
‘Luxury cloaked in secrecy' – Ntshavheni explains why she won't disclose her official travel expenses
ActionSA has accused Ntshavheni of evading public accountability by refusing to disclose her travel information.
Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, says she will not compromise national security for political expediency by disclosing information not meant for the public.
The minister was responding to ActionSA, which on Tuesday wrote to the Speaker of Parliament, Thoko Didiza, to demand urgent intervention and 'defend the integrity of Parliament's oversight role'.
The party sent a parliamentary question to the minister, requesting a breakdown of all her official travel and that of her deputy ministers since they assumed office on 3 July 2024.
ActionSA had requested an explanation of the purpose and justification for each trip, destination details, costs incurred, and the names of the accompanying staff.
ALSO READ: MK party calls for 'immediate suspension' of Khumbudzo Ntshavheni
In her response, the minister wrote: 'The reply to this question is forwarded to the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence.'
However, this was not a satisfactory response, according to ActionSA.
Ntshavheni 'brazenly evaded public accountability'
The party released a statement chastising the minister for 'brazenly evading public accountability' with her response, which was sent 'four months late'.
'This is nothing more than a deliberate attempt to further shield her spending from scrutiny. This conduct cannot be allowed to stand, and the reply must be made public immediately,' said the party.
'Every minister in the government of national unity (GNU) was asked the same question on travel expenses. All others who responded did so in a transparent manner. Only the Minister in the Presidency has opted to hide, and we ask, 'why?''
ALSO READ: DA tells Ramaphosa to fire Ntshavheni: 'SA deserve better than growing list of crooks in your Cabinet'
'Is it because ActionSA recently exposed over R200 million in excessive GNU spending, including the Deputy President's outrageous R950 000 bill for four nights of accommodation in Japan and the R160 000 spent by the Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture on a trip to Burkina Faso that never took place?'
ActionSA accused the GNU of turning the public purse into a private travel slush fund, and the minister of disregarding the public's right to know how their taxes are spent.
'South Africans deserve leaders who serve with humility, not luxury cloaked in secrecy.'
Briefing the media on the outcomes of the post-Cabinet meeting on Thursday, Ntshavheni said she does account for her actions, just not in the way ActionSA wants.
ALSO READ: SSA employees over 50 years not being forced to take early retirement, says Ntshavheni
The minister said her work on state security requires that some of her travel plans be kept confidential, as sharing them could compromise national security.
'Nothing wrong'
Ntshavheni said the state security only discloses summits that the ministers are attending, not private meetings.
'It's just not the travel to say which country you have gone to, it's to say what meetings and all those other details. If you understand the nature of my work, you'll realise that 80% of my travel is for work related to state security. If we release it in public, it would compromise some of the initiatives we're working on,' said Ntshavheni.
'You'll recall when the Russia-Ukraine war started and the African leaders initiative led by Ramaphosa to go to Ukraine, it required some of us to take that type of preparatory work for that and if you disclose such details, you compromise the operations that you are running as a country and thus fail national security.
ALSO READ: SSA corruption accused will be brought to book, MPs told as independent panel takes shape
'It is for that reason that the National Strategic Intelligence Act has provided the joint standing committee on intelligence for us to fully account for those things that cannot be fully shared in the public domain.
'There are meetings that we attend that we do not post at all, because what we have posted are summits, not meetings. There is nothing wrong because we are allowed by law to provide the committee, unless ActionSA wants to claim the committee has no capacity to hold us accountable. Those members were appointed by parliament and sworn in to hold us accountable. We will not sacrifice national security for political expediency.'
