&w=3840&q=100)
HRA exemption glitch in ITR utility: What salaried taxpayers must do
Himank Singla, a chartered accountant, flagged the issue on X, highlighting that the utility wrongly asks taxpayers to enter their 'place of work' instead of 'place of residence' to compute HRA exemption under Section 10(13A). 'If you live in a metro but work in a non-metro, entering your work city will reduce your exemption incorrectly and vice versa,' Singla wrote.
Under the Income Tax Act, 50 per cent of salary qualifies as HRA exemption for metro cities (Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata) and 40 per cent for non-metros. The exemption is determined by where the taxpayer lives, not where they are employed.
How are taxpayers impacted?
'This mismatch can lead to reduced HRA exemptions and inflate taxable income for those living in metros but working elsewhere,' said Vishwanathan Iyer, senior associate professor of Finance at Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai. 'It may also trigger defective return notices from the tax department in cases of over-claimed exemptions.'
Employees opting for the old tax regime are particularly vulnerable, explained Naveen Wadhwa, vice-president at Taxmann. 'Until the utility is fixed, taxpayers should enter their place of residence in the field asking for place of work to ensure accurate computation,' he suggested.
What to do if you've already filed?
Taxpayers who have already filed using the faulty utility can revise their returns. 'You can file a revised return without penalty if done before the deadline,' said Iyer, adding that proof of residence and rent receipts must be retained. Wadhwa also advised filing a grievance with the Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) as an alternate remedy.
Wait for a fix or act now?
Experts are divided on whether taxpayers should wait for the department to release an updated utility. 'It is safer to compute HRA manually and file now to avoid missing the due date,' said Suresh Surana, chartered accountant. Niyati Shah of 1 Finance, however, suggested waiting or using an offline JSON utility. 'Filing now with incorrect data may result in reduced refunds or defective return notices, leading to double the effort later,' she cautioned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
ITR filing alert: Rebate on market gains allowed, but not auto-applied
Ahmedabad: Filed your ITR and surprised by a tax bill despite being under the Rs 7 lakh limit under the new tax regime? You're not alone. The income tax portal isn't auto-applying the 87A rebate on stock market gains—but the good news is, you can still claim it manually, say tax experts. To illustrate, if a resident individual has a regular income of Rs 5 lakh and short-term capital gains of Rs 75,000, the tax liability would be Rs 10,000 on the regular income and Rs 15,000 on the STCG (taxed at 20%). The utility currently applies the rebate only to the Rs 10,000 from regular income. However, if the taxpayer manually enters a rebate of Rs 25,000, the system accepts it — effectively reducing the net tax liability to zero. "It is good to note that the Income Tax Department appears to have accepted, in principle, that an eligible taxpayer should be entitled to Section 87A rebate even on capital gains," said Mukesh Patel, international tax expert. "However, this relief should have been auto applied by the ITR utility rather than requiring taxpayers to manually make the claim." You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad The debate over the applicability of the Section 87A rebate on capital gains first surfaced during ITR filings for AY 2024–25. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like People Born 1940-1975 With No Life Insurance Could Be Eligible For This Reassured Undo The confusion centred on whether the rebate was available on STCG from equities under Section 111A and long-term capital gains (LTCG) under Section 112. On July 5, 2024, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) instructed the Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) to block such rebate claims in the utility. Taxpayers, however, argued that there had been no change to the language of Section 87A that could justify denial of the rebate. Their argument gained further strength when the Finance Act, 2025, formally amended Section 87A—but only with prospective effect, starting AY 2026–27. This, experts say, effectively vindicates the position that the rebate on capital gains is still valid for AY 2025–26—provided taxpayers proactively claim it while filing their returns.


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
I-T 'survey' at Nuvama's premises on Jane St link
Representational image (Agencies) MUMBAI: Nuvama Wealth Management said on Thursday that an I-T department survey is ongoing at its registered office, and the company is cooperating with authorities. Business operations continue as usual. Sources said the survey pertains to the firm's role as a service provider to Jane Street, whose trading strategy came under Sebi scrutiny, triggering regulatory action and a penalty. Nuvama stated that the survey was conducted under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, which provides for a limited, non-intrusive visit during business hours to inspect records and verify income, without any seizure powers. A survey is distinct from an income tax search (commonly called a raid), which is a coercive action under section 132 to seize undisclosed assets based on credible evidence of tax evasion. Nuvama Wealth Management served as Jane Street's on-ground trading partner in India, providing the client accounts and infrastructure through which the U.S. quant firm executed its derivatives strategy. On July 3, Sebi barred Jane Street from Indian markets and impounded over Rs 4,800 crore in alleged illegal gains. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
I-T department digs deeper into Jane Street case, surveys Nuvama
Mumbai: The income tax (I-T) department on Thursday conducted a survey on Nuvama Wealth Management Limited in connection with its preliminary assessments into US-headquartered proprietary trading firm Jane Street, probing whether the alleged market manipulation by the firm also led to potential tax losses. Nuvama is Jane Street's on-ground trading partner in India. The move forms part of a broader investigation into suspected financial irregularities involving the US-based entity. The I-T department is examining possible violations of provisions under the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) framework and permanent establishment (PE) norms, according to people familiar with the matter. Under GAAR, any arrangement lacking "commercial substance" or structured primarily to evade taxes may be disregarded by the tax department. PE refers to a company's taxable presence outside its home country. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category PGDM Data Science Project Management Operations Management Leadership Degree Management Data Analytics Digital Marketing Data Science Healthcare Finance Artificial Intelligence Technology Product Management MCA MBA others Design Thinking Cybersecurity healthcare CXO Others Public Policy Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis & Decision Making Quantitative & Analytical Skills Organizational Management & Leadership Innovation & Entrepreneurship Duration: 24 Months IMI Delhi Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Online) Starts on Sep 1, 2024 Get Details In a filing to the stock exchanges, Nuvama said: "...the income tax department is conducting a survey today, under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the Company's registered office. The Company is extending full co-operation with the authorities." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Direct shopping From Adidas Franchise store Adidas Buy Now Undo In its 105-page order dated 3 July, SEBI had alleged that Jane Street Group made illegal gains of ₹4,843.5 crore through alleged manipulation of trades in Bank Nifty and Nifty Index Options. SEBI directed Jane Street to impound and deposit the alleged gains in an interest-bearing escrow account with lien marked in its favour, while also imposing a temporary trading ban. On 21 July, SEBI lifted the ban and allowed Jane Street to resume trading in Indian markets under strict conditions, including a mandate that exchanges monitor its trades closely. According to SEBI's findings, Jane Street's India entity executed intraday trades in the cash segment, while its offshore entities in Singapore and Hong Kong booked substantial profits through index option trades. SEBI had initially barred the group from capital markets, but lifted the ban after the firm deposited ₹4,840 crore (approximately $560 million) in alleged "unlawful gains" into an escrow account. Live Events