logo
Why foreign property and casualty insurers are quitting Canada

Why foreign property and casualty insurers are quitting Canada

Globe and Mail2 days ago

In the fragmented domestic auto and home insurance industry, the big question is: Who will be next to exit?
Last week, U.S. insurance giant Travelers surprised the market by selling its Canadian operations to Waterloo-based Definity Financial Corp. DFY-T for $3.3-billion.
New York-based Travelers is the latest in a string of foreign-owned property and casualty (P&C) insurance company to quit the domestic market. Over the past decade, global insurers such as State Farm, AXA and Hartford opted to exit.
While there have been numerous departures, there are still more than 150 P&C players competing in a consolidating sector where scale and marketing heft are increasingly critical to success. The vast majority have single-digit market share – Travelers had roughly 2 per cent of the market – and would need to spend billions to bulk up.
There are also a handful of Canadian companies – including market leader Intact Financial Corp., Definity, Desjardins Group, Co-operators, Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd. and Toronto-Dominion Bank – with ambitions to dominate the sector. Analysts say further auto and home insurer consolidation is as inevitable as highway fender benders on holiday weekends.
Toronto-based Intact has moved onto the global stage as part of its consolidation strategy. In 2020, Intact and a Danish insurer acquired London-based RSA Insurance Group PLC, a major player in the Canadian market, for $12.4-billion.
Institutional investors are willing to put money into consolidators such as Intact and Definity. Three larger domestic pension plans committed capital to the RSA purchase.
Analysis: Why investors love Definity's big acquisition, helping the home and auto insurer extend its hot run
For ambitious chief executives such as Intact CEO Charles Brindamour, an accomplished integrator of insurance businesses, the obvious next targets are Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, which has a Chicago-based parent, and Aviva Insurance Co. of Canada, with an owner in London.
Both companies have larger market share than Travelers, but similar challenges when it comes to further expanding their platforms. Both Allstate and Aviva will be looking at the economics behind the Definity deal and making a go-big-or-go-home decision.
Travelers built its Canadian platform through acquisitions, highlighted by the 2013 purchase of Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co. for more than $1-billion. (Definity's acquisition of the company brings a business founded by Sir John A. Macdonald in 1887 back into Canadian hands.)
Part of Travelers' expansion strategy centred on using a familiar U.S. brand – a red umbrella – to sell insurance north of the border. The campaign never really caught on.
In part, that reflects a P&C industry that sells through independent agents, who care more about commissions than umbrellas. It also reflects domestic insurers spending heavily on advertising to sell online through flanker brands such Intact's Belair Direct and Definity-owned Sonnet. These campaigns drowned out Traveler's marketing.
Travelers decided to sell at a time when industry dynamics favour P&C insurers, with what's known as a hard market on pricing. The Canadian division sold for 1.8 times its book value, an impressive premium. Travelers plans to use US$700-million of the sale's proceeds to buy back its own stock, a shareholder-friendly move.
In soft insurance markets, when P&C insurers discount their rates to win customers, acquirers will offer far smaller premiums to book value on potential purchases. For Allstate and Aviva, this is a seller's market, one that may not last.
Definity paid up for Travelers, and devoted the better part of a year negotiating the takeover, because the transaction vaulted the insurer into the country's top five players. The additional scale translates into $100-million a year in annual savings, a significant boost in the company's return on equity and a 30-per-cent increase in premiums.
Definity went public in 2021 to do this sort of takeover, after being founded in 1871 as mutual company Economical Insurance, owned by its policyholders. CEO Rowan Saunders said in announcing the Travelers deal that 'this acquisition demonstrates our commitment to long-term growth and competitiveness.'
It also avoids having Definity show up on lists of potential takeover targets, alongside Allstate and Aviva. As part of the initial public offering, the company and regulators struck a four-year moratorium on takeovers of Definity. The standstill agreement expires this fall.
Buying Travelers should make Definity too large or too expensive for a domestic rival such as Intact to acquire. Or an even more tempting prize.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ontario expected to pass controversial mining law; Ford warns against blockades
Ontario expected to pass controversial mining law; Ford warns against blockades

CTV News

time28 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Ontario expected to pass controversial mining law; Ford warns against blockades

