Pinterest projects revenue above estimates as AI tools boost ad spend; shares jump
Pinterest forecast first-quarter revenue above market estimates on Thursday, betting on the image-sharing platform's artificial intelligence-powered advertising tools to boost ad spend, sending its shares up 19% in extended trading.
The forecast followed better-than-expected record monthly active users and revenue during the fourth quarter, thanks to a robust holiday shopping season.
Advertisers turn to Pinterest for its AI-driven ad tools such as Performance+ suite, designed to help advertisers better target users with automation features.
"Our strategy is paying off. People are coming to Pinterest more often, the platform has never been more actionable," CEO Bill Ready said in a statement.
Rising Gen Z users and new shoppable content have made the platform more lucrative for marketers.
That is bolstered by Pinterest's third-party ad deals with Google and Amazon.com, which are expanding and helping the company to diversify its revenue streams.
"Pinterest has strong global engagement, but the ad dollars are still disproportionately tied to North America," said Jeremy Goldman, senior director of briefings at eMarketer.
"Expanding third-party ad integrations could open up new revenue streams, but execution here has historically been slow."
Ecommerce merchants such as those on Shopify or Adobe Commerce can integrate their products into Pinterest by using platform-specific extensions that are offered by the company.
Its first-quarter revenue forecast of $837 million to $852 million was above analysts' average estimate of $832.8 million, according to data compiled by LSEG.
The company expects adjusted core earnings of $155 million to $170 million, above the average estimate of $140.8 million.
Global monthly active users on the platform were at an all-time high of 553 million, exceeding estimates of 545.8 million. They rose 11% from a year earlier.
Revenue in the fourth quarter ended December 31 grew 18% to $1.15 billion, compared with estimates of $1.14 billion.
Adjusted profit per share of 56 cents missed estimates of 65 cents due to certain tax adjustments in the quarter.
(Reporting by Jaspreet Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
6 hours ago
- Zawya
Google is going ‘all in' on AI. It's part of a troubling trend in big tech
Google recently unveiled the next phase of its artificial intelligence (AI) journey: 'AI mode'. This new feature will soon be released as a new option to users of Google's search engine in the United States, with no timeline yet for the rest of the world. The company says it will be akin to having a conversation with an expert well versed on a wide range of topics. This is just one of many steps Google is taking in pursuit of its 'all-in' approach to AI. The 'all-in' approach extends beyond just integrating the technology into different applications. Google is providing products all along the AI supply chain – a process known as 'vertical integration' – housing everything from AI computer chips through to the user interfaces we interact with on a daily basis, such as Google maps or Gmail. Google isn't the only AI company with ambitions of vertical integration. For example, OpenAI recently acquired a hardware startup co-founded by Apple's Jony Ive, which will centralise hardware development within the company. Amazon is taking similar steps. It owns cloud computing platforms, custom chips, device plans and is incorporating more AI services into products. This may be the beginning of a trend of vertical integration across big tech. And it could have significant implications for users and companies alike. The AI 'tech stack' Hardware, software, data sources, databases and servers are some of the layers that make up what is commonly referred to as the 'AI tech stack'. There are four main layers to Google's evolving vertical tech stack: 1. Hardware layer. Google develops its own AI chips, known as tensor processing units (TPUs). The company claims these chips provide superior performance and efficiency compared to general purpose processors. 2. Infrastructure layer. The company uses its own cloud infrastructure to source its computing power, networking and storage requirements. This infrastructure is the foundation for running and scaling AI capabilities. 3. Model development layer. In-house research capabilities are used to drive the development of their products and services. This includes research around machine learning, robotics, language models and computer vision. 4. Data layer. Data is constantly sourced from users across all Google platforms, including its search engine, maps and email. Data collection is a condition of using any Google application. Some argue vertical integration is an optimal and cost-effective business strategy in many industries, not just tech. However, the realities of this set-up prove otherwise. Fuelling power imbalances Google and OpenAI are two of just a handful of companies which dominate the global technology market. Thanks to this market dominance, these companies can charge higher markups for their goods and services and abuse practices in online advertising. Vertical integration further skews this power imbalance by centralising the layers of the AI tech stack to one company. A distribution of hardware, infrastructure, research and development and data across multiple industries helps support a more equitable playing field across the industry. The loss of this equity creates greater barriers to entry for smaller companies as the larger conglomerates keep everything in-house. It also reduces incentives to innovate in ways that benefit consumers because it eliminates the business competition that usually drives innovation. Data is often described as the new gold. This is especially true in the case of AI, which is heavily reliant on data. Through its many platforms, Google has access to a continuous stream of data. In turn, this gives the company even more power in the industry. The vulnerabilities of vertical integration The success of a company that is vertically integrated relies on housing the best knowledge and expertise in-house. Retaining this level of resourcing within a small handful of companies can lead to knowledge and expertise hoarding. Research shows knowledge and expertise hoarding reduces social learning and increases disparities between 'winners' and 'losers' in a given market. This creates an overall vulnerable industry because net gains are lost in the pursuit of exclusivity. Exclusivity also breeds a lack of resilience. That's because the points of failure are centralised. Risk is better managed with additional oversight, transparency and accountability. Collaborations across industry rely on these processes to work together effectively. Centralising the AI tech stack within one organisation eliminates external scrutiny, because it reduces interactions with external providers of products and services. In turn this can lead to a company behaving in a more risky manner. Regulatory bodies can also provide external scrutiny. However, the current push to deregulate AI is widening the gap between technology development and regulation. It is also allowing for big tech companies to become increasingly opaque. A lack of transparency raises issues about organisational practices; in the context of AI, practices around data are of particular concern. The trend towards vertical integration in the AI sector will further increase this opacity and heighten existing issues around transparency.
