Gold gains as soft U.S. data pressures dollar, fuels rate-cut bets
Spot gold was up 0.2% at $3,351.46 per ounce, as of 0239 GMT. U.S. gold futures for December delivery gained 0.1% to $3,401.60.
"The fall in the USD enabled a moderate bounce in the gold price, with the precious metal oscillating around the $3,350 level ahead of the Trump-Putin meeting on Friday," said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade.
"If the meeting in Alaska doesn't resolve anything and the war in Ukraine continues, gold could be making a push back towards $3,400 once again."
The summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin "is a listening exercise for the president," the White House said on Tuesday, tempering expectations for a quick Russia-Ukraine ceasefire deal.
Data released on Tuesday showed that the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.2% in July, following a 0.3% increase in June. On a year-over-year basis, the CPI climbed 2.7%.
The dollar index extended declines, making greenback-denominated assets more affordable to holders of other currencies.
Markets are pricing in about a 90% chance of a Federal Reserve rate cut in September, with at least one additional reduction expected by the end of the year. Non-yielding gold thrives in a low-interest-rate environment.
Easing trade tensions in the market, the United States and China have extended a tariff truce for another 90 days, staving off triple-digit duties on each other's goods.
Investors are now awaiting more U.S. economic data due later this week, including the U.S. Producer Price Index, weekly jobless claims, and retail sales.
Elsewhere, spot silver rose 0.7% to $38.14 per ounce, platinum gained 0.4% to $1,341.80 and palladium climbed 0.3% to $1,132.89.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Trump's Trifecta: Leveraging tariffs and energy dominance for industrial renewal
President Trump's trade and energy policies are recalibrating the global economic order — and not by accident. Under his leadership, trade is no longer simply about moving goods. It is a tool of strategic policy — one that drives industrial revival, and shapes strategic, economic and national outcomes. Trump's approach is disruptive but methodical. Tariffs create negotiating power, leading to trade agreements that reduce deficits and rewire supply chains. When combined with U.S. energy exports and capital markets, this strategy doesn't just rebalance trade — it reinvigorates American industry. As a senior negotiator on the U.S.-China Phase I Trade Agreement in Treasury during Trump's first term, I saw firsthand that what critics dismissed as 'erratic', 'chaotic' and 'unpredictable' was, in fact, deeply strategic. President Trump's instincts, honed by decades of high-stakes dealmaking, informed a broader strategy. He approached policy like a grandmaster playing three-dimensional chess: every tariff, handshake and message was a calculated move to reassert American economic leadership. Just as in Trump's first term, this administration began by confronting structural imbalances. The 2024 U.S. goods trade deficit hit $1.2 trillion — its highest in history. In response, Trump used executive authority to impose reciprocal tariffs — not as an end in themselves, but as tools to bring others to the table. Starting in early 2025, Trump's targeted tariffs compelled negotiations to rebalance trade relationships and repatriate supply chains. Japan agreed to reduce average industrial tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent and pledged $550 billion in U.S.-bound investment. The European Union followed suit, agreeing to a framework that includes a baseline 15 percent tariff on industrial goods, expanded market access for U.S. energy, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, and a commitment to $420 billion in foreign direct investment into the U.S. And, most recently, the United States also reached a trade agreement with South Korea: Seoul will face a 15 percent duty, reduced from a threatened 25 percent, in exchange for a pledge to invest $350 billion in U.S.-owned projects and purchase $100 billion in American liquefied natural gas and energy products. Indonesia and the Philippines opened markets for U.S. agriculture and energy, while committing to major purchases, including 50 Boeing aircraft. Vietnam accepted 20 percent tariffs and tighter controls on transshipped Chinese goods. Negotiations continue with India, Taiwan and others. Together, these countries now account for $809 billion — or 67 percent — of the 2024 U.S. trade deficit. Once deals with India and Taiwan are finalized, that coverage will exceed three-quarters. A mere 5 percent improvement across these relationships could slash the annual deficit by up to $95 billion. Beyond deficit reduction, these agreements reset incentives. They punish transshipment, enhance transparency and support rules-of-origin provisions that favor North American manufacturing. The result? Companies are investing in new U.S. production — auto components, semiconductors, specialty steel and energy systems. And job creation follows capital. Analysts estimate that up to 1.5 million advanced manufacturing jobs could be brought back to American soil over five years — a far cry from Barack Obama's declaration that some U.S. manufacturing jobs were gone forever. Trade reform paves the way for yet another explosion in growth: deploying U.S. energy and capital into newly aligned partner markets. Programs like America Crece and Asia EDGE, flagship infrastructure growth initiatives during Trump's first term, demonstrated the power of this model. This programming identified and unlocked growth opportunities in our partner countries using American energy exports and American equipment, employing American workers, and financing through American capital markets. In Latin America alone, we identified over $300 billion in infrastructure projects with U.S. private capital in the lead. In Vietnam, we identified $8 billion in near-term energy exports and $50 billion in longer-horizon infrastructure investments. Before