Protesters and community members chant and wave signs, as they listen to speakers during a demonstration opposing Bill 5, outside the Ontario legislature at Queen's Park in Toronto, Monday, June 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston TORONTO — Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government is expected to pass a controversial mining law that gives it the power to suspend provincial and municipal laws for chosen projects in areas it deems to have economic importance. If Bill 5 ends up being challenged and found unconstitutional in court, Ford wouldn't say if he would use the notwithstanding clause to save it, but says that he would 'cross that bridge' when he comes to it. The proposed legislation has sparked an angry backlash from First Nations who say the bill tramples their rights and ignores their concerns and they have warned they may blockade roads and railways in protest. But Ford said Wednesday that wouldn't be 'very wise.' 'You can't break the law,' Ford said. 'Simple as need to move on or they'll be dealt with appropriately.' When asked to clarify his comments, Ford said he doesn't direct the police and any enforcement would be up to the Ontario Provincial Police or local police services. The legislation proposes to create so-called 'special economic zones,' where the government could suspend laws in order to speed up projects such as mines. Ford cites the need to move more quickly on mining places such as the Ring of Fire in order to strengthen the province's economy while it is under attack from U.S. President Donald Trump. NDP deputy leader Sol Mamakwa, who represents the northern Ontario riding of Kiiwetinoong that is home to many First Nations and the Ring of Fire, said that Ford is not listening to their concerns. 'This is not the wild, wild west,' he said, surrounded by several people who flew in from various communities in his riding. 'We are the ones that live in these communities on these lands. He does not live in those cannot vote legislatively bulldoze your way. These are the people that will stop that bulldozer coming north.' Ford's government is fast-tracking the bill and limiting third-reading debate and while the opposition parties tried to stall the bill at the committee stage, it is set to return to the legislature Wednesday afternoon for third reading and an expected final vote. In response to the growing backlash, Indigenous Affairs Minister Greg Rickford and Mining Minister Stephen Lecce said late last month that the province would amend Bill 5 to explicitly include duty to consult provisions throughout the legislation. That amendment did not end up making it in the bill due to the tactics the Liberals used in committee. Ford said it's unfortunate that opposition parties wanted to 'drag this out,' but his government will consult with First Nations over the coming months. 'When it comes to duty to consult, which is very important, and we are going to do it, if they have an equity partnership it moves like greased lightning,' he said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025. Liam Casey and Allison Jones, The Canadian Press

Meet TPC Toronto, the new home for the RBC Canadian Open - that's not in Toronto
Meet TPC Toronto, the new home for the RBC Canadian Open - that's not in Toronto

National Post

time38 minutes ago

  • National Post

Meet TPC Toronto, the new home for the RBC Canadian Open - that's not in Toronto

Article content 'With this property, we squashed a lot of rumours that were coming that this place was going to be too far away … that it wasn't a member club,' Paul said. 'But to have over 2,100 volunteers coming back to us, to have ticket sales that are running neck-in-neck with what happened in Hamilton last year really shows the growth of this tournament. Article content In recent years, the tournament has been leaning into a Muskoka chair/cottage vibe with it's 'Summer's Open' branding and that is something golf fans can expect more of with the tournament moving out of the city to a rural area. Article content '(TPC Toronto) has established a vibe and an atmosphere and a culture here that is pervasive, and it's authentically Canadian. It feels different,' he said. 'Because it's a big expanse, it feels a little freer, it's a little more open … It has that vibe. Lots of water, big trees, that really great feeling.' Article content There has been some concern that having a home base for the tournament relatively far from the buzz of Toronto could hinder visitors and players from what has been a very successful decade for the RBC Canadian Open. Article content Corey Conners said on Wednesday that initial reaction he has heard from fellow players has been very positive. Article content 'The facilities here — great practice facility, great clubhouse, locker room — those are all added bonuses, which I think make the week a little bit easier. Once you're here, you've got everything that you need,' Conners said. '(As for) the proximity to the city, I think it's close enough. Yeah, it's just a special place that a lot of people are going to take notice of. I know a lot of the players have already told me some positive feedback about it. I think everyone's going to like it.' Article content McIlroy hinted that, although proximity to downtown Toronto was a plus for the tournament, the RBC Canadian Open has put itself in a position to succeed wherever it is played. Article content 'Look, we play so much in the States anyway, and you come here, it feels a little different, but you're not that far away,' he said. 'I think when the tournament has been a little closer to the city and we've been able to stay in Toronto, it feels a little more, I won't say European, but cosmopolitan and may be different from what we do week in, week out. Article content 'But I think for the most part, it's become a very, very good tournament, and I think because of that, and you see guys playing each and every year,' he added. 'I just think this tournament has grown from strength to strength over these last few years, and that's a lot to do with Golf Canada and RBC and everyone behind it, and they should be really proud of what they've built.'

NDP to vote against throne speech, forcing Liberals to find support elsewhere
NDP to vote against throne speech, forcing Liberals to find support elsewhere

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

NDP to vote against throne speech, forcing Liberals to find support elsewhere

Interim NDP Leader Don Davies says his party will be voting against the government's throne speech, meaning the Liberals will need to get support from another opposition party to survive the confidence vote. Davies told reporters on Parliament Hill on Wednesday that the throne speech doesn't emphasize some key priorities that the NDP want included, such as health care and employment benefits. "It's a clear message that this throne speech is not a worker-centred throne speech and it does not deliver the priorities that we heard from millions of Canadians across this country," Davies said. "We can't support a speech that so badly misses the mark in terms of the economic and social policies people need in this country." A government's throne speech is traditionally a confidence vote, meaning if it doesn't pass the government could fall and Canadians could potentially be facing another election this year. The NDP was reduced to seven seats in April's election. But with the Liberals just a few seats short of a majority, the party still has some sway in this Parliament. Without the NDP, the Liberals will need backing from either the Conservatives or the Bloc Québécois to pass the throne speech.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store