Turkiye's Erdogan appoints legal team to draft new constitution, sparking fears of extended rule
ANKARA, Turkey — ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Tuesday he has appointed a team of legal experts to start working on a new constitution — which critics say could allow him to remain in power beyond 2028, when his current term ends.
Erdogan, who has led Turkiye as president since 2014 and was prime minister for more than a decade before that, has advocated for a new constitution arguing that the current one, which was drafted following a military coup in 1980, is outdated and retains elements of military influence even though it was amended several times.
'As of yesterday, I have assigned 10 legal experts to begin their work, and with this effort, we will proceed with the preparations for the new constitution,' Erdogan told his ruling party's local administrators in a speech. 'For 23 years, we have repeatedly demonstrated our sincere intention to crown our democracy with a new civilian and libertarian constitution.'
Under the current constitution, Erdogan cannot run again unless early elections are called or the legal framework is changed. Critics see the push for a new constitution as a possible path for re-election, allowing legal changes that would bypass the constitutional term limits.
Erdogan, who has grown increasingly authoritarian over the years, has denied seeking a new constitution in order to remain in power, saying last week 'we want the new constitution not for ourselves, but our country.'
Erdogan's ruling party and its nationalist allies lack the votes needed to usher in a new constitution. Some analysts believe the government's recent effort to end the decades-long conflict with the militant Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, is part of strategy to gain the support of a pro-Kurdish party in parliament for the new charter.
The effort to introduce a new constitution comes months after Ekrem Imamoglu, the popular mayor of Istanbul and a key Erdogan rival, was arrested and jailed on corruption charges.
His arrest has been widely viewed as politically motivated although the government insists Turkiye's judiciary is independent and free of political influence. It triggered widespread demonstrations calling for his release and an end to Turkiye's democratic backsliding under Erdogan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
19 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Ukraine's Sumy city under threat as Russian forces advance
Russian forces have widened the frontline in Ukraine's northern region of Sumy, officials and analysts said, and Moscow said it captured another village on Tuesday, bringing the region's capital closer to within the range of frontline drones. The advance towards the city of Sumy – the administrative center of the Sumy region – comes as Kyiv showed its ability to continue fighting by conducting a series of strikes in recent days, hitting Russian strategic bombers and the Crimean Bridge. Russian and Ukrainian delegations met in Turkey for peace talks on Monday where Moscow said it would only agree to end the war if Kyiv cedes big new chunks of territory and accepts limits on the size of its army. On Tuesday, Russia's defense ministry said its forces took control of Andriivka, after capturing several other villages in recent days. Kyiv said Russian artillery attack on the city of Sumy killed four people and injured 28. The head of the military administration of the Sumy region, which lies north of Ukraine's second-largest city of Kharkiv, held a meeting on Tuesday to discuss the region's defence strategy. 'The situation in the border area of Sumy region remains complex, dynamic, but controllable,' the head of the military administration, Oleh Hryhorov, said on Facebook. 'The Russian army is constantly shelling border villages, hitting residential buildings, farms, and civilian infrastructure facilities.' The dual advance with fierce frontline fighting and missile and drone strikes in Sumy hinders Ukraine's defence abilities along in the southeast Donbas region, of which Moscow is seeking full control, military analysts say. On Monday, Ivan Shevtsov, a spokesman for the Ukrainian brigades fighting in Sumy, told Ukrainian national broadcaster that Russian forces had captured about 15 km (9 miles) along the frontline, going 6-7 km deep. If Russian advances take the town of Yunakivka, Shevtsov said, the city of Sumy will be under a direct threat. Satellite data shed light on Russia's modern-day gulags for Ukrainian children The Ukrainian Deep State blog of analysts who track the front line using open sources said Russian forces are moving to within 20-25 km of Sumy, putting the city within a range of shorter-range attack drones. Reuters could not independently verify the Russian claim of capturing Andriivka and Ukraine's General Staff made no references to the village in its evening battlefield report. DeepState said early on Wednesday that Andriivka was now in Russian hands. Over the weekend, Sumy's authorities ordered mandatory evacuation of 11 additional villages due to escalating Russian attacks. Shevtsov said Russia wants to completely capture the Sumy region, not just make a small incursion. 'Just . . . like other regions in eastern Ukraine,' he added.
