Changing the face of financial advice
The ADP was established to help young ACI graduates gain both a foot in the door and a pathway to success in financial planning. Through structured training, mentorship, and real-world work experience, the 18-month programme equips participants to become confident and competent professionals.
Proof in progress: Phylicia Marule and Lanelle Fortune
Phylicia Marule grew up in the village of Rolle Trust in Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga, with dreams of becoming a doctor. A fear of blood, however, rerouted her ambitions toward accounting. 'I completed my BCom in Accounting and started an internship at a small firm in Nelspruit,' she recalls. 'But I realised I wanted more – a career where I could grow and make a difference in people's lives.'
That opportunity came unexpectedly via a LinkedIn message about the ADP. With no previous exposure to financial planning, Marule took a leap of faith. 'I told myself I'd learn as I go, and that's exactly what happened.' Today, she works as an adviser assistant and is planning to complete her Postgraduate Diploma in Financial Planning next year. 'I want to be that adviser who helps people see their finances differently and plan better for their futures,' says Marule. 'The ADP helped me fall in love with this work.'
Johannesburg-born Lanelle Fortune also didn't set out to be a financial adviser, but the seeds were always there. Raised by a single mother and surrounded by strong women, she learned early on the value of resilience and empathy. 'I didn't always know what career I wanted, but I knew it would involve listening to people and helping them navigate life's complexities,' she explains.
The ADP offered the perfect bridge between Fortune's passion for people and a profession that demands both heart and strategy. 'It was insightful and transformative,' she says. 'The training sessions were practical and engaging, and the support from fellow participants was invaluable. There were moments I doubted myself, but the community around me reminded me I belonged.'
Now also working as an adviser assistant, Fortune is focused on building her confidence and capability before stepping into an advisory role. 'It keeps me sharp and continuously learning, while also giving me a closer look at what it takes to take the next step in my career.'
Empowering more women to rise
Both women agree that the financial services industry is slowly changing for the better, but more progress is needed. 'There's an increasing number of women entering and thriving in this industry,' says Marule, 'but there's still a perception that we can't handle pressure or big responsibilities. That needs to change.'
Fortune echoes this sentiment. 'There needs to be more emphasis on creating environments where women don't just fit in but thrive. The industry also needs more intentional mentorship, not just from women but from men who champion inclusion meaningfully.'
The ADP is helping catalyse this shift. 'It's more than just a development programme,' Fortune says. 'It's a statement. It says we belong here; we don't have to shrink to fit in; we can take up space.'
For other young women considering the industry, both have heartfelt advice. 'Be bold, patient, and always be willing to learn,' says Marule. Fortune adds: 'Trust your fire. You are the answered prayer of generations before you, so don't let self-doubt break what you were born to rebuild.'
Affiliates of the PSG Financial Services Group, a licensed controlling company, are authorised financial services providers. www.psg.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
MTN Group Ltd (MTNOF) (H1 2025) Earnings Call Highlights: Robust Revenue Growth Amidst ...
