logo
Andrew Cuomo to drop NYC mayoral bid after blistering primary defeat to Zohran Mamdani: ‘Can't run a loser'

Andrew Cuomo to drop NYC mayoral bid after blistering primary defeat to Zohran Mamdani: ‘Can't run a loser'

New York Post25-06-2025
Cuo-no more.
Andrew Cuomo will drop out of the mayor's race after his humiliating defeat against socialist Zohran Mamdani, sources told The Post — as the ex-governor's donors and backers desert him and weigh whether to boost Eric Adams.
Several insiders close to the Cuomo camp said Wednesday that the thrice-elected Democrat will almost certainly not run in the general election as an independent candidate, seeing no obvious path to victory.
'The understanding is he's not running, every indication is that he doesn't want to do it and the money wouldn't be there even if he did want to do it,' said one of the sources, a leader from a prominent union.
Cuomo's bruised backers are eyeing shifting their support — to Adams or even an independent candidate — after the former gov faceplanted in Tuesday's Democratic mayoral primary to dark-horse left-wing hopeful Mamdani.
But Cuomo still insisted to The Post on Wednesday that he was waiting to see the full results of the ranked-choice voting contest before making an official decision about November.
3 Andrew Cuomo admitted defeat in Tuesday's Democratic mayoral primary.
AFP via Getty Images
'I'm looking at the numbers from last night. I want to get an idea of what the general election looks like and what landscape looks like, and what the issues are, and then make the decision,' he said outside of his home in Midtown East.
'It's one step at a time, and we haven't even gotten all the numbers from last night.'
Cuomo's stunning admitted defeat to Mamdani has sparked frenzied talks among business and union leaders about whether to back the untested presumptive Democratic nominee or rally behind Adams — who is running on an independent line to be called either 'End AntiSemitism' or 'Safe and Affordable.'
One New York City business insider said it's unlikely the well-to-do will get behind Mamdani — who has vowed to get taxes raised on businesses and billionaires to pay for his $10 billion in proposed freebies.
But whether Adams receives their backing is also an open question, especially if Hizzoner's abysmal polling doesn't improve as the general race heats up.
'I think if Eric Adams is still polling awful, there has to be a reckoning,' the insider ominously warned.
Two real estate sources said they weren't sure they would back Adams because of how poor his polling was — and several meetings are expected to take place over the coming days among business industry leaders.
'You can't make something out of nothing,' one of the sources quipped.
Billionaire hedge fund titan Bill Ackman — who had backed Cuomo — is preparing to support Adams and hopes other candidates drop out to clear the lane in the fight against Mamdani.
Other business leaders told Post columnist Charles Gasparino that Adams, despite being politically tainted goods after his controversially dismissed corruption case, may well be their best option after Cuomo whiffed the primary.
'He got destroyed — our best shot is Adams,' said one prominent city business leader about Cuomo.
3 Zohran Mamdani is the presumptive Democratic mayoral nominee.
Stephen Yang
But one well-placed business insider said that well-heeled commercial leaders are unlikely to slam the door on Mamdani just yet by getting behind another candidate.
'It's a wait and see,' the source told The Post. 'He does deserve the opportunity, the benefit of the doubt that he will work with business. He does deserve that. He hasn't said he won't. I think jumping to conclusions would hurt business at this point.'
A Democratic source also told The Post that two unions are weighing throwing their weight behind Adams or Mamdani — but not a potential longshot independent mayoral bid by Cuomo.
Another source from a prominent union predicted Mamdani will reap support from labor groups that had backed Cuomo.
3 Mamdani's win created a political shockwave.
Whether or not Adams or Mamdani scoops up the spoils, one thing is clear: Cuomo's comeback is toast.
The former governor is widely seen as squandering an enormous polling lead — and $25 million — through an ineffectual campaign that failed to spark excitement among New Yorkers, unlike Mamdani's vigorous operation.
The humiliating result — a 7-point deficit to Mamdani even before ranked-choice voting tabulations — is likely to imperil Cuomo's past promise to run as an independent on a 'Fight & Deliver' ballot line if defeated in the primary.
'Cuomo reaped what he sowed,' said Ken Frydman, a Democratic political operative.
Another Democratic source told The Post Tuesday night that an independent Cuomo run was DOA: 'You can't run a loser against a winner.'
Whether Cuomo continues his run will have an enormous impact on November's election, which is expected to be unusually competitive for New York City.
Mamdani will face Adams, lawyer Jim Walden is also running as an independent and Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa.
Local Democratic bigwigs are already signaling they'll consolidate their support behind Mamdani — despite the progressive Queens assemblyman's outsider status within his own party.
New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, who had backed former city Comptroller Scott Stringer in the Democratic primary, endorsed Mamdani, the New York Times first reported.
New York Democratic bigs Gov. Kathy Hochul, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries all congratulated Mamdani on his apparent victory, but notably didn't yet endorse him in November's election.
The floodgates of establishment support in the city appeared to be opened by Brooklyn Democratic Party leader Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn, who posted on X that she'd support Mamdani in the general election after backing Cuomo in the primary.
'To everyone who had reservations, I ask you to put them aside in this moment and come together for the future of our city and our party,' she wrote. 'Mamdani has show he is committed to representing all Democrats from every neighborhood and borough, as evidenced by his overwhelming victory in Brooklyn and across the city.
'Let's unite as Democrats for a brighter future for our city.'
— Additional reporting by Matthew Fischetti
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Barack Obama Reacts to Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Play
Barack Obama Reacts to Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Play

