Epstein is the lie even Donald Trump can't sell
Instead, the conspiracy theory that gave us Trump is now threatening to burn his presidency to the ground.
Trump sold himself to conspiracy-minded voters as the only man in America capable of 'draining the swamp' and revealing the true scope of Epstein's sex trafficking and grimy influence-peddling. His claim this week that the Epstein files never existed set off a MAGA crisis of faith that cut deeper and broader than any past quarrel — it's even fracturing his own ultra-loyalist Cabinet.
The Department of Justice is so paralyzed by Epstein-related turf wars that Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino briefly stopped coming to work. Meanwhile, top Republican donor and former Trump ally Elon Musk implied in a post on X that Trump might even be named in Epstein's files, a staggering accusation from such an intimate former confidant. Even Trump lapdog Charlie Kirk displayed a flash of conscience before the White House bullied him back into line.
To 70 percent of Trump voters and the millions of Americans tuning in for the media scandal of the summer, Trump the Crusading Epstein Truther now looks like Trump the Man with Something to Hide. The swamp he so boldly pledged to drain is quickly rising up his legs, leaving the president with two bad options: release documents he claims not to have or admit that one of MAGA's founding myths is a lie.
Trump is standing in front of an exploding fireworks store and insisting there is nothing to see here. But he isn't Frank Drebin and this isn't 'The Naked Gun.' Epstein was a real criminal, and uncovering the full truth of his crimes comes with real stakes for the women he abused and the lives he destroyed. Trump is playing political games with an unspeakable crime. The public is right to be furious.
Trump's self-inflicted scandal has gifted Democrats something akin to Republicans' 2015 Benghazi hearings, Hillary Clinton's emails and the Hunter Biden laptop scandal all rolled into one. Epstein's depraved life and unexpected death in 2019 still captivate the American imagination. His name is still front-page news, straddling the worlds of power politics and lurid true crime entertainment. But propriety be damned, the people want to know more.
There's good reason for our cultural obsession with Epstein and our continued hunger for answers. His life was no conspiracy theory, and his 2008 sweetheart plea deal was so rotten that even the Justice Department formally disavowed its unbelievably lenient terms. We deserve and expect the transparency that Trump promised us, including full disclosure of Epstein's files and personal documents.
The White House has a surprising ally in its quest for transparency in the Epstein case: House Democrats. On Monday, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) introduced an amendment that would force the Justice Department to release the Epstein files in full, effectively helping Trump fulfill one of his major campaign promises. Republicans were less than grateful for Khanna's help, voting to block the amendment (and the release of the files).
In fact, Republicans are going out of their way to prevent any discussion of the investigation at all. On Monday, Epstein's ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell suggested she would be willing to testify under oath about the financier's sex trafficking operation. Not a single Republican lawmaker has supported capturing Maxwell's firsthand testimony — perhaps they are afraid of what she might say.
After years of kicking rocks and cursing their bad luck, Democrats have been handed a headline-ready issue that voters care about and that Trump can't easily shake off. Recent polling has seen his approval rating tumble as the Republican base seethes over an Epstein bait-and-switch that plays directly to their conspiratorial mindset. The public wants hearings. Democrats should give them hearings, even if that means conducting them in the press.
