The Irish Times view on the EU budget: major barriers to getting an agreement
Even though the commission touted a headline figure of €2 trillion, the actual amount to be allocated is just over €1.8 trillion, when Covid debt payments are factored in. This is still a considerable increase on the €1.2 trillion agreed for the EU budget in 2021, though it still only represents 1.23 per cent of EU GDP.
A sum of €300 billion was allocated for agriculture, compared to €386billion in the 2021 budget. What's more, agriculture is no longer a standalone section in the budget. Farmer organisations have vowed to resist the reforms.
The spending priorities delineated by the commission reflect the challenges facing the bloc. One is a lacklustre economic performance. There were sizeable increases in allocations for research, innovation and the digital economy. The budget also directs more to eastern member states and allows for extra defence spending.
READ MORE
To help fund this, the commission is proposing a list of new fund-raising measures, including a tax on big companies. These are sure to prove controversial. And with questions about the financing of the package as well as the direction of resources, what emerges may look very different from the initial plan.
Member states have ruled out bigger national contributions and many remain resistant to the idea of expanding common debt issuance to fund centralised spending. There are a lot of spending demands, in other words, but few easy ways to find revenue to meet them. Many member states will push for a smaller EU budget while the European Parliament will argue for more. These are the seemingly intractable problems that von der Leyen has to solve over the next two years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Financial consultant who misappropriated funds to repay money, court told
A financial consultant has given a number of undertakings to the High Court to take steps to repay money he misappropriated from two companies he was engaged to wind up. Accountant David Kennedy and David Kennedy Financial Consulting of David Kennedy Financial Consulting Ltd, Orwell Shopping Centre, Templeogue, Dublin, consented to several orders, including judgment against him personally in the sum of €588,301 in favour of the two companies owned by third parties. On Wednesday, the court was told Mr Kennedy was taking steps to wind up his business, as he had a number of other liquidations which he had to deal with beforehand. Mr Justice Brian Cregan said it was a matter of significant concern that in circumstances where Mr Kennedy admitted misappropriation and breach of duties that he could 'possibly continue for a day longer as a liquidator'. READ MORE Micheál D O'Connell SC, for the defendants, said the orders made preclude him from misappropriating funds for other 50 companies he was dealing and it was necessary that they be wound down in an orderly fashion. It is anticipated allowing him to continue in his role for the time being will enable him to improve the situation not only in relation to the clients in this case but to others who are affected. Jarlath Ryan SC, for the plaintiff companies, said his side was satisfied that was addressed by obligations in the part of the orders restraining him from only to paying €1,000 per business transaction apart from normal wages, all monitored by the liquidators put in to replace him. He also must 'come clean' and disclose all other assets, he said. The judge said he wanted the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) to be notified and supplied with court papers so that it could tell the court whether it wished to be a notice party in the case. The other orders require that Mr Kennedy is only entitled to €15,000 in living expenses until the end of October and that he repay funds he had diverted from the plaintiff companies and restraining him from reducing assets in his consulting company below €588,301. He must also transfer €300,000 from a Bank of Ireland account he held to Micheál Leydon, the receiver who has now been appointed by the court to recover the funds. The court heard he had already transferred €200,000 from that account back to receivers who replaced in as liquidators of the plaintiff companies. He must deliver to those liquidators all books and records of those companies. The court heard gardaí were investigating him and had removed records and the Office of Corporate Enforcement had also been notified. The orders provide that proceedings against his wife, Danielle Colgan, who is also a defendant, can be adjourned generally on payment of €19,000 to the receiver. Mr O'Connell said she was the unknowing recipient of funds from her husband. Ms Colgan is the sole shareholder of David Kennedy Financial Consulting. Earlier this month, the court granted orders freezing assets of the defendants below €800,000, the sum which Mr Kennedy was engaged to capitalise on behalf of the two plaintiff companies. When the case returned, the court was told Mr Kennedy had 'put his hands up' in relation to the misappropriation and wished to be as much assistance as he can in recovering the money. Mr Justice Cregan adjourned the case to October but said in the meantime he would like to hear from the ACCA in relation to possibly making it a notice party.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
EU and US closing on 15% tariff deal to break impasse
The European Union and the US are progressing toward an agreement that would set a 15% tariff for most products, according to diplomats briefed on the negotiations. Member states could be ready to accept a 15% tariff and EU officials are pushing to have that cover sectors including cars, the diplomats said. Steel and aluminium imports above a certain quota would face the 50% duty, one of the diplomats added. The diplomats said that while the EU is optimistic that a deal can be reached, they are also cautious that any final agreement will need sign off from US president Donald Trump and his ultimate decision is difficult to predict. The EU has prepared plans to hit the US with 30% tariffs on some €100bn worth of goods in the event of no deal and if Mr Trump carries through with his threat to impose that rate on most of the bloc's exports after August 1. As a part of a first wave of countermeasures, the EU would combine an already approved list of tariffs on €21bn of US goods and a previously proposed list on an additional €72bn of US items into one package, a European Commission spokesman said yesterday. The US exports, which include industrial goods such as Boeing aircraft, US-made cars, and bourbon whiskey, would face a levy that matches Mr Trump's 30% threat, sources said. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent dismissed talk of €100bn tariffs by the EU as a 'negotiating tactic', adding: 'It's what I would do if I were in their place'. Mr Trump announced two tariff deals on Tuesday — one with the Philippines and another with Japan, and both featured across-the-board duties on their imports that were lower than initially threatened. Also noteworthy was the 15% US levy on Japanese autos that was lower than the current 25% rate on major car exporters including the EU. Mr Bessent said the EU has not yet brought anything as innovative as the Japanese offer. 'Talks are going better than they had been,' he said. 'I think that we are making good progress with the EU, but as I've said before, the EU has a collective action problem with 27 countries.' The EU's most potent trade tool is the ACI, and a growing number of member states is pushing for its use if a deal isn't reached. The instrument is primarily designed as a deterrent and is currently not on the table, with its activation requiring a qualified majority of member states to support the move. The ACI would enable the EU to launch a broad range of retaliatory actions, including new taxes on US tech giants, targeted curbs on investments, and limiting access to the EU market. The commission is discussing the instrument with members, the sources said. While some capitals having been pushing to use the tool, most want to wait to see how the situation develops beyond August 1 before progressing discussions further to try to achieve the required majority, they added. The overwhelming preferencewas to keep negotiations with Washington on track. European leaders are in Tokyo and Beijing this week for talks with some of the bloc's biggest trading partners in Asia. European automakers' stocks rallied after the US-Japan trade deal sparked hopes that American import tariffs on their vehicles could be cut. Bloomberg
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘I am disappointed in myself for believing we were more than just a number': AIB staff angered by cut to hybrid working
A decision by AIB to cut hybrid working has been met by frustration and disappointment by some staff at the bank, internal company communications show. The bank informed more than 10,000 employees on Tuesday that staff eligible for hybrid working will be required to work from the office 'a minimum of three days each week' on a phased basis, the tightest rule among Irish retail banks. The company said it believes the new arrangements 'strike the right balance' between flexibility for staff and 'delivering invaluable opportunities and benefits of collaboration and deeper engagement' between colleagues. More than 250 staff members have expressed disappointment and frustration with the decision on an internal company forum seen by The Irish Times. [ AIB calls eligible staff into office three days a week Opens in new window ] 'I am disappointed in myself for believing we were more just a number,' one AIB employee said in response to a company question and answer post on the forum, in which AIB notes that 'deliberate non-compliance with the new policy will not be accepted'. Another staff member labelled the decision a 'really disappointing move'. It 'completely disregards the struggles working families already face with limited childcare and creche spaces available,' the person said. AIB 'A solution to a problem that didn't exist,' another person responded, saying the policy was 'forcing staff to be less productive, less motivated, and more stressed. Bravo.' Some responses criticised the company for the manner in which the decision was communicated. One staff member called it 'an example of very poor communication', calling for 'something this serious that affects staff lives' to have been delivered in-person or over a video call. [ Remote working is here to stay and has whole new language about 'hidden hybrid' and 'mouse jiggling' Opens in new window ] Another AIB employee said the company's Q&A posted to the forum, in addition to the staff email, 'reads like a lecturer to a student with a bamboo stick out... disgusting terminology.' 'There is ZERO thought for your employees here – we will be told where and when we are working and we will be 'MONITORED' for 'NON COMPLIANCE''. 'Who exactly do you think you are talking to after the loyalty shown and the HUGE hours far and beyond our working weeks with no overtime to keep the show on the road during Covid while the Bank raced to make bumper profits and coming back to private ownership?' AIB The new policy, according to the company Q&A post, will not allow in-person days be decided for individuals, with requirements being detailed on a team-by-team basis. A number of staff voiced concerns with this element of the policy. [ Office attendance is becoming a performance metric Opens in new window ] 'You state 'We'll be as flexible and understanding as we can',' an employee said, before pointing a number of restrictions on the flexibility of the policy, 'So what is this flexibility you speak of, can you give more detail please.' AIB Many employees questioned how the new limitations to hybrid working fit with the company's green ethos. 'As part of the Green Agenda, AIB wants to put more cars on the road commuting to their base location, locations already with limited on-site parking.' The employee said the bank had seen five 'hugely successful' years of hybrid working, which was used as a selling point to new staff, and that the reward for that performance was 'making staff come into the office an extra day for no logical reason other than they might bump into someone they know.' Some employees pointed to logistical and financial challenges that the new policy will pose for them. One employee, based in Cork, said the policy will require him to make a '520km round trip' to attend work and will make life harder for people to manage work and family responsibilities 'especially when remote work has already proven effective'. Links to sign up to the Financial Services Union (FSU) were posted in the channel a number of times. In a statement to The Irish Times, the FSU encouraged AIB to 'consider how they can promote sustainability while at the same time putting 10,000 staff back in cars.' The FSU said it will be holding 'a number of members meetings over the next few days' and expects to meet management following that consultation to 'strongly advocate for a reversal of this decision'. It said a survey of almost 3,000 AIB employees conducted in the past 48 hours showed 'real dissatisfaction' at the 'unilateral decision'. Responding to questions from The Irish Times, a spokesman for AIB said 'all employees benefit from in person time with their own team and broader colleagues' and that AIB 'recognise[s] the benefits of structured, hybrid working and are committed to enabling it.' The spokesman said AIB has a 'balanced and comprehensive hybrid working structure in place' and would continue to review the policy.