Newsweek

timea minute ago

  • Newsweek

Barack Obama Reacts to Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Play

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Former Democratic President Barack Obama has weighed in on the rare mid-decade redistricting battles unfolding in several states, voicing support for California Gov. Gavin Newsom's cautious approach to revising congressional maps. Obama's comments came as Republican-led efforts in Texas, encouraged by President Donald Trump, aim to strengthen GOP control ahead of next year's elections. "I believe that Gov. Newsom's approach is a responsible approach," Obama said Tuesday during a fundraiser on Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts, according to excerpts obtained by The Associated Press. "He said this is going to be responsible. We're not going to try to completely maximize it. We're only going to do it if and when Texas and/or other Republican states begin to pull these maneuvers. Otherwise, this doesn't go into effect." This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.

Obama applauds Newsom's California redistricting plan as 'responsible'

timea minute ago

Obama applauds Newsom's California redistricting plan as 'responsible'

Former President Barack Obama has waded into states' efforts at rare mid-decade redistricting efforts, saying he agrees with California Gov. Gavin Newsom's response to alter his state's congressional maps, in the way of Texas redistricting efforts promoted by President Donald Trump aimed at shoring up Republicans' position in next year's elections. 'I believe that Gov. Newsom's approach is a responsible approach. He said this is going to be responsible. We're not going to try to completely maximize it,' Obama said at a Tuesday fundraiser on Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts, according to excerpts obtained by The Associated Press. 'We're only going to do it if and when Texas and/or other Republican states begin to pull these maneuvers. Otherwise, this doesn't go into effect.' While noting that 'political gerrymandering' is not his 'preference,' Obama said that, if Democrats 'don't respond effectively, then this White House and Republican-controlled state governments all across the country, they will not stop, because they do not appear to believe in this idea of an inclusive, expansive democracy.' According to organizers, the event raised $2 million for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee and its affiliates, one of which has filed and supported litigation in several states over GOP-drawn districts. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Eric Holder, who served as Obama's attorney general and heads up the group, also appeared. The former president's comments come as Texas lawmakers return to Austin this week, renewing a heated debate over a new congressional map creating five new potential GOP seats. The plan is the result of prodding by President Donald Trump, eager to stave off a midterm defeat that would deprive his party of control of the House of Representatives. Texas Democratic lawmakers delayed a vote for 15 days by leaving the state in protest, depriving the House of enough members to do business. Spurred on by the Texas situation, Democratic governors including Newsom have pondered ways to possibly strengthen their party's position by way of redrawing U.S. House district lines, five years out from the Census count that typically leads into such procedures. In California — where voters in 2010 gave the power to draw congressional maps to an independent commission, with the goal of making the process less partisan — Democrats have unveiled a proposal that could give that state's dominant political party an additional five U.S. House seats in a bid to win the fight to control of Congress next year. If approved by voters in November, the blueprint could nearly erase Republican House members in the nation's most populous state, with Democrats intending to win the party 48 of its 52 U.S. House seats, up from 43. A hearing over that measure devolved into a shouting match Tuesday as a Republican lawmaker clashed with Democrats, and a committee voted along party lines to advance the new congressional map. California Democrats do not need any Republican votes to move ahead, and legislators are expected to approve a proposed congressional map and declare a Nov. 4 special election by Thursday to get required voter approval. Newsom and Democratic leaders say they'll ask voters to approve their new maps only for the next few elections, returning map-drawing power to the commission following the 2030 census — and only if a Republican state moves forward with new maps. Obama applauded that temporary timeline. 'And we're going to do it in a temporary basis because we're keeping our eye on where we want to be long term,' Obama said, referencing Newsom's take on the California plan. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach, designed to address a very particular problem in a very particular moment in time.'

