‘Luxury cloaked in secrecy' – Ntshavheni explains why she won't disclose her official travel expenses
Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, says she will not compromise national security for political expediency by disclosing information not meant for the public.
The minister was responding to ActionSA, which on Tuesday wrote to the Speaker of Parliament, Thoko Didiza, to demand urgent intervention and 'defend the integrity of Parliament's oversight role'.
The party sent a parliamentary question to the minister, requesting a breakdown of all her official travel and that of her deputy ministers since they assumed office on 3 July 2024.
ActionSA had requested an explanation of the purpose and justification for each trip, destination details, costs incurred, and the names of the accompanying staff.
ALSO READ: MK party calls for 'immediate suspension' of Khumbudzo Ntshavheni
In her response, the minister wrote: 'The reply to this question is forwarded to the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence.'
However, this was not a satisfactory response, according to ActionSA.
Ntshavheni 'brazenly evaded public accountability'
The party released a statement chastising the minister for 'brazenly evading public accountability' with her response, which was sent 'four months late'.
'This is nothing more than a deliberate attempt to further shield her spending from scrutiny. This conduct cannot be allowed to stand, and the reply must be made public immediately,' said the party.
'Every minister in the government of national unity (GNU) was asked the same question on travel expenses. All others who responded did so in a transparent manner. Only the Minister in the Presidency has opted to hide, and we ask, 'why?''
ALSO READ: DA tells Ramaphosa to fire Ntshavheni: 'SA deserve better than growing list of crooks in your Cabinet'
'Is it because ActionSA recently exposed over R200 million in excessive GNU spending, including the Deputy President's outrageous R950 000 bill for four nights of accommodation in Japan and the R160 000 spent by the Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture on a trip to Burkina Faso that never took place?'
ActionSA accused the GNU of turning the public purse into a private travel slush fund, and the minister of disregarding the public's right to know how their taxes are spent.
'South Africans deserve leaders who serve with humility, not luxury cloaked in secrecy.'
Briefing the media on the outcomes of the post-Cabinet meeting on Thursday, Ntshavheni said she does account for her actions, just not in the way ActionSA wants.
ALSO READ: SSA employees over 50 years not being forced to take early retirement, says Ntshavheni
The minister said her work on state security requires that some of her travel plans be kept confidential, as sharing them could compromise national security.
'Nothing wrong'
Ntshavheni said the state security only discloses summits that the ministers are attending, not private meetings.
'It's just not the travel to say which country you have gone to, it's to say what meetings and all those other details. If you understand the nature of my work, you'll realise that 80% of my travel is for work related to state security. If we release it in public, it would compromise some of the initiatives we're working on,' said Ntshavheni.
'You'll recall when the Russia-Ukraine war started and the African leaders initiative led by Ramaphosa to go to Ukraine, it required some of us to take that type of preparatory work for that and if you disclose such details, you compromise the operations that you are running as a country and thus fail national security.
ALSO READ: SSA corruption accused will be brought to book, MPs told as independent panel takes shape
'It is for that reason that the National Strategic Intelligence Act has provided the joint standing committee on intelligence for us to fully account for those things that cannot be fully shared in the public domain.
'There are meetings that we attend that we do not post at all, because what we have posted are summits, not meetings. There is nothing wrong because we are allowed by law to provide the committee, unless ActionSA wants to claim the committee has no capacity to hold us accountable. Those members were appointed by parliament and sworn in to hold us accountable. We will not sacrifice national security for political expediency.'
READ NEXT: Ntshavheni says AfriForum admitted farm murder stats are accurate, Kriel accuses her of lying
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Presidency: Ramaphosa, Mbeki's relationship remains 'cordial' despite National Dialogue differences
JOHANNESBURG - The Presidency said the relationship between Cyril Ramaphosa and former statesman Thabo Mbeki remains 'cordial' despite disagreements over the National Dialogue. Mbeki, through his foundation, has announced he will no longer be participating in the dialogue and has rejected an invitation to attend Friday's convention. The former president has for years been pushing for a National Dialogue; however, he is now complaining that the event has been taken over by the government and is no longer led by citizens and civil society. At a media briefing in Pretoria on Thursday, Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said Ramaphosa respects and acknowledges all criticisms. 'One would have loved and it would have been great to have the former president there but if he is not there, he is not there. The reality is the show will go on and South Africans will continue with the dialogue process and hopefully at some point, not only the Thabo Mbeki foundation but also other foundations will find it among themselves to participate in the process.'
