SoftBank's Ampere Deal Now Faces a More In-Depth Review by FTC
The Federal Trade Commission, one of two regulators charged with reviewing deals, has opened an in-depth investigation of the takeover, known formally as a second request for information about the transaction, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified because it wasn't public yet.
Only a small portion of deals face such follow-up requests. In some instances investigations can last for a year or more and are a precursor to a lawsuit to block the deal.
A representative for Ampere declined to comment. A SoftBank spokesperson was unable to immediately comment, while a representative for the FTC didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
SoftBank's all-cash transaction valuing Ampere at $6.5 billion was announced in March and represents another step in the Japanese company's push to add artificial intelligence infrastructure capabilities. Ampere makes server processors that are one of the main components of data center computers.
SoftBank is already the majority owner of Arm Holdings Plc, whose technology is used across the electronics industry and increasingly as the basis of server chips. Ampere is a customer that licenses Arm's fundamental technology.
When the deal was announced, SoftBank and Arm said they intended to close the transaction in the second half of 2025. Their plan called for Ampere to operate as a wholly owned subsidiary of SoftBank, retaining both its name and its headquarters in Santa Clara, California.
SoftBank and Arm have previously faced antitrust scrutiny. SoftBank's 2020 plan to sell Arm to Nvidia Corp. was investigated by agencies around the world and ultimately abandoned after being challenged in the US and the UK.
Arm is also embroiled in a global licensing dispute with Qualcomm Inc., which lodged antitrust complaints with the European Commission, the FTC and South Korea's antitrust regulator late last year, Bloomberg News has reported. Qualcomm alleges that Arm is hurting competition by restricting access to its technology after operating an open network for more than 20 years.
--With assistance from Josh Sisco and Mayumi Negishi.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Three shipbuilding clusters to come up at ₹75,000 crore
New Delhi: The Centre is looking at an investment of ₹75,000 crore in the three brand-new shipyards planned along its east and west coasts, as it targets to make India a global hub for shipbuilding. The investment will be made over four to five years, with the yards capable of making and repairing ships. 'The government is seeking to set up three greenfield shipbuilding clusters and support the existing shipyards carry out brownfield expansion. Overall, the government is targeting about ₹25,000 crore investment per greenfield cluster, which may be subject to significant changes based on the final locations and the shipyard sizes," the Union ports ministry said in response to a query. Five states are in talks with local and foreign shipbuilders to pick the ideal locations to host the three facilities, the ministry said. One of the shipyards may also host a shipbreaking facility supplying material for shipbuilding. 'MoPSW is also finalizing schemes to support these clusters (greenfield). For the brownfield expansion of existing yards, there is a scheme under finalization to support the expansion efforts of all the yards," the ministry said. Greenfield manufacturing refers to facilities put up from scratch, while brownfield refers to the expansion of existing facilities. The planned total amount of ₹75,000 is expected to come from both the Centre and companies. Mint reported in July that Indian state-run firms were looking to tie up with global shipbuilders. Also, in September, Mint reported that India is looking to Japan and Korea for shipbuilding initiatives. Talks are on with Japanese and Korean shipbuilders for investments in Indian clusters, while existing public sector shipbuilders are separately negotiating with Korean firms for joint ventures. Push for local The shipyard push is part of the government's ambition to make ships of all sizes and build locally, and encourage Indian built, owned and flagged cargo ships. The country's share in global shipbuilding now remains below 1%. The government's projection is to raise the share of Indian built ships in India's fleet from 5% at present to 7% by 2030 and 69% by 2047. Earlier, shipping secretary T.K. Ramachandran had told Mint that five locations in Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Maharashtra were being considered for developing shipbuilding clusters. It is expected that first three may come up in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Odisha, where identification and notification of land for the project has progressed swiftly. Special purpose vehicles have also been formed in these states and they have also commissioned techno economic feasibility report (TEFR) for the project. Some of the sites have carried out initial viability assessments of the locations and the same is planned for other locations. The findings will be shared with shipbuilders, and they will be invited to invest in these clusters, the ministry said. "A significant capital commitment under a public-private partnership model underpins the ambitious objective of becoming a leading shipbuilding power by 2047. While the challenge is massive, the opportunity is equally substantial," said Anshuman Magazine, chairman & CEO, India, South East Asia, Middle East & Africa, at CBRE, a global consulting firm. India is a classic example of peninsular geography, with an extensive coastline spanning nine states, which provides a distinct competitive advantage in maritime logistics across the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, and the Indian Ocean, Magazine said. "The regional market, particularly the supply chains of emerging Southeast Asian economies, presents a huge opportunity for India to position itself as a reliable and cost-competitive alternative in the shipbuilding industry," he added. Indian officials have visited traditional shipbuilding centres in Korea, Japan, and a few Scandinavian countries to explore partnerships and joint venture agreements. Over the next few months, some tie-ups between global shipbuilders and Indian private sector and state-owned companies are