the Biden administration ended this programming, we executed on $2.5 billion in transactions in Panama, backed a $3.5 billion facility in Ecuador and laid the groundwork for more than $4 billion in liquefied natural gas-based investment flows into Vietnam. Japan and Taiwan are now adopting this U.S. liquefied natural gas-driven model. Their national priorities — liquefied natural gas security and grid modernization — create natural demand for U.S. energy exports and financing partnerships. Trade deals open the market; energy and infrastructure partnerships deliver the substance. Our capital markets are unmatched in size, efficiency and depth. Trump's tariff leverage opens doors. Energy exports and U.S. financing flow through them — fueling global infrastructure while anchoring demand for American industry. This energy multiplier also advances a core tenet of Trump's economic agenda: U.S. energy dominance. American liquefied natural gas, coal and refined products are now strategic assets — tools of both commercial strength and geopolitical influence. Trump's approach fuses trade, energy and finance into a cohesive doctrine. It turns deficits into investment. It transforms market access into industrial revival. And it leverages the full might of U.S. capital to strengthen allies abroad and jobs at home. If the goal is to bring back U.S. manufacturing, secure energy markets and make capital markets work for working Americans — this is the model. The chessboard is set. And America, once again, is playing to win. Mitchell A. Silk served as assistant secretary for International Markets at the U.S. Treasury during Trump's first term. He was the senior Treasury official on U.S.-China trade negotiations and helped design America Crece and Asia EDGE. He is the author of ' A Seat at the Table: An Inside Account of Trump's Global Economic Revolution,' to be published in September 2025.
Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
Student Visas to Be Upended Under Trump Admin Proposal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Department of Homeland Security rule proposal that would limit how long international students could remain in the United States has cleared a final White House review, a move that could lead to huge changes to the visa applications for international students. The regulation would replace the current practice under which F-1 and J-1 visa holders are authorized to remain for the full length of an academic program with fixed-term limits that could require renewals while students remained enrolled, creating potential procedural disruptions for campuses and visa applicants, according to Bloomberg Law. Newsweek reached out to the Department of Homeland Security for comment. Why it Matters Higher education institutions and advocates have argued that limiting authorized duration would require students to reapply for status mid-program, potentially introducing processing delays, gaps in lawful status, and interruptions to work authorization tied to study. Advocates and university leaders previously told Newsweek that tightened student visa rules and other immigration changes have already prompted some prospective international students to choose institutions outside the United States, a trend that analysts said could reduce enrollment and revenue for U.S. colleges. NAFSA: Association of International Educators projects new international enrollment in the U.S. could fall 30 to 40 percent this fall, a potential $7 billion hit to the economy. With many foreign students paying full tuition, the drop could deal a sharp blow to college finances. Stock image of college students attending their graduation ceremony. Stock image of college students attending their graduation ceremony. Getty Images What To Know F-1 student and J-1 exchange visitor visa holders are allowed under current regulations to stay in the U.S. for the duration of an academic program or internship. If finalized, the new regulation would restrict their legal status to a fixed period of time before they are required to apply for renewal, potentially before the completion of their studies. The Department of Homeland Security submitted the rulemaking package (RIN: 1653-AA95) to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) on June 27, which completed its review the following week. The proposal would limit how long F-1 and J-1 visa holders could remain authorized without seeking a renewal, replacing the current program length authorization, marking a major departure from decades of practice that allowed enrollment-tied stays. A prior version of the idea under the Trump administration sought two- or four-year limits by field of study and drew sharp criticism from educational groups for creating needless disruption to academic programs. That proposed rule was subsequently withdrawn by the Biden administration. The rule change will now be publicized in the Federal Register following OIRA clearance, which would trigger a public comment period before any final rule could be issued. A separate DHS proposal to change how H-1B visas are allocated also cleared White House review. That rule change would see the current random lottery for H-1B visas replaced with a "weighted selection process" that gives priority to registrants who meet or exceed certain criteria, such as wage or education level. The Trump administration has earlier taken steps that unsettled many international students, including the temporary revocation and later partial restoration of legal status for thousands of students and enhanced scrutiny of visa applicants' social media, moves that courts and advocates challenged. What People Are Saying Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, told the Associated Press about international students bypassing American universities: "The American brand has taken a massive hit, and the U.K. is the one that is benefiting." What Happens Next The proposal will be published in the Federal Register next, which would open a formal public comment period and begin a multi‑step process before any final rule could take effect.
