
Unhappy with varsity's solutions, JNUSU continues hunger strike
The JNUSU's protest, which has also drawn attention from All India Students' Association (AISA) with their participation, is centred around issues related to PhD admissions, hostel extensions and student welfare policies.
The protestors raised concerns over the university's decision to exclude candidates who appeared for the June 2025 UGC-NET in their PhD prospectus. The protesters contested that this leaves out many students, who are currently enrolled in Master's programmes.
After the protests began, the university issued a circular on July 5, stating that the second cycle of PhD admissions for the academic year 2025-26 has tentatively been scheduled for December, giving the students a chance to apply for PhD admissions later in the year.
'This is no solution. Here, we are demanding JNUEE for PhD Admission. The entire delay of the academic cycle is happening because of dependency on the incompetent National Testing Agency (NTA),' JNUSU President Nitish Kumar told The Hindu.
Another issue being raised by the protesters is the eviction of the PhD scholars from the hostel. In response, the university issued a notification allowing an extension for PhD scholars in the hostel facility.
Mr. Kumar, however, said that they are 'unsatisfied' with the notification as he claimed the academic extension is 'self-validatory'.
'There is no need for any extra signatures from any authority. And how will the admonish decide the humanitarian grounds? Hostel accommodation is our right. We reject this notice. Admin must ensure that the hostel facility is available until PhD Submission,' Mr. Kumar said.
After joining the strike, AISA said, 'Today, 236 students joined the mass relay hunger strike to escalate the ongoing indefinite hunger strike. We demand JNUEE for admissions, increased Merit-cum-means scholarships, and revocation of unfair proctorial punishments.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Academics emphasise on robust grievance redressal in colleges
Bhubaneswar: Educationists and human rights activists on Saturday emphasised that a robust grievance redressal mechanism should be adopted by higher education institutions to prevent students from taking extreme steps. They said this in view of the self-immolation by a girl student of a govt college in Balasore. Human rights activist and lawyer Akhand stated that the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 exists and colleges should follow it in letter and spirit. "If the student files a complaint with the college authority about the harassment, the institution should follow the law," he added. Jayant Kumar Mohapatra, former vice-chancellor of Berhampur University, said the govt should probe whether the college has formed an internal complaints committee ICC as per UGC regulations. "If the girl lodged a complaint with the principal, he/she should immediately hand over the complaint to ICC without any delay. The higher education department should review the grievance redressal mechanism and guide the colleges to make the system robust," he added. Former regional director of education Mihir Ranjan Sethi said the complaint redressal mechanism of higher education institutions should be strengthened so that students and staff do not suffer.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Higher education in India requires autonomy with accountability to improve human capital: Ashok Vardhan Shetty
Higher education institutions in India require 'autonomy with accountability and not control through compliance' if the country is to radically improve its human capital, Ashok Vardhan Shetty, former Vice-Chancellor of Indian Maritime University, said here on Saturday. Delivering the Dr. M. Anandakrishnan Memorial Lecture on the topic 'India's Higher Education Needs a Systemic Overhaul', Mr. Shetty lamented the excessive centralisation in the country that has been holding back development. Giving examples, he said the union government should not be running schools; rather, it should be focusing on high-class research institutions. 'A decision that can be taken at the district level is being taken at the Government of India level. There are bound to be delays, inefficiency and corruption,' he observed. 'Why should there be a UGC nominee for selection of Vice-Chancellors of universities and principals of colleges,' he asked, pointing at over-regulation by the regulatory bodies such as the University Grants Commission (UGC) and All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). As a way forward, he suggested the constitution of a State universities commission by the State government, on the lines of the State Finance Commission, consisting of eminent academic experts and finance experts, to recommend the staffing pattern and how much the State government should bear. With Artificial Intelligence (AI) redefining higher education across most disciplines, mostly engineering, there should be added focus on introducing AI tools, the ability to craft effective prompts, and courses on algorithmic bias and data ethics, Mr. Shetty remarked. He gave away Dr. M. Anandakrishnan Memorial Scholarships to three students from Government Higher Secondary School, Athanavur, Yelagiri Hills, who belonged to the Malayali tribe, and another student from Government Higher Secondary School, Semmangudi, Thiruvarur district, Dr. Anandakrishnan's hometown. Satya Ananda Krishnan, former Director, James Webb Space Telescope; D. Nedunchezhian, Founder and CEO, Technocrats India College Finder; Vijayan Ramalingam, Senior Editor, Puthiya Thalaimurai; and Dr. Ilakya Devadas, Paediatrician, spoke.


