution is now very much in the political long grass.
Yet, while Europe has comparatively little political influence in the Middle East today, the economic impact of the elevated tensions there could significantly slow the EU's economy in coming months. This is particularly the case in respect to oil prices which, despite the Iran-Israel ceasefire announced by Trump on Monday, have risen since Israel's latest wave of bombing began in Iran.
Beyond the Middle East, the EU summit this week will also focus on the region's defence buildup which is fuelling the market capitalisation of the region's security-focused firms. The meeting will discuss building Europe's common defence readiness by 2030 with huge new security-related investments.
Ukraine is also on the agenda with European leaders increasingly concerned that the war with Russia will last for at least months more to come, potentially into 2026. Given the still-uncertain stance of Trump towards Kyiv, the EU is keen to help ensure that Ukraine is in a financial and military position to be able to continue to fight a protracted conflict as the nation continues on its path towards EU membership.
Amid this gathering storm of geopolitical factors, the EU is increasingly concerned that von der Leyen's second term could get blown off-course.
Von der Leyen's long-held belief is that it is critical for the more than 400 million population bloc to be ambitious, and further seize the initiative in coming years. The alternative, in her view, is more drift that has characterised EU affairs for so long, a danger that may be growing.
For while opportunities still exist on the horizon, there are growing risks too from not only international but also domestic challenges.
On the domestic front, there remains a significant rise of anti-EU, nationalist sentiment across the continent which has seen populist arguments coming to the fore as well as the perceived erosion of the fundamental values of liberal democracy. Only earlier this month, the presidential election in Poland was won by a populist nationalist, Karol Nawrocki, who is intent on frustrating the reformist policy agenda of Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
Yet, it is the international front that is the most prominent challenge for the EU, right now. Not only is there an increasingly assertive Russia, there is also massive uncertainty from the United States from Trump, not least with the 90-day pause period of his tariffs scheduled to expire in July with only one nation (the United Kingdom) having reached a tariff deal with the White House.
Skilful leadership
Amid all the gloom, the one potential upside of this crisis-driven environment is that, with very skilful leadership by top EU officials including von der Leyen, she finds a way to continue to deliver her reform agenda. There is significant historical precedent for this.
A good example is the Commissions of former president Jacques Delors whom von der Leyen is sometimes compared to in terms of the significant historical consequence of her presidency. Coming to office during a troubled period for the bloc in 1985, the presidency of Delors is seen by many as giving what is the modern EU a clear sense of direction, including as the founding father of the euro single currency. In his first term, he rallied the bloc to the call of the Single Market, and when appointed to a second term, he urged Europeans towards the ambitious goals of Economic and Monetary Union.
It remains to be seen if history will see von der Leyen's presidency as being as historically important as that of Delors, but she nonetheless still has a remaining window of opportunity to deliver a number of big achievements that could enhance the EU's competitiveness. This includes implantation of the new Clean Industrial Deal which aims to enhance the competitiveness of EU industries while addressing climate change by focusing on energy-intensive sectors and clean technologies which are crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fostering sustainable growth.
In this challenging context, the second term of the von der Leyen Commission faces gathering storm clouds that may yet grow worse in 2025. So the window of opportunity could be narrowing significantly to help define the EU's longer-term political and economic trajectory and forge a stronger, sustainable path for the continent.