Instead of giving Americans the truth about the Epstein files, Trump offered an evolving string of unconvincing excuses before finally claiming the whole thing was a Democratic hoax. It was a line that would have electrified the MAGA base in 2016. But few Americans, even those who make up the backbone of Trump's political movement, believe lines like that anymore.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brazil's Lula calls Trump's tariff threat 'unacceptable blackmail'
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on Thursday slammed Donald Trump's threat to impose 50 percent tariffs on Latin America's largest economy as "unacceptable blackmail." Lula's comments during a nationally televised speech were the latest in series of tense exchanges between the leaders, with the US president launching especially blistering attacks on the government in Brasilia. Trump announced on July 9 his intention to slap steep tariffs on Brazil as punishment for what he termed a "witch hunt" against his far-right ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. The United States has also said it is investigating Brazil's "unfair trading practices," and Brasilia said it was committed to negotiations. The tariffs on all products from Brazil would kick in on August 1 if Brasilia and Washington do not reach an agreement. In his speech, leftist leader Lula slammed Brazilian politicians who back Trump's policies as "traitors to the homeland." He said he would continue "betting on good commercial and diplomatic relations" but warned: "Brazil has only one owner: the Brazilian people." Bolsonaro is facing trial over accusations he plotted a coup after his narrow 2022 election loss to Lula. If found guilty, he could face up to 40 years in prison. Earlier on Thursday, Trump posted a letter addressed to Bolsonaro on his Truth Social platform in which he insisted Lula's government "changes course" and "stop attacking" his political ally. "I have seen the terrible treatment you are receiving at the hands of an unjust system turned against you," Trump wrote to Bolsonaro. "I have strongly voiced my disapproval both publicly and through our Tariff policy," he added. Trump also said he was "concerned about the attacks on free speech" in Brazil and in the United States. He appeared to be alluding to the suspension in Brazil of Rumble, a video-sharing platform popular among conservative groups, over its refusal to block a user accused of spreading disinformation. - 'Interference' - Trump's intervention in the Bolsonaro case has improved Lula's popularity, who has appealed for national unity in the face of US "interference." Unlike the tariffs Trump is slapping on economies around the world, including top US allies, the measures against Brazil were announced in openly political terms. Brazil had not been among dozens of trade partners previously threatened with duties above a 10 percent baseline. The United States runs a goods trade surplus with Brazil, which said it had repeatedly requested that Washington point out areas of particular concern. Brazil expressed "indignation" at the stiff proposed tariff in a letter addressed to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. ffb/mel/aks/sst
New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democratic lawmaker calls out party for being ‘scared' to offend immigration groups
Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., called out the Democratic Party in an interview on Thursday for being 'scared' to offend immigration groups as they navigate the issue. 'The Republicans are fomenting anti-immigrant hate as a policy and a strategy, and Democrats are so scared of offending either immigration groups or people to the left of them — maybe they're in a primary, they are concerned about saying: 'No, not everyone gets to be here. Not everyone has the right to live in the United States, and we, like every other country in the world, get to know who and what is coming across our borders,'' Slotkin told The New York Times in an interview. Slotkin argued that most Americans agree that immigrants are integral to the American economy, but they want immigrants to come here legally and through 'vetted channels.' 'That kind of clamping down with rules tends to make a lot of my Democratic colleagues really nervous,' she added. 'There's been a lot of ink spilled about advocacy groups that don't seem to represent a lot of voters. We saw that in real time in this last election, when no one had a bigger swing toward Trump than Latinos. Some of these groups were trotting around Washington saying they represent the immigrant community, and they clearly did not,' Slotkin said. 3 Sen. Elissa Slotkin took a shot at the Democratic Party for being 'scared' to call out immigration groups when it comes to the U.S. border crisis. AP Slotkin also said she thought Democrats had lost their 'alpha-energy.' The Michigan senator said 'alpha-energy' was about emotion. 'We respond to people's pain with a long list of wonky policies,' Slotkin continued. 3 In an interview with The New York Times, Slotkin said, 'The Republicans are fomenting anti-immigrant hate as a policy and a strategy, and Democrats are so scared of offending either immigration groups or people to the left of them.' diy13 – 'Alpha energy is synonymous with being bold. Call the tough play, take a risk, be bold. And don't be so damn scared of your own shadow.' Slotkin delivered the official response to President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress in March. She criticized Trump's foreign policy and called for 'responsible' ways to make changes to the government. 3 Slotkin's take is that the majority of U.S. citizens believe immigrants are vital to the economy, though they do not want them to come to this country illegally. AP 'We all want an end to the war in Ukraine, but Reagan understood that true strength required America to combine our military and economic might with moral clarity,' Slotkin said after Trump's address. 'As a Cold War kid, I'm thankful it was Reagan and not Trump in office in the 1980s. Trump would have lost us the Cold War.'
31 minutes ago
Committee advances former Trump attorney for key appeals court role
Democrats walked out of the Senate Judiciary Committee before Republicans voted to advance Pres. Trump's nomination of Emil Bove.