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa to Mbeki and legacy foundations: ‘National Dialogue will proceed with or without you'
President Cyril Ramaphosa has responded to the withdrawal of several legacy foundations from the upcoming National Dialogue, saying 'the show goes on.' Image: ANC/X President Cyril Ramaphosa has responded to the withdrawal of several legacy foundations from the upcoming National Dialogue, saying 'the show goes on' and that dialogue will continue with or without legacy foundations, including former President Thabo Mbeki. Ramaphosa said that through his spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, during a media briefing at the Union Buildings on Thursday afternoon. This comes amid mounting criticism of the dialogue process from political parties, civil society groups, and prominent legacy foundations. The National Convention for the National Dialogue is scheduled to take place in Pretoria on 15 and 16 August. Magwenya emphasised that the convention is not the dialogue itself, but rather a platform to set the agenda and map out a roadmap for the broader National Dialogue. 'The National Convention is not the actual dialogue,' said Magwenya. 'It is a platform where the agenda for the National Dialogue will be set and agreed upon. The roadmap for the rollout of the actual dialogue will also be affirmed.' He said that the inclusivity of the process should not be questioned at this stage, as the convention is just the beginning of a nine-month, nationwide engagement. 'It's always been understood that this is the kick-off of the dialogue process. Out of the National Convention, we will get a clear roadmap for dialogues in communities, wards, districts and sectoral groups. At the end of this nine-month process, all South Africans will have had an opportunity to participate.' Magwenya dismissed concerns about the legitimacy of the process, arguing that the withdrawal of seven foundations does not undermine its credibility. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'With respect to the National Convention and the withdrawal of seven foundations - with all due respect, these foundations do not represent the majority of South Africans.' Last week on Friday, IOL News reported that several prominent legacy foundations announced their withdrawal from the process, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, WDB Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group. In a joint statement, the organisations expressed 'deep regret,' saying their decision was necessary to protect the credibility and integrity of the process. They accused organisers of deviating from the original citizen-led vision and shifting towards government control. 'What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately, in practice, shifted towards government control,' the statement read. Magwenya dismissed the notion that the foundations represent defined constituencies, arguing that their absence would not diminish the legitimacy or inclusiveness of the convention. 'These foundations were never set up to be constituency groups, as far as we understand, unless that has changed. We now have close to 1,000 confirmed delegates. The Convention will be representative of all sectors of society through the different formations and groups that have accepted invitations to attend.' He added that the dialogue must eventually reach communities, industries, households and other sectors. 'It can't be held over two days at a university campus - that would be illogical. The credibility of the dialogue is not a once off exercise . It will depend on the level of participation across communities and the outcomes of that process.' Magwenya rejected the idea that the credibility of the dialogue could be determined by one person or a handful of organisations. 'South Africa is much bigger than any one individual or any single foundation. It would've been great to have former (President Mbeki) there – but if he's not there, he's not there.' 'The reality is that the show will go on, and South Africans will continue with the dialogue process. Hopefully, at some point, not only the Thabo Mbeki Foundation and others will eventually decide to participate in the process and realise that there's no benefit out the boycotting the people of South Africa.' 'Boycotting the process is not boycotting the government – it's boycotting the people of South Africa.' He added that the dialogue process does not belong to Ramaphosa or the government 'It belongs to all South Africans. Those who choose not to participate are not disadvantaged by the president or the government – they are choosing not to be part of the broader national conversation.' Several political parties have also withdrawn from the National Dialogue.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Draft terms of reference for Mkhwanazi inquiry incorporate party inputs
The Ad Hoc Committee to probe allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi will circulate the draft document integrating the inputs from parties to check if their submissions were correctly captured before the terms of reference are adopt on Monday. Image: Parliament The Ad Hoc Committee into serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi integrated all the submissions made by parties on the proposed terms of reference. This was after a marathon meeting where the committee took a break twice to allow the technical team to factor in the inputs of the parties that made written submissions prior to the deadline into one document. Committee Chairperson Soviet Lekganyane said the draft document would be sent to parties to check if their submissions were captured before they adopt the terms of reference. 'For the purpose of coherence in our engagements, it will be better, and also looking at the kind of document which must guide the work we will be doing, it will be important for parties and members of the committee to study it, especially the proposals that have been made here. 'I realise that there are so many areas of convergence on the draft that was released last week. You would need to study the proposal of the parties and agree when we make the final adoption,' he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The integrated terms of reference will be discussed and then finally adopted at a meeting on Monday. MK Party MP Sibonelo Nomvalo said as soon as they were done with deliberations on the terms of reference, they should get started with their inquiry's work. 'Our proposal is that we must start next week. We know that such is not to be determined in this meeting,' Nomvalo said. EFF leader Julius Malema agreed that the sooner they start working, the better. Malema said they could not come up with the commencement date without adopting the terms of reference. 'It is not given when we meet next week on the terms of reference that we are to agree and immediately start the inquiry,' he said. DA MP Glynnis Breytenbach urged that the integrated document be shared with parliamentary legal services to advise on whether any proposals are problematic. ANC Chief Whip Mdumiseni Ntuli said the integrated document should incorporate all inputs of the parties. 'If we can get it before the end of the day tomorrow, it will allow us to go through the document over the weekend,' Ntuli said. Lekganyane said the document would be sent to all the parties to confirm their inputs were correctly captured. He confirmed that the document will be taken to the parliamentary legal services to have a look at to make sure it complies with the laws of the country. 'The sooner we start, the better. In the next meeting, there should be a draft programme on commencement of proceedings, but that is dependent on whether we agree on the terms of reference on Monday,' Lekganyane said. The draft terms of reference say the parliamentary inquiry will be inquisitorial. The document proposes that the committee uses the services of an external legal counsel in an advisory capacity to assist it in carrying out its work and lead evidence from witnesses, but some want this function to be done by the parliamentary legal services. It also proposes that the committee may invite any interested parties to provide input if they wish to do so. 'In the event that an invited witness refuses to submit a sworn statement and/or avail themselves as requested, the committee may use its power of subpoena as provided for in the Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act.' The document also proposes that legal representation be allowed to those who will testify, but they will be allowed to have their legal assistance at their own cost if they choose. 'Witnesses will be allowed to have their lawyers with them and, within reason, consult with and take advice from their lawyers. The committee will not allow lawyers to speak on behalf of their clients at all,' reads the document.
