Horror as knifeman tackled to ground after ‘slashing 3 people' outside Aldi in broad daylight attack
Officers raced to the violent scene in Bevois Valley, Southampton where they arrested a man on suspicion of attempted murder.
The suspect is described as South Asian, aged in his 40s, around 5ft 11ins and with black hair and a beard.
He was wearing a red shirt and a navy blue jacket when the violent assault took place.
The knifeman was wrestled to the ground by cops as horrified onlookers watched on.
The store has been closed off and a cordon put in place as officers launch an investigation into the incident.
Mohamed Kamal, 16, is a student at Limitless Martial Arts and recently finished studying at Cantell School when the horror unfolded.
Brave Mohamed rushed over to help when he saw the violence, ushering bystanders into the nearby Aldi.
He went on to lead the attacker in circles in the car park of the store while waiting for officers to arrive.
He told the Daily Echo: 'He just kept running that same slow pace.
'It was a bit scary, he was close at times.
'There was a point it wasn't even scary any more, it was just weird.'
Officers probing the incident are now asking for witnesses to come forward to assist with their investigation.
A spokesperson for Hampshire Constabulary said: "We know there were a lot of people in the area at this time and we want to hear from anyone who can help with our enquiries.
"Did you witness the incident or do you have any footage of what happened; whether it's CCTV, phone or dashcam?
"Did you see anyone matching this description in the Southampton area today acting suspiciously or in a way that caused you concern?
'You can report information and send footage through our public portal using this link: Public Portal or by calling 101 and quoting 44250348108.'
2
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How to work out if YOU can claim £950 from the car finance scandal - and what to do if you can't find the paperwork
It's the scandal dubbed 'PPI on Wheels', but last week five judges at the Supreme Court dealt a blow to millions of drivers hoping for a payout on their car finance deals. There will be no compensation for customers who were simply unaware commission was being paid when they took out car finance, with the judges declaring this was not enough to count as mis-selling.
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
Six months on from my accident, I've not got on a Lime Bike again
Six months ago I was hit by a car while riding a Lime bike. I was cycling home after a late netball match in a quiet residential area of south London. It was dark but dry and it was a journey I'd made hundreds of times before. I wasn't wearing a helmet — I never did when I got Lime bikes. I had nearly crossed a mini roundabout when a driver coming from my left failed to stop, hitting the back of my bike and sending me catapulting me over the handlebars. I broke my wrist, my jaw and chipped my front teeth. I'm going to require dental work for the rest of my life. I was signed off work for six weeks. It was at least two months before I felt slightly more like myself again. I still get a little pang of nervousness crossing a road when I see a Lime bike coming. And I still haven't got back on a bike. That's why the decision by Hounslow Council to stop Lime ebikes operating in the borough appeals to me. Although less about rider behaviour on the roads and more about parking issues (alternative contracts have been offered to the rental firms Forest and Voi, with 'stricter enforcement for designated bay use' cited as a reason), it feels like sanity is starting to prevail. • The man behind Lime e-bikes on why they're 'no nuisance' The driver who hit me claims she didn't see me, that I 'came out of nowhere''. I guess if I'd been on my normal bike (which had a puncture, hence the Lime), I would have been travelling at a slower pace and therefore more visible to others, or I'd have been able to swerve before she crossed. I don't hate Lime bikes but I fear them now. While in many ways they've positively transformed our mobility across the city, they're big and heavy and fast. Anyone can get on one, and it feels like they leave them anywhere. As an able-bodied person I can walk around the scattered ebikes left on my road but I often think of how this affects wheelchair users, parents with prams, the elderly and people with disabilities. Since my accident, multiple friends have also had incidents, as riders and pedestrians. With summer weather making buses and trains far less desirable, more people are going to choose a Lime bike — thus more potential for accidents. • I know why Lime bike riders are so reckless Am I convinced things will be that different with Forest and Voi bikes? I don't know. It's good to see moves toward stricter parking systems but will that really stop people from riding recklessly? Banning one brand doesn't fix the problem, it just passes it on. For me, it's not so much the product that's inherently dangerous but how people use it. I often see riders on their phones, listening to music, even rolling a cigarette, completely absorbed in their bubble. Red lights and zebra crossings seem optional. And for pedestrians, these heavier, faster bikes leave a fraction of the reaction time compared to non-electric bikes. Riders need to understand that while we feel free and protected, the power is illusory. We're not in a car, it's still a bike, and our bodies are vulnerable. While the ban might ease frustration in the short term, it doesn't solve the bigger issue of integrating technological advances into city travel. Cities need to adapt, not just restrict. If councils don't tackle the root behaviours and infrastructure gaps, we'll be here again in six months with a different logo. As long as we treat these bikes as a quick fix — for cities, for commuters, for climate goals — without properly integrating them into how we move and live, we're asking for more accidents, more frustration and more bans. We need to fix the system before the fear outweighs the convenience and people like me never get back on.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Kick It Out say reports of abuse and discrimination in football is at record high
Football 's anti- discrimination charity Kick It Out received almost 1,400 reports of discrimination during the 2024-25 season, a record high. There were 1,398 reports of abuse, Kick It Out revealed, up from 1,332 in the 2023-24 campaign. The data shows a rise in sexism, transphobia, and faith-based abuse, with racism remaining the most reported form of discrimination. There was a big spike in sexism and misogyny, with the number of complaints rising by 67 per cent, with a rise also in youth football. Kick It Out chief executive Samuel Okafor said: 'These figures show that discrimination remains deeply embedded across the game, but the rise in abuse in youth football should be a wake-up call. 'No one should be facing hostility simply for taking part. 'What we're seeing now is that fans aren't just reporting abuse, they're demanding action. There's been a clear shift this season in how people are calling out sexist behaviour, both online and in stadiums, and asking football to treat it as seriously as any other form of hate.' 'At the same time, it's clear that online platforms are still falling short. The volume of abuse remains high, and too often, those responsible face no consequences. 'Fans are doing their part by speaking up. It's now up to football authorities, tech companies and government to show they're listening, and to act.' During Euro 2025, Lionesses defender Jess Carter was sent 'vile' and 'abhorrent' racist abuse online following their quarter-final win over Sweden. The Football Association (FA) confirmed they were working with UK police and the relevant social media platforms, while Carter said she would 'a step back' from social media as a result of the abuse she has received throughout the tournament. In May, Kick It Out has called on the football authorities to show 'solidarity and support' to the trans community after the English and Scottish governing bodies banned transgender women from the competitive female game. The football associations updated their policies in light of last month's ruling from the UK Supreme Court, which clarified that the word 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act meant biological sex. Previously, transgender women had been able to compete provided they reduced testosterone to accepted levels. The FA's new policy came into effect on June 1.