National Post
a day ago
- National Post
Iddo Moed: False narratives about Israel have violent consequences
I am the ambassador of a country that was built by unexpected leaders. Article content Article content The founders of the State of Israel were not aristocrats or members of a wealthy elite. They were refugees and immigrants — men and women who arrived with little more than determination and hope. They fled violence, persecution, and antisemitism from every corner of the world: pogroms in Europe and Asia, attacks by mobs and ultimately expulsion from Arab lands, and the unthinkable horrors of the Holocaust. Article content Article content While Jews have had a continuous presence in the Holy Land for millennia, modern Israel was forged in the crucible of exile and survival. Today, Israel is a thriving liberal democracy with a diverse and multicultural society, a dynamic economy, and a strong defence force. Article content Article content We are proud of these achievements. But we have never forgotten an important lesson from Jewish history: false narratives, when left unchallenged, have violent consequences. Article content One need not look far to understand why this lesson is so deeply ingrained in our psyche. Theodor Herzl, the father of modern political Zionism, was moved by what he witnessed during the infamous Dreyfus Affair in late 19th-century France. A Jewish army officer, Captain Alfred Dreyfus, was falsely accused and convicted of treason. The campaign against him was led by the virulently antisemitic press — particularly La Libre Parole, which pushed a dangerous narrative: that Jews were inherently disloyal. Article content Given our history, we are highly attuned to the moments these falsehoods begin to surface. That's why, when I woke up Sunday morning to headlines from nearly every major Canadian media outlet — except National Post — about an alleged incident at a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aid hub in Rafah, I was immediately concerned. Article content This war has shown us, time and again, how Hamas manipulates facts on the ground, creating stories of atrocities that either didn't happen or happened in a very different way. The media often amplifies these claims uncritically, and by the time the truth emerges, the damage is done. Article content The most egregious example came just weeks after the October 7 massacre. The Hamas-run Palestinian Health Ministry claimed an Israeli airstrike had killed hundreds at Al-Ahli Hospital. Israel immediately launched an investigation — but the media didn't wait. The story exploded across front pages and screens around the world. Article content By the time the investigation revealed that the explosion was caused by a Palestinian rocket, which was confirmed by the Canadian Forces Intelligence Command, millions were misled. Worse, some politicians — including Canada's own foreign affairs minister at the time — rushed to condemn Israel before the facts were known.
Globe and Mail
a day ago
- Globe and Mail
‘Every vote counts' is not just a slogan
'Every vote counts' has long been a slogan for those urging participation in the democratic process. But those three words − with a question mark − are now shaping up to be a legal question that could ultimately trigger a by-election in the Quebec riding of Terrebonne. The result, after all the official counting was done, was as close as it could be: Liberal candidate Tatiana Auguste received 23,352 votes in a judicial recount, just one more than her Bloc Québécois opponent Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné. Even with that tiniest of victory margins, that would have given the seat to Ms. Auguste and the Liberals – except that riding resident Emmanuelle Bossé then went public with her claim that her mail-in ballot, with a vote for the Bloc, was returned to her on May 2. Elections Canada had used an incorrect postal code for a self-addressed return envelope. Ms. Bossé has told reporters that she put her ballot in the mail on April 5, well ahead of the April 22 deadline for it to be received by Elections Canada. That ballot was returned to her on May 2, four days after the election. Her additional vote for the BQ would have meant a tie, triggering a by-election. The BQ filed a court application on May 23, as it is entitled to under the Canada Elections Act, requesting a by-election. That would be a just outcome, not just for Ms. Bossé, but for all Canadians' voting rights. Elections Canada says that 106 mail-in ballots were sent out with incorrect postal codes. Of those, 85 were returned in time to be counted, five were returned to Elections Canada late and 16 (including Ms. Bossé's ballot) were not returned at all. It is possible – even likely – that more than just Ms. Bossé's right to vote is at stake. The five late ballots could have been slowed down by their lack of an accurate postal code. And there is a possibility that another 15 votes were cast and not received by Elections Canada, as was the case for Ms. Bossé. That is a question mark hanging over the basic democratic rights of nearly two dozen voters in Terrebonne. And the arithmetic is clear: Even one more vote for the Bloc in the official count would have resulted in a new election. And that is a key fact for the court to consider. It's not enough that Elections Canada made a mistake in addressing the envelopes. No election is conducted without hiccups. Perfection is an unreasonable standard. The mistake must be big enough to have potentially affected the outcome of the election in the riding. Most of the time, that error would have be very large indeed to be bigger or equal to the winning candidate's margin of victory. But in Terrebonne in the 45th general federal election, the margin was tiny, just one vote. So, if the facts are as Ms. Bossé has described, the resulting irregularities would appear to meet the legal standard in the Canada Elections Act for nullifying the election and ordering a by-election. There is a downside, both for partisans and for riding residents. For Liberals, they are trading the certainty of a win for the possibility of defeat. The results were surprisingly good for the Liberals on April 28. In a by-election, voters would know that the Liberals would continue on in government no matter the outcome. That could well mean the BQ wins. More broadly, a by-election would deprive the residents of Terrebonne of representation during the current sitting of Parliament. That is not a step that should be taken lightly. Neither of those is a good enough reason to avoid a by-election in Terrebonne for the very simple reason that Ms. Bossé's vote is no less important than those from the 60,278 people currently in the official count. Her vote should have been part of that group verdict and was not, seemingly through no fault of her own. And that means one of her fundamental rights as a Canadian was violated. Democratic rights are not just part of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. They are set on a higher plane than many other rights in the Charter, beyond the reach of a legislature's ability to use the notwithstanding clause. Freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom of peaceful assembly: all are important but can be limited using the notwithstanding clause. But not the right to vote, because the power of democracy ultimately underpins all other rights. 'Every vote counts' has been used as a slogan for so long that it has slipped into the bland world of platitudes. But if Ms. Bossé's case has no other effect, it has demonstrated that real power lies in the hands of each voter.
