Sharon Stone on Another Simple Favor: 'I Loved Being Cast and Removed'
Sharon Stone has alleged that she was unexpectedly removed from the upcoming thriller sequel Another Simple Favor, despite previously being cast in the film. The Casino star made the claim in a social media comment, stating she was dropped 'for no reason at all.'
The Amazon MGM Studios film, directed by Paul Feig, recently premiered at South by Southwest (SXSW) and is scheduled for release on May 1. It serves as a sequel to A Simple Favor (2018) and brings back Blake Lively and Anna Kendrick in their lead roles. Stone's alleged involvement in the project had not been reported before her comment surfaced.
'I LOVED being cast and removed from my role unexpectedly for no reason at all LOVED it 👏👏👏,' Stone wrote under an Instagram post by E! News about the film.
-Instagram/ENews
However, a source close to the production refuted her claim, telling Variety that Stone was never officially cast. While there were discussions about her joining the project, the source stated that 'finances didn't align,' and the role eventually went to Elizabeth Perkins. 'The idea that she was dumped from this movie is not true,' the source added.
Another Simple Favor follows Stephanie (Kendrick) and Emily (Lively) as they reunite in Italy for Emily's wedding to a wealthy businessman. The film explores their complicated dynamic, with Emily, recently released from prison, unexpectedly inviting Stephanie to the wedding.
The SXSW premiere of the sequel sparked online speculation about possible tension between Lively and Kendrick. Feig dismissed the rumors on X (formerly Twitter), responding to a claim that Lively was 'terrified' to be near Kendrick by saying, 'Um… you're wrong.'
Lively expressed enthusiasm for reprising her role, calling it 'probably my favorite character I've ever played,' according to The Hollywood Reporter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Blake Lively steps out after speaking against lawsuit dismissal, vow to advocate for all women
Blake Lively made a poised public appearance at Chanel's annual Tribeca Film Festival Dinner in New York City just hours after a federal judge dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against her and husband Ryan Reynolds. Photo: GC Images Lively wore a white crochet dress and smiled for photos before entering the venue, marking her first public outing since the ruling. 'Last week, I stood proudly alongside 19 organisations united in defending women's rights to speak up for their safety,' she wrote on Instagram. 'Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us.' Though victorious in court, Lively highlighted the struggle many face without resources. 'While the suit against me was defeated, so many don't have the resources to fight back,' she said. 'I'm more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves.' Lively ended her message with: 'I will never stop appreciating or advocating for you.' Photo: Instagram She urged followers to support advocacy organisations including the National Network to End Domestic Violence and the National Organization for Women. The case began in 2024 after Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment during production of It Ends With Us. Baldoni denied the claims and filed a countersuit, which Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed on 9 June. Some legal claims may be amended by June 23.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Sylvester Stallone is not dead: Online confusion follows passing of funk legend Sly Stone
Actor Sylvester Stallone is alive and well despite a wave of misleading tributes that surfaced online on Monday, June 9. The confusion arose after the confirmed death of funk music pioneer Sly Stone at age 82. The mistaken reports stemmed from the nickname 'Sly,' which both Stone and Stallone share. Stone, born Sylvester Stewart, was a pivotal figure in American music history, known for leading the revolutionary band Sly and the Family Stone. His hits like 'Everyday People' and 'Family Affair' helped redefine funk and soul music. Stone died peacefully after a prolonged battle with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, according to a family statement. His legacy includes breaking racial and gender barriers in popular music and inspiring generations of artists. In contrast, Stallone—best known for his roles in 'Rocky' and 'Rambo'—continues to work in film and remains politically outspoken. The 78-year-old has not commented publicly on the mix-up, though social media was quick to clarify the error. Sly Stone leaves behind children including Novena Carmel and Phunne Stone, while Stallone's children include Sage, Seargeoh, Sophia, Sistine and Scarlet.
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds
A federal judge has dismissed actor and director Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, marking a significant development in the legal feud stemming from the 2024 film It Ends With Us. The ruling, issued Monday by Judge Lewis J. Liman, also included the dismissal of Baldoni's $250 million libel suit against The New York Times. Baldoni, who co-starred and directed the film adaptation of Colleen Hoover's novel, had alleged that Lively, Reynolds, and publicist Leslie Sloane defamed him in connection with Lively's civil rights complaint filed in December 2024. The complaint included allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, and a smear campaign during and after the film's production. Baldoni, who has denied the allegations, filed his countersuit in January. According to court documents obtained by multiple outlets including Page Six and CNN, Judge Liman determined that Lively's complaint was protected by legal privilege under California law, which shields such statements made in civil rights proceedings. Additionally, the court ruled that Baldoni failed to show that Reynolds, Sloane, or The New York Times acted with 'actual malice' or seriously doubted the truth of the statements in question—criteria necessary to sustain a defamation claim. The court allowed Baldoni until June 23 to amend two claims: breach of the implied covenant of good faith and tortious interference with contract. These claims relate to alleged disruptions to existing agreements and potential reputational damage involving Reynolds and Lively. In a statement to Page Six, Lively's attorneys, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, called the decision a 'total victory and a complete vindication.' They further criticized Baldoni's lawsuit as a 'sham' and stated their intent to pursue attorneys' fees, punitive damages, and treble damages. While Baldoni's legal team did not immediately respond to requests for comment, the broader legal battle remains active, with a trial date set for March 2026.