The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US hits back at accounts Iran moved uranium
[WASHINGTON] President Donald Trump's administration hit back Wednesday at accounts Iran may have moved enriched uranium before US bombing, as a row grew on how much the strikes set back Tehran's nuclear program. Trump, seeking credit for ordering military action and then quickly announcing a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, has lashed out angrily at media accounts of a classified report that doubted the extent of damage to Iranian nuclear sites. Another key question raised by experts is whether Iran, preparing for the strike, moved out some 400 kg of enriched uranium - which could now be hidden elsewhere in the vast country. 'I can tell you, the United States had no indication that that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strikes, as I also saw falsely reported,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News. 'As for what's on the ground right now, it's buried under miles and miles of rubble because of the success of these strikes on Saturday evening,' she said. Vice President JD Vance, asked about the uranium on Sunday, had sounded less definitive and said the United States would discuss the issue with Iran. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'We're going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel,' Vance told ABC News programme This Week. The quantity of uranium had been reported by the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, with which Iran is considering severing cooperation after the Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear programme. 'The IAEA lost visibility on this material the moment hostilities began,' the agency's chief, Rafael Grossi, told France 2 television. But he added: 'I don't want to give the impression that it's been lost or hidden.' Trump lashes out The US military said it dropped 14 GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs - powerful 13,600-kg weapons - on three Iranian nuclear sites. Trump has repeatedly said that the attack 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities, including the key site of Fordo buried inside a mountain. But an initial classified assessment, first reported by CNN, was said to have concluded that the strike did not destroy key components and that Iran's nuclear program was set back only months at most. Trump furiously lashed out at the CNN reporter behind the story, taking to his Truth Social platform to demand that the network fire her. Trump also said that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, whom he dubbed 'war' secretary, would hold a news conference at 8 am (1200 GMT) on Thursday to 'fight for the dignity of our great American pilots' after the media accounts on the efficacy of the strike he ordered. Trump's intelligence chiefs also pushed back on Wednesday. CIA Director John Ratcliffe in a statement said that new intelligence from a 'historically reliable' source indicated that 'several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Iran's government has said that its nuclear facilities were 'badly damaged.' The uranium in question is enriched to 60 per cent - above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. The IAEA, in a report cited by the United States and Israel to justify their attacks, said that Iran was not complying with obligations but did not find that Tehran was making a nuclear bomb. Israel is widely known to have nuclear weapons but does not publicly confirm or deny its programme. The United States is the only nation to have used nuclear weapons in war. AFP

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US hits back at accounts Iran moved uranium
Mr Donald Trump has lashed out angrily at media accounts of a classified report that doubted the extent of damage to Iranian nuclear sites. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump's administration hit back on June 25 at accounts Iran may have moved enriched uranium before US bombing, as a row grew on how much the strikes set back Tehran's nuclear program. Mr Trump, seeking credit for ordering military action and then quickly announcing a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, has lashed out angrily at media accounts of a classified report that doubted the extent of damage to Iranian nuclear sites. Another key question raised by experts is whether Iran, preparing for the strike, moved out some 400kg of enriched uranium – which could now be hidden elsewhere in the vast country. 'I can tell you, the United States had no indication that that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strikes, as I also saw falsely reported,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News. 'As for what's on the ground right now, it's buried under miles and miles of rubble because of the success of these strikes on Saturday evening,' she said. Vice-President JD Vance, asked about the uranium on June 22, had sounded less definitive and said the United States would discuss the issue with Iran. 'We're going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel,' Mr Vance told ABC News programme 'This Week'. The quantity of uranium had been reported by the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, with which Iran is considering severing cooperation after the Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear programme. 