Release Date: August 18, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points MTN Group Ltd (MTNOF) reported a robust financial performance with a 22% growth in service revenue, surpassing medium-term guidance. The company achieved significant cost savings of 1.5 billion rand in the first half, contributing to a cumulative 5.3 billion rand since 2024. MTN Nigeria showed strong performance with a 54.1% increase in service revenue, driven by data and voice growth. The fintech segment experienced a 24.9% growth in revenue, with advanced services growing by 42%. The balance sheet remains resilient with a consolidated net debt to EBITDA ratio improving to 0.5 times. Negative Points MTN South Africa faced competitive pressures, resulting in a modest 2.3% growth in service revenue. The company had to revise its guidance for South Africa to reflect competitive dynamics, particularly in the prepaid market. There are ongoing legal and regulatory challenges, including a DOJ investigation related to past operations in Afghanistan and Iran. The CapEx intensity was slightly above the targeted range, driven by accelerated investments in Nigeria. The company is facing challenges in maintaining market share in South Africa, with strategic initiatives needed to address this. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with MTNOF. Q: Can you comment on your market share ambitions in South Africa and how you plan to achieve them, given the guidance suggests a potential loss in service revenue market share? A: We are widening the lower end of our service revenue guidance to reflect current realities, but our aspirations remain to maintain or grow market share. We are investing more in distribution and dealer commissions to improve competitiveness. Our goal is to capture 30-35% of all net additions in the market. (Ralph Mopita, CEO) Q: What are your plans regarding network as a service and wholesale roaming agreements in South Africa? A: We are cautious about expanding network as a service due to strategic concerns about market dynamics and MVNOs. We aim to avoid a situation similar to Europe where MVNOs disrupted retail pricing. We will pursue retail business but have a walkaway point if pricing lacks sufficient headroom. (Ralph Mopita, CEO) Q: How do you plan to scale Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) and Fiber to the Home (FTTH) in South Africa? A: We will continue to push FWA as long as we have sufficient spectrum and can deliver quality service. For FTTH, we anticipate potential consolidation opportunities in the medium to long term and are not planning to overbuild fiber infrastructure. (Ralph Mopita, CEO) Q: With the significant increase in operating free cash flow and Nigeria's positive equity outlook, is there an opportunity for share buybacks in the second half of 2025? A: Share buybacks are considered a sustainable option and are currently number five on our priority list. We are evaluating the best way to return value to shareholders and will communicate our approach by the end of the year. (Thulu Molefe, CFO) Q: How do you view the impact of Starlink and other LEO providers on your CapEx and CapEx intensity? A: We see potential partnership opportunities with non-terrestrial networks, particularly in sparsely populated areas. However, we do not anticipate these partnerships significantly influencing our CapEx intensity, which remains on a glide path towards 15-18% over time. (Ralph Mopita, CEO) For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
CNN
8 hours ago
- CNN
Analysis: Did Trump really end six wars?
President Donald Trump is not just trying to end the vicious war in Ukraine. He's claiming he's already ended almost one war for each month of his second term — spanning the Middle East; Africa; and Central, South and Southeast Asia. 'I've done six wars — I've ended six wars,' Trump said in his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders on Monday. 'Look, India-Pakistan, we're talking about big places, you just take a look at some of these wars. You go to Africa and take a look at them.' The White House proclaimed in a statement this month that 'President Trump is the President of Peace,' listing claimed diplomatic agreements between Armenia and Azerbaijan; Cambodia and Thailand; Israel and Iran; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo; Egypt and Ethiopia; and Serbia and Kosovo, as well as the Abraham Accords, a normalization pact signed in Trump's first term between Israel and some Arab states. Some of this is classic Trumpian hyperbole. And the president's team is scanning the globe looking for fires to extinguish to claim quick wins for his transparent campaign for a Nobel Peace Prize. Trump hasn't suddenly reinvented American foreign policy. Every administration works to halt wars and to advance US interests. Most don't take constant victory laps — indeed, such triumphalism can often destroy quiet diplomacy. Yet Trump has saved lives. In some cases, he's used presidential power in novel ways to stop sudden conflicts from escalating into full-scale wars. But his success raises new questions that also apply to Ukraine. Is Trump in it for the long haul or just for deals he can hype, much as he licensed products as a businessman and stamped his name on them? And will Trump's evisceration of the US Agency for International Development and downsizing of the State Department deprive him of the tools the US needs to turn breakthroughs into lasting peace agreements that solve underlying causes of wars? Trump kept insisting Monday — as he tried