Gizmodo
a minute ago
- Gizmodo
Forget the Crypto Bros. Wall Street Is Driving the New Crypto Boom
The crypto market is on fire again, but this time, the fuel isn't coming from 'crypto bros' on social media. It's coming from Wall Street, and it's all based on a massive bet that the Federal Reserve is about to cut interest rates. Ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency, is leading the charge, surging nearly 10% in the past 24 hours to $4,723.26, bringing its all-time high of $4,878.26 within sight. This rally is, according to some market observers, a calculated move by large, institutional investors who are flocking to risky assets in anticipation of a major shift in U.S. economic policy. While Bitcoin has been taking a breather, altcoins (a catch-all term for any cryptocurrency other than Bitcoin) are exploding. Ether (ETH), the native currency of the Ethereum blockchain, a platform for decentralized finance (DeFi) services that mimic traditional banking without middlemen, is up nearly 10% in the last day. Ether (ETH) is trading nearing its all-time high of $4,878.26 set in November 2021, according to data from CoinGecko. Other major tokens like Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), and Avalanche (AVAX) have all posted sharp gains of 10% to 16%. Even memecoins like Dogecoin (DOGE) are riding the wave, jumping 12%. This broad-based rally is a classic sign of an 'altcoin season,' a period when confident investors move money from the relative safety of Bitcoin into riskier but higher-potential assets. This is reflected in Bitcoin's market dominance, which has fallen to 57.4% of the total crypto market, a sign that investors are diversifying. 'We suspect that investors are selling the first cryptocurrency to finance purchases of altcoins,' said Alex Kuptsikevich, chief market analyst at FxPro. According to experts, this surge is being driven by institutional money, not retail speculation. 'The current hot market is being driven predominantly by institutional adoption, led by aggressive buying from digital asset treasury companies,' Min Jung, a senior analyst at quantitative trading firm Presto, told Decrypt. These professional investors are betting on one thing: a September rate cut from the Federal Reserve. Recent economic data supports their wager. The U.S. labor market is showing signs of slowing down, and last month's inflation numbers came in cooler than expected. With its dual mandates of stable prices and full employment seemingly in check, the Fed now has plenty of room to cut interest rates. Lower rates reduce borrowing costs and encourage investment in higher-yielding, riskier assets. With the stock market already at historic highs, many large investors see crypto as the next logical place to find big returns. The market is already pricing in the Fed's next move. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, traders see an 82.5% probability of a rate cut at the Fed's September meeting. The sentiment is so strong that some are even calling for a more aggressive cut. 'I think the real thing now to think about is: Should we get a 50-basis-point rate cut in September?' U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox Business on Tuesday, referring to a half-a-percentage-point cut. The institutional money is flowing in fast. Analysts at Presto noted that 'US Ether ETFs just saw a record $1B single-day inflow, the biggest ever,' a clear sign that big players are positioning themselves for the next leg up in the crypto market. For now, the fate of the rally rests in the hands of the Federal Reserve. US Ether ETFs just saw a record $1B single-day inflow, the biggest ever. Over $15B in ETH now sits in treasury firms. Our Head of Research @ClearLensPC told Bloomberg: 'The proliferation of ETH treasury companies is driving renewed interest in ETH.' ETH? $4,300 and up.… — Presto Research (@Presto_Research) August 12, 2025Yes, crypto is used by some for shady, even criminal purposes. But the warm embrace from the Trump administration, paired with the scent of easy money from a Fed rate cut, is making Wall Street pour billions into digital assets. Institutional investors are buying the idea that crypto has finally 'gone legit.' The question now is whether this marriage of politics, policy, and profit will hold … or if it's just another boom before the next bust.
