Jean-Pierre triggers Democratic fury with public split from party
Jean-Pierre served as former President Biden's voice to the media for more than two and a half years, and her decision to split from the party at a time when it is particularly troubled has been more than irksome to Democrats.
They not only see it as a form of a betrayal, but as an instance in which one of their own again stuck the knife in the collective party's back, preventing it from moving forward after a terrible election.
It amounted to another bad day for Democrats, who have had a whole host of those since former Vice President Kamala Harris lost the presidential race to President Trump.
'You know how I feel about it. This is how: What the f— are we doing?' one angry strategist said in an interview that was laced with expletives.
'We see Donald Trump and he's ripping up this country and we're focused on the press secretary of the former president who hasn't been there for six months. It's madness.'
Democrats have been annoyed with Biden, who keeps showing up in public to, in their view, give Trump and Republicans a target to go after.
Now there is his press secretary, saying she no longer wants to be a Democrat and taking aim at the former president's critics.
The description of her forthcoming book, titled 'Independent: A look inside a broken White House, outside the party lines,' discusses a 'betrayal' of Biden by the Democratic Party that led him to bow out of the race and back Harris.
Democratic operatives, former Biden aides and donors were all miffed by Jean-Pierre's move to leave the party, particularly as many of them say they still feel misled by the Biden administration and his aides' insistence that Biden's mental acuity was above board.
'The fact that she feels like she can distance herself from the Democratic brand is laughable,' another strategist said. 'Democrats are trying to distance themselves from the Biden White House but here we have Karine trying to distance herself from a pissed off Democratic Party. She's part of the problem. Does she not realize that?'
'Karine is one of the most notable spokesperson of the last 5 years. She is part of the Democratic establishment,' the strategist added. 'That's what makes this feel weird and right out of bizarro land.'
In a release on Wednesday, Legacy Lit, Jean-Pierre's publisher, said that in the book the former White House press secretary would urge Americans to 'embrace life as independents,' suggesting that both the Democratic and Republican parties are broken.
'I'm going to stay until the end, milk it for all it's worth and then s— on all of it,' said a third strategist who was close to the Biden White House. 'Huge profile in courage there.'
On Thursday, Jean-Pierre's book fueled an all-out ambush by former Biden aides and operatives close to the White House who say they felt the former White House Press Secretary was 'in over her head' as one former aide put it 'and required a crazy amount of coddling and hand-holding' as a second former aide said.
'I like Karine but it's comical that she was the face of the White House and the lead communicator because she was anything but that,' the first former Biden aide said. 'She was never a communicator. She's affable and politically astute but she was a field organizer. She wasn't meant to ever be a communicator.
'She was miscast in that role,' the former aide said. 'And that was probably what pissed off a lot of people at the time because she was completely the wrong fit for that job.'
At the same time, there was long-running animosity toward Jean Pierre among some White House aides for building her own profile in the role, which included magazine spreads and appearances on major shows.
'There was this feeling in the building that she used the podium to build her persona and sure that's what a lot of these people at the podium do but she took it to another level,' said a former White House aide.
Axios reported on Thursday that 'concerns' about her self-promotion were so widespread that some aides raised the issue with the White House counsel's office. Some aides 'felt torn between their administration duties and helping Jean-Pierre promote herself.'
News of the book comes as Biden and his closest aides and advisers have come under scrutiny for hiding his mental decline while he served as president.
And the aspect that arguably angered Democrats the most was that Jean-Pierre regularly stood behind the podium and defended Biden and his capabilities as president.
Following the infamous debate that led to his withdrawal from the presidential race, Jean-Pierre said Biden was 'as sharp as ever.'
Since then, Democrats have felt they were misled and that the White House —including Jean-Pierre — wasn't being forthcoming about the president's condition.
'There's spin and there's lying and I'll just leave it there,' one major Democratic donor said.
The donor said Jean-Pierre's book news 'pours salt on a big, gaping wound that is still oozing.'
The first strategist agreed, saying that Jean-Pierre's book is 'a microcosm of a presidency that's ignoring the thing that's right in your face.'
'And it was right in our face,' the strategist added. 'We just didn't want to see it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
12 minutes ago
- CBS News
Is this legal? A look at why North Texas Democratic Rep. Nicole Collier remains in state Capitol
A Texas House member from Fort Worth prepares to spend another night inside the Capitol in a political showdown over the rules established by the state legislature. Representative Nicole Collier, who represents District 95 in East Fort Worth, objects to the House speaker's demand that Democrats, who had fled the state to prevent a quorum, sign permission slips to leave and promise to be inside the Capitol on Wednesday morning. SMU political science professor Matthew Wilson explains the rarely enforced rules being applied during this second special session of the legislature. He said once enough Democratic lawmakers returned to the Capitol to meet the quorum for the second special session, the speaker needed only 15 other members, according to the House Rules Manual. "I think both sides in this are playing hardball. Everybody's using all the tools that are at their disposal to achieve the political outcome that they want. I mean, it's worth noting she's the only Democratic legislator who is being subject to this, and it's because of her own decision not to sign the agreement," said Wilson. Collier told CBS News Texas' Jack Fink that she's taking a stand against what she believes are improper efforts by Republicans to control her and other Democrats. "I have a right to resist, I have a right to oppose, just like my voters do, just like Texans have a right to challenge government, and that's what I'm doing," said Collier. Spending a few nights inside the state Capitol may not stop the redistricting plan from passing, but political observers say it will help raise Collier's profile within the Texas Democratic Party.