READ NEXT: Ntshavheni says AfriForum admitted farm murder stats are accurate, Kriel accuses her of lying
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Wonder Woman's Lynda Carter slams US immigration raids
Lynda Carter, the original Wonder Woman, has leapt into the heart of America's latest immigration storm. She delivered a fiery rebuke of US immigration authorities amid the chaos gripping Los Angeles. As protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids spiralled into riots, Carter, now 73, took to social media. 'I am Latina and proud. I am the product of immigration – my grandmother was undocumented and entered the country from Mexico as a baby. This madness must stop'. ICE swept through the city, pulling workers from jobs and detaining them for deportation, including, shockingly, some American citizens, according to the Daily Mail. The raids triggered mass protests that quickly turned violent. Downtown businesses were looted, cars burned, and major highways blocked. By Monday, police had made nearly 400 arrests, mostly for failing to disperse, while nine officers suffered injuries. Carter's posts, made on the Blue Sky platform, resonated with many. 'Immigrants built this country. Apart from people indigenous to the US, we are ALL immigrants. This madness must stop,' she insisted. One fan summed up the mood: 'Wonder Woman has spoken. End of discussion.' But not everyone agreed. Some pointed out that her message overlooked the legacy of slavery in America. 'Juneteenth is right around the corner, you should delete this,' one critic replied. The unrest in LA has echoes for South Africans, who know all too well the tensions that arise when authorities crack down. Scenes of tear gas, burning vehicles, and heavily armed troops have become all too familiar. 'There was a kind of stampede of people, and we were tear-gassed,' said Pau Castro, a local caught in the fray. The US president responded by deploying 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines – a show of force that California's governor condemned as 'inflammatory'. Carter's story and pride in her roots, along with her call for compassion, echo the ongoing debates here about migration, identity, and justice. 'My mother was a fierce, gorgeous Latina woman of Mexican and Spanish descent,' Carter wrote, reminding followers that migration is woven into countless family stories. As the LA riots rage on, the city's streets remain a battleground between federal power and local resistance. The protests have sparked solidarity marches across the US, as the country wrestles with the meaning of belonging. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Navigating the Ideological Divide: The Litmus Test for Fragile GNU
President Cyril Ramaphosa hosted a working dinner with leaders of political parties that are signatories to the Government of National Unity (GNU) at Genadendal, the President's official residence in Cape Town on November 11, 2024. Image: GCIS Prof Dirk Kotzé South Africa's second Government of National Unity (GNU) reached its first anniversary this week. Comparisons with the GNU of 1994 were initially made, but the ensuing debates made it clear that they are not comparable. The first point of debate was whether the new multiparty government was indeed a GNU or a coalition government. For some, the distinction was merely a matter of semantics, while for others, it represented a political stance on black unity in government. The fact that the uMkhonto weSizwe party (MKP) and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) were not included in the new government disqualified it as a national unity government. In the meantime, this debate has petered out, mainly because the ANC and DA continue to use the name GNU. The GNU's formal foundation is very limited in nature: in essence, it is the Statement of Intent first signed by the ANC and DA, and later by the other eight parties. The Statement included ten Foundational Principles, the Basic Minimum Programme of (nine) Priorities and the GNU's Modalities or main procedural arrangements. The programme of priorities came the closest to an agreement about policy matters, though they were formulated in very general terms. Compared with new coalition governments in many parts of the world who first negotiate a coalition agreement over an extended period, a combination of sections 51 and 86 in the South African constitution determines that a new president must be elected by Parliament not more than 14 days after the results of the election were announced. That sets the maximum time available to establish a coalition of at least 50%+1 in parliament that is required to elect a president. The fact that the election of the president is linked to a parliamentary majority (and therefore in some cases a coalition) is because the president is not directly elected. The coalition also does not allow for the outgoing cabinet to continue until a new one is formed by the president but is dissolved when the new president is inaugurated (section 94) five days after the presidential election. The impact of these constitutional arrangements are lessons already learnt from the GNU's first year of existence. Given the fact that coalition governments appear to be the norm in South Africa for the foreseeable future, constitutional re-engineering might be required, because the GNU's early history demonstrated that the Constitution was not designed to include a coalition government. A potential complication for a coalition government – especially for one in a stalemate situation – is the Constitution's section 50(1)(b) which states that an early general election cannot be held within three years after the previous election. It means that no early election can be held before May 2027. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Coalition governments sometimes collapse, like the German one not long ago, and then an early election is held to form a new government. If it were to happen in South Africa before 2027, such an option would not exist. Its desirability in South Africa under new conditions should be considered. A counterintuitive consequence of the GNU's emergence is that it enhanced the prominence of Parliament. In the past, the ANC government (cabinet) dominated Parliament, especially when the opposition was small. The ANC also did not accommodate parliamentary backbenchers who could ask difficult questions. With the GNU, these dynamics are changing. Portfolio committees are now chaired by members of the GNU parties and even other small parties such as Rise Mzansi, BOSA and ActionSA. DA and other GNU parliamentarians play often the role of critical backbenchers. The official opposition (MKP) and the EFF are often vocal in debates but not necessarily an effective opposition that can enhance public accountability by the GNU executive. In this regard, the oversized 70% coalition government suffocates the parliamentary opposition. That might be one of the considerations why GNUs are normally only a one-term government arrangement. It is noteworthy that opinion surveys done by the Social Research Foundation suggest that the bigger parties in the GNU (except for the ANC) have increased their support since the May 2024 elections, while the opposition parties have lost support, notably the MKP and EFF. It suggests that the downside of the GNU already mentioned, as well as the policy differences, the GNU as a concept, is not discredited in the public mind. Despite the absence of a coalition policy agreement – or maybe because of it – policy matters have become very prominent during the GNU lifespan. South African politics are dominated by the socio-economic issues of increasing unemployment, crime, illegal immigration and transformation policies, as well as the governance issues of service delivery and corruption. In the context of the GNU, the policy issues that became prominent have been school education (BELA Act), health care (NHI Act), fiscal policies (Budget), property rights (Expropriation Act) and international relations. In the areas of home affairs, agriculture and trade & industry a process of convergence is seen. While the conventional approach for coalitions is to negotiate an agreement on policy matters, largely as a consequence of the 14-day limitation on the formation of a coalition, the alternative is a piecemeal approach to dealing with policy issues one by one as they emerge. Some of them, like the BELA Act, went to the GNU's 'clearing house' or dispute resolution mechanism, chaired by Deputy President Mashatile, and thereafter to the National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac). The Budget issue was resolved by different negotiation and consultation processes, mainly by the ANC and DA, while other policy matters, like the BELA and NHI Acts as well as the Budget, were taken to court. The result so far is therefore an incremental development of a policy framework in the absence of a comprehensive agreement.


The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
Youth Day: Long weekend loading for South Africa
South Africans are mere hours away from another long weekend – and a short week next week. Those who like to diarise public holidays well in advance will no doubt be well aware that the next official day off work is Monday, 16 June when Youth Day will be celebrated. Youth Day is the day on which South Africans honour the youth that were ambushed by the apartheid regime police in Soweto on 16 June 1976. On the day over 500 youths were killed. On the morning of 16 June 1976, thousands of black students went on a protest rally from their schools to Orlando Stadium. They were protesting against an official order which made Afrikaans compulsory in black township schools throughout the country. The use of local languages was prohibited in these schools whilst the constitution supported that Afrikaans and English be made the official languages of the country. The rally was meant to be a peaceful protest with the intentions to plea with government not to make Afrikaans compulsory in schools. However, things got out of control when the police were called in to disperse the crowds and riots broke out. Although the protests of 16 June 1976 resulted in a number of casualties, the youth of 1976 played a role in fighting and overcoming the inequality and oppression caused by apartheid. Following the advent of democracy in 1994, the new democratic government declared 16 June as National Youth Day and June as Youth Month. Although South Africans will enjoy fewer public holidays in 2025, there will be more long weekends this year than in 2024. Mzansi had 14 public holidays in 2024, but there will only be 13 days this year – and only 12 will be actual days off work. Of course, the fewer days off, the better for business in the country. Working South Africans will not get a day off to celebrate National Women's Day in 2025 because the public holiday falls on Saturday, 9 August. The Public Holidays Act (Act No 36 of 1994) determines that whenever any public holiday falls on a Sunday , the Monday following it will also be a public holiday. However, for public holidays that fall on a Saturday , it's just a 'normal' weekend day. The exciting news is that there are FIVE long weekends in 2025. The first was thanks to Human Rights Day on Friday, 21 March which gave South Africans 21-23 March off. The second was the Easter weekend with a four-day 18-21 April break to enjoy your chocolate. The third was thanks to Freedom Day falling on Sunday, 27 April, meaning Monday, 28 April was a holiday – and another three-day weekend. Monday, 16 June (Youth Day) will mean another three-day long weekend in mid-year, while the fifth and final long weekend in another four-day one with Christmas and the Day of Goodwill (Boxing Day) falling on a Thursday and Friday, respectively. Diarise the following public holidays in 2025 and plan your vacations accordingly! Wednesday, 1 January: New Year's Day Friday, 21 March: Human Rights Day Friday, 18 April: Good FridayMonday, 21 April: Family Day Sunday, 27 April: Freedom Day