Texas GOP nears vote on new maps as Democrats stage protest in state House
Texas GOP nears vote on new maps as Democrats stage protest in state House

CNN

time4 minutes ago

  • CNN

Texas GOP nears vote on new maps as Democrats stage protest in state House

Source: CNN Texas Republicans are moving closer to approving new congressional maps amid a Democratic show of protest over the GOP House speaker's order that members who fled the state weeks earlier be placed under law enforcement watch. The state House is set to reconvene Wednesday as Republicans push ahead with their Trump-backed redistricting plan, which would create five more GOP-leaning House districts in time for next year's midterm elections. The House could vote Wednesday and the Senate as early as Thursday. It's not yet clear exactly when the House will vote, however, and a lengthy floor debate could delay the process. Relegated to the minority, Democrats have no viable way to stop passage of the maps, but have continued to protest GOP tactics to prevent them from leaving the state again. House Speaker Dustin Burrows required that the quorum-breaking Democrats be placed under the around-the-clock supervision of the Department of Public Safety to be allowed to leave the House floor. However, state Rep. Nicole Collier has refused to do so and has been confined to the House chamber. Other Democrats on Tuesday evening ripped up the written agreements that allowed them to leave the chamber and vowed to spend Tuesday night on the House floor. 'This is a civil discussion and disagreement, and in order to win, the other side is willing to use force — to use the arms of a state to get what they want. Good guys don't do that,' state Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic leader, told CNN's Pamela Brown on 'The Lead.' In California, Democrats moved forward with their own redistricting countermeasure. Two committees advanced a trio of bills that ask voters to amend the state constitution and approve new maps that create five additional Democratic leaning seats. Wu is introducing an amendment that would block the proposed Texas congressional maps from going into effect until all files related to Jeffrey Epstein are released. While the amendment is not likely to pass, Democrats are hoping to put the GOP in a politically tough spot with the vote. It's unclear whether there would be Republicans who would side with this amendment. The amendment text reads, 'This Act takes effect, to the extent permitted, on the 30th day after the United States Attorney General makes publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in the possession of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Attorneys' Offices, that relate to Jeffrey Epstein.' Now that Democrats have returned to the state, the House is all but guaranteed to have the two-thirds quorum it needs to conduct business when Burrows gavels the chamber into session Wednesday. The only item on the day's agenda is House Bill 4 — the measure that would redraw the state's congressional map to add five more Republican-leaning seats. That bill cleared a committee on a party-line vote Monday. What's not clear is how long debate will last before votes place. It could drag well into Austin's evening hours. The state Senate, where the redistricting plan's passage is all but certain, is scheduled to return Thursday night. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott said Monday on Fox News that the new congressional maps 'will become law probably by the end of this week.' Burrows imposed an unusual requirement on the Democrats who ended their 15-day boycott and returned to the Capitol on Monday: They'd be released from the House floor into the custody of a Department of Public Safety officer who would ensure their return Wednesday. The move came after the civil arrest warrants Burrows signed shortly after Democrats fled the state proved unenforceable outside of Texas. Most Democrats complied with the law enforcement escort, showing reporters what they called 'permission slips' they received to leave the House floor and pointing to the officers escorting them around the Capitol. But some Democrats protested. Collier refused to leave the House floor, sleeping there Monday night and planning to do so again Tuesday. Wu and Rep. Vince Perez, who signed the 'permission slips' to leave with a police escort, stayed with Collier through Monday night. 