finesse his adoption of Russia's opposition to an immediate Ukraine ceasefire — that he was more interested in final deals. Ironically however, some of his 'six wars' deals are closer to ceasefires than peace agreements that permanently end generational disputes. And in the case of Iran and Israel, Trump's claims to have made peace after their 12-day conflict are complicated by US involvement in strikes against Tehran's nuclear program. While an informal truce is in place, there's no sign a slow-boiling state of war involving all three nations since Iran's Islamic Revolution in 1979 will end. Trump is also conveniently forgetting his failed attempt to end the war between Israel and Hamas. And global outrage over reports of widespread starvation in Gaza and the president's staunch support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could thwart his hopes for a Nobel Prize — whatever happens with Ukraine. His record is also blotted by the failure of his first-term peace efforts with North Korea. Leader Kim Jong Un now has more nuclear weapons than before Trump offered him fruitless, photo-op summits. Some of Trump's biggest successes have been behind the scenes. 'I'm struck by the fact that the ones that were helpful, especially India-Pakistan, were conducted in a professional way, quietly, diplomatically … laying the ground and finding common ground between the parties,' said Celeste Wallander, a former assistant secretary of defense who is now with the Center for a New American Security. The most recent triumph was a joint peace declaration signed by Armenia and Azerbaijan on their long-running conflict in the Caucasus. The agreement, inked at a lavish White House ceremony, commits the two former Soviet republics to recognizing each other's borders and to renouncing violence against the other. But complex negotiations loom on knotty constitutional and territorial issues before a full peace agreement. This deal is notable for two things — the way foreign states flatter Trump to get what they want, and an imperialistic streak in much of his peacemaking. The rivals, for instance, agreed to open a transportation corridor to which the US will have full development rights and to call it the 'Trump Route for Peace and Prosperity.' Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev declared, 'President Trump, in six months, did a miracle.' This is smart deal for the US as it counters the influence of rival powers Russia and Iran in the region. But it will need Trump's constant attention. 'Wishes and verbal declarations are not enough,' two former US ambassadors to Azerbaijan, Robert Cekuta and Richard Morningstar, wrote in a recent Atlantic Council commentary. They called on Trump to deploy officials from the State Department, the Commerce Department and other agencies to lock in the agreement. Another of Trump's recent triumphs came in Southeast Asia, where he threatened to shelve trade deals with both Thailand and Cambodia to halt a border war last month that killed at least 38 people. The leverage pressed home in calls to leaders of each country was effective, and it might not have occurred to another president. But Trump didn't work alone. The agreement was brokered by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet knew the drill, however. He nominated Trump for the Nobel Prize for 'extraordinary statesmanship.' Pakistan took a similar step, as part of a successful diplomatic offensive to win over Trump and to disadvantage its nuclear-armed rival India after the president intervened in a border clash in May. But the government of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, an erstwhile Trump buddy, dismissed Washington's claims of a pivotal role. And other states, including Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Britain, were also involved. Trump's claims to have ended a war are selective. The agreement is fragile and doesn't solve the territorial dispute that sparked the fighting — over the Himalayan region of Kashmir, which has caused three full-scale wars. Trump has proclaimed a 'glorious triumph for the cause of peace' in a deal brokered between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. This contains important first steps on recognizing borders, renouncing war and disarming militia groups. However, no one expects the conflict to end soon, since the main Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group has rejected the agreement. Some analysts see the initiative, also brokered by Qatar, as a US attempt to secure mineral rights as part of an African 'great game' against China. Trump's claim to have brokered peace between Egypt and Ethiopia is a stretch. He's referring to a dispute over a Nile dam in the latter nation that Egypt fears will reduce the flow in its share of the key strategic waterway. He has called for a deal over the dam, but no binding agreement has been reached. The White House claims on Serbia and Kosovo originate in Trump's first term, when the rivals agreed to economic normalization steps. But they still don't have diplomatic relations, 17 years after Kosovo declared independence from Serbia. And recent normalization efforts have involved the EU more than the Trump team. In many ways, Trump's claims to have ended six wars are typical of a presidency that claims massive wins that often add up to less than what they seem. But there are real achievements in his record, and the possibility of genuine long-term breakthroughs if Trump can maintain application and patience. That's a good lesson for his nascent Ukraine peace drive.