CBS News
12 minutes ago
- CBS News
Democrats, Republicans expect Texas-sized fight over new congressional maps on House floor Wednesday
The political showdown over new congressional maps in Texas moves to the House floor on Wednesday. While Republicans and Democrats expect multiple amendments and points of order to kill the maps that will give Republicans five more seats, the maps are still on their way to passing. The vote will take place after Democrats returned to the House Monday, which established a quorum for the first time in two weeks. Speaker Dustin Burrows ordered all Democrats who left the state and broke quorum to sign permission slips so they could be assigned a Texas DPS agent to escort them around the clock to ensure they return to the House chamber Wednesday morning for the vote on the congressional maps. But Democratic Representative Nicole Collier of Fort Worth would not sign the permission slip. In a moment made for social media on Tuesday afternoon, Collier waved to supporters standing outside the chamber as other lawmakers visited her. Republicans and Democrats disagree over the need for the permission slips and DPS escorts. Representative Mihaela Plesa, D-Dallas, told CBS News Texas, "I signed it, but I am standing strong with Representative Collier. She is showing Collier courageousness right now. Look, she felt in her heart that what we were signing was wrong. And I say I agree with her." Representative Brent Money, R-Greenville, said, "It's her choice. All her Democratic colleagues have left except for the ones who come back and join her for videos. She can leave now if she wants to. She's decided it's in her best interest to stay." Democrats said their DPS escorts are a waste of money, but Republicans point out the Texas Constitution allows the legislature to enforce a quorum. Watch Eye On Politics at 7:30 Sunday morning on air and streaming. Follow Jack on X: @cbs11jack
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legislative committees advance CA redistricting legislation
(The Center Square) — Legislators, taxpayers and others debated passionately Tuesday for several hours as Democratic-led election committees in the California Assembly and Senate advanced congressional redistricting legislation. The bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act received support from the Democratic majorities in the Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee and the Assembly Elections Committee. Ultimately they're expected to land on the floors of the Assembly and Senate on Thursday. They're backed by the Democratic supermajorities in both houses, as well as by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. With their passage certain, the legislation will mean voters on a Nov. 4 special election will decide whether to revise boundaries for congressional districts in response to redistricting in Republican-led states such as Texas. But the Republican minority in the Legislature scored what they called an early victory Monday night by delaying Thursday's floor votes. "The bill was stalled until after 7 p.m., meaning the earliest it can be legally voted on is Thursday evening. That leaves only hours before the special election deadline for passage and Newsom's signature," Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, R-San Diego, posted on X. Democrats and Republicans agree democracy is at stake and that California has a gold standard with its independent, nonpartisan Citizens Redistricting Commission. Republican lawmakers argued the will of voters, who approved a constitutional amendment creating the commission, was being disregarded. But Democratic legislators stressed voters can see the proposed map, which is posted at They also noted that unlike people in Texas, Californian voters will have the final say on whether congressional districts are changed and that the independent commission can resume its work after the 2030 census. "We are not asking California to rubber stamp maps behind closed doors," Assembly Elections Committee Chair Gail Pellerin, a Democrat, told the committee. "As a former election official, I would never stand for that. This is about defending democracy itself, making sure checks and balances our kids learned in government class are alive and well after the 2026 election." Other Democrats on the committee voiced their support. 'Who should have the control of the vast power of the federal government?' asked Assemblymember Steve Bennett, D-Ventura. 'Our founding fathers agreed hundreds of years ago on a special form of democracy, designed to protect our democracy from power grabs.' If people in power try to change the rules to seize power undemocratically, then democracy advocates must also change their rules in response, Bennett argued. But Assemblymember David J. Tangipa, R-Clovis, who sits on the committee with Bennett, told the committee that Republicans weren't given enough time to review the legislation in advance of Tuesday's hearing. He also noted the proposed congressional map changed at 8 p.m. Monday. Pellerin countered that she understood the map was posted at 8 a.m. Monday. Pellerin and Tangipa clashed during the hearing as the latter asked extensive questions of Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Palo Alto, who spoke on behalf of one of the three bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act. Pellerin said she was trying to keep the meeting moving, and Tangipa stressed the importance of his questions on topics such as funding. A large number of residents throughout California, union representatives and representatives of organizations such as Planned Parenthood and the California Teachers Association, spoke in favor of redistricting at the Assembly committee meeting. But what appeared to be an even bigger number of taxpayers from throughout the state, as well as representatives of Republican organizations, spoke against the legislation. Comments on the two sides echoed those made by the Democratic and Republican legislators. The Assembly committee rejected a motion by its ranking Republican, Vice Chair Alexandra Macedo of Tulare, that the committee recess until its members could read all 16,000 comments that voters have made in a portal on the Assembly website. "Democratic power bosses want to take the power away from the people," Macedo said. She called the Election Rigging Response Act a coordinated effort to tear down the independent commission and gerrymander districts for political gain at a time California faces severe budget shortfalls. The Assembly Republican Caucus has said the Nov. 4 election will cost voters more than $235 million. Democrats have countered the Trump administration has cost the state much more than that by cutting or withholding funding.