Zawya
10 hours ago
- Zawya
AI-driven search ad spending set to surge to $26bln by 2029, data shows
Spending on AI-powered search advertising is poised to surge to nearly $26 billion by 2029 from just over $1 billion this year in the U.S., driven by rapid adoption of the technology and more sophisticated user targeting, data from Emarketer showed on Wednesday. Companies that rely on traditional keyword-based search ads could experience revenue declines due to the growing popularity of AI search ads, which offer greater convenience and engagement for users, according to the research firm. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Search giants such as Alphabet-owned Google and Microsoft's Bing have added AI capabilities to better compete with chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Perplexity AI, which provide users with direct information without requiring to click through multiple results. Apple is exploring the integration of AI-driven search capabilities into its Safari browser, potentially moving away from its longstanding partnership with Google. The report has come as concerns grew about users increasingly turning to the chatbots for conversational search and AI-powered search results could upend business models of some companies. Online education firm Chegg said in May that it would lay off about 248 employees as it looks to cut costs and streamline operations because students are using AI-powered tools including ChatGPT over traditional edtech platforms. QUOTE "Publishers and other sites are feeling the pain from AI search. As they lose out on traffic, we're seeing publishers lean into subscriptions and paid AI licensing deals to bolster revenue," Emarketer analyst Minda Smiley said. AI search ad spending is expected to constitute nearly 1% of total search ad spending this year and 13.6% by 2029 in the U.S., according to Emarketer. Sectors such as financial services, technology, telecom, and healthcare are embracing AI as they are seeing clear advantages in using the technology to enhance their ad strategies, while the retail industry's adoption is slow, the report said. Google recently announced the expansion of its AI-powered search capabilities into the consumer packaged goods sector through enhancements in Google Shopping. (Reporting by Jaspreet Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel)
Arabian Post
a day ago
- Arabian Post
Meta and Yandex Exploited Android Loophole to Track Users Across Browsers and Apps
Meta and Yandex have been found to exploit a loophole in Android's architecture, enabling them to de-anonymize users' web browsing activities by linking them to persistent app identities. This tracking method bypasses standard privacy protections, including incognito mode and cookie clearing, raising significant concerns about user privacy. Researchers from Radboud University, IMDEA Networks, and KU Leuven discovered that Meta's Pixel and Yandex's Metrica tracking scripts, embedded in millions of websites, communicate with their respective Android apps via the device's localhost interface. This communication allows the apps to receive browsing data directly from the browser, effectively linking web activity to user identities within the apps. The tracking mechanism operates by having the browser-based scripts send data to specific ports on the localhost interface, where the apps are listening. For instance, Meta's apps listen on UDP ports 12580–12585, while Yandex's apps use ports 29009, 29010, 30102, and 30103. This setup enables the apps to collect browsing data, including cookies and metadata, even when users employ privacy measures like incognito mode or VPNs. ADVERTISEMENT Meta began implementing this method in September 2024, while Yandex has utilized a similar approach since 2017. The widespread use of Meta Pixel and Yandex Metrica—estimated to be present on 5.8 million and 3 million websites respectively—suggests that a vast number of Android users could be affected. The discovery has prompted responses from major browser developers. Google has initiated an investigation and is working on mitigations to prevent such tracking techniques. Mozilla is also developing solutions to protect Firefox users on Android from this invasive tracking. Meta has paused the functionality in question and is in discussions with Google to address the issue. Privacy advocates and experts have expressed alarm over the findings. The method's ability to circumvent standard privacy controls and its potential to be used by malicious actors for surveillance underscore the need for stricter enforcement of privacy standards and greater transparency from tech companies regarding data collection practices.
