logo
Ramaphosa and Malema put cash and equality in the spotlight this Women's Month

Ramaphosa and Malema put cash and equality in the spotlight this Women's Month

As South Africans marked National Women's Day on Saturday, 9 August, financial burdens were a central focus during key addresses by the country's political leaders.
The theme for this year's celebration is 'Building Resilient Economies for All.'
President Cyril Ramaphosa and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema used the occasion to highlight the socio-economic challenges females face.
In his address, Ramaphosa said that while South Africa has made significant progress since the historic 1956 Women's March, more must be done to empower women financially.
The president said that over the years, the government introduced the Employment Equity Act and other progressive laws that have assisted in paving the way for female empowerment.
Ramaphosa said women's participation in the workforce continues to grow, and the public sector prioritises procurement from female-owned businesses. The president added that government support also includes skills training, entrepreneurial assistance, access to funding, and multi-sectoral partnerships.
'This is progress. But it is not enough. We cannot rest until we have achieved gender equality throughout society,' Ramaphosa said.
He urged South Africans to recommit to building a future where men and women are equal.
Meanwhile, EFF leader Julius Malema echoed some of Ramaphosa's sentiments. Speaking at his party's commemoration, Malema highlighted the challenges women, especially domestic workers, face.
He emphasised the importance of valuing and supporting females.
'We must protect them, we must respect them, we must provide for them. Any man who doesn't give women money is an irresponsible man – women have to receive money, especially black women,' said Malema.
He stressed the need for more opportunities for women in the workforce and added that empowerment is key to combating poverty.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘BBBEE will not help us one bit if this economy is not growing'
‘BBBEE will not help us one bit if this economy is not growing'

Eyewitness News

timean hour ago

  • Eyewitness News

‘BBBEE will not help us one bit if this economy is not growing'

The DA is proposing sweeping regulatory reforms to establish a 'business-friendly environment' in South Africa. Party leader John Steenhuisen stated at a media briefing that Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) and racial quotas have failed in their goals and have created an environment that deters investment and job creation. The party has put forward alternatives to BBBEE, the Employment Equity Act, and the Expropriation Act, saying these three acts are obstacles to economic growth. Aucamp says the party is in favour of transformation, but that the current policies in place do not work and have harmed the economy.

Police fire rubber bullets at Germiston residents in housing stand-off
Police fire rubber bullets at Germiston residents in housing stand-off

eNCA

time2 hours ago

  • eNCA

Police fire rubber bullets at Germiston residents in housing stand-off

EKURHULENI - Police fired rubber bullets at residents who tried to block the eviction of scores of houses in Germiston on Tuesday by throwing stones and torching a municipal building, officials said. After police gained access to the housing complex in Ekurhuleni, a squad of men moved in and hauled furniture and personal belongings out of the homes. Shocked residents accused the government of failing them amid South Africa's housing crisis, saying they believed the homes were part of a scheme to provide houses for black South Africans disadvantaged by the previous racist apartheid system. Two people were arrested for setting alight the nearby offices of the municipal home affairs department, police said, adding they were acting on a June court order to evict people from the complex, which was reportedly home to 450 families. "Unfortunately, the people got wind of the eviction and closed the road. Innocent people and the police were thrown with stones and we had to retaliate to ensure that we dispersed them," Major General Fred Kekana, the deputy provincial police commissioner, told AFP. "Somebody allegedly threw a petrol bomb at the Department of Home Affairs. Two arrests have been made so far," he said. Some residents insisted they had not been issued an eviction order and had been paying rent for years. "Our government is failing us. They are chasing us yet we have titles for these houses," 37-year-old resident Akhona Mbadi, a mother of four children, told AFP. After taking power following the end of white minority rule in 1994, the African National Congress-led government adopted a Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) to provide subsidised housing and other services to black South Africans disadvantaged by apartheid. By 2017 nearly 14 percent of South African households lived in RDP or government-subsidised homes, according to government figures. However, homelessness has risen dramatically from 13,000 in 1996 to more than 55,700 in 2022, according to government statistics.

Civil society groups reject President's National Dialogue as exclusionary
Civil society groups reject President's National Dialogue as exclusionary

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Civil society groups reject President's National Dialogue as exclusionary

Criticism of President's National Dialogue: A Missed Opportunity for Unity Image: X The President's planned 'National Dialogue' is being sharply criticised by civil society groups, who say it is 'neither national nor a dialogue' as it fails to unite the country. In an interview with IOL on Tuesday, Paul Maritz, Free SA Campaigns Director, contended the national exercise is neither truly national nor a meaningful conversation about the country's future. The organisation stated that divisions can only be overcome through honest dialogue and that the current format excludes entire sectors of society, including key political parties. 'South Africans must remain in constant conversation about our shared future. Unfortunately, in this case, the President's planned National Dialogue is neither national nor a dialogue in any meaningful sense. 'Entire sectors of society, including key political parties, were excluded from the outset. That makes this look far more like a PR exercise than a sincere, open conversation about where we are 30 years into democracy and how we move forward together,' said Maritz. Free SA expressed a pattern of disengagement from prominent foundations that had been expected to back the process. The Steve Biko Foundation, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the FW de Klerk Foundation, the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group have all withdrawn, casting a pall over what many hoped would be a more inclusive national conversation. The organisations cited violations of the dialogue's core principles and called for postponement to ensure adequate preparation, coherence, and participatory integrity. Responding to the withdrawal by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Free SA noted the importance of former President Thabo Mbeki's role in persuading parties and citizens to engage. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Former President Mbeki's role is significant, both because of his stature and because he represents a tradition of thoughtful political engagement,' the organisation said. 'His withdrawal, or that of organisations he supports, would be a serious blow to the credibility of this process. If respected voices like his are not fully on board, ordinary citizens will rightly question whether this is worth their time.' The Democratic Alliance (DA), the country's second-largest political party and a governing partner in a national unity framework, is among the groups that have rejected the National Dialogue. Free SA assesses that if a ruling coalition partner cannot be won to participate, the broader public is unlikely to be convinced of the process's legitimacy. 'If you cannot convince your coalition partner to participate, how can you hope to convince the rest of the country? The process loses legitimacy without their involvement before it even begins,' Maritz argued. Meanwhile, The MK Party (uMkhonto weSizwe Party) has condemned the National Dialogue as an expensive political stunt, while services are collapsing nationwide. The party described the Dialogue as a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, bypassing Parliament, and granting the Presidency unchecked influence over policy-making without democratic oversight. 'This National Dialogue is a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, not a platform for genuine national problem-solving," the party asserted. The MK Party also highlighted what it calls urgent national failures that deserve attention before any dialogue can yield real progress. It pointed to a litany of service delivery and governance crises across several provinces, arguing that public resources are being diverted to political theatre rather than addressing urgent needs: Free SA and its critics argue that the National Dialogue risks becoming more about optics than addressing root causes such as poverty, inequality, and governance failures. 'From what we can see, it risks being nothing more than a political tool. It does not seriously address the root causes of poverty, inequality, and poor governance. 'A true national dialogue would require a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and to make space for voices that may disagree with the President's vision,' Maritz said. IOL Politics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store