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Minister Alleges 1,000 Non-Hindus On Tirumala Temple Board's Payroll, Seeks Action
Hyderabad: Union Minister and prominent Telangana BJP leader, Bandi Sanjay Kumar, has ignited a fresh controversy by alleging that more than 1,000 non-Hindus are currently employed within the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), the administrative body managing the revered Lord Venkateswara temple at Tirumala. The Minister made the remarks after a darshan of Lord Venkateswara at Tirumala. Mr Kumar questioned the very presence of individuals from other faiths within an institution dedicated to Hindu deities and traditions. "How can an organization like TTD, which upholds the sanctity of Hindu dharma, allow over 1,000 non-Hindus to be on its payroll?" he asked, emphasising the need to preserve the sanctity and spiritual purity of the temple. The BJP leader further demanded stringent action, urging the TTD to immediately identify and remove all non-Hindu employees. He stressed that the employment of non-Hindus not only violates the spiritual ethos of the temple but also potentially hurts the sentiments of millions of Hindu devotees who visit Tirumala from across the globe. "Does anyone provide employment for Hindus at mosques and churches?" Mr Kumar asked. The Minister also called for a comprehensive inquiry into how these appointments were made, suggesting a potential lapse in recruitment policies or deliberate circumvention of existing regulations. This is not the first time concerns have been raised about the employment of non-Hindus within TTD. Previous instances have also drawn criticism, with proponents arguing that only devout Hindus should be employed in a religious institution of such significance. The TTD administration is yet to issue an official response to Bandi Sanjay's specific claims regarding the number of non-Hindu employees. However, the allegations are likely to put pressure on the board to conduct an internal review and provide clarity on the matter. The BJP leader demanded stringent action, urging the TTD to immediately identify and remove all non-Hindu employees. He highlighted a recent case where a TTD AEO, A Rajasekhar, was suspended after being found regularly worshipping at a local church, questioning why action is only taken after such exposures. This is not the first time concerns have been raised about the employment of non-Hindus within TTD. Previous instances have also drawn criticism, with proponents arguing that only devout Hindus should be employed in a religious institution of such significance. TTD's service rules, amended in 2007, generally prohibit the hiring of non-Hindus, though some employees hired before this amendment have continued their service. The TTD administration has yet to issue an official response to Bandi Sanjay's specific claims regarding the number of non-Hindu employees. However, the allegations are likely to put pressure on the board to conduct an internal review and provide clarity on the matter. The Andhra Pradesh government, led by Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu, has previously stated that non-Hindu employees in TTD would be reassigned to other government departments. Bhumana Karunakar Reddy, former Chairman of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), has strongly reacted to Bandi Sanjay's comments regarding the employment of non-Hindus within the TTD. Mr Reddy has challenged Bandi Sanjay to provide evidence for his claim of over 1,000 non-Hindu employees. He pointed out that the current TTD board had recently stated there were only 22 non-Hindu employees. Bhumana Karunakar Reddy expressed suspicion that there might be a conspiracy behind Bandi Sanjay's remarks to undermine the sanctity of the Tirumala Srivari temple. He demanded an explanation from the "alliance government" regarding Bandi Sanjay's statements. The TTD rules ( No. 1060, read with No. 1372 in 2007) mandate that only individuals professing the Hindu religion are eligible for recruitment into TTD service, and employees must adhere to Hindu dharma and traditions. The TTD board has also taken steps to transfer non-Hindu employees to other Andhra Pradesh government departments or offer them voluntary retirement schemes.