expected. The FY26 budget proposed Maritime Development Fund, a ₹25,000 crore government-industry partnership that would help develop manufacturing clusters with focus on shipbuilding and breaking. The budget also proposed that the existing Shipbuilding Financial Assistance (SBF) policy will be revamped to address cost disadvantages while also providing Credit Notes for shipbreaking to help purchase indigenously build ships. The budget has also included large ships in the infrastructure harmonized master list (HML) allowing purchase of ships on easier terms while providing basic customs duty exemption on raw materials, components, consumables or parts for the manufacture of ships extended for another ten years. Formal government notification for these programmes is still awaited. As per Maritime Vision 2030 and Vision 2047 plan, government is targeting to make India among the top 10 and among top five shipbuilding and ship owning country's worldwide respectively. Overall investment of ₹3 to 3.5 lakh crore across ports, shipping, and inland waterways categories is targeted. The shipbuilding initiative would also address a concern of the trade about the uncertainty and variability (escalation) of shipping cost impacting their market competitiveness. With better availability of domestic shipping lines at affordable prices, the freight rate volatility due to black swan events like covid-19, the Russia-Ukraine war, Red Sea crisis, Iran-Israel conflict, etc, could also be checked.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Japan's Nikkei hits record high as automakers rise on weaker yen
Japanese stocks surged to record highs, mirroring Wall Street's gains and fueled by a weaker yen that boosted automaker stocks like Toyota and Honda. Renewed optimism about the domestic corporate outlook and foreign investor interest further propelled the rally. While banks declined following strong economic data, chip-related stocks also weighed on the Nikkei, contrasting with the broader market's positive momentum. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Japan's Nikkei share average extended their gains from last week to hit a record high on Monday, tracking the Dow Jones's higher finish last week, as a weaker yen boosted automakers' Nikkei rose 0.7% to 43,683.56 as of 0137 GMT. The broader Topix also scaled a record peak, gaining 0.58% to 3, shares rallied this month on renewed optimism over the domestic corporate outlook as the impact of U.S. tariffs became clearer."Domestic equities kept the momentum from last week. There was an expectation that foreign investors would continue buying Japanese stocks," said Seiichi Suzuki, chief equity market analyst at Tokai Tokyo Intelligence Retailing gained 1.2% to lend the biggest boost to the rose, with Toyota Motor and Honda Motor rising 1.58% and 1.22%, respectively, as the yen lost 0.2% against the U.S. dollar on Monday.A weaker Japanese currency tends to boost exporters' shares as it increases the value of overseas profits in yen terms when repatriated to Japanese shares were also underpinned by the Dow Jones hitting an intraday record high on Friday, as UnitedHealth's shares jumped after Berkshire Hathaway raised its in Tokyo, banks fell, sending the banking index 1.45% lower and making it the biggest loser among the Tokyo Stock Exchange's industry UFJ Financial Group lost 1.96% and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group shed 1.78%.Banks had risen on Friday after a surprisingly strong economic data drove expectations for the Bank of Japan's interest rate heavyweights weighed on the Nikkei, with Tokyo Electron and Advantest falling 1.3% and 0.09%, respectively.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
The tariff puzzle
Trump gets Exxon back in Russian oil sector. Will he still insist on penal duties for India? The Trump-Putin summit in Alaska has raised more questions than answers for India. New Delhi was hoping that a modus vivendi between Washington and Moscow on the Ukraine war would stave off Trump's threatened secondary sanctions. It was a logical assumption: If Trump and Putin can do business, why can't India also have a commercial relationship with Russia? But what transpired in Alaska was somewhat strange. While Trump and Putin appeared to agree on a peace deal to end the war – though details are yet to be worked out – there is no word on the secondary sanctions. Even more worryingly for New Delhi, Washington has postponed a scheduled meeting of trade officials on Aug 25 that was supposed to clear the air on the secondary tariffs. Those come into effect on Aug 27, doubling tariffs on Indian exports to US to 50%. Interestingly, on the same day Putin met Trump, he signed a new decree that could allow American oil major Exxon Mobil to regain shares in the lucrative Sakhalin-1 oil and gas project. Exxon, before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, held 30% operator share in the project. If Exxon actually returns to Russia, Trump's secondary sanctions on India for buying Russian oil have no leg to stand on. That said, on the bilateral trade deal, India has done well to stick to its guns. Also, before Trump decided to torpedo a deal, New Delhi had been as flexible as possible. But it simply cannot compromise on the farm sector. In fact, no country can afford to play with the livelihood of its farmers. Take Japan. Although Trump forced Tokyo to increase imports of American rice by 75%, it has become a hot-button political issue in Japan with many Japanese buyers vowing to reject the imports. Similarly, for India's large agricultural sector that employs around 46% of the workforce, opening up to duty-free US agri-imports is impossible. However, in non-agricultural sectors there is ample room for negotiations. US also needs to keep in mind the larger geopolitical play here. India can be a viable option in the China+1 strategy. But Washington has to cut New Delhi some slack. If it continues pressuring India through tariffs and sanctions, New Delhi will have no choice but to increase its alignment with Brics or even revive the Russia-India-China platform. Note that Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi is beginning a visit to New Delhi today. Trump, therefore, should think hard before trying to drag India over the tariff coals. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