News24
8 hours ago
- News24
A setback for democracy - MVC slams Ramaphosa doubling amount of money parties may receive
Lucas Ledwaba/AFP President Cyril Ramaphosa has signed a proclamation doubling the political donation threshold to R200 000 and the cap to R30 million annually. This means political parties can take more money with less transparency. Lobby group My Vote Counts criticises the move, arguing it increases secrecy in political funding and allows wealthy donors more influence. A setback for democracy - this is how lobby group My Vote Counts (MVC) described the doubling of the limit and threshold for political donations, which means political parties can accept more money from donors, with less transparency. President Cyril Ramaphosa's proclamation to double the threshold and limit for the donations political parties and independent candidates may receive was gazetted on Monday. This means that political parties must now declare donations received higher than R200 000 - the threshold - and may not receive donations totalling more than R30 million per year from a single donor - the limit or cap. Ramaphosa was empowered to do this after the National Assembly in May adopted the Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs' report, which empowers the president to set regulations that would allow political parties to get more money with less transparency. It was the ANC's idea to simply double the previous threshold of R100 000 and limit of R15 million. 'This is indeed a setback for our democracy. We cannot allow those in power to jeopardise our democracy and water down constitutionally protected rights for their narrow, self-serving interests,' said Joel Bregman, MVC project lead on money in politics. READ | Ramaphosa signs proclamation allowing bigger political party donations with less transparency He said MVC would continue to advocate and litigate when necessary to ensure the Political Finance Act (PFA) is constitutional and upholds the principles of transparency and accountability. Bregman said, 'The immediate impact of a higher disclosure threshold and donation limit is that we will have more secrecy in political funding.' Noting that the details of all donations under R200 000 would not be known to the public, Bregman said it is 'an enormous sum for most South Africans, and donations of such amounts should be made public knowledge to facilitate scrutiny of parties' relationships with donors and ensure that donors are not receiving anything in return'. 'Further, when a right is to be limited - in this case, the two rights mentioned above - there needs to be adequate justification for doing so. The State has never provided a legitimate reason why all donations should not be disclosed to the public.' Bregman said that since disclosures became mandatory in 2021, the data shows that a handful of wealthy individuals dominate the private political funding landscape. He said: Doubling the amount a donor can donate to a party in a year to R30 million will give donors an even greater ability to have an outsized influence on our political system. It will also make parties more susceptible to undue influence. 'And because the law does not regulate donations from related parties through the different legal entities they control, wealthy donors can now have an even more significant impact.' Bregman is referring to the currently perfectly legal situation where mega-donors - like entities linked to Capitec founder Michiel le Roux and mining magnate Patrice Motsepe - make donations to the same party, going over the limit. For instance, Le Roux donated R30 million to the DA in each of the previous three years, while the previous limit was R15 million per year. He donated R15 million through his private company, Fynbos Ekwiteit, and R15 million through the investment holding company, Fynbos Kapitaal. READ | R15m donation 'cannot reasonably' have improper influence, govt argues in party funding case Similarly, Motsepe's companies, Botho Botho Commercial Enterprise, with R10 million, and African Rainbow Minerals and Harmony Gold Mining, with R6.9 million each, donated a combined R23.8 million to the ANC in the 2023/24 financial year. Bregman said that while MVC recognises the importance of the PFA, it is clear that the law has many defects that limit its ability to achieve its objectives. 'Considering this, in 2023, we initiated legal proceedings to challenge the constitutionality of the PFA. 'After lengthy delays, MVC's case was heard before a full bench of the Western Cape High Court in February 2025. A key component of our challenge is that the original limits were not formulated with reference to empirical evidence and were therefore irrational and unlawful. We asked the court to find the limits unconstitutional, and refer them back to Parliament for remedying. 'We also asked the court to find that the President's power to make the final determination on the limits (a power that arose through an amendment to the law after our initial papers were filed) was also unconstitutional because it placed too much power in a conflicted officeholder who is both head of the executive and (in most cases) the head of a political party.' The High Court's judgment in this matter is still awaited. 'Should our case succeed, the amendments to the act will be set aside with full retrospective effect, including the determination of these new limits,' said Bregman. 'While we await judgment, we are considering other legal options to address the president's action. We will also be writing to the president to request that he release the reasons and full record of factors that were considered as he applied his mind to this matter.'