'The IAEA lost visibility on this material the moment hostilities began,' agency chief Rafael Grossi told France 2 television. But he added: 'I don't want to give the impression that it's been lost or hidden.' Trump lashes out The US military said it dropped 14 GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs – powerful 13,600-kg weapons – on three Iranian nuclear sites. Mr Trump has repeatedly said that the attack 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities, including the key site of Fordo buried inside a mountain. But an initial classified assessment, first reported by CNN, was said to have concluded that the strike did not destroy key components and that Iran's nuclear program was set back only months at most. Mr Trump furiously lashed out at the CNN reporter behind the story, taking to his Truth Social platform to demand that the network fire her. Mr Trump also said that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, whom he dubbed 'war' secretary, would hold a news conference at 8am (8pm, Singapore time) on June 26 to 'fight for the dignity of our great American pilots' after the media accounts on the efficacy of the strike he ordered. Mr Trump's intelligence chiefs also pushed back on June 25. CIA Director John Ratcliffe in a statement said that new intelligence from a 'historically reliable' source indicated that 'several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years'. Iran's government has said that its nuclear facilities were 'badly damaged'. The uranium in question is enriched to 60 per cent – above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. The IAEA, in a report cited by the United States and Israel to justify their attacks, said that Iran was not complying with obligations but did not find that Tehran was making a nuclear bomb. Israel is widely known to have nuclear weapons but does not publicly confirm or deny its program. The United States is the only nation to have used nuclear weapons in war. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Nato's Trump flattery buys time but dodges tough questions, World News
THE HAGUE — Lavishing praise, playing the royal card and copying his slogans — Nato pulled out all the stops to keep Donald Trump happy and hold the alliance together at a summit in The Hague. The plan came off, although it largely avoided tough topics of vital importance to Nato such as the war in Ukraine, Russia strategy and a likely drawdown of US troops in Europe. Sooner or later, Nato will have to deal with them too. As Nato boss Mark Rutte had planned, the main summit outcomes were a vow by the allies to heed Trump's call to spend five per cent of GDP on defence — a big increase on the current two per cent target — and a renewed US commitment to Nato's mutual defence pact. That is a far cry from a few months ago, when transatlantic ties were so tense that Friedrich Merz, now Germany's chancellor, wondered openly after his election win whether Nato would exist in its current form by the time of the Hague summit. There was nothing subtle about Nato's strategy to keep Trump on board. Rutte gushed with compliments in a message to Trump, made public by the US president as he flew to The Hague. "You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done," the former Dutch prime minister said in his message, putting some of his words in capitals like Trump. "Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win." Right before the summit, in another sign of chumminess with Trump, Rutte reacted to the US president's comments berating Iran and Israel by saying that "daddy has to sometimes use strong language". Given Trump's threats to quit Nato in his first term and not to protect allies who failed to spend enough on defence, the stakes for Nato have been high. Most Nato members see Russia as an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and know they would struggle badly to defend themselves against attack without their nuclear-armed superpower ally. After the summit, Trump's previously harsh rhetoric on Nato had been replaced by something very different. "I left here saying that these people really love their countries. It's not a rip-off, and we're here to help them, protect them," he told reporters. Trump only criticised Spain for not signing up to the new defence spending target and said it would pay up another way — in its trade relations with the United States. Many European nations will find it tough economically to meet the target, but that issue was left for another day. Charm offensive As part of Nato's Hague charm offensive, Trump was granted the rare honour of staying overnight at the ornate royal palace of Dutch King Willem-Alexander before the summit. The king hosted a three-course meal for leaders prepared by 20 chefs and served by 18 footmen in the baroque 17th century "Orange Hall" in the Huis ten Bosch palace. At the start of the summit, other Nato leaders lined up to praise Trump. Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda suggested the alliance adopt the motto "Make Nato Great Again". Rutte kept the summit short and simple, minimising the risks of any blow-ups with Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner rather than the main meeting, although he held a separate meeting with Trump after the summit. The summit's final statement ran to just five paragraphs — compared with 38 in the text from last year's leaders' meeting in Washington. It does not explicitly describe Russia's military action in Ukraine as a war or invasion, nor does it repeat or reaffirm a previous pledge that Ukraine will one day join the alliance. By focusing on reaffirming commitments to Nato and the new spending pledge, it papered over major differences between Washington and many European allies on Russia and Ukraine. To the discomfort of many Europeans, Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance with Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor Joe Biden as he seeks to end the war. While such diplomatic fudges may hold Nato together for now, it will be hard for the alliance to function effectively if there is a major long-term difference between the United States and Europe on a question as fundamental as how to handle Russia. "A Nato summit that essentially ignores the war that is still raging in Ukraine should worry all of us," said Julianne Smith, who served as the US ambassador to Nato under the Biden administration. Peter Bator, Slovakia's former ambassador to Nato, said "we have just missed an opportunity to send a strategic message to the ruler in the Kremlin. And it will cost us in our security". Nato officials will now be watching to see whether Trump's newfound enthusiasm for the alliance is reflected in his administration's ongoing review of US military posture, as Europe relies heavily on US forces for its security. European leaders say they are committed to taking on more of that responsibility but they are anxious to ensure any transfer is done in an orderly and gradual way. "You can feel the anxiety when talking to senior European officials about this," said Oana Lungescu, distinguished fellow at RUSI and former Nato spokesperson. "Most expect the Pentagon to start pulling out some troops and capabilities, but nobody knows how many and how soon." [[nid:719500]]