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights,' Collier said. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts. My community is majority-minority, and they expect me to stand up for their representation. When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents — I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.' Other Democrats joined Collier and Wu on Tuesday night. State Rep. Penny Morales Shaw said after returning to the Houston area under police escort, she realized it was a mistake to enter into the agreement, arguing she is now 'correcting course.' 'Yesterday, I left in custody and I came back in custody, because I stand with Nicole Collier and Gene Wu,' she said. 'This is illegitimate, this is a wrongful use of power, and I will not condone it, and I don't want to be a part of setting a very bad and low precedent for future legislators.' The state's Senate and Assembly elections committees both advanced Democrats' redistricting countermeasure Tuesday, despite opposition from Republicans on the panels. 'When other states decide to do something else, we shouldn't react to them,' Republican state Assemblymember David Tangipa said Tuesday. 'We should prove by example that we can do this better.' Democrats have framed their push to redraw the maps as a check on Texas Republicans. 'Let's not dance around the issue here: If California Democrats had our way, the midterms would continue as they are, with a map drawn by the state's independent California citizens redistricting commission,' Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, the Assembly's Democratic majority leader, said during the chamber's elections committee meeting. 'But that's not good enough for this president or the Republicans following his commands in Texas and DC.' Under the proposals, voters would have the opportunity to approve or reject a constitutional amendment allowing Democrats to override the state's independent redistricting commission and redraw congressional lines through the 2030 elections. The proposed lines could net Democrats an additional five favorable seats as well as shore up the districts of some vulnerable incumbents. The bills will be considered by the Assembly's appropriations committee Wednesday at 9 a.m. PT/12 p.m. ET before the full legislature votes on Thursday. Democrats, who have a supermajority, will need two-thirds support in both chambers. Many California Republicans have acknowledged that their best chance to block the new maps are by defeating them in November. But that hasn't stopped GOP lawmakers from attempting to stop the proposed constitutional amendment from making it onto the ballot. California Republicans filed a lawsuit with the state Supreme Court Tuesday requesting an emergency injunction to stop the redistricting effort on the grounds that the legislature didn't give voters enough notice. State Rep. Carl DeMaio, a San Diego Republican, also filed a proposed citizens' initiative that would retroactively ban lawmakers who approve the constitutional amendment from running in one of the new districts. The proposal mirrors a rule that bans members of the independent redistricting commission from running on maps they drew. It's also a dig at DeMaio's Democratic colleagues, including Mike McGuire, the senate president pro tempore. McGuire, who is term-limited, is seen as a likely candidate to run in a redrawn Northern California district under the new maps. If DeMaio and his allies gathered enough signatures, the measure would not appear before voters until 2026. Republicans have also grilled Democrats over the origin of the maps, leading to tense exchanges during the Assembly's elections committee meeting Tuesday. 'Who drew the maps? It's a very simple question,' state Assemblymember Alexandra Macedo, the committee's Republican vice chair, said during the panel's Tuesday meeting. 'The assembly did,' Aguiar-Curry said. 'I'm in the Assembly, and I did not draw these maps,' Macedo responded. The chair of the Assembly's elections committee, Gail Pellerin, also declined to say who drew the maps during a gaggle with reporters Tuesday. Pellerin said it was a 'collaboration' with several people. One reporter asked: 'When you consume something, don't you want to know who makes it?' 'When I go to a restaurant, I don't need to meet the chef,' Pellerin said. 'I just enjoy the food.' See